
Bahrain: MPs unanimously vote for 2% remittance tax
Bahrain - MPs have once again unanimously approved a two per cent tax on each expat remittance.
It comes a year after the move was unanimously rejected by the Shura Council following a previous unanimous approval by MPs.
If Shura Council rejects it a second time then a joint session of the National Assembly will vote on it.
Parliament's financial and economic affairs committee chairman Ahmed Al Salloom told his colleagues during yesterday's weekly session that the tax revenue would help reduce reliance on oil, while encouraging foreigners living in Bahrain to spend here rather than send money back home or anywhere else.
Committee rapporteur Zainab Abdulamir said millions of dinars are being remitted and the taxation move would hopefully reduce that.
The Shura Council's financial and economic affairs committee referred a comprehensive report to Parliament on reasons following three meetings with officials from the Finance and National Economy Ministry (National Bureau for Revenue), the Central Bank of Bahrain (CBB), the Bahrain Chamber and the Bahrain Association of Banks (BAB) as well as a representative from the foreign exchange companies.
Shura's financial and economic affairs committee chairman Khalid Al Maskati said the negatives far outweighed the positives and the proposal was found impractical.
Mr Al Maskati
'The expected revenue from 2pc tax is low and doesn't constitute as proper government income, while the damage to proper revenues from other related avenues would be grave,' he added.
'Around 72pc of expats earn less than BD200 a month and they will seek alternative illegal channels to send money.
'It means that either the employers will have to increase wages or increase the cost of service.
'The move could encourage money laundering and result in losses for money transfer agencies ... the list goes on.'
He added that many factors had been overlooked by the MPs.
'This legislation will only reduce remittances made through official channels in favour of illegal money transfer systems,' he added.
'It will also encourage money laundering and the rise of black market practices or unauthorised cryptocurrencies.'
The proposed legislation would contradict mutual and international agreements and conventions and would harm plans to attract and encourage investments.
'For instance, adopting the legislation would mean breaching the Unified Arab Investment Agreement which disallows imposing any restrictions – whether administrative, legal or financial – on Arab capital and investments.'
Mr Al Salloom
Finance and National Economy Ministry officials said that the levy would contradict the basic principles of freedom of money transfer.
It would also violate the concept of tax, as referenced by the Constitutional Court, as such levies should be inclusive, without anyone being singled out, which is not the case with this legislation, the officials pointed out.
'Bahrain has signed many international agreements and mutual pacts with countries across the world on the freedom of money transfer, which it is committed not to breach,' they added.
The proposed law also stipulated that the tax shall be paid during the transfer process at authorised financial institutions with the National Bureau of Revenue recovering the amount from those institutions.
'The move will have a negative impact on the economy, in general, and the financial and commercial sectors, in particular,' said ministry officials.
'Imposing such a tax would cause massive damage as it will lead to the emergence of illegal transfer channels.
'The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund have, in numerous studies, shown that countries that took the approach have faced trouble controlling transfers and we do not want the same situation here.'
The ministry added that such taxes wouldn't be paid by workers and would be forced on sponsors, which would add to the burden on businessmen.
'Such taxes will hugely affect expatriates in leadership positions in companies and banks in Bahrain and it could even lead to them moving to other countries,' it added.
'Bahrain is working towards being a more competitive regional hub. There are also companies that make regular transfers every day, in bulk, and such tax is just illogical and frustrating for them.'
Ministry officials said the legislation would hurt Bahrain's plans to attract investment and global brands and companies.
'We are in a competitive region and have to be considered as a strong choice for investments and this levy doesn't help achieve that,' they added.
CBB officials said the move would create a black market for money transfers as expats or their employers would look for ways to evade the tax.
'The legislation has no exemptions and also includes expats in leadership positions who earn high wages in companies and banks headquartered in Bahrain. It could deter the progress of financial activities, should they opt out of the country.
'Expats also cover GCC nationals and a tax for all would be catastrophic with moves underway to integrate citizens of the six nations.'
The Bahrain Chamber, BAB and exchange companies also rejected the proposal.
