British woman wakes up sounding CHINESE after a stroke
Sarah Colwill was just 35 when her thick Devon drawl sensationally disappeared overnight in 2010.
Her case is one of only around 100 known cases of foreign accent syndrome (FAS) worldwide.
MailOnline can reveal that Sarah, now 50, still sounds Chinese today - and has never even stepped foot in Asia.
Sarah has opened up about the years of bullying she has faced since the life-changing medical episode and how even her own family has turned on her, calling her a 'freak' and an 'embarrassment'.
She revealed how Christian groups claimed she was 'possessed by the devil' and needed an 'exorcism', leaving her feeling 'suicidal'.
Speaking exclusively to MailOnline, she said: 'I can't describe how it feels when your society, your country turns against you and doesn't recognize you as a resident anymore - and tells you to go back to where you came from.
'I haven't got anywhere to go. If you don't want me, where am I meant to go?'
In a message to her doubters, she added: 'If you don't believe me and you think this is all a fake, that's fine. Get on with your life. Don't feel the need to send me messages about how ugly I am or what a faker I am.
'Just get on with your life and believe it's not real. That's fine.'
Doctors have never been able to pinpoint what caused her stroke, but it left her with a range of neurological impairments that left her unable to walk and speak the same. She said she felt like a 'cabbage for the first three years'.
The stroke forced Sarah to give up her job as an IT coordinator and move back into her mother's house with her husband, Patrick, to be cared for by the both of them.
The couple, who have been married 25 years, sold their house and moved into an extension on the back of her mother's home, but they say they are living in a 'glorified shed' because she does not have enough money to finish the project.
Sarah, who does not believe she sounds Asian, said she has been accused of being 'an insult to the whole of the Asian community' and that she 'must be a racist by blatantly going out and mimicking an accent that doesn't belong to me'.
She also recalled two occasions where she was told to 'go back to your own country'.
Once when she was struggling to get off a bus because she was using a rollator to assist her walking after her stroke.
'I said, "Can you lower it? I need to be able to get off". And he said, "Oh got another foreigner - why don't you go back to your own country".
On another, when she driving her car, a passenger questioned her ability on the roads and told her to 'go back to your own country'.
But in complete contrast, Sarah said that she has Asian friends who have stood by her.
'I used to go to a regular Chinese restaurant and I was quite friendly with the owner, so she knew me before it happened.
'When we were speaking to each other, she had no problem. She didn't feel like I was taking the mick or anything like that.
'She just accepted how I spoke, because to her I didn't sound Chinese. I didn't sound like I was taking the p***, so it was all the people's interpretation.
'But anytime we were in town in a supermarket, having a conversation, people would stand around and stare, like, "are you two speaking to each other in Chinese?" No, it's English!'
Sarah said there was also a 'particularly cruel' time in her life when she was targeted by Christian groups online.
She explained: 'It was an American church that bombarded me with messages almost on a daily basis. My sister took over my social media then so I didn't have to deal because I would just be crying all the time.
'They were saying things like I've been possessed by demons, that I deserve this to happen to me because I married a divorced man. They said I definitely need an exorcism, that I was speaking in tongues and the devil is within you.
'It was just an awful, awful time.'
Sarah, who said her accent is aggravated when she gets migraines, told how even her own family started to turn against her.
'It wasn't that they didn't believe me. It was like I wasn't trying hard enough to speak properly, and they just made really nasty comments about the way I walked, the way I talked, and they couldn't come to accept it.
'I lost contact with quite a few family members that seem to think that somehow this was my fault, that I was doing it for attention and I was an embarrassment to them.'
She said that on the whole people have found it 'absurd and unbelievable' and that it must be a 'joke'.
'I'm not choosing to speak this way and your perception of my speech and where I'm from, that's on you. I can't change it,' she said.
'I think the when people kept saying to me, "you sound Chinese", I didn't hear that. I just felt like I was slurring.
'I didn't associate it with any particular accent. It wasn't until I saw a neurologist in Newcastle, and he made me read this speech out which amplifies any speech impediments that you have, and it wasn't until I heard the recording back of that that I was shocked at how I sounded.
'But it always varies. The common one, obviously, was Chinese at the time, but now it's just, where are you from? Because people can't really recognize the accent. They just know it's not local.'
Others have suggested that it sounds Australian, Spanish, or Polish, but Sarah still hopes that her Plymothian accent will one day return.
