logo
Texas Summer Camp Tragedy Reminiscent of Similar Flooding 40 Years Ago

Texas Summer Camp Tragedy Reminiscent of Similar Flooding 40 Years Ago

Newsweek5 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A flash flooding disaster in 1987 mirrors the horrific event in Central Texas over the weekend that killed more than 80 people, including 27 young campers and their Christian summer camp counselors.
Why It Matters
On Friday, the National Weather Service (NWS) issued urgent warnings to people across Central Texas amid heavy downpours that resulted in months' worth of rain at once, prompting the Guadalupe River to surge 25 feet in only 45 minutes.
More than a foot of rain lashed the region before the river flooding on Friday afternoon, National Weather Service (NWS) meteorologist James Wingenroth told Newsweek. The downpours caused rivers to surge with little advance notice. Floodwaters inundated Central Texas, sweeping away an RV park with families still inside their vehicles.
More than 80 people have died, and search-and-rescue missions continue on Monday as the region is anticipating up to 10 inches of rainfall throughout the day at some locations.
What to Know
On Friday, floodwaters rushed through Camp Mystic, creating perilous evacuation conditions in which girls were instructed to hold onto a rope to cross a bridge as floodwaters surged past their knees, The Associated Press reported. Helicopters brought some of the girls to safety, but 27 people died, Camp Mystic confirmed on Monday, including some of the young campers.
A photo shows flooding caused by a flash flood at the Guadalupe River in Kerrville, Texas, on July 5, 2025.
A photo shows flooding caused by a flash flood at the Guadalupe River in Kerrville, Texas, on July 5, 2025.
Ronaldo Schemidt/Getty
The 1987 Guadalupe River Flood
Flash floods in Texas Hill Country have proved lethal more than once, the Guadalupe River flooding in 1987 in a similar way to this past weekend.
The area surrounding the Guadalupe River, part of Texas' so-called "Flash Flood Alley," is known for its susceptibility to fast-forming, deadly floods due to unique geography and weather patterns. The Guadalupe River is bedded with limestone rather than mud, which contributes to its susceptibility to flooding and the fast flow of floodwaters.
In 1987, sudden and intense rainfall caused the river to surge at an unprecedented rate in mid-July, leading to a tragedy that killed 10 campers at Pot O' Gold Christian Camp, a summer camp near Comfort, Texas. The campers drowned when their bus attempted to evacuate them and was overtaken by floodwater.
In the span of just a few hours, heavy rainfall pushed the Guadalupe River well beyond its banks. The rising waters swept through campsites, inundating cabins and cutting off escape routes. The disaster prompted statewide scrutiny of safety protocols at summer camps near rivers.
Decades later, the 1987 Guadalupe River flood looms large due to its parallels with subsequent tragedies. During the devastating flood that hit the region over the weekend, cabins at Camp Mystic also were destroyed and more than two dozen people were killed before evacuations could get everyone to safety.
What People Are Saying
Elinor Lester, a 13-year-old camper at Camp Mystic who was evacuated by helicopter, said according to a report by The Associated Press: "The camp was completely destroyed. It was really scary."
Luther Vanlandingham Jr, a deputy for the Kendall County Sheriff's Office in 1987, said of the flood that year, according to a report by KSAT: "It was just a loud rushing noise. I have never seen the river that high before … Unbelievable how fast it was going."
NWS Austin said in a Monday forecast: "There remains a threat of flash flooding from slow moving heavy rains overnight and through the day on Monday somewhere over the watch area. Difficult to pinpoint exact locations where isolated heavier amounts will occur. An uptick in coverage and intensity of scattered showers and storms is possible overnight near the I-35 corridor and eastern Hill Country, developing west through the day on Monday. … Any additional heavy rainfall over hardest hit areas of the past few days will lead to rapid runoff and flash flooding."
What Happens Next
Numerous flood-related weather alerts remain in place across Central Texas on Monday afternoon. Most of the majorly flooded rivers have receded, though some remain in minor flooding.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

National Weather Service issues extreme heat watch for Oregon's Willamette Valley
National Weather Service issues extreme heat watch for Oregon's Willamette Valley

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

National Weather Service issues extreme heat watch for Oregon's Willamette Valley

