AI fakes duel over Sara Duterte impeachment in Philippines
Philippine senators are seated after taking their oath as jurors in the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte on June 10. PHOTO: AFP
MANILA - Days after the Philippine Senate declined to launch the impeachment trial of the country's vice-president, two interviews with Filipinos arguing for and against the move went viral.
Neither were real.
The schoolboys and elderly woman making their cases were AI creations, examples of increasingly sophisticated fakes possible with even basic online tools.
'Why single out the VP?', a digitally created boy in a white school uniform asks, arguing that the case was politically motivated.
The House of Representatives impeached Ms Sara Duterte in early February on charges of graft, corruption and an alleged assassination plot against former ally and running mate President Ferdinand Marcos.
A guilty verdict in the Senate would result in her removal from office and a lifetime ban from Philippine politics.
But after convening as an impeachment court on June 10, the senior body immediately sent the case back to the House, questioning its constitutionality.
Duterte ally Senator Ronald dela Rosa shared the video of the schoolboys – since viewed millions of times – praising the youths for having a 'better understanding of what's happening' than their adult counterparts.
The vice-president's younger brother Sebastian, mayor of family stronghold Davao, said the clip proved 'liberals' did not have the support of the younger generation.
When the schoolboys were exposed as digital creations, the vice-president and her supporters were unfazed.
'There's no problem with sharing an AI video in support of me. As long as it's not being turned into a business,' Ms Duterte told reporters.
'Even if it's AI... I agree with the point,' said Mr Dela Rosa, the one-time enforcer of ex-president Rodrigo Duterte's drug war.
Five minutes' work
The video