Operation Sindoor: Pakistan exposed over Sajid Mir terror links and FATF grey list deception
NEW DELHI: In a cat-and-mouse game of global deception,
Pakistan
's shifting narrative on Sajid Mir left it exposed, as pointed out by Foreign Secretary
Vikram Misri
on Wednesday, and left the world questioning the country's claims of combating terrorism.
Once claimed to be a non-entity, Mir was abruptly declared dead in a brazen attempt to shield him from accountability.
Operation Sindoor
'Op Sindoor's precision & execution was unimaginable': Rajnath Singh
Operation Sindoor: India repels drone, missile attack across LoC
Operation Sindoor: Several airports in India closed - check full list
The truth eventually caught up, and Mir was 'arrested' by Pakistan's authorities, exposing the Pak govt's long-standing charade. As the veil of secrecy lifted, the world got a glimpse into the shadowy world of state-sponsored terror, where 26/11 plotters like Mir operated with impunity and the Pak govt played a game of denial and deception.
According to sources, the acceptance of Mir's existence was a desperate attempt by Pakistan to get out of the grey list of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an intergovernmental entity which tracks terror financing and money laundering. Mir was, on paper, lodged in central jail, also known as
Kot Lakhpat
jail in Lahore, after being 'sentenced' for eight years by an "anti-terrorism court" of Pakistan on charges of terror financing. He was detained in April 2022 in a hush-hush affair while the prison term was awarded in June just before a meeting of the FATF.
Mir, who has a five million dollar bounty on his head announced by the FBI, is wanted even by the US govt. The FBI described Mir as someone who once wore a beard and hair down to his shoulders. He, according to the FBI, altered his appearance through plastic surgery.
The US has held Mir responsible for directing preparations and reconnaissance and being one of the Pakistan-based controllers during the 26/11 attacks. Additionally, Mir conspired to commit a terrorist attack against a newspaper and its employees in Denmark between 2008 and 2009.
Mir, who would currently be in his early 50s, was LeT's foreign recruiter and the main handler for American terrorist David Coleman Headley, alias Dawood Gilani. A US Justice Department document mentions how the 26/11 attackers were in real-time telephonic contact with Mir and his associates, Abu Qahafa and
Mazhar Iqbal
, during the attack. On Mir's advice, Headley, then based in Pennsylvania, changed his given name of 'Dawood Gilani' to 'David Coleman Headley' in order to facilitate his activities on behalf of
Lashkar
by enabling him to present himself in India as an American who was neither Muslim nor Pakistani.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Innovation takes a backseat at small companies as tariffs become a full-time preoccupation
Toy robots that teach children to code. Sneakers made in America. Mold-resistant kitchen gadgets. The three items are among new products that have gotten stuck in the pipeline due to President Donald Trump 's unpredictable trade policies, according to the brand founders behind the stalled items. They say that instead of fostering U.S. innovation, Trump's tariffs are stifling it with extra costs and unexpected work. At Learning Resources in Vernon Hills, Illinois, Made Plus in Annapolis, Maryland, and Dorai Home in Salt Lake City, research and development have taken a backseat to recalculating budgets, negotiating with vendors and tracking shipments in the shifting tariff environment. "If we don't have enough cash to cover just the restocks of the things that we know we need, do we want to take a risk on this new thing when we don't know how well it will sell yet?" Dorai Home founder Kelsey O'Callaghan said. O'Callaghan started the eco-friendly home goods company with a stone bath mat and now offers about 50 kitchen and bathroom accessories, which are made in China with a non-toxic material that dries quickly. New launches are critical to increasing sales and attracting customers, she said. As Trump increased the tariff on Chinese goods to 20% and as high as 145% before reducing the import tax rate to 30% for 90 days, Dorai Home postponed introducing new merchandise. O'Callaghan said she had to lay off the CEO as well as the head of product development, who helped the company jump on new trends. "I haven't really put the time or the emphasis on (innovation) because I'm covering too many other people's roles," she said. The company paused shipments from China in early April but resumed some on a staggered basis after the president's rate reduction. On Wednesday, Trump touted progress in U.S.-China trade talks. With details still sketchy and a deal not finalized, entrepreneurs interviewed by The Associated Press said they viewed the tariffs war as an ongoing threat. Tariffs and American innovation The potential stunting of innovation follows an economic slowdown during the coronavirus pandemic, when companies also had to put projects on hold. Some experts think the on-again-off again tariffs may have more enduring consequences because they rewire markets and upend business strategies. "When executive attention shifts from innovation to regulatory compliance, the innovation pipeline suffers. Companies end up optimizing for the political landscape rather than technological advancement," economists J. Bradford Jensen, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics , and Scott J. Wallsten, president of the Technology Policy Institute think tank, wrote in an April blog post. Trump has argued that curtailing foreign imports with tariffs would help revive the nation's diminished manufacturing base. Analysts and various trade groups have warned that fractured trade ties and supply chains may depress R&D activity of U.S. tech and health care companies that rely on international partnerships or foreign suppliers. Small companies, which often drive the innovations that create jobs and economic growth, already are under strain. With fewer people on staff and tighter budgets compared to large corporations, entrepreneurs say they are spending more time on cutting costs, suspending or arranging orders, and deciding how much of their