logo
N. Korean POW says used anti-drone jamming guns in battle against Ukraine: lawmaker

N. Korean POW says used anti-drone jamming guns in battle against Ukraine: lawmaker

Korea Herald07-03-2025

A North Korean soldier captured by Ukraine has said he used jamming guns to neutralize Ukrainian drones, a South Korean lawmaker who recently met the soldier said Friday, in a rare glimpse into the North's battlefield tactic to aid Moscow's war against Kyiv.
Rep. Yu Yong-weon of the ruling People Power Party made the remark in an interview with Yonhap News Agency as he released an audio clip of his talks with the soldier, identified only by his surname Ri. Ri is one of the two North Korean soldiers captured by Ukrainian forces in January during combat against Kyiv in Russia's Kursk region.
"The prisoners of war captured belong to the Reconnaissance General Bureau, and it appears that the Russian military provided them with weapons from its special forces," Yu said following his trip to Ukraine from Feb. 23-26.
"This shows that the North Korean soldiers were not simply suffering defeats but were also using jamming technology and that they are learning through such experiences."
Ri told Yu there were six drone-jamming guns in his company, and that the drones were "taken down easily at first, but it seemed like the Ukrainian troops changed the frequency because they didn't go down as well as they did."
North Korean troops were initially believed to lack understanding of drones, according to an assessment by South Korea's spy agency in January. Ri's comments reveal for the first time that North Korean soldiers have been using drone jamming guns supplied by the Russian military on the battlefield.
"The North Korean soldiers are being deployed, shedding blood, suffering enormous sacrifices and gaining real combat experience," Yu said. "If a significant number of these North Korean soldiers return to North Korea alive, they could pose a direct threat to us in the event of a contingency in the future."
Ri also told Yu about the role of Russian troops within the joint unit of North Korean and Russian troops, saying there were seven Russian soldiers assigned to his company to help communicate with their authorities, coordinate artillery support, provide logistical support, conduct reconnaissance with drones and share reconnaissance data with North Korean soldiers.
Ri, however, said the artillery shells supported by the Russian military did not land accurately on the coordinates and fell in random areas.
"This shows North Korean troops were being used as a kind of cannon fodder," Yu said, pointing out such "ineffective" support from Russia likely increased the casualties of North Korean soldiers.
Yu also recounted his first time meeting Ri and another captured soldier, identified by his surname Paek.
The two soldiers were held captive in a building used for prisoners of war, which was originally a prison, and lacking in heating, hot water and ventilation. They were kept in solitary confinement in separate cells located three or four rooms apart and were unaware of each other's presence.
The lawmaker said he was dumbfounded for a moment when Ri asked whether he could go to South Korea and live as he hoped as it was unprecedented for a prisoner of war to come to the South since the 1953 Armistice Agreement with the North.
Yu said he reassured Ri, telling him not to worry and that he will live well in South Korea.
Yu also said he visited a drone factory during his trip and witnessed how drone technology and advanced warfare were evolving in Ukraine.
"The drone technology I saw in the field is advancing rapidly, but our military is not keeping pace," he said.
"We should send an expert team to Ukraine to analyze the war even if it's a small number so that our military can learn from them." (Yonhap)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

