More first-home buyers bite the bullet as market confidence swells
More first-time buyers are taking the plunge on home ownership with loan applications surging 16 per cent at one of Australia's big four banks.
Victoria is leading the way in first-home owner activity, recording a 28 per cent jump in lending since February, new NAB data shows.
It's followed closely by Western Australia, up 22 per cent, and Queensland, up 21 per cent.
Overall, lending to all owner occupiers increased by almost a third nationwide since the Reserve Bank delivered its first rate earlier this year.
Surprise source of home deposits exposed
Geelong children's librarian Charlotte Dru Ziegeler is one of a growing number of first-home buyers re-entering the market as conditions improve.
The 33-year-old recently purchased a house in the seaside Bellarine Peninsula town of St Leonards, near where she grew up.
She said had been watching the market and wasn't sure if her deposit would be enough to purchase a home but was encouraged as variable home loan rates started to fall.
'I spoke to a banker, got pre-approved in less than an hour and then, not long after, the right house came up,' Ms Dru Ziegeler said.
'It all happened so fast, it was really exciting, and a huge 'pinch me' moment.'
She moved in just six weeks after kickstarting the process, becoming the first of her siblings to buy a house.
NAB home lending executive Denton Pugh said cuts to both fixed and variable home loan rates were enticing more first-home and other buyers to re-enter the market.
'We're seeing momentum return, especially with people like Charlotte who've been saving or waiting for the right time to take heat jump into home ownership,' Mr Pugh said.
'And that momentum could carry through winter, which is usually a quieter time with less sellers listing over the cooler months.'
He said despite the rate cuts, borrowing costs remained high but this worked in favour of first-home buyers by keeping a lid on property price rises.
Buyers' advocate Cate Bakos said first-home buyers were sensing that now might be their chance to get a foot in the door.
'I think it's driven by a few factors. There's a bit of FOMO, sure, but more than that, it's optimism,' Ms Bakos said.
'The federal election is out of the way, interest rates look to be on a downward path, and that's creating a window of confidence.'
She said the expansion of the First Home Guarantee scheme had been a game changer for some of her clients, while other were co-buying with their parents or siblings.
'Victoria, in particular, has been a more accessible market for first-home buyers lately,' she said.
'Investor demand here has been softer compared to other states, which has opened up more opportunity.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
24 minutes ago
- News.com.au
How Melbourne renters will live like millionaires inside $1bn tower
A record-breaking new skyscraper in the heart of Melbourne is flipping the great Australian dream on its head, offering renters rooftop bars, private cinemas, co-working suites, pet spas and even a bowling alley. But while the 45-storey West Tower will deliver a lifestyle most buyers can only dream of, it's part of a growing shift in Melbourne's housing market, one that could see more people choosing not to own at all. Set to welcome its first residents in early 2026, the $1bn build-to-rent development is now the largest single build-to-rent tower in the country, with 797 apartments exclusively for lease, not sale. Located at 899 Collins St, Docklands, the Lendlease and Daiwa House project will feature a concierge, 25-metre lap pool, cinema, rooftop gardens and sweeping bay and city views, all within walking distance of the CBD. Daiwa House Australia chief executive Koji Morishige said the project aimed to raise the bar for rental housing. 'Everyone deserves a place they can call home, with everything a home can and should offer,' Mr Morishige said. Lendlease Development chief executive Tom Mackellar said long-term BTR developments like West Tower were not just lifestyle-driven, they were also about meeting demand. 'Long-term rentals provide much-needed housing supply and diversity,' Mr Mackellar said. 'They give people more choice at different stages of life.' The announcement comes amid renewed debate over the future of housing in Victoria, where house prices and rental costs remain near record highs. While some see institutional landlords as a threat to affordability, others argue they could offer much-needed consistency and quality in a system currently dominated by mum-and-dad investors. Interim REIV president Jacob Caine said large-scale build-to-rent projects would become a bigger part of Melbourne's housing mix, especially as traditional rental stock came under pressure. 'Build-to-rent is going to play a major role in Melbourne's housing future, and the announcement of a project of this scale is a huge vote of confidence in that model,' Mr Caine said. 'We need more homes of all kinds, whether that's rentals, first-home buyer listings, family homes, or downsizer-friendly options. 'Build-to-rent is one piece of the puzzle, but it's an increasingly important one.' Mr Caine said the growth of build-to-rent could help relieve pressure on renters by adding more listings to the market and offering longer leases with clearer standards of management. 'The more choice there is in the market, the more pressure we can take off prices and the greater the opportunity for Victorians to find housing that suits their needs,' he said. West Tower is part of a broader pipeline of 2800 apartments being developed by Lendlease across Melbourne and Brisbane. Its location within the Melbourne Quarter precinct means residents will also have direct access to the recently opened Quarterhouse pub and rooftop bar, and elevated green space via the city's first 'Sky Park'. And while it won't solve the housing crisis alone, industry leaders believe it's a glimpse into how future generations will live, with luxury amenities and no mortgage.