tariff-related costs to charge customers. That means they're spending less time thinking of their next big ideas. Schylling Inc., a Massachusetts company that produces modern versions of Lava lamps, Sea-Monkeys, My Little Pony and other nostalgic toys, has its products made in China. As part of its strategy to account for tariffs, the company put a group of employees on temporary unpaid leave last month to reduce expenses. Beth Muehlenkamp, who was marketing director at the company, was one of them, but now she and several others who were furloughed, were permanently laid off early this month. She noted that she and other staff members typically would have been planning products for the final months of 2026. But Schylling isn't focusing on designing new products given the unstable trade outlook. "It's really hard to focus on innovation and creativity when you're consumed with this day-to-day of how we're just going to balance the books and deal with the changing rates," Muehlenkamp said. An uneven product pipeline Even some companies that do their manufacturing in the U.S. are scaling back investments in new products. Made Plus, a Maryland company that makes athletic shoes at a small factory in the state capital, put a planned golf line on hold because two key components - a foam insole and the tread for the bottom of the shoe - currently are made in China, founder Alan Guyan said. The company customizes its shoes on demand and charges $145 to $200 a pair. The footwear is made from recycled plastic bottles with advanced knitting, 3D printing and computerized stitching techniques. It's looking into getting components from Vietnam instead of China. Embracing new technology is essential to restoring manufacturing capability in the U.S. and competing with Asia, Guyan said. But given ongoing trade frictions, he said he does not want to invest time or money evaluating the latest embroidery and knitting machines, which come from Germany, Italy, China and the U.S. "We're just battening down the hatches a little bit and just hoping that there's enough influence in the community of footwear that it will somewhat change and get resolved and we can move forward," he said of the tariff roller coaster. In contrast, many big companies are forging on. Google parent Alphabet confirmed late last month that it still planned to spend $75 billion on capital expenditures this year, with most of the money going toward artificial intelligence technology. What's next for R&D? Sonia Lapinsky, a managing director at consulting firm AlixPartners, has advised her clients to limit tariff discussions to a small group of executives and to keep their product creation cycles in motion. Businesses have an even greater imperative to come up with attention-grabbing innovations when consumers may be reluctant to open their wallets, she said. Yet smaller companies may struggle to wall off tariff discussions from the rest of the business. Learning Resources CEO Rick Woldenberg said that roughly 25% to 30% of the 350 employees at the educational toy company's headquarters, including product developers, are working at least part-time on tariff-related tasks. The company usually develops 250 different products a year and expects to get half that many off the drawing board for 2026, Woldenberg said. While exploring factories in countries besides China, he said, Learning Resources is delaying the next generation of its interactive robots that help children develop computer programming skills through games and other activities. The family-run business and Woldenberg's other toy business, hand2Mind, are locked in a legal battle with the Trump administration. The jointly owned companies filed a lawsuit accusing the president of exceeding his authority by invoking an emergency powers law to impose tariffs. A federal judge ruled in favor of the two companies last month, and the administration has appealed the decision. Woldenberg said he's ready to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court . "It's a win at the Supreme Court that we need," he said. "And so until then, there will be no certainty. Even then, if the government is bound and determined to keep us in an uncertain situation, they'll be able to do that."
NDTV
18 minutes ago
- NDTV
Trump To Attend Security Meeting On Friday After Israeli Strikes On Iran
U.S. President Donald Trump will attend a National Security Council meeting on Friday morning, the White House said late on Thursday after Israeli strikes on Iran that have put the Middle East on edge. The meeting will be held at 11 am ET (1500 GMT) on Friday, the White House said. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT Israel said early on Friday Middle East time and late Thursday U.S. time that it had struck Iran to block Tehran from developing atomic weapons, and Iranian media and witnesses reported explosions including at the country's main uranium enrichment facility. U.S. top diplomat Marco Rubio called Israel's strikes against Iran a "unilateral action" and said Washington was not involved while also urging Tehran not to target U.S. interests or personnel in the region. The U.S. State Department said late on Thursday that the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem has directed all U.S. government employees and their family members to shelter in place until further notice. CONTEXT Trump had been seeking a new nuclear deal to place limits on Iran's disputed uranium enrichment activities but the talks have appeared to be deadlocked. Trump said earlier on Thursday an Israeli strike on Iran "could very well happen" but reiterated hopes for a peaceful resolution. The U.S. military is planning for the full range of contingencies in the Middle East, including the possibility that it might have to help evacuate American civilians, a U.S. official told Reuters. SECURITY ALERT BY U.S. EMBASSY A security alert by the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem said the security environment was complex and could change quickly. In response to security incidents and without advance notice, the U.S. embassy may further restrict or prohibit U.S. government employees and their family members from travelling to certain areas of Israel and the Israeli-occupied West Bank, the State Department said.