[Editorial] Build confidence
[Editorial] Build confidence

Korea Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

[Editorial] Build confidence

Lee should use G7 summit to cement US alliance, free world's trust in Korea President Lee Jae-myung will attend the summit of the Group of Seven advanced countries in Alberta, Canada, from June 15-17. It will mark Lee's debut on the stage of summit diplomacy 11 days after he took office Wednesday. South Korea is not a G7 member state but was invited to participate as an observer. The summit is an opportunity for Lee to start building confidence with leaders of the seven major countries -- Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK and the US. Particularly, his first face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump will be significant. The presidential office is said to be pushing to hold bilateral talks with Trump on the sidelines of the summit. As Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is scheduled to attend the summit, a trilateral meeting among leaders of South Korea, the US and Japan could also be held. Lee had his first phone call with Trump Friday night, three days after his presidential inauguration. Trump congratulated Lee on his election victory, according to the presidential office. But considering that Lee's predecessors first spoke on the phone with US presidents usually on the day they won their elections or the day after, the Lee-Trump phone call came exceptionally late. Shortly after the presidential election, the White House said the US remains concerned about and opposed to Chinese interference and influence in democracies around the world. It is uncertain if the US is suspicious of Lee's past remarks about or attitude toward China. Last year, he said something to the effect that the Taiwan Strait issues are none of South Korea's business. The US alliance, together with three-way cooperation among Seoul, Washington and Tokyo, is the bedrock of South Korea's national security. Lee should reaffirm and further strengthen the alliance. That's also a way to gain the confidence of G7 leaders. Cooperation with the US across almost all areas, including diplomacy, security and economy, is indispensable for South Korea. If trust is weak between the South Korean and US leaders, it will become difficult to find breakthroughs on key pending issues such as defense cost-sharing and trade negotiations. High-level communications are more urgent than ever to prevent mutual misunderstandings and to keep Korea's security environment stable. Smooth communication stems from unshakable trust among leaders. These days, Washington emphasizes strategic flexibility for US Forces Korea. This suggests the possibility of extending their role beyond the defense of South Korea. It would not be an exaggeration to say that the US has focused all its diplomatic, military and economic strategies on checking China. Seoul used to walk a tightrope between Washington and Beijing in seeking to maximize its national interests, but the Trump administration is not likely to condone such behavior anymore. In addition to a possible one-on-one meeting between Lee and Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit, the presidential office in Seoul is reportedly pushing for Lee to visit Washington. The sooner he visits Washington, the better, because there have not been summit communications for quite a long time. South Korea was invited to the G7 summit thanks to the country's elevated international stature. This means that it should live up to the free world's expectations. Lee should assure them that South Korea is on the same side as their countries. In the meantime, the country has been invited to the NATO summit in The Hague, the Netherlands, on June 24 and 25. The presidential office said that Lee has not yet decided whether to attend it. NATO is strengthening dialogue and cooperation with its four Asia Pacific partners: South Korea, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. Some of NATO member states are emerging markets for South Korea's defense and nuclear power industries. Maintaining friendly relations with them could be a shortcut to realizing the pragmatism that the new administration claims to advocate. Lee should positively consider attending the summit.

Korean battery-makers push President Lee for direct subsidies
Korean battery-makers push President Lee for direct subsidies

Korea Herald

time13 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Korean battery-makers push President Lee for direct subsidies

Korean firms seek bolder funding as Chinese rivals leverage robust government backing South Korean battery manufacturers are urging President Lee Jae-myung to act as they face slowing electric vehicle demand and intensifying competition from Chinese rivals increasingly dominating global markets. On May 31, three days before the presidential election, Lee wrote in a Facebook post, 'I will recharge the South Korean economy with K-batteries,' underscoring his belief that the battery industry is key to driving Korea's next economic leap. Lee's pledges included strengthening research and development to secure cutting-edge technologies such as all-solid-state batteries; introducing domestic production tax incentives; creating a "battery triangle belt" connecting the Chungcheong, Yeongnam, and Honam regions; increasing battery demand through energy storage systems; and nurturing the battery recycling industry. Calls for IRA-style subsidies While industry insiders are optimistic about the domestic tax incentives, they anticipate a more direct form of financial support from the government. Lee's tax benefit pledge offers tax breaks for companies producing and selling battery products in Korea, similar to the US Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit under the Inflation Reduction Act. However, AMPC also includes options like 'cash refunds' and 'third-party transfers' in addition to tax benefits. 'If we could receive cash returns, we'd have more flexibility to expand investments in global markets — particularly in the US, where rising tariffs on automobiles and parts are already dragging down the EV market,' said an industry source on condition of anonymity. The source emphasized that additional support measures are needed, pointing out that unlike China, which offers subsidies from direct funding to state-led R&D programs, the Korean government has only granted corporate tax credits. Under the Act on Restriction on Special Cases Concerning Taxation, the battery industry is designated a national strategic technology, making it eligible for approximately 15 percent and 30 percent tax credits on facility investments and R&D, respectively. However, these credits apply only to companies that are generating taxable profits. In the first quarter, Korea's top three battery makers — LG Energy Solution, Samsung SDI, and SK On — all reported operating losses, even when factoring in benefits from AMPC. As a result, they are likely ineligible for domestic tax breaks, despite having collectively borrowed 49.6 trillion won ($36.5 billion) for large-scale investments both at home and abroad. Chinese surge Experts suggest that even with the battery sector's strategic importance, direct subsidies from the Korean government remain unlikely. 'Korea has traditionally been wary of direct funding due to the associated risks and concerns over misusing taxpayer money,' said Kim De-jong, a business professor at Sejong University. 'In contrast, while China provides massive subsidies, it often gains substantial control over the company's management and operations.' Kim added that more feasible alternatives to direct subsidies could include offering discounted rates on electricity and water for domestic production facilities. Meanwhile, Chinese battery giants CATL and BYD have strengthened their grip on the global EV market. According to SNE Research, CATL and BYD held market shares of 38.1 percent and 17.3 percent, respectively, as of the latest period, up from the previous year. LG Energy Solution ranked third but saw its share fall from 12.3 percent to 10.2 percent. SK On and Samsung SDI also experienced declines, with market shares dropping to 4.3 percent and 3.3 percent, respectively.

Russia advances to east-central Ukrainian region
Russia advances to east-central Ukrainian region

Korea Herald

time19 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Russia advances to east-central Ukrainian region

Russia said Sunday that its forces had advanced to the edge of the east-central Ukrainian region of Dnipropetrovsk amid a public row between Moscow and Kyiv over peace negotiations and the return of thousands of bodies of soldiers who fell in the war. Despite talk of peace, the war is stepping up with Russian forces grabbing more territory in Ukraine and Kyiv unfurling high-profile drone and sabotage attacks on Russia's nuclear-capable bomber fleet and, according to Moscow, on railways. Russia, which controls a little under one-fifth of Ukrainian territory, has taken more than 190 square kilometers of the Sumy region of northeastern Ukraine in less than a month, according to pro-Ukrainian open-source maps. Now, according to the Russian defence ministry, units of the 90th Tank Division of the Central Grouping of Russian forces have reached the western frontier of Ukraine's Donetsk region and are attacking the adjacent Dnipropetrovsk region. "The enemy does not abandon its intentions to enter the Dnipropetrovsk region," Ukraine's Southern Defense Forces said on Telegram. "Our soldiers are courageously and professionally holding their section of the front, disrupting the occupier's plans. This work does not stop for a minute." Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chair of Russia's Security Council, said the Dnipropetrovsk offensive showed that if Ukraine did not want to accept the reality of Russia's territorial gains in peace talks, then Moscow's forces would advance further. The pro-Ukrainian Deep State map showed Russian forces very close to the Dnipropetrovsk region, which had a population of more than 3 million before the war, and advancing on the city of Kostyantynivka in the Donetsk region from several directions. A Ukrainian military spokesperson, Dmytro Zaporozhets, said that Russian forces were trying to "build a bridgehead for an attack" on Kostyantynivka, an important logistical hub for the Ukrainian army. Russia on Saturday accused Ukraine of delaying the swap of prisoners of war and the return of the bodies of 12,000 dead soldiers. Ukraine denied those claims. On Sunday, Russia said it was moving bodies towards the border and television showed refrigerated trucks containing the bodies of Ukrainian soldiers on the road in the Bryansk region. Ukraine, officials said, was playing politics with the dead. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pledged to press on with prisoner exchanges. "The Russian side is therefore, like always, even in these matters, is trying to play some kind of dirty political and information game," he said in his nightly video address. "We believe that the exchanges will continue and will do everything for this. If the Russians do not stand by agreements even in humanitarian matters, it casts great doubt on all international efforts — including those by the United States in terms of talks and diplomacy." Zelenskyy said he had reviewed commanders' reports about areas hit by heavy fighting, including near Pokrovsk, targeted by Moscow for months. He said the situation was "far from easy, but everything depends on the resilience of our units." US President Donald Trump, who says he wants an end to the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II, on Thursday likened it to a fight between young children and indicated that he might have to simply let the conflict play out. Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday that he did not think Ukraine's leaders wanted peace, after accusing them of ordering a bombing in Bryansk, western Russia, that killed seven people and injured 115 a day before talks in Turkey. Ukraine, which has not commented on the attack on a Bryansk bridge, has similarly accused Moscow of not seriously seeking peace, citing Russian resistance to an immediate ceasefire. Russia is demanding international recognition of Crimea, a peninsula it annexed from Ukraine in 2014, and four other regions of Ukraine that Moscow has claimed as its own territory. Ukraine would have to withdraw its forces from all of them. Russia controlled 113,273 square kilometers, or 18.8 percent, of Ukrainian territory as of June 7, according to the Deep State map. That is an area bigger than the U.S. state of Virginia. The areas under Russian control include Crimea, more than 99 percent of the Luhansk region, over 70 percent of the Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, all in the east or southeast, and fragments of the Kharkiv and Sumy regions in the northeast. Putin told Trump on Wednesday that he would have to respond to Ukrainian drone attacks on Russia's bomber fleet and the bombings of the railways. Zelenskyy warned Ukrainians in his video message to be particularly attentive to air raid warnings in the coming days. The US believes that Putin's threatened retaliation against Ukraine over its attacks has not happened yet in earnest and is likely to be a significant, multipronged strike, US officials told Reuters. (Reuters)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store