The National Weather Service has issued an extreme heat watch for the Willamette Valley from July 15-16. Dangerously hot conditions with temperatures between 95 and 105 degrees are possible across much of northwest Oregon, including the northern and central Willamette Valley. The highest chances are in the Portland/Vancouver metro area and Columbia River Gorge. Low temperatures between 65 to 70 degrees may occur in the evening of July 15, which would limit overnight relief. Both daily high and nightly low temperatures are considered when determining an extreme heat watch should be issued, according to Lee Picard, lead meteorologist at the National Weather Service in Portland. "(A low of) 65 is an important threshold for us," he said. "If it doesn't go below that, it's difficult for people to cool down overnight." An extreme heat watch doesn't mean extreme heat will definitely occur, Picard said. It is issued ahead of time, in this case six days in advance, to allow people to prepare for a potentially dangerous event. High and low temperatures factor into an index known as HeatRisk, which provides a forecast of heat-related impacts in a 24-hour period. The formula accounts for climatic factors as well, like how unusual extreme heat is during a particular time of years. If the HeatRisk in an area falls into the two highest categories, major or extreme, it meets the criteria for a hazardous event. "A watch is when a hazardous event is possible. We usually say about 50% likely that it will occur," Picard said. Heat related illnesses increase significantly during extreme heat events, the National Weather Service said. The agency advised people to drink plenty of fluids and to stay out of the sun in a cool place during the heat of the day and check up on relatives and neighbors. For those without air conditioning, people should use fans to keep air moving and keep windows closed during the day and open at night, unless air quality is degraded due to wildfire smoke. "Do not leave young children and pets in unattended vehicles," the alert from NWS said. "Car interiors will reach lethal temperatures in a matter of minutes." Rose Shimberg is an outdoors journalism intern at the Statesman Journal. Reach her at rshimberg@ This article originally appeared on Salem Statesman Journal: NWS issues extreme heat watch for Oregon's Willamette Valley

What Camp Gives Girls
What Camp Gives Girls

Atlantic

time28 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

What Camp Gives Girls

A few specific sounds punctuate summer evenings in rural Iowa. A chorus of spring peepers, for example, or the shrill conk-la-ree of a red-winged blackbird on the side of a county road. But only one demands a response: the hostile, metallic beep of a NOAA weather radio. For 25 years, my mother ran Camp L-Kee-Ta, a small Girl Scout camp in the southeastern part of the state, which meant that, every summer, she was responsible for the safety of 64 girls and a staff of 20 young adults. At the first declaration of a tornado warning, Mom would walkie the counselors, instructing them to move their campers indoors. She'd ring the camp's cast-iron bell as the wind began to howl. And, because my family lived on-site, she'd toss me in the truck before driving from the cabins at Hickory Hills to the huts at Trail's End, checking for stragglers. Within minutes, we'd all convene in the basement of the Troop House, the largest camp building, a few dozen girls sitting cross-legged on the concrete floor with snacks and songbooks. I don't recall much crying in these moments as the storm raged above us. Mainly, I remember singing. Camp felt safe, in the literal sense but also the figurative one; there, girls could challenge themselves, free from the judgment of the outside world. At camp, we—for several summers, I was a camper too—learned to dive, to build a fire, to make friends. We practiced our courage and resilience, how to skin our knees and keep on hiking, how to carefully extract a tick. Even when disaster sent us underground, we were always ultimately okay. It was good for campers to be a little uncomfortable and homesick. These moments were and are the purpose of camp—preparation for the trials of real-world life. View: Deadly flooding in Texas And what I haven't been able to stop thinking about is the unfathomable tragedy that, last week in the Texas Hill Country, at least a dozen little girls lost their lives while they were learning how to be brave. Camp leaders across the country can't stop thinking about it, either. 'It is quite literally our worst nightmare,' Georgia Del Favero, a co-director of Camp Birchwood, a Minnesota summer camp for girls, told me. Right now, hundreds of camps, including Del Favero's, are in the middle of a summer session, or are about to welcome a new busload of children for three days or a week or a month. Moving forward requires accepting that, at camp as in life, we can make plans and follow guidelines, but even then, 'we can't always prevent tragedy.' Camp Mystic is a Christian camp, and one of several summer camps dotting the Guadalupe River in central Texas. It's a century-old, sprawling complex with two campuses and a range of activities on offer, including horseback riding, riflery, and synchronized swimming. Last week's flood came only a few days into a month-long summer session, and hundreds of campers were spread out across several cabins. When the rain began in earnest, early on the morning of July 4, most of those campers were still asleep. Elizabeth Bruenig: An inhospitable land Details about what happened next are murky, and news reports are difficult for those unfamiliar with the camp layout to follow. What comes through most clearly, at least to me, is the charm of Mystic's site names, instantly recognizable to anyone with camp experience: Senior Hill, where older girls stayed and were safe from the rising river; the Giggle Box and Wiggle Inn cabins in the lower part of camp, where girls were able to ride out the flood or evacuate; the Bubble Inn cabin, full of little girls who couldn't. What comes through, as well, is the heroism of Mystic's staff, who smashed cabin windows to push their campers outside, carried girls on their backs, and wrote campers' names in Sharpie on their arms in case they were swept away in the flood. Dick Eastland, a longtime co-director of the camp, navigated his truck through the dark water and died trying to save the girls at Bubble Inn. Many children currently attending summer camp still have no idea that any of this has occurred. Lots of camps follow a no-phones policy that provides kids a psychological haven from the noise of modern life. But their parents have seen the news, and camp-office phones nationwide have been ringing for days. It's hard to know what to tell parents, Ariella Rogge, who oversees the High Trails Ranch camp for girls, in Colorado, told me. You can help to calm a parent's fears by outlining the stringent safety standards most camps follow or the staff's extensive disaster-preparedness training. Still, 10 girls from Texas are set to attend Rogge's camp this week, and some of their parents are understandably unnerved, she said. 'My husband didn't go to camp, I didn't go to camp, and I am incredibly risk-averse,' one mother told her, according to Rogge. Then again, the mother said, 'this is what my daughter has been dreaming about all year.' Rogge isn't sure whether that mother will still send her daughter to camp next week. But she hopes so. She's trying to help anxious parents recognize that two things can be true. 'You can know this is going to be a really great experience for your daughter, and that she's going to have all this personal growth,' Rogge said, 'and you can be really nervous and scared.' Camp directors like Rogge and Del Favero will use this moment to review their safety procedures and communicate them to concerned parents; they'll train counselors on how to comfort anxious campers. Some camps might need to reevaluate cabin locations or work with local officials to install effective weather-warning systems, which didn't exist near Mystic. But my hope is that people won't use this tragedy as an occasion to bubble-wrap their kids, or to take away from their child the chance at a life-changing summer. Stephanie Bai: The Texas-flood blame game is a distraction This week, I called my mom to ask what she would say to parents if she were still directing camp. 'I'd show them how we mitigate risk,' she told me. But then, she said, she'd tell them all the stories: of the girls who'd been shy before camp and who, by week's end, bloomed with confidence; of the campers who cooked themselves dinner for the first time under a starry sky; of the little girl who fell from a horse, went to the hospital, and demanded to immediately be brought back to camp. When Mom and I spoke about the Mystic campers, we talked less about the tragedy itself, and more about all the times when we were sure that they'd been brave. How, woken by the sound of thunder, girls might have climbed down from their bunks and gathered their bunkmates with urgent voices. How they might have waited one extra minute for a new friend to grab a flashlight or a teddy. How afraid they probably were, but also how determined, as they waded together into the muddy water.

