Tushy Goes Luxe With Its Aura Electric Bidet
Another nice feature of the Aura is the instant heater, which means you never run out of warm water—this feature is a relatively recent addition to bidets, and I'm happy to see it becoming the standard.
The two things I found lacking on the Aura compared to competitors (which, to be fair, are mostly a little more expensive) were the fan and the water controls.
Photograph: Martin Cizmar
Drying fans are often the first place I notice the difference between premium bidets that cost north of grand and cheaper models. The Aura's fan is very loud (I measured it above 60 decibels on high) and yet not very powerful, taking a minute or more to dry me off.
The Aura's remote is intuitive by way of its simplicity—unlike with Toto's higher-end models, there's no way to adjust the spray's width or angle, and there are no presets for different users—but it does have the most important spray adjustments, like back, forward, and flow strength. The fan speed can also be adjusted with three clicks of one button rather than having to click the fan button and then separately adjust its speed up or down, as with the Toto. Touché Tushy
The Aura is a solid product, and I'd recommend it as a budget pick (especially if it goes on sale as often as the classic Tushys do) or an upgrade for any brand partisan looking to get into an electric bidet. For now, I take it as a welcome sign the American bidet market is maturing from the era of the 'Clean Butt Society' T-shirt toward a bright new future of heated seats, night-lights, and auto-opening toilet seats.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia (NVDA) Keeps China Market Access at a Cost, Wedbush Calls It a Smart Trade-Off
Nvidia Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is one of the best big tech stocks to buy right now. The company again came under the radar after the Trump administration asked it to pay 15% sales tax on certain semiconductors it sells to China. However, the impact appears to be quite manageable for the company. Wedbush Securities' Daniel Ives and his team believe the decision allowing Nvidia and AMD to sell certain AI chips in China removes a major obstacle for sector growth. Under the arrangement, Nvidia will pay 15% of revenue from its H20 AI chips and AMD will do the same for its MI308 chips. While the imposition raises legal and policy scrutiny, Ives sees it as a meaningful growth driver not just for these companies but for the U.S. tech sector more broadly. As per a Bloomberg report, considering the company's $5 billion quarterly relevant sales exposure to China, Nvidia might end up paying $700 million per quarter. This would barely hurt the company, which generates $20 billion in quarterly profit. Ives notes that if the previous blockade on Nvidia's H20 chip had remained, it could have created a $15 billion annual opportunity for Huawei, strengthening China's AI position and constraining U.S. firms. The current approach, he argues, strikes a balance between protecting national security and fostering American innovation. Ives frames the situation as part of an 'AI arms race' between the U.S. and China, crediting the administration for ensuring U.S. tech players remain competitive globally. He underscores that Nvidia's role as the supplier of the core AI chip worldwide gives it a unique edge, and paying 15% to maintain access to China and other strategic markets is, in his words, a small trade-off for the potential upside. Nvidia Corp. (NASDAQ:NVDA) designs and manufactures graphics processing units (GPUs), system-on-a-chip units (SoCs), and AI hardware and software. While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 13 Best Defensive Stocks to Invest in According to Analysts and 10 Best Large Cap Tech Stocks to Buy Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Global powerhouse dominates Tesla in highly anticipated EV race: 'Nobody looked at us'
Chinese automaker BYD could soon dominate the European market and add to Tesla's struggles to recapture the hearts of electric vehicle drivers. What's happening? Fortune reported that BYD is now poised to produce around 300,000 EVs per year at its factory in Szeged, Hungary, by 2030. Starting next year, it estimates it will manufacture 150,000 of its all-electric sedans annually at the facility as it continues its push to firmly topple Tesla as the tastemaker of the EV realm, marketing its compact cars as perfect for narrow European streets. Over the first five months of the year, BYD sold 55,000 cars in Europe — three times more sales than it did during the same period in 2024. "If they keep growing at this speed, Europe should expect big disruption in the coming months," said JATO Dynamics analyst Felipe Munoz. BYD executive vice president Stella Li told Fortune that many underestimated her company as a potential EV powerhouse because of its small size. "Nobody looked at us," she said. Why is this important? Back in 2011, when speaking with former Bloomberg TV anchor Betty Liu, Tesla CEO Elon Musk laughed at the idea of BYD ever being able to compete with Tesla. In later years, he seemed to have softened his stance, demonstrating just how far the EV industry has come since Tesla first gained renown in the 2000s for successfully selling and marketing its EV to the modern consumer — inspiring other automakers to follow suit. In turn, the market is filled with increasingly affordable options for people who want to make their next car an EV, and consumers are leaping at the opportunity to purchase a more eco-friendly vehicle that offers cost savings on energy and maintenance. Would you buy an EV if there were no tax incentives for getting one? Definitely No way Depends on the sticker price Depends on the range Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Last year, EV sales worldwide rose by more than 25%, according to the International Energy Agency. Still, Tesla has the largest market cap among automakers by far at more than $1 trillion, and BYD clocks in fourth with a $130.8 billion market cap. Yet BYD has begun to establish itself as a dominant force in international markets, surpassing Tesla in global sales this year, even if Musk remains bullish on his company's ability to rise above the competition. What could this mean for American-made EVs? While Tesla has factories in Europe and China, it does most of its manufacturing in the U.S., creating thousands of jobs. For his part, Musk has criticized the Donald Trump administration's tariffs as a move that will have a "significant impact" on his company, undermining domestic manufacturers' ability to compete with automakers like BYD in international markets. For now, Tesla remains the top-selling EV in the United States despite consumer backlash to Musk's involvement in politics and high-profile mishaps with the company's Robotaxi rollout. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
4 Things Schools Need To Consider When Designing AI Policies
Artificial intelligence has moved from Silicon Valley boardrooms into homes and classrooms across America. A recent Pew Research Center study reveals that 26% of American teenagers now utilize AI tools for schoolwork—twice the number from two years prior. Many schools are rushing to establish AI policies. The result? Some are creating more confusion than clarity by focusing solely on preventing cheating while ignoring broader educational opportunities AI presents. The challenge shouldn't be about whether to allow AI in schools—it should be about how to design policies that strike a balance between academic integrity and practical preparation for an AI-driven future. Here are four essential considerations for effective school AI policies. 1. Address Teacher AI Use, Not Just Student Restrictions The most significant oversight in current AI policies? They focus almost exclusively on what students can't do while completely ignoring teacher usage. This creates confusion and sends mixed messages to students and families. Most policies spend paragraphs outlining student restrictions, but fail to answer basic questions about educator usage: Can teachers use AI to create lesson plans? Are educators allowed to use AI for generating quiz questions or providing initial feedback on essays? What disclosure requirements exist when teachers use AI-generated content? When schools prohibit students from using AI while allowing teachers unrestricted access, the message becomes hypocritical. Students notice when their teacher presents an AI-generated quiz while simultaneously forbidding them from using AI for research. Parents wonder why their children face strict restrictions while educators operate without clear guidelines. If students are required to disclose AI usage in assignments, teachers should identify when they've used AI for lesson materials. This consistency builds trust and models responsible AI integration. 2. Include Students in AI Policy Development Most AI policies are written by administrators who haven't used ChatGPT for homework or witnessed peer collaboration with AI tools. This top-down approach creates rules that students either ignore or circumvent entirely. When we built AI guidelines for WITY, our AI teen entrepreneurship platform at WIT - Whatever It Takes, we worked directly with students. The result? Policies that teens understand and respect because they helped create them. Students bring critical information about real-world AI use that administrators often miss. They are aware of which platforms their classmates use, how AI supports various subjects, and where current rules create confusion. When students participate in policy creation compliance increases significantly because the rules feel collaborative rather than punitive. 3. Balance AI Guardrails With Innovation Opportunities Many AI policies resemble legal warnings more than educational frameworks. Fear-based language teaches students to view AI as a threat rather than a powerful tool requiring responsible use. Effective policies reframe restrictions as learning opportunities. Instead of "AI cannot write your essays," try "AI can help you brainstorm and organize ideas, but your analysis and voice should drive the final work." Schools that blanket-ban AI usage miss opportunities to prepare students for careers where AI literacy will be essential. AI access can vary dramatically among students. While some students have premium ChatGPT subscriptions and access to the latest tools, others may rely solely on free versions or school-provided resources. Without addressing this gap, AI policies can inadvertently increase educational inequality. 4. Build AI Literacy Into Curriculum and Family Communication In an AI-driven economy, rules alone don't prepare students for a future where AI literacy is necessary. Schools must teach students to think critically about AI outputs, understand the bias in AI systems, and recognize the appropriate applications of AI across different contexts. Parents often feel excluded from AI conversations at school, creating confusion about expectations. This is why schools should explain their AI policies in plain language, provide examples of responsible use, and offer resources for parents who want to support responsible AI use at home. When families understand the educational rationale behind AI integration—including teacher usage and transparency requirements—they become partners in developing responsible use habits rather than obstacles to overcome. AI technology changes rapidly, making static policies obsolete within months. Schools should schedule annual policy reviews that include feedback from students, teachers, and parents about both student and teacher AI usage. AI Policy Assessment Checklist School leaders should evaluate their current policies against these seven criteria: Teacher Guidelines: Do policies clearly state when and how teachers can use AI? Are disclosure requirements consistent between students and educators? Student Input: Have students participated in creating these policies? Do rules reflect actual AI usage patterns among teens? Equity Access: Can all students access the same AI tools, or do policies create advantages for families with premium subscriptions? Family Communication: Can parents easily understand the policies? Are expectations clear for home use? Are there opportunities for workshops for parents? Innovation Balance: Do policies encourage responsible experimentation or only focus on restrictions? Is the school policy focusing on preparing students for the AI-driven workforce? Regular Updates: Is there a scheduled review process as AI technology evolves? Does the school welcome feedback from students, teachers and parents? Skills Development: Do policies include plans for teaching AI literacy alongside restrictions? Who is teaching this class or workshop? Moving Forward: AI Leadership The most effective approach treats students as partners, not adversaries. When teens help create the rules they'll follow, when teachers model responsible usage, and when families understand the educational reasoning behind policies, AI becomes a learning tool rather than a source of conflict. Schools that embrace this collaborative approach will produce graduates who understand how to use AI ethically and effectively—exactly the capabilities tomorrow's economy demands.
