EXCLUSIVE Both corners of the Trump-Musk cage match are dishing to MARK HALPERIN about Elon's implosion... and the depth of the president's heartbreak
And if you're feeling déjà vu, you're not alone.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Disney 'planning reboot' of iconic film series... and fans want Pedro Pascal to play the lead
Disney is reportedly planning a reboot of one of its most beloved film series... and fans want Pedro Pascal to play the lead. Rumors erupted this week that the company is going to remake the popular Indiana Jones movies. The first Indiana Jones film, made by LucasFilm, came out in 1981 and starred Harrison Ford as an archaeology professor named Indiana Jones who was asked by the US government to find a hidden relic before the Nazis. Along the way, Indy faced booby traps, a slew of life or death situations, and even some romance as he raced against time to try to uncover the artifact. The action-packed movie was a massive success, and over the last four decades, the franchise went on to release four more films as well as a prequel television series. Now, it's been speculated that Disney - who acquired LucasFilm in 2012 - wants to do a 'full reboot.' DisInsider reported earlier this week, 'Lucasfilm is letting the franchise rest for a bit before they do a full reboot of the franchise. 'I would expect the studio to announce something next year at the D23 Expo because even though the last film tanked at the box office, Indiana Jones is still an iconic IP and Disney/Lucasfilm do not want to waste that.' Amidst the rumors, fans have been debating who should play the iconic titular character, known for his whip, hat, and snarky one-liners, on X (formerly Twitter). And there's one actor who seems to be a top choice - The Last of Us star Pedro, 50. One X user shared an article about the alleged reboot and included a snap of Harrison in the original film but edited Pedro's face onto it, and it quickly went viral. 'We all know what's coming,' they captioned it. The post gained more than 10 million views and tons of replies from other fans who agreed he'd be perfect for the role. 'Pedro would be a fantastic choice in the Indiana Jones reboot,' one person wrote. 'This actually works amazingly well,' agreed another. Someone else added, 'I'd watch the hell out of it!!!' The post gained more than 10 million views and tons of replies from other fans who agreed he'd be perfect for the role 'This would be peak casting,' read a fourth tweet, while a fifth said, 'I'm 100 percent for it, go get it Pedro.' Others suggested Chris Pratt, Glen Powell, Ryan Gosling, and Bradley Cooper. Pedro certainly seems to have a great relationship with Disney as he starred in the Disney+ series The Mandalorian from 2019 until 2023. He's now gearing up to play Reed Richards in the new Marvel flick The Fantastic Four: First Steps, which premieres later this month.
BreakingNews.ie
26 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Hakeem Jeffries sets record with 8 and a half hour speech before vote on Trump tax bill
Hakeem Jeffries talked. And talked. And talked, as the top Democrat in the US House of Representatives on Thursday blasted president Donald Trump's sweeping tax cut and spending bill in the longest speech in the chamber's history. Mr Jeffries' speech, at 8 hours and 46 minutes, marked Democrats' last chance to prosecute their case against the $3.4 trillion package. Advertisement Lacking the votes to defeat the measure in a chamber that Republicans control by a slim 220-212 margin, Mr Jeffries, 54, railed against legislation that he characterised as a giveaway to the wealthy that would strip low-income Americans of federally-back health insurance and food aid benefits. "It's not the type of leadership that this country needs right now. But that's what we're getting. Chaos. Cruelty. And corruption," he said. Mr Jeffries began speaking at 4.53am and wrapped up at 1.38pm. That broke a 2021 House record sent by then-House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy, who spent 8 hours and 32 minutes lambasting Democratic president Joe Biden's clean-energy and domestic-spending package. Shortly after Mr Jeffries concluded his speech, the House voted 218-214 to pass the bill. Every Democrat and two Republicans opposed it. Advertisement His speech recalled that of another Democratic lawmaker, senator Cory Booker of New Jersey, who broke the record for the longest Senate speech in April with a 25-hour, five-minute attack on Mr Trump's unilateral firings of federal workers. Mr Booker's performance drew cheers from Democratic voters who have been frustrated by their party's powerlessness in Washington and have accused the party's leaders of being too meek. Mr Jeffries used his status as Democratic leader to stretch his customary 60-second speaking time, known as a "magic minute," for hours. Mr Jeffries made clear he also had his eye on a prize further down the road. Voters, Mr Jeffries said, "will get even" in the November 2026 midterm elections "because of these cuts being unleashed on the American people". Advertisement If Democrats win control of the House, Mr Jeffries would be positioned to make history again by becoming the first Black House speaker in the Congress that convenes at the start of 2027. Early into his speech, Mr Jeffries showcased sick children in Republicans' home districts who might eventually lose Medicaid coverage under the legislation. It was a manoeuvre that could increase coverage of his speech in local media across the country. Mr Jeffries pulled no punches. He said the bill was "ripping healthcare" from Americans and called it "shameful," "disgusting" and "reckless". "This is a crime scene and House Democrats want no part of it," he said.
