Prediction: This Artificial Intelligence Stock Will Be More Valuable Than Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft in 5 Years
Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft are the three most valuable stocks in the world today.
In five years, however, Amazon could overtake them due to the enormous opportunities it possesses in artificial intelligence.
These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›
Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) are the three most valuable stocks in the world right now, with market caps north of $3 trillion. They are prominent names in tech, and all stand to benefit significantly from artificial intelligence (AI) as they enhance their existing products and services.
But while these stocks have all been doing well, I'm not confident that they will remain on top when looking at the longer term -- the next five years. By then, I think one company will surpass all of them in value, and that's Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN).
While Amazon is already a massive company, and it, too, is worth a sizable amount -- over $2 trillion, I see plenty of room for it to become even more valuable. Here are just some of the AI-related opportunities that the company is pursuing:
The company is rolling out Alexa+, an AI-powered version of its popular assistant, which will cost $19.99 per month for non-Prime subscribers.
It invested billions into Anthropic, a key rival of ChatGPT.
Amazon plans to invest over $100 billion into data centers over the next decade.
Its subsidiary, Zoox, is developing robotaxis that can drive up to 45 miles per hour at night and amid light rain.
It is developing its own AI chips -- which even Apple has used.
There are a plethora of opportunities for Amazon when it comes to AI. For a business that generated nearly $33 billion in free cash flow last year, it has the resources at its disposal to continue investing heavily in AI, which can pay off significantly in the future. From enhancing its online marketplace to entering in new opportunities like robotaxis, it arguably has more to gain from AI than the tech stocks that are more highly valued than it is right now.
Amazon has plenty of growth potential ahead, but for it to catch up to the big three, it'll probably need them to stumble. Here's why I think that will happen.
Microsoft Copilot has been underwhelming, with Salesforce's Marc Benioff often comparing it to Clippy from years past, which was a big disappointment. While it's infused into the company's office applications, it isn't turning out to be a huge growth catalyst for the business, at least not yet. Microsoft is the safe AI stock to buy, but it may not be the best one, as Copilot will be going up against other chatbots. And it's hard to make the case that it's winning. The company's sales were up just 13% in the most recent quarter (covering the first three months of the year).
Apple fumbled the rollout of AI, delaying the launch of Apple Intelligence and frustrating both analysts and customers along the way. It gave up on its electric car and has been scaling back on its Vision Pro headset. Innovation simply hasn't been a strong point for the company in recent years, and while it does have a strong ecosystem of products and services, there's little reason to expect the company will be at the forefront of AI development in the future. The stock could be due for a decline, given how lackluster its performance has been on that front.
Nvidia continually performs well, but in the years ahead, there could be more competition to worry about. Rival Advanced Micro Devices recently posted a strong quarter, perhaps signaling proof that its chips may offer serious competition. Meanwhile, as Amazon and other companies make their own custom chips, Nvidia's high-priced products may experience a slowdown. At the very least, investors may scale back the multiples they're willing to pay for Nvidia.
Amazon was involved in AI well before ChatGPT made it a hot buzzword in the market. The company has looked for ways to automate its warehouses and use next-gen technologies to make its processes more efficient. With so many ways to still benefit from AI's growth, I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes the most valuable stock in the world in the next five years. Amazon is a top growth stock to own, and one that you can buy and forget about.
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $351,127!*
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $40,106!*
Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $642,582!*
Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Salesforce. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Prediction: This Artificial Intelligence Stock Will Be More Valuable Than Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft in 5 Years was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sanitation fee passes, begins July 1
The sanitation fee resolution, which caused many conversations and criticisms within Lebanon, was passed by the City Council in a 4-2 vote during Tuesday's meeting. The structure of the fee will be $20 for residential customers and $40 for business customers. The city's sanitation department does not pick up dumpsters used by businesses, only bins specifically used for the city service. Geri Ashley and Camille Burdine, Councilors for Ward 2 and 3 respectively, stuck to their votes against the fee for the second reading. Both raised concerns of how residents at or below the poverty line or seniors on fixed incomes may be impacted by the $20 per month fee. Questions regarding how the sanitation department is funded were asked as confusion rippled through the community. 'This was an unadvertised discussion in a work session. It was a 15-minute discussion,' Ashley said. 'I still don't have all my questions answered. I don't feel like I have the economic information.' 'I think that we should, as a City Council, have spent more time talking about it and seeing if we could come up with any other solutions,' Ashley added. 'If in fact we are paying for garbage in our city's taxes, and now we're incorporating a fee, then what happens next year when we get our taxes? Are our taxes going to be reduced at that point, because that is a double dip.' On Wednesday, Burdine reiterated her thoughts that the city should be more proactive in studying the impact on the citizens before a fee was implemented. She said the response to rising costs caused the city to be 'reactive instead of proactive.' Burdine said she is not opposed to a sanitation fee, but feels that more time should have been spent researching it. Also on Wednesday, Ashley called the fee a 'knee-jerk reaction' and likewise felt that not enough research was done. She also said instead of a flat fee, a property tax increase would take into account the property values and Wards 1, 2 and 3 would not have to deal with a monthly fee which might be a burden. Ashley said she wants to see if the sanitation fee will disappear from the property taxes. Ward 1 Councilor Joey Carmack said he supported the fee because it's a flat fee that all residents pay, which doesn't fluctuate. 'I do not feel it's fair for the sanitation fee to be a property tax,' Carmack said. 'A property tax would be unfair, because for example, person one has a $1 million house, and [may] only have one can of trash. They would pay more taxes than person two [who has] a $350,000 home.' 