Floods Are Inevitable. Catastrophe Is Not.
Floods Are Inevitable. Catastrophe Is Not.

New York Times

time34 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Floods Are Inevitable. Catastrophe Is Not.

Images and stories of the devastation wrought by the July 4 flood of the Guadalupe River in Texas will stay with many of us for a long time. There has been an outpouring of compassion and sorrow for those who have died, remain missing or have lost their homes and possessions. There has also been a healthy dose of scrutiny of the shortcomings in early warning systems, government response and evacuation efforts — some of which have been blamed on the Trump administration's bludgeon of cuts across emergency services, weather reporting and scientific agencies. But even with a flawless response, the storm that roared through that night would most likely have claimed many lives. The rest of us might now do well to look past the astonishment, sympathy or blame, and consider how to avoid or minimize similar hazards in the future. What happened in Central Texas is only the latest in a long series of horrific floods, and they're getting worse. In Ellicott City, Md., a flood level expected only once in 1,000 years occurred twice in a three-year span, in 2016 and 2018. In 2022, flash floods in Kentucky displaced thousands of people who had no flood insurance. In February of this year, devastating floods occurred in Kentucky, West Virginia and Tennessee. We should no longer be surprised by the inevitable. We are living in a new age of flooding. We can no longer deny the increasing danger posed by these floods. Nor can we afford to continue believing we have the solutions to stop or contain the rise of water. The best option to save American lives is reducing our vulnerability and exposure to these floods. That means preventing unnecessary new development on floodplains, and amping up efforts to help people move their homes from high-risk areas to safe territory. This starts with the protection of floodplains, the natural areas that have been shaped over time to absorb floods when they occur. Human development on these spaces destroys their ability to absorb excess water. To prevent it, we must implement adequate zoning policies that limit construction there. This is the least costly option for preventing flood damages from getting worse. Likewise, relocation of flood-prone homes to higher ground has been an important strategy for decades. But there is still a huge investment poured into trying to prevent flooding damage from occurring, building levees to try to keep floods away from our homes and using emergency relief checks and insurance subsidies to pay victims for losses after they occur. Billions of dollars are spent to protect those who have homes and businesses in flood zones — and then billions more are spent on recovery efforts when those protections fail. The Natural Resources Defense Council analyzed thousands of data points and determined that for every $1.72 FEMA spends helping people move away from the paths of floods, $100 is spent to rebuild properties. We are essentially paying people to stay. Our response to floods has been inadequate, if not misdirected. And now, owing to the heating climate, floods will be growing irrevocably worse, more widespread and longer in duration. We've failed to halt the losses and the threats of the past. Lacking a major course correction, we're destined to fail worse in the future. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store