Syndigate.info).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
7 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
How Turkey and Qatar are playing an outsized role in Trump's new Middle East
Turkey and Qatar are making themselves crucial to US President Donald Trump's reshaping of the Middle East. Look no further than in Syria, where Qatari gas and cash, along with Turkish military might, are helping war-ravaged Syria back on its feet while Trump tries to fulfil his promise to pull the plug on western interventionists and 'nation builders'. The two countries' rising stock is not going unnoticed among Arab officials. 'Trump has too much on his plate; China, Iran talks, the war in Ukraine. He doesn't want to intervene. In Syria, he has these two local allies who don't mind getting involved in the nitty-gritty details of Syria's reconstruction. He is going to lean on them,' one senior Arab official told Middle East Eye. Qatar and Saudi Arabia are paying the salaries of Syrian government employees. In March, Qatar began supplying gas to Syria via Jordan. Meanwhile, Turkey's government is in talks with Damascus on a defence pact amid Israeli air strikes in Syria. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters That Turkey and Qatar are the regional powers most active in Syria should not come as a surprise. Turkey shares a long border with Syria and was the last true backer of rebels who fought to oust Bashar al-Assad after most Gulf monarchies gave up on their cause. Qatar was the exception. It was the sole Gulf state to recognise and host Syria's opposition. Conversely, the UAE made a big bet on rehabilitating Assad. MEE revealed that the UAE was negotiating a grand bargain to lift US sanctions on Assad in return for reducing Iran's influence. The talks continued up until the last minute. Assad was toppled in an offensive led by Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, whose commander, Ahmed al-Sharaa, is Syria's new president. The biggest deal Turkey and Qatar have made in Syria so far was in May. US ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack assumes Syria envoy post Read More » Along with the US, they signed a $7bn energy agreement that envisions the three countries building four gas power plants in Syria and one solar plant to boost the war-ravaged country's meagre energy supplies. Qatar's UCC construction and energy company, owned by the prominent al-Khayyat family, is set to lead the project. Speaking in Damascus at the signing ceremony, US envoy to Syria Thomas Barrack took the opportunity to praise the 'alignment of these amazing countries". 'A young and prosperous Qatar, one of the most incredible and ancient civilisations in Syria; [and] one of the most dominant empires that ever existed in the Ottoman Empire and the succession of Türkiye.' Barrack framed Syria as the poster child for Trump's vision of a Middle East, where the US was empowering local countries to redress the wrong of Sykes-Picot, the agreement that colonial Britain and France used to divide Syria during WWI. 'That mistake cost generations. We will not make it again,' he wrote on X. 'Need to address the PKK' If there is any doubt about whose voice the US will give the most credence to in Syria, look to Ankara, where Barrack also serves as Trump's ambassador to Turkey. 'The Trump administration understands the Turks have a vital national security interest in Syria. He respects that in a way others in Washington haven't,' Robert Ford, the last US ambassador to Syria, told MEE. 'The US has to work with the Turks otherwise, there will be another war' - Bassam Barabandi, former Syrian diplomat and opposition activist During the Biden administration, Syria was a sore point in US-Turkey ties. US troops first entered Syria in 2014 to fight the Islamic State militant (IS) group. They partnered with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). Turkey views the SDF as an extension of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). The PKK has waged a decades-long guerrilla war in southern Turkey and is labelled a terrorist organisation by the US and the European Union. 'You can't have a stable Syria without addressing the PKK. The US has to work with the Turks, otherwise there will be another war,' Bassam Barabandi, a former Syrian diplomat and opposition activist, told MEE. During his first term in office, Trump tried to withdraw US troops from Syria. His own officials hamstrung him, and his former defence secretary, Jim Mattis, resigned over a partial troop withdrawal. Although US troops were ostensibly in Syria to fight IS, they came to be seen as a force denying territory to Iran. With Tehran's ally Assad gone, that rationale no longer exists. Trump himself says Turkey has 'taken over Syria', alluding to its close ties to Sharaa. He appears to sense this as his chance to withdraw troops, despite pleas from Israel and the SDF to keep them there. Barrack told Turkish media in June that the US planned to downsize from eight bases to one in northeastern Syria. How Trump's allies view Turkey and Qatar Turkey and Qatar have long been seen as close partners. In a sense, they complement each other. Turkey has the second largest army in Nato, but is cash poor. Qatar is one of the world's top exporters of Liquefied Natural Gas, but has just 300,000 nationals. Turkey has a military base in Qatar. Doha made tens of billions of dollars in investments in Turkey during its inflation crisis, providing Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan with an economic lifeline. The two countries' alignment was solidified during the 2011 Arab Spring, when they backed popular protests against rulers like Assad in Syria and Hosni Mubarak in Egypt. Saudi Arabia and the UAE accused them of supporting political Islamists who Abu Dhabi and Riyadh feared would unsettle their monarchies. The rift got nasty in 2017, when a Saudi-led blockade was imposed on Qatar. That Trump should welcome Qatar and Turkish investment in Syria now shows how rapidly the region has reorganised itself. In 2017, he gave a White House speech throwing his weight behind the blockade. Until recently, Trump's Middle East director at the National Security Council was Eric Trager, who has been critical of Qatar. 