'We dump the trash from the city at Walter Hill (in Murfreesboro), which has been in the news about closing soon,' Carmack added. 'When that does happen, we will be paying even more to dump trash.' Middle Point Landfill has been working with Rutherford County to increase fees for 'out-of-county' tipping fees, as well as downsizing the number of counties allowed to dump there. During a meeting earlier this year, it was proposed to double the fees for non-Rutherford County clients from $1.20 per ton to $2.50 per ton to generate more revenue for that county. The town meeting hall had more residents in attendance than usual, which was commented on by the Councilors, who expressed gratitude for the increased attendance. Burdine, Chris Crowell, Councilor for Ward 4 and Phil Morehead, Councilor for Ward 6, particularly welcomed the attendance and interest in city business. During the public comment period, nearly a dozen people spoke to the City Council. One resident, Stephen Lawson, said he and others should have the option to opt out of the fee, and that he would rather pay a private company $30 to support that business than give the city $20. He also asked if there were other landfills which could be used. 'I thought there was a landfill in Wilson County. Is that one full?' Lawson asked. 'That's owned by the Wilson County government, and it's just open to construction materials,' Mayor Bell responded. 'It's not open to us.' Alex Buhler, former Ward 1 Councilor who stepped-down in 2012, also spoke. 'They should have that option to opt out,' Buhler said. 'If a thousand people opt out, that's a thousand houses you don't have to go to.' Bell responded by saying that wouldn't save as much money as people think because the sanitation trucks will still be driving by those houses anyway. Some of the Councilors said they don't know if private companies would have the same quality of work that the city does, as officials believe sanitation is a public health matter which the Council 'takes seriously.' Another resident wondered if the sanitation fee would lead to the start of 'nickel and diming' the residents of the city. Glenn Denton, County Commissioner for District 20, which covers the downtown Lebanon region of the county, criticized the growth of the city, which he thinks sparked the need for growing services and the fees to pay for them. 'Enough is enough. We have overbuilt in our city beyond what our infrastructure can handle,' Denton said. 'When do we stop building to where we cannot service and when we cannot pay for the infrastructure around it?' Nearly an hour and a half was spent discussing the sanitation fee and budget for the next year. With the passing of the resolution, the sanitation fee goes into effect July 1.
Tom's Guide
29 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
5 features iOS 26 needs to steal from Google to catch up on AI
I've been enjoying Google's AI features on my Pixel phones for the last couple of years. Starting with the Pixel 8 Pro and proceeding with the Pixel 9 Pro, Google has proven to me that its AI features in its Pixel phones are unmatched — and Apple's in trouble if it doesn't catch up. With WWDC 2025 right around the corner, it's Apple's chance to redeem itself by introducing more Apple Intelligence features for what's presumably going to be the next iteration of its phone software: iOS 26. While there's been a handful of useful AI features, such as Visual Intelligence and Photo Clean Up to name a few, iPhones could still stand to get more. In fact, there are a number of Google AI features I think Apple needs to copy that could boost the iPhone experience. I'm not saying outright steal the same exact features, but at least come up with something similar — or if not, better one. If there's one AI feature that Apple desperately needs to copy from Pixel phones, it has to be none other than Call Screen. Not only is it one of the most underrated AI features I've tried in any phone, but it's also one of the most helpful. Call Screen allows Pixel phones to take incoming calls on your behalf, using Google Assistant to listen to callers and then provide you with contextual responses on your phone to choose. Think of it like an actual assistant who's fielding the call for you and relaying your response. I can't tell you how many times it's been such a lifesaver when I'm stuck in a work meeting. Although it technically debuted with the Galaxy S25 Ultra, the cross-app actions function migrated to Pixel phones and it shows the impressive abilities of AI. While Apple Intelligence can call on Siri to perform simple actions, it doesn't have the ability to connect with third-party apps — which is exactly what makes cross-app actions such a big game changer with Pixel phones. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Through simple voice commands, it can work with several apps to complete a certain request. For example, you can ask Gemini on a Pixel phone to summarize an email or find a nearby restaurant that's pet friendly and add a calendar appointment for it. Another feature that debuted with Samsung and eventually made its way to Pixel phones is Circle to Search. Apple currently doesn't have anything like it, although you could argue that Visual Intelligence can effectively function in almost the same way. With Circle to Search, it's a quick and convenient way to perform searches directly on-device, from whatever app you're using. When activated, you simply circle or select what you're looking at on your phone's screen to perform a search — which could result in answering a question, performing a general Google Search, identifying something, and even finding deals on a product. One AI feature I've come to appreciate as a photo editor is the Pixel's Reimagine tool, which allows me to select parts of a photo and transform it into something else through a text description. The closest Apple Intelligence feature to this would be Image Playground, but that generates images from scratch through a text description — it doesn't work with existing photos. Reimagine helps to make existing photos look better, whether it's to change up the scene entirely or make minor edits. I personally love being able to select the sky in my photos and change it up to something else, or using Reimagine to insert different elements with realism. Even though it could benefit from a few enhancements, Pixel Screenshots can be better at helping you recall information you might forget — or need to remember for later on. It's exclusively available on the Pixel 9, Pixel 9 Pro, Pixel 9 Pro XL, and Pixel 9 Pro Fold and lets you use the screenshot function and AI to recall details in them. For example, if you screenshot a pizza recipe you want to try for later, or the details about an upcoming party you're going to, Pixel Screenshots will allow you to perform a search to find the exact details about it. Apple doesn't have a comparable AI feature, but wouldn't it be neat if Apple Intelligence could recall the most obscure (or detailed) information that you go through on your iPhone.
The Verge
33 minutes ago
- The Verge
'You can now easily pause, play, skip forward or backward, and seek via the progress bar right from the picture-in-picture window,'
Microsoft Edge's picture-in-picture mode is getting better controls. according to a blog post. I don't use Edge, but these seem like good upgrades.