Describing the last 15 years of her life, she said: 'It has been a very hard road and there's limited support because it's such a rare thing.
'I still don't know what happened or if it will happen again. It's been hard to keep pushing to speak better, walk better, be able to be more independent.
'I've reached my goal in terms of communication and mobility, but now I need to start working on my mental health, how I feel about myself, regaining my confidence somehow.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
More sugar than chocolate: The best and worst alcohol-free beers for your health
What a time to be alive if you're a teetotaller. Alcohol-free and low-alcohol beers (which typically contain up to 0.5% ABV – around the same amount of alcohol you would find in a ripe banana), are big business. No longer an insipid, metallic-tasting booby prize for designated drivers, the thirst for them is insatiable – with the market worth £380 million in 2024 – and encompasses a dizzying range of stouts, porters and craft wheat beers. However, before you knock them back with joyful abandon, it's worth having a closer look at the label, as many contain a lot more sugar and calories than you may think. There's that attractive-looking bottle of alcohol-free stout which contains more sugar than a Galaxy chocolate bar and enticing blonde beers with more calories than a packet of salty crisps. Which are the best options and the ones to avoid then? From Guinness to Lucky Saint, we rank the leading brands and speak to the experts about how much is safe to drink. The best and worst alcohol-free beers for your health Rated by Sam Rice, Telegraph nutrition expert Nøgne Ø Svart/Hvit Milk Stout Innis & Gunn 0.0% lager Leffe Blonde 0% Abbey Ale Madrí Excepcional 0% Brewdog Punk IPA Alcohol Free Guinness 0.0 Lucky Saint Alcohol Free Lager 7. Nøgne Ø Svart/Hvit Milk Stout Ingredients: water, malted barley, lactose, hops, yeast Wowzers, this wholesome-looking bottle contains a whopping 23g of sugar, the highest by far of those tested. The clue is in the name; lactose is the sugar found in milk, and it has been added here to give the stout its characteristic creamy mouthfeel. Yeast cannot ferment lactose, so it remains in the finished beer, providing a distinct sweetness. A 330ml bottle contains 23g of sugar, equal to a 42g bar of Galaxy chocolate. I think I know which I'd choose, but if you like this beer, then, like Galaxy, it's probably best kept as a treat. Verdict: One point for the fact that it's alcohol free. 6. Innis & Gunn 0.0% lager Ingredients: water, barley, oats, hops. A simple ingredients list is always a great start when it comes to nutrition, but sadly, that's where the good news ends, as this beer is the second-highest in sugar, 4.5g per 100ml, compared with the minuscule 0.1g in Lucky Saint. One 440ml can contains two thirds of the recommended daily sugar intake set by the NHS, which is 30g. Unless you absolutely love this for the taste, which is a valid reason to drink anything, I'd probably choose something else. Verdict: Just the one point for being alcohol-free. 5. Leffe Blonde 0% Abbey Ale Ingredients: water, barley malt, maize, barley, sugar, hops, natural aromas. What this beer gives with one hand – it's pretty low in sugar – it takes with the other; it's the highest in calories of the beers featured, with almost three times that of the Brewdog Punk AF. Blonde ales are an unfiltered beer style known for being high in silicon, or more specifically, orthosilicic acid, which helps the body to build and maintain healthy bones, and may help guard against conditions such as osteoporosis. Each 250ml bottle contains 100 calories, so a couple of those and you're consuming more calories than a standard bag of Walker's ready salted crisps. Verdict: An extra half a point for the silicon. 4. Madrí Excepcional 0%. Ingredients: water, barley malt, wheat, barley, glucose syrup, sucrose, natural flavourings, hops. This beer sits right in the middle of the pack for calories and sugar, so if you love that cool, crisp Spanish cerveza-style lager, then this might be the one for you. But before you pop the top, the addition of glucose syrup, sucrose, and natural flavourings raises a nutritional red flag – we are entering UPF territory here. Verdict: The additives let this down. 3. Brewdog Punk IPA Alcohol Free Ingredients: water, lactose, malted barley, hops, yeast, malted oats, malted wheat, lactic acid. While Brewdog Punk IPA was the lowest in calories, just edging out Lucky Saint, it was much higher in sugar, presumably due to the lactose. This is a method for adding body to beer after the alcohol has been removed. With 6g of sugar per 330ml, this would add up pretty rapidly if you were to enjoy a few cans in the sun. Sometimes, even alcohol-free beers should be enjoyed in moderation. Verdict: Shame about the sugar. 2. Guinness 0.0 Ingredients: water, malted barley, barley, roasted barley, fructose, natural flavourings, hops, yeast I'm reliably informed by beer connoisseurs (my husband!) that Guinness 0.0 is the closest to the real thing of all the zero-alcohol beers. This is likely because it is brewed in the same manner as regular Guinness, utilising a cold filtration method to remove the alcohol. This preserves the flavour as well as plant compounds called polyphenols from the barley, which act as antioxidants in the body to protect cells against cancer-causing compounds called free radicals. Polyphenols are also prebiotics, which feed our good gut bacteria, and they can even help improve circulation and blood pressure. Guinness famously contains energy-boosting iron, too. A 440ml can contains only as many calories as a single Hobnob biscuit, which is half the calories of regular Guinness, and it's also very low in sugar. A win in my book. Verdict: One of the best on the market. 1. Lucky Saint Alcohol Free Lager Ingredients: water, malted barley, hops, yeast. This is the alcohol-free lager I have in my fridge at home. It has a delicious fruitiness and a paltry 53 calories and 0.3g of sugar per can. This simple, unfiltered beer is made with just four ingredients and no additions, such as aromas or flavourings. You'll also be getting a hit of plant polyphenols for some extra gut goodness. Bravo Lucky Saint, you win! Verdict: Not much wrong with this. FAQs How much is safe to drink? A recent study by a research team from University of California San Diego, Knappschaft Kliniken in Germany and the University of the Basque Country in Spain, which was published in the journal Nutrients, suggests that even two bottles of non-alcoholic beer a day is enough to increase blood sugar levels. The authors conclude: 'The consumption of non-alcoholic beverages has unfavourable effects on metabolism, mainly driven by their calorie and sugar contents.' The researchers indicated a long-term risk of Type 2 diabetes and obesity. The study, however, was limited. The cohort was restricted to 44 healthy young men who drank either two 330ml bottles of alcohol-free beer or water every day for four weeks. The team conducted regular tests to check for changes in glucose and lipid metabolism, liver enzymes, body composition, and the composition of the men's gut microbiome – and compared the results between the alcohol free beer drinkers and the water drinkers, so it was not surprising these drinkers fared worse. Nevertheless, consuming alcohol-free beers with high levels of calories and sugar, over time and at volume could have more serious implications for health. What are the main health risks? Clearly, 'the biggest benefit to alcohol-free beer is cutting out the alcohol and typically they add fewer calories to your diet,' says Matt Coulshead, the research and development manager at Gaba Labs, which specialises in neuropsychopharmacology and synthetic chemistry. But the main problem is that the sugar and calorie content varies widely between the different types of beers. The research findings revealed that mixed beer – alcohol-free beer with added lemon or orange soda, for example, raised long-term blood sugar levels and fats in the bloodstream, and wheat beer increased insulin and blood fats. And some lagers, such as one 440ml can of Innis & Gunn 0.0% lager beer, contains 20g of sugar, two thirds of the recommended daily intake. (The NHS recommends that adults consume no more than 30g of added sugar a day, approximately 7tsp.) It's not all bad news, however. According to the NHS, it is not usually a serious problem if your blood sugar is slightly high for a short time – it is when it is sustained that high blood sugar can raise the risk of pre-diabetes and Type 2 diabetes. Dr Federica Amati, the head nutritionist and global head of communications at Zoe, explains: 'If you consume these products every so often, they're unlikely to do much harm – or good. However, if you're having several cans every day, we don't really know what effects they might have, but it's unlikely to be neutral. These drinks are still providing liquid calories, which we know contribute to worse metabolic health outcomes compared with drinking water, tea or coffee, for example. 'Consuming any sugar and energy in liquid is more harmful for health,' says Dr Amati. 'This is because you can consume them quickly, and we know that the speed you eat – or in this case, drink – increases the risk of weight gain. One can every now and then is only contributing a small amount to our overall dietary pattern, but I wouldn't make this my main drink of choice. It's worth noting that low-alcohol beers do still contain some alcohol. It's in small amounts, but it may still have some negative effects.' The verdict: are non-alcoholic beers really bad for you? Dr Amati concludes: 'In nutrition, the most important question is 'what is it replacing?' If you swap standard beer for non-alcoholic beer, it's absolutely a healthier option. No question. If you swap regular fizzy pop for low-alcohol beer, that's probably a little better. But if you swapped low-alcohol beer for water or kombucha, that's even healthier. 'As with any soft drinks, moderation is key. But if you love the taste of beer, and it's replacing regular beer, you're making a solid choice.'