'You certainly have those in the administration, not the Witkoffs or Barracks, who still believe in a Muslim Brotherhood boogyman. This is deep-seated. So it's interesting to see Trump's really close cohort move beyond this,' Natasha Hall, a Syria expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS, )said, referring to US Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff. Both of Trump's close advisors enjoy good relations with Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The UAE's hotspot troubles The Arab Spring descended into a slew of conflicts, of which Syria was just one. After the Nato-led removal of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, Turkey backed a government in Tripoli while Saudi Arabia and the UAE threw their support behind a rogue general and one-time CIA asset, Khalifa Haftar. The UAE also backed Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, the general who overthrew the democratically elected president, Mohammed Morsi, whom Erdogan backed. Turkey and Qatar's growing clout in the Middle East vis-a-vis Syria contrasts with mounting troubles for the UAE in some of these hotspots. UAE lobbying Trump administration to reject Arab League Gaza plan, officials say Read More » Ties between Egypt and the UAE are becoming seriously frayed, although both sides are trying to downplay it, Arab officials tell MEE. Sisi's economy is in crisis, but he has failed to push through the reforms that the UAE, his top backer, wants. The Emiratis have lobbied against Cairo in Washington, MEE revealed. The UAE's ambassador to the US publicly backed a plan floated by Trump to forcibly displace Palestinians from Gaza - a thought that unnerves Egyptian generals. Libya remains divided. Haftar's bid to conquer Tripoli failed in 2020. His son and likely successor, Saddam, has even courted Turkey and Qatar as their power rises. He visited Doha and Ankara this year. The parliament in Eastern Libya controlled by him is weighing whether to agree to a contentious maritime deal that Turkey favours. As Turkey and Qatar sign energy deals in Damascus under US auspices, the UAE is bogged down in a brutal civil war in Sudan. There it is backing the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) against the Sudanese army, which is backed by Turkey, Egypt and Iran. Litmus test Syria is going to be a test case as the first post-Arab Spring country to be rebuilt after the 2021 al-Ula agreement, in which the Gulf states agreed to put their differences behind them and mend fences. Qatar and Saudi Arabia have patched up ties, but the Qataris and Emiratis still have a chilly relationship. The same goes for the Turks. 'Syria's greatest benefit is that Assad was ousted after al-Ula,' a Syria analyst in the UAE told MEE, speaking on condition of anonymity. Trump announced in Saudi Arabia that he was lifting all US sanctions on Syria, and he credited both Erdogan and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman with convincing him to do so. 'The Saudis have been just as instrumental as the Turks and Qataris, if not more, in convincing Trump to drop sanctions on Syria. They want a stable Syria in order to focus on their own economic development at home,' Anna Jacobs, a non-resident fellow at the Arab Gulf States Institute, told MEE. 'The new Saudi looks for interest, not emotion or ideology,' Barabandi told MEE. 'They are with Turkey and Qatar on Syria. The US's goal is to facilitate the flow of GCC money into Syria. That's it.' Even the UAE is stepping in and trying to gain influence. In May, state-owned Dubai Ports World signed a pledge to invest $800m to modernise the port of Tartus. The analyst in the UAE said Sharaa's government welcomed the UAE's investment in Tartus because it needed a country that was seen as agreeable to Russia, which still has a military base there. France's CMA CGM shipping inked a 30-year deal to operate Latakia port in Syria. 'Sharaa couldn't have Turkey or a European state come in. Russia would have complained about that. The UAE is a friend of Russia,' the analyst said. The UAE's Al Habtoor group, a massive conglomerate that spans real estate to the automotive industry, is set to send a delegation to Syria this week. Ford said that Turkey, Qatar, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia all have a convergence of interests in Syria to ensure its transition is stable, and Iran, Assad's old patron, stays out. 'I'm not saying Abu Dhabi is comfortable with a conservative Islamist in power, but they all want to see Sharaa reduce Iran's influence,' he said. No nation-building The UAE, which has the closest ties to Israel among Gulf states, also brokered secret talks between Syria and Israel, Reuters reported in May. Israel pummelled Syria after Assad's removal and has sent troops to occupy a swath of the southeast, south of Damascus. MEE previously reported that the US lobbied Turkey and Israel into deconfliction talks. 