BreakingNews.ie
27 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Republicans muscle Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill through Congress
The 218-214 vote amounts to a significant victory for the Republican president that will fund his immigration crackdown, make his 2017 tax cuts permanent and deliver new tax breaks that he promised during his 2024 campaign. It also cuts health and food safety net programmes and zeroes out dozens of green energy incentives. It would add $3.4 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Advertisement Despite concerns within Donald Trump's party over the 869-page bill's price tag and its hit to healthcare programmes, in the end just two of the House's 220 Republicans voting against it, following an overnight standoff. The bill has already cleared the Republican-controlled Senate by the narrowest possible margin. Independence Day The White House said Mr Trump will sign it into law at 5pm ET (2100 GMT) on Friday, the July 4th Independence Day holiday. Republicans said the legislation will lower taxes for Americans across the income spectrum and spur economic growth. "This is jet fuel for the economy, and all boats are going to rise," House speaker Mike Johnson said. Advertisement Every Democrat in Congress voted against it, blasting the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would leave millions uninsured. "The focus of this bill, the justification for all of the cuts that will hurt everyday Americans, is to provide massive tax breaks for billionaires," House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said in an eight-hour, 46-minute speech that was the longest in the chamber's history. Mr Trump kept up the pressure throughout, cajoling and threatening lawmakers as he pressed them to finish the job. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" he wrote on social media. Though roughly a dozen House Republicans threatened to vote against the bill, only two ended up doing so: Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, a centrist, and Thomas Massie of Kentucky, a conservative who said it did not cut spending enough. Advertisement Marathon weekend Republicans raced to meet Trump's July 4th deadline, working through last weekend and holding all-night debates in the House and the Senate. The bill passed the Senate on Tuesday in a 51-50 vote in that saw vice president JD Vance cast the tiebreaking vote. According to the CBO, the bill would lower tax revenues by $4.5 trillion over 10 years and cut spending by $1.1 trillion. Those spending cuts largely come from Medicaid, the health programme that covers 71 million low-income Americans. The bill would tighten enrollment standards, institute a work requirement and clamp down on a funding mechanism used by states to boost federal payments - changes that would leave nearly 12 million people uninsured, according to the CBO. Republicans added $50 billion for rural health providers to address concerns that those cutbacks would force them out of business. Advertisement Nonpartisan analysts have found that the wealthiest Americans would see the biggest benefits from the bill, while lower-income people would effectively see their incomes drop as the safety-net cuts would outweigh their tax cuts. The increased debt load created by the bill would also effectively transfer money from younger to older generations, analysts say. Ratings firm Moody's downgraded US debt in May, citing the mounting debt, and some foreign investors say the bill is making US Treasury bonds less attractive. The bill raises the US debt ceiling by $5 trillion, averting the prospect of a default in the short term. But some investors worry the debt overhang could curtail the economic stimulus in the bill and create a long-term risk of higher borrowing costs. Advertisement On the other side of the ledger, the bill staves off tax increases that were due to hit most Americans at the end of this year, when Mr Trump's 2017 individual and business tax cuts were due to expire. Those cuts are now made permanent, while tax breaks for parents and businesses are expanded. Tipped income The bill also sets up new tax breaks for tipped income, overtime pay, seniors and auto loans, fulfilling Trump campaign promises. The final version of the bill includes more substantial tax cuts and more aggressive healthcare cuts than an initial version that passed the House in May. During deliberations in the Senate, Republicans also dropped a provision that would have banned state-level regulations on artificial intelligence, and a "retaliatory tax" on foreign investment that had spurred alarm on Wall Street. The bill is likely to feature prominently in the 2026 midterm elections, when Democrats hope to recapture at least one chamber of Congress. Republican leaders contend the bill's tax breaks will goose the economy before then, and many of its benefit cuts are not scheduled to kick in until after that election. Opinion polls show many Americans are concerned about the bill's cost and its effect on lower income people.
