logo
'I'm a victim of cuckooing - I'm ashamed, my Thornton Heath home wasn't mine anymore'

'I'm a victim of cuckooing - I'm ashamed, my Thornton Heath home wasn't mine anymore'

Yahooa day ago
'I felt like it wasn't my home anymore. It was awful. I felt ashamed that I let the situation happen... I'm a grown man,' Richard said, talking to me in his small flat in Thornton Heath.
Richard, whose real name we aren't using for his safety, was a victim of cuckooing, where criminals take over a vulnerable person's home to deal, store or take drugs.
Richard's vulnerability due to his mental health – he said he 'hears voices' - was exploited by a group of people who used his home as a drug den.
'It started when they knocked on my door. They were homeless, or so they said, so I let them stay for a little bit but they started to take over. I didn't say anything - I thought they would just leave eventually... out of politeness - but they started inviting their friends over and would stay for nights at a time,' Richard said.
'They used to sit outside the front door smoking. The neighbours blamed me. I felt so embarrassed. I eventually asked them to leave. They wouldn't. It got confrontational and we had a few scuffles.'
The group came and went from Richard's home as if it belonged to them for over a year but Richard is hopeful that's now over following a police intervention.
Chief Inspector James Weston, whose team were called to Richard's flat on June 29, said: 'We found three drug users inside along with a zombie knife.
'Two of them were on his sofa and one was on the bed next to it, so Richard didn't even have anywhere to sit. These criminals completely take over the home.'
Richard said the group have returned since the police visit but he stood firm and turned them away.
But with Thornton Heath and surrounding areas being a hot spot for county lines operations, many other vulnerable people have found themselves in the same position as Richard.
I joined Met Police and Croydon Council officers on Tuesday, August 5, as they made visits to addresses which have been cuckooed in the past with the aim of safeguarding the victims and building intel to target the perpetrators.
It took us to the home of a man in his late 60s – we'll call him Andy rather than his real name - who was very vulnerable because of a brain injury.
Just days before our visit, officers attended Andy's home following a call about his welfare from a concerned neighbour.
When police knocked on his door a man jumped out of the window and ran away, officers then found two zombie knives at the scene.
On returning to Andy's address a few days later, we saw evidence that his living room had been taken over by drug dealers.
A large amount of white powder – most likely a cutting agent to mix with drugs – was found alongside other drug paraphernalia and a broken knuckle duster.
A knuckle duster found in Andy's home (Image: Newsquest) The lightbulb was removed from the living room, which officers believed may have been an attempt by the drug dealers to make the room unusable for Andy – who said 'I don't sit in the living room, I just sit in my bedroom.'
Sergeant George Bartlett said: 'He's a prisoner in his own home, and he's not the only one.'
Cuckooing victims are frequently subjected to threats or actual violence and abuse to keep them compliant.
Often the victims are substance abusers, but people with disabilities are also seen as fair game for these criminals.
In Andy and Richard's cases the police have been able to put a stop to the abuse before it escalated any further, but in September of last year a woman in north London a suspected cuckooing victim jumped to her death from her balcony.
Sergeant Bartlett said local officers team are committed to stamping out cuckooing in the Croydon.
'If we can work together – local officers, the local authority, county lines, Project Adder (addiction, diversion, disruption, enforcement and recovery) - we can help,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Coward' jailed for robbing elderly deaf woman at Westminster Tube station in central London
‘Coward' jailed for robbing elderly deaf woman at Westminster Tube station in central London

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Coward' jailed for robbing elderly deaf woman at Westminster Tube station in central London

A 'cowardly' robber has been jailed for targeting an elderly deaf woman on the escalators of Westminster Tube station in central London. Liam McGuicken, 53, stalked the victim in her 80s from behind as she travelled down towards the platform. Her companion, also deaf, was unaware of what had been occurring behind them. McGuicken put his hands against the woman's chest, pinning her against the handrail. She couldn't hear what he was saying, but turned her face away in fear. McGuicken reached into a coat pocket and stole her wallet before getting off of the escalator at the bottom. As he got an escalator back up to the London Underground station's exit, CCTV footage shows him rifling through the purse. McGuicken, of no fixed address, was arrested a month later at Sutton railway station after he was stopped by officers in connection with fare evasion. At Inner London Crown Court on Friday, he was sentenced to 16 months imprisonment, having pleaded guilty at an earlier hearing. British Transport Police Detective Inspector Alan Judd said: 'McGuicken sickeningly targeted an elderly deaf woman as she was making her way through the station, cowardly choosing to target a vulnerable woman for his own gain. 'I'm very pleased with the result, and I sincerely hope McGuicken takes this opportunity to change. 'His conviction sends a strong message that robbery will not be tolerated on the railway network.' Anyone who is the victim of a robbery or who witnessed one, can call BTP on 0800 40 50 40, or text 61016.