'I think the Emiratis, and other Gulf states' number one concern is that there not be an outbreak of violence between the Turks and Israelis in Syria or the Iranians and Israelis,' Ford said. Syria after Assad: Sharaa's delicate balancing act with Israel Read More » He said while Turkey and Qatar have stepped up in Syria, it's a leap to say the US is recognising it as a sphere of their influence. 'That is too nineteenth century,' he said. 'The Trump people don't object to Turkey and Qatar getting involved in Syria. But they don't object to the Saudis and Emiratis getting involved either. Ultimately, the goal is for commerce between Israel and Syria.' Still, regional officials say Sharaa's ascent to power has bolstered Turkey and Qatar's power in the Levant. 'Sharaa will take Emirati money, but he won't trust them with security,' the Arab official told MEE. 'The UAE is on their back foot.' However, the real change is that Syria is not talking about elections. 'Sharaa has gone out of his way to prove that he won't be part of any political Islamist movement beyond Syria's borders,' the UAE-based analyst said. 'And he isn't mentioning democracy.'


Dubai Eye
13 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
US envoy says 'no room' for Palestinian state in West Bank currently
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has said that Washington does not wholeheartedly back a Palestinian state under the current circumstances. "I don't think so," Huckabee said in an interview with Bloomberg News published on Tuesday, when asked if a Palestinian state remains a goal of US policy. Asked about Huckabee's comments, the White House referred to remarks earlier this year by US President Donald Trump when he proposed a US takeover of Gaza, which was condemned globally by rights groups, Arab states, Palestinians and the UN as a proposal of "ethnic cleansing". The White House also referred to remarks by Trump from last year before he won the 2024 election when he said: "I'm not sure a two-state solution anymore is going to work." Asked whether Huckabee's remarks represented a change in US policy, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce declined to comment on Tuesday, saying policy-making was a matter for Trump and the White House. "I'm not going to explain them or really comment on them at all. I think he certainly speaks for himself," Bruce told reporters. Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor, has been a vocal supporter of Israel throughout his political career. "Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there's no room for it," Huckabee was quoted as saying by Bloomberg. Those probably won't happen "in our lifetime," he said. Trump, in his first term, was relatively tepid in his approach to a two-state solution, a longtime pillar of US Middle East policy. Trump has given little sign of where he stands on the issue in his second term. Trump has pursued strongly pro-Israel policies as president and his choice of Huckabee as ambassador signaled that they would continue. The US has for decades backed a two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinians that would create a state for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza alongside Israel. The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered in October 2023, when Hamas fighters attacked Israel, killing 1,200 and taking about 250 hostages, according to Israeli allies. US ally Israel's subsequent military assault on Gaza has killed nearly 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, while internally displacing nearly Gaza's entire population and causing a hunger crisis. The assault has also triggered accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denies the accusations.


Gulf Today
13 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Pakistan hikes defence budget 20%, but overall spending is cut
Pakistan Tuesday hiked defence spending by 20% following last month's deadly conflict with India. The government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced the increase as part of the budget for the fiscal year 2025-26, in which overall spending will be cut by 7% to 17.57 trillion rupees ($62 billion). Pakistan and India were pushed to the brink of war earlier this year after a gun massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir, marking the biggest breakdown in relations between them since 2019. Weeks of tension followed, culminating in missile and drone strikes that resulted in dozens of fatalities on both sides of the border. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said the government was allocating 2.55 trillion rupees ($9 billion) for defense compared with 2.12 trillion rupees in the previous budget. India in February increased its defense spending by 9.5%. Sharif told the Cabinet: "All economic indicators are satisfactory. After defeating India in a conventional war, now we have to go beyond it in the economic field as well.' Opposition members of the National Assembly verbally abused Aurangzeb, chanting slogans, throwing scrunched-up copies of the budget at him, whistling, and banging their desks as he gave his address. The coming year's defense allocation is considerably more than the government's expenditure on higher education, agricultural development, and mitigating climate-related risks, to which Pakistan is especially prone. Associated Press