logo
Stanford's student newspaper sues Trump administration over use of immigration law to target pro-Palestinian students

Stanford's student newspaper sues Trump administration over use of immigration law to target pro-Palestinian students

CNNa day ago
The Middle East
Media
Student life
ImmigrationFacebookTweetLink
Follow
Stanford University's student-run newspaper sued the Trump administration on Wednesday over its decision to use part of a federal immigration law to target and deport pro-Palestinian activists, arguing the government's effort has impermissibly chilled students' First Amendment rights.
The lawsuit, filed at a federal court in California, represents the latest legal challenge to two provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act that have been key to the State and Homeland Security Departments' so-called ideological deportation policy. In several other cases brought around the country, judges have also been asked to weigh the constitutionality of the INA provisions and the administration's policy around them.
The California case was brought by the organization that publishes The Stanford Daily and two noncitizen former college students who fear their pro-Palestinian views or advocacy could put them at risk of being deported. Attorneys for the newspaper said in the lawsuit that international students on staff are turning down assignments related to the war in Gaza or 'seeking removal of their previous articles about it.'
'Since the Trump administration began targeting lawfully present noncitizens for deportation based on protected speech in March 2025, lawfully present noncitizen students working at and contributing to Stanford Daily have self-censored expression for fear of visa revocation, arrest, detention, and deportation,' attorneys from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which brought the new case, wrote in court papers.
One of the INA provisions at issue gives Secretary of State Marco Rubio the authority to decide that a noncitizen is removable if he 'personally determines' that the individual's views 'would compromise a compelling United States foreign policy interest.' The other gives the secretary the power to 'at any time, in his discretion' revoke a visa.
The Stanford Daily and the two unnamed former students are asking a federal judge to bar the administration from using the pair of provisions to deport them and any noncitizen members of the newspaper's staff based on their 'protected speech.'
'The First Amendment cements America's promise that the government may not subject a speaker to disfavored treatment because those in power do not like his or her message. And when a federal statute collides with First Amendment rights, the Constitution prevails,' the attorneys wrote.
The lawsuit comes on the heels of a weekslong bench trial in a separate case in Boston during which members of the Trump administration testified under oath about the government's targeting of noncitizen pro-Palestinian students and scholars.
The trial, which concluded on July 21, highlighted how DHS began taking orders from the State Department as it went after certain professors and students to change their immigration status and work to have them deported. US District Judge William Young, an appointee of former President Ronald Reagan, is now deciding whether the government's 'ideological deportation policy' had the effect of unlawfully chilling the speech of certain professors.
The attorneys in that case say the administration's actions toward pro-Palestinian activists on college campuses have targeted potentially hundreds of noncitizens.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Threatens 100% Semiconductor Tariff—Why Chip Stocks Are Still Rising
Trump Threatens 100% Semiconductor Tariff—Why Chip Stocks Are Still Rising

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Threatens 100% Semiconductor Tariff—Why Chip Stocks Are Still Rising

Key Takeaways Chip stocks advanced Thursday after President Donald Trump said companies that commit to manufacturing in the U.S. will be exempt from 100% tariffs on imported semiconductors. Trump's announcement was light on details about how the tariffs and exemptions would work, but analysts expect clarity within the next week. Wall Street analysts were optimistic that the vast majority of chip designers and manufacturers would win exemptions from manufacturing commitments or by contracting with U.S.-based stocks rose on Thursday, the day after President Donald Trump said companies that manufacture in the U.S. or have committed to doing so will be exempt from 100% semiconductor tariffs. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors. But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge,' Trump said during a White House press conference Wednesday afternoon. The tariffs were disclosed alongside Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook, who appeared with Trump to announce plans to invest $100 billion in U.S. manufacturing, on top of the $500 billion committed earlier this year. President Trump's off-the-cuff announcement was light on details. For example, it was unclear whether existing commitments to manufacture in America would be sufficient, or if the president wants chipmakers to make new investments to win an exemption. It also remains unclear whether the tariffs and exemptions apply to electronics that contain semiconductors, or just the chips themselves, according to Jefferies analysts. "We await full details likely in the next week or so before jumping to any conclusions, as it has always been a bad move to extrapolate too much from Trump's words or social media post[s]," said Angelo Zino, senior vice president and equity analyst at CFRA Research. Nonetheless, investors seemed to think Wednesday's announcement removed a significant overhang for semiconductor stocks. The PHLX Semiconductor Index (SOX) was up 1.2% in recent trading. AI chip giants Nvidia (NVDA) and Broadcom (AVGO) were recently both up about 0.5%, though down from their earlier highs, while competitor Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) jumped 5%. Contract chip manufacturer Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSM) also advanced 5%, and manufacturing equipment maker Applied Materials (AMAT) rose more than 2%. Which Chipmakers Will Be Affected? 'From a high level, the 100% headline number seems intimidating, but in practice we expect a much lower impact,' wrote Bank of America Securities analysts in a note on Wednesday. U.S.-based companies with domestic manufacturing capacity, such as Intel (INTC), Micron (MU), and Texas Instruments (TXN), should not be affected by the tariffs, according to Citigroup analysts. And fabless chip designers, including giants Nvidia, AMD, Broadcom, and Qualcomm (QCOM), should also be able to avoid the tariffs by contracting with major foundries like TSMC, Samsung, and GlobalFoundries (GFS), all of which have U.S. manufacturing facilities. "If Taiwan Semi does get a full exemption ... it would bode well for the broader tech semiconductor/hardware ecosystem and our positive stance on the space," Zino of CFRA said. Even European semiconductor companies without a U.S. presence are expected to be spared the 100% levy. The EU-U.S. trade deal announced late last month capped semiconductor tariffs at 15% and guaranteed zero-for-zero tariffs for semiconductor equipment makers like Netherlands-based ASML (ASML). European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill on Thursday reportedly said the Trump administration had guaranteed that the 15% cap established by the trade deal would not be overwritten by other tariffs. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

One Of Trump's Biggest Celebrity Fans Just Signed Up To Be An ICE Officer
One Of Trump's Biggest Celebrity Fans Just Signed Up To Be An ICE Officer

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

One Of Trump's Biggest Celebrity Fans Just Signed Up To Be An ICE Officer

ICE has been ramping up efforts to recruit new agents. They've gotten rid of the age cap. They're offering studen loan forgiveness and a $50,000 sign up bonus. Related: They're saying you don't need an undergraduate degree. And they're using South Park pics to entice anyone to join. Well, one of Trump's *famous* fans says he's signed up. In case you didn't know, Dean Cain is best known for playing Superman in the early '90s series Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman. Related: Nowadays, he's a permanent Trump fanboy, tweeting stuff like this: This: And this: Related: Now, he's joining ICE. Cain told Jesse Watters on Fox, "I put out a recruitment video yesterday. I'm actually a sworn deputy sheriff and a reserve police officer. I wasn't part of ICE, but once I put that out there and you put a little blurb on your show, it went crazy. So now I've spoken with some officials over at ICE, and I will be sworn in as an ICE agent ASAP. So they'll have 88,001 recruits for their 10,000 positions." "Are you gonna be hopping out of ICE vans and apprehending guys?" Watters asks. "I will do Director Lyons tells me what to do. If that what it takes. Absolutely, I somehow doubt I'll be in that position, but I'll be there in a heartbeat." Later in the interview, Watters asks, "What is it about serving this country that is inspiring to you?" Related: "This country was built on patriots stepping up, whether it was popular or not, and doing the right thing. I truly believe this is the right thing. Listen, the United States takes in more legal immigrants than the next four countries combined," he says. "We have a broken immigration system. Congress needs to fix it, but in the interim, President Trump ran on this. He is delivering on this. This is what people voted for. It's what I voted for, and he's going to see it through, and I'll do my part and help him make sure it happens." So, there you have it, Dean Cain is joining ICE. Let's see if Roseanne steps up next! Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Solve the daily Crossword

Fox News Files to Dismiss Gavin Newsom's $787 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against Jesse Watters
Fox News Files to Dismiss Gavin Newsom's $787 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against Jesse Watters

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fox News Files to Dismiss Gavin Newsom's $787 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against Jesse Watters

The news organization calls the governor's effort a "political stunt" that should be dropped Fox News has filed a motion to get California Gov. Gavin Newsom's $787 million defamation lawsuit against host Jesse Watters dismissed, TheWrap has learned. On Tuesday, on behalf of Watters, Fox News submitted a motion to dismiss Newsom's suit, which Newsom filed back in June as a legal response to the broadcaster allegedly claiming that the politician never had a phone conversation with President Donald Trump regarding the ongoing ICE raids in Los Angeles and the president's subsequent deployment of the National Guard. More from TheWrap Fox News Files to Dismiss Gavin Newsom's $787 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against Jesse Watters Diddy's Lead Attorney Calls Cassie Relationship a 'Modern Love Story' in First Network Interview Since Trial | Video Harvey Weinstein Sues 'Finding Neverland' National Tour Producers, Alleges $2.3 Million in Withheld Payments Trump Agrees to Delay Rupert Murdoch's Deposition Over WSJ, Epstein Libel Lawsuit Per Washington Post reporter, Jeremy Barr, the news organization called the governor's move a 'political stunt,' adding that the suit should be dismissed because it was supposedly filed in the wrong state, Delaware. '[Gavin] Newsom cannot create conditions ripe for confusion or misinterpretation and then demand a $787 million ransom from a news organization taking his words at face value,' the network claimed in the filing according to Barr's reporting. In addition, Fox News claimed that Newsom can't prove that Watters was aware that it was wrong to state that Newsom was 'lying.' 'The tone and content of Newsom's complaint and his conduct underscore that the purpose of this lawsuit is to create a press spectacle and harass Fox News, not to remedy any legitimate reputational harm,' Barr reports. The California governor responded to motion calling the filing desperate and accused Fox News of remaining 'committed to distorting the truth.' 'Fox's motion reveals their desperation and that they remain committed to distorting the truth on Donald Trump's behalf,' Newsom shared in a statement with TheWrap regarding the motion to dismiss. 'They should face consequences — just like they did in the Dominion case. Until Fox is willing to be truthful, I will keep fighting against their propaganda machine. We will see them in court.' Per Newsom's lawsuit, as TheWrap previously reported, Newsom stated that he last spoke to the president on June 7 for about 16 minutes; the call came a day after President Trump sent 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to counter protesters amid the anti-ICE demonstrations that happened in the city. Later, on June 10, Trump said he spoke to Newsom 'a day ago,' which Newsom pushed back against. Watters then asked on air, 'Why would Newsom lie and claim Trump never called him?' while flashing a screenshot of Trump's June 7 call with Newsom on the screen, which had been obtained by Fox News reporter John Roberts. That move, according to Newsom's attorneys, fits the legal standard for defamation. His lawsuit, filed in Delaware Superior Court, the same state in which Fox News is incorporated, said the broadcast hurt his standing in the eyes of voters, which could cost him in future elections. Watters' reporting also violated California's Unfair Competition Law, which prohibits 'unfair, deceptive, untrue or misleading' business practices or advertising. 'Gov. Newsom's transparent publicity stunt is frivolous and designed to chill free speech critical of him,' a Fox News spokesperson said in a statement at the time. 'We will defend this case vigorously and look forward to it being dismissed.' A person familiar with Newsom's lawsuit said he is pursuing legal action in a personal capacity and that his office is not involved. In a letter sent to Fox News at the time, Newsom's attorneys Mark Bankson and Michael Teter blasted President Trump as a 'near-octogenarian with a history of delusionary public statements and unhinged late-night social media screeds' who might easily confuse his dates. 'But Fox's decision to cover up for President Trump's error cannot be so easily dismissed.' The post Fox News Files to Dismiss Gavin Newsom's $787 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against Jesse Watters appeared first on TheWrap.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store