ABC News
33 minutes ago
- ABC News
Ombudsman criticises ACT Integrity Commission for awarding $150,000 consulting contract to then-CEO
The ACT Ombudsman has criticised the territory's corruption watchdog for awarding a $150,000 consulting contact to its then-CEO, while he was still in the top job. An investigation into the ACT Integrity Commission was sparked when the Ombudsman noticed the contract had been awarded, via the ACT government's Tenders ACT website in 2022, without any declared conflicts of interest. It is the first time Ombudsman Iain Anderson, in his capacity as Inspector of the ACT Integrity Commission, has used his powers to investigate the conduct of the commission or its personnel. The investigation found that while he was still in the role the then-CEO, known as Mr A, had planned to resign before his contract ended, but would stay on at the commission as a consultant, working with the new CEO and Integrity Commissioner. Mr Anderson's report, provided to the ACT Legislative Assembly on Tuesday, found that Mr A had prepared his own documents for the procurement of his consultant contract without declaring a conflict of interest. The report also found Mr A suggested the contract be made exempt from any public competitive process that usually assesses whether a proposal is value for money. The commissioner then copied those pre-prepared documents and failed to declare any apprehension of bias in his decision to engage the then-CEO, or seek independent advice, the report said. "These shortcomings occurred despite the commission being on the record as stating that 'managing conflicts of interest effectively and appropriately is an inherent part of working in the ACT public sector'," the Ombudsman said in his report. "As an integrity agency, in my view it is desirable the commission demonstrates integrity and probity in its procurement practices, otherwise it risks undermining public confidence in the broader systems it is meant to safeguard." The Ombudsman said Mr A was in a position of authority and breached his statutory obligations to avoid, declare, and manage a conflict of interest. "He had a clear personal financial interest with respect to the proposal that he be engaged, which was considered by the commission while he was still the CEO," he said. Mr A did not accept that a conflict of interest declaration was required, but said that if it was, it would rest with the final decision maker, namely the commissioner. The commissioner disputed findings that Mr A had breached his obligations as "completely unjustified", given a conflict of interest disclosure had been declared in writing but was not in the correct form. The commissioner argued that Mr A, who had been responsible for building the commission from its inception in 2019, had arranged to stay on at the watchdog to manage the significant outstanding structural work that would likely remain after his resignation. He said that Mr A's retention was a practical solution to a "difficult and stressful task" because there was no advantage in recruiting an outsider to complete that work until the new CEO could assume complete control. "The criticisms levelled by the inspector about the manner in which the essentially simple management of Mr A['s] departure proceeded represent the triumph of form over substance and a complete disregard for common sense," the commissioner said. At the time, the ACT Integrity Commission did not have a procurement policy in place. Mr Anderson said the investigation had exposed a possible gap in legislation which requires the commissioner to report conflicts of interest to the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly and the inspector, when they apply in a strict legal sense. "It may be appropriate for the commissioner to disclose to the speaker and the inspector the management of apprehensions of bias in the same way the commissioner discloses management of conflicts of interests," the report said. The Ombudsman made three recommendations, including engaging independent procurement advice as an integral part of any proposed single select tender process, and developing a procurement policy consistent with ACT government frameworks. Both of those were rejected by the ACT Integrity Commission, which only accepted a recommendation to develop and maintain a register of mandatory staff training to include training on conflicts of interest, bias, and procurement training. The Ombudsman was not required to publish the report into the integrity commission until its annual operational review in October 2025, but said he considered it appropriate to prepare a special report given the public interest issues identified and the rejection of two recommendations made.
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
How much super do Australians need to retire? It could be less than you think
ASFA CEO Mary Delahunty attributed the rise in retirement affordability to higher super contributions. Credit: Getty / Xavierarnau / s-c-s / AtlasStudio / Oleksandra Korobova Australians on a median wage will be able to retire in a good financial position, according to the peak body for the superannuation industry. The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) projects a 30-year-old with a super balance of $30,000, earning the median wage of $75,000 until retiring at age 67, should accumulate $610,000 in super. This exceeds the figure ASFA says is needed for a "comfortable" retirement, which it estimates requires $595,000 in super for a single person living in their own home. A homeowner couple needs $690,000 in superannuation to reach the same level of financial security, It is the first time the body has predicted that someone on the median wage will reach that financial goal, since its reporting started in 2004. But experts say it may take even less in superannuation to have a secure retirement, especially if you own your own home. The ASFA retirement standard breaks down the cost of retirement, examining health insurance, basic living expenses, and other essential costs. According to estimates for the March 2025 quarter, a household with a 'comfortable lifestyle' — including a reasonable car, health insurance and an overseas trip — spends $73,875 per year for a couple who own their home and about $52,383 for a single homeowner. In contrast, those living a 'modest lifestyle', the estimated annual budget was approximately $15,000 lower for singles than for couples living in their own home, typically spending less on health insurance, cars, and taking fewer holidays, among other expenses. While for renters living a 'modest lifestyle', a couple was estimated to have spent $64,259 and a single person $46,663 annually. Someone on the age pension is estimated to spend $29,024 per year, and a couple $43,753, with both figures including supplements. ASFA CEO Mary Delahunty attributed the rise in retirement affordability to higher super contributions. From July, employers will be required to pay 12 per cent of their employees' wages in superannuation, an increase of 0.5 per cent. "With the 12 per cent super guarantee coming in, we can now say that the system foundations are cemented for young, working people to have a comfortable retirement. It's a moment all Australians should be proud of," Delahunty said. Joey Moloney, the deputy director of the housing and economic security program at the Grattan Institute, told SBS News the real cost of retirement could be even lower, as retirees typically spend less once they stop working. "When you look at people's spending habits from pre-retirement to post-retirement, what you see is that people spend less in retirement and increasingly so as retirement goes on," he said. "Pensioners benefit from a bunch of discounts on council rates, electricity, medicines and other benefits that add up to an implicit income of thousands of dollars a year." For people who have paid off their mortgage, they could have an extra 30 per cent of their income freed up rather than going into repayments, Moloney said. He said most people who own their own homes would have a secure retirement, but the situation is different for renters. "What the data shows is that renters in retirement are actually typically doing it tough. Poverty rates are pretty high, and levels of reported financial stress are pretty high."