Rhyl Journal
41 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Are you brewing your tea wrong? Quarter of Brits are
The research commissioned by the supermarket found that nearly three quarters of Brits (72%) drink an average of four cups a day, with 78% so passionate about a good brew that they give exact instructions when someone offers to make them a cup to make sure they get it right. Almost a quarter (22%) of those who make tea are doing it wrong by putting the milk in first and English Breakfast (67%) is the go-to brew. Of those asked, 78% add the water first before letting the bag stew for two minutes to achieve the ultimate shade - classic builders (toffee brown), the supermarket shared. Nearly half agreed that a splash of semi-skimmed milk should then be added to help bring the temperature down to 57 degrees which is considered the perfect drinking temperature. Two in five (38%) of tea drinkers revealed they prefer their brew with no sugar at all, while almost a quarter (22%) take two sugars. Jo Bryant, an etiquette consultant, said: 'It's clear that tea remains a very important part of our lives, with the average Brit consuming a staggering 1,460 cups a year, and each tea-drinker has their own particulars about how they have their tea. 'I'm with the majority as I love a cup of English Breakfast tea, freshly-brewed for around two minutes, with a moderate amount of milk – and it's always tea first, milk last. 'It is good manners when making someone else a cup of tea to check how they like it. Most people simply ask about milk and sugar, but it is better tea-making etiquette to also enquire about strength and any other preferences 'Try to take the time to make perfect brews for friends, colleagues and family, and make sure you remember just how they like it for next time.' While tea remains a constant in British lives, the way the nation is consuming it seems to be changing, with several tea traditions falling out of favour. Drinking two or more cups of tea per day is linked with a lower risk of death, compared with not drinking tea, according to a recent study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine,' says the British Heart Foundation. The charity added: 'Tea is known to contain beneficial compounds, such as antioxidants, that boost your overall health. 'Previous studies in China and Japan have suggested that drinking green tea regularly is linked with better health and a lower risk of dying. 'But past studies focusing on populations that mostly drink black tea haven't given clear results.' Recommended reading: Scientists claim drinking tea releases billions of microplastics into our bodies The best cup of tea? I blind tested 7 to see if Yorkshire really is my favourite 'Do not eat': Popular snacks recalled in the UK due to salmonella contamination Below are the tea traditions that are becoming less popular, according to Aldi. How many of these still apply to your tea-making routine? Let us know in the comments.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Too late to fix Guernsey hospital project black hole, says deputy
The new president of Guernsey's Health and Social Care Committee (HSC) has conceded there was "no political oversight" of the first phase of the hospital modernisation week the BBC revealed the project to build a new critical care unit was delayed because of problems with the building work. Deputy George Oswald, who was a non-States member of the last HSC committee, said "the States does not handle big budget projects well". "I think the problem is lack of resourcing, we try and do things on the cheap probably because we know we're a small island with a small community and not a lot of money," he said. HSC said "sadly but unavoidably, the CCU would continue to be delayed until essential remedial works have been completed" but it did not give a Rihoys and Son said the work to extend the hospital had been BBC understands work is under way to fix the defects by contractors Rihoys and Son, which was commissioned to work on the full hospital modernisation was negotiating with Rihoys about how this work would be funded. Speaking about the problems, Oswald said: "We don't invest in the technical experts we need right at the beginning to ensure the project goes the right way. "I think that was very apparent in phase two."Last year it was revealed officers knew about a potential £30m overspend for phase 2 of the hospital modernisation project. It led to an inquiry which found no problems with the way the States managed big building projects and a review of the hospital project by a UK firm, which has not been publicly released. 'Technologically difficult' Oswald said: "That has now been resolved but possibly too late to influence the problem with the black hole we had and as far as I'm aware certainly didn't involve it at stage one. "It was all sourced in-house because that was the cheapest option but building hospitals and commissioning hospitals is an expensive and technologically difficult thing to do."The NHS is littered with examples of where hospital builds have gone wrong to the detriment of both the local population and also sometimes to the detriment of the builders who got themselves involved in it."