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
The philosopher changing free speech in Britain
A good way to understand Arif Ahmed, a philosopher, is to have visited him in his old rooms at Cambridge University. In some ways the study was standard philosopher fare: wood floors, air of faded grandeur. Peer from its paned windows and you could see King's College, where Ludwig Wittgenstein argued with Karl Popper with a poker. Wander down the street, and you'd be at Trinity, where Bertrand Russell argued with almost everyone. In many ways, Mr Ahmed was the standard philosopher. Visit him there—he was a professor based at Gonville & Caius College until 2023—and he would make you tea with mild ineptitude and talk with quiet exactitude about John Locke or free speech. But he wasn't quite typical. For one thing, he talked openly to journalists about threats to speech in universities, and had forced Cambridge to change its own policy on free speech. For another, in the corner of his room were hefty weights: this was a philosopher with muscle; a philosopher who could, if necessary, pack a punch. Last month, the punch landed. Sussex University has been fined £585,000 ($752,000) by the Office for Students (OfS), a university regulator, for 'free speech and governance breaches". It is Mr Ahmed who—having resigned his professorship in 2023 to take over as the OfS's director of free speech—is behind it. The fine is a whopper: nearly 16 times bigger than any the OfS has previously issued. Mr Ahmed, philosophically, notes that it could have been worse: 'There's potential for those fines to be higher," he says. Sussex, which is not being philosophical at all, is taking legal action against the OfS and has accused it of wanting to 'persecute" it. The choice of word is unfortunate. Sussex is well known for persecution—but chiefly for hosting it not suffering it. It was there that Kathleen Stock, a philosophy professor, was hounded so badly for her beliefs (among other things she does not consider trans women to be women) that the police told her to stay off campus. Other British universities also underwhelm; on the Academic Freedom Index produced by Friedrich-Alexander University and the V-Dem Institute Britain has, over the past decade, fallen from among the best in the world to 64th, ahead of Niger but behind Albania. This bothers Mr Ahmed: if speech is suppressed at university 'it's dangerous for the whole country"—words that would resonate powerfully on American campuses right now. That tone is, for him, unusually strong. Free speech in Britain suffers not merely from those who oppose it but from those who champion it, as their speech is often an eloquent argument for silence. A brief predecessor at the OfS was Toby Young, who has written articles with titles like 'Could I limit myself to 100 bottles of wine in a year?" and books with sentences like: 'She had Baywatch tits, perfect 34Ds". Mr Ahmed is a more muted and meritocratic choice. His parents arrived in Britain from India in the 1970s. He grew up in Somerset (as a boy, he pronounced it 'Zomerzet"), then did maths at Oxford before a PhD in philosophy at Cambridge. Unlike Lord Young, he tweets about nothing and writes articles with titles like 'Causal Decision Theory: a Counterexample". Though he too has written books appealing to the popular market, his was called 'Wittgenstein's 'Philosophical Investigations': A Reader's Guide". It was rich in phrases like: 'Let us now return to Wittgenstein's discussion of…'dispositions'." It was not rich in phrases about tits. His discussions of free speech are similarly learned—he often refers to Locke and Hume and Mill—and subtle. All Western philosophy, it has been said, is a footnote to Plato; but Mr Ahmed seems happy in the footnotes. His most famous intervention was almost a mere addendum: in 2020 he made Cambridge introduce Amendment 1 to Paragraph 2 of its free-speech policy. Which hardly sounds thrilling but was: the university was about to demand that staff and students 'be respectful of the diverse identities of others". Mr Ahmed argued that 'respectful" should be changed to 'tolerant" since 'while people should be treated with respect, ideas should not be." He forced a vote, and won. The freedom to disagree matters to him, philosophically (Locke's 'Letter Concerning Toleration" lurked behind that new wording) and personally. He was brought up Muslim, is now atheist and thinks that 'being able to talk freely about [religion] is especially important." As 'a teenager in the cold war", he was aware of 'people like Vaclav Havel", a dissident who became Czech president. In an essay on free speech, Havel considers a greengrocer who puts a 'Workers of the World, Unite!" sign, delivered from HQ, in his window. 'Why does he do it?" Havel asked. Not because he believes but to show 'I am obedient" so 'have the right to be left in peace". For Hume the bell tolls The fine on Sussex is also subtle; issued not for the egregious experience of Dr Stock but for documents that, says the OfS, could have a 'chilling effect" on free speech, such as a trans-equality policy demanding all course materials 'positively represent trans people". This might seem trivial. Mr Ahmed thinks otherwise. 'What's really important is that you don't restrict what viewpoints can be expressed." Sussex, incidentally, did not write that policy itself. It based it on a central template. Perhaps its administrators believed it. Or perhaps they too were showing that they were obedient; they too had the right to be left in peace. With Mr Ahmed about, they and others are now unlikely to be. For more expert analysis of the biggest stories in Britain, sign up to Blighty, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter.