Street preacher who lost Spectator libel case to challenge High Court ruling
Street preacher who lost Spectator libel case to challenge High Court ruling

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Street preacher who lost Spectator libel case to challenge High Court ruling

An Islamic street preacher who lost a High Court libel case against The Spectator and the magazine's associate editor has said he will be appealing against the decision. Mohammed Hegab, known online as Mohammed Hijab, sued the publication and Douglas Murray over an article that alleged he was a 'street agitator' who whipped up his followers and made disparaging comments about Hindus in the wake of the 2022 Leicester riots, which he denied. In a ruling last week, Mr Justice Johnson found that the article from September 2022 was 'defamatory' at common law, but dismissed the claim. He said: 'The publication has not caused, and is not now likely to cause, serious harm to the claimant's reputation. 'In any event, it is substantially true, and it is not materially inaccurate.' The judge also found that, as a witness, Mr Hegab was 'combative and constantly argumentative'. In his written judgment, he said: 'He sought, at every turn, to debate with counsel, responding to questions with rhetorical questions of his own, arguing his case rather than giving straightforward responses, and denigrating the character of the second defendant to whom he bears palpable personal animosity. 'I am satisfied that he lied on significant issues, with the consequence that his evidence, overall, is worthless.' In a YouTube video posted on Wednesday, Mr Hegab said he had 'learned a lot' from the process, adding that he would be appealing against the ruling. He said: 'I didn't expect it to go that way. I was very disappointed, very disheartened with the ruling.' He added: 'I will be appealing this judgment.' In the clip, Mr Hegab also accused the judge of being biased, adding that he had made the mistake of 'putting a bit too much trust in the justice systems in the West'. The defamation trial centred around a video Mr Hegab made amid violence between Muslims and Hindus in Leicester in the summer of 2022, which was sparked after India won a cricket match against Pakistan in August that year. In it, he said: 'If they believe in reincarnation … what a humiliation and pathetic thing for them to be reincarnated into some pathetic, weak, cowardly people like that. 'I'd rather be an animal. I'd rather be reincarnated as a grasshopper…' During the trial in London, Mr Hegab claimed it was clear from the context that he was not talking about Hindus, but Hindutva, an extremist far-right ideology. But Mr Justice Johnson said that Mr Hegab 'knew exactly what he was doing' and 'chose his words deliberately'.

What we know as Paul Doyle faces 24 new charges over Liverpool car incident
What we know as Paul Doyle faces 24 new charges over Liverpool car incident

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What we know as Paul Doyle faces 24 new charges over Liverpool car incident

Doyle, 53, of the West Derby area of Liverpool, is set to face trial in November. Paul Doyle, the man accused of being the driver who ploughed into crowds at the Liverpool FC victory parade, is facing an additional 24 charges. Doyle, 53, appeared via videolink from prison for the hearing at Liverpool Crown Court on Thursday. He was in tears as the charges, including two relating to alleged victims who were babies, were read out to him. He was originally charged with seven offences after the incident on Water Street in the city centre just after 6pm on Monday, 26 May. Doyle, wearing a grey T-shirt, did not enter any pleas during the hearing, which lasted about 20 minutes. He appeared to be struggling to speak through tears as he confirmed his name at the start of the hearing. Recorder of Liverpool Judge Andrew Menary KC adjourned the case until 4 September, when Doyle is expected to enter pleas. Earlier this year, a provisional trial date was fixed for 24 November, and the case is expected to last three to four weeks. Doyle is reported to be a local businessman who has three children. He is believed to be a former Royal Marine who went on to become an IT security consultant. What happened during the Liverpool trophy parade crash? On 26 May, Liverpool's Premier League victory parade was the location of a a crash in the centre of the city. At around 6pm, Doyle allegedly drove a grey Ford Galaxy minivan into a crowd on Water Street, just after the open-top bus carrying Liverpool players had passed through the area. The vehicle, which had followed an ambulance through a temporarily lifted roadblock, struck pedestrians, injuring 134 people, including four children. Fifty people, among them an 11-year-old and a 17-year-old, were hospitalised, with four initially in serious condition. Firefighters lifted the vehicle to free three adults and one child trapped underneath at around 7pm – an hour after the crash. Merseyside Police ruled out terrorism before Doyle was arrested and later charged on 29 May. What is Paul Doyle charged with and what are the punishments? Doyle, whose full name is Paul Desmond Sanders Doyle, of Croxteth, Liverpool, was previously charged with six counts that are all contrary to Section 18 of the Offences Against The Person Act 1861. But the new indictment, which was not read out in court, has 31 counts relating to 29 victims, aged between six months and 77. Doyle is charged with 19 counts of attempting to cause grievous bodily harm, seven counts of causing grievous bodily harm with intent, three counts of wounding with intent, one count of dangerous driving and one count of affray. Sentencing for the grievous bodily harm and wounding with intent offences can range from two to 16 years in prison, with a maximum of life imprisonment. Sentencing for these crimes depends on the court assessing the level of harm caused to the victim, both physical and psychological. Any aggravating factors can also affect a sentence, including whether a suspect has any previous convictions, any motivations for the offence and who it was carried out against, as well as the presence of children, and whether the perpetrator was under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The court will also take into account mitigating factors like remorse, positive character, and any difficult personal circumstances. Dangerous driving carries a maximum sentence of two years in prison, with sentencing ranging from a community order to the maximum two years. Someone convicted of this offence will also be disqualified from driving for a minimum of a year. Affray, a public order offence involving violence or the threat of violence, carries a maximum sentence of three years in custody in the UK. However, sentencing can range from a fine to a custodial sentence, depending on the severity and aggravating factor The CPS said the charges would be kept 'under review as the investigation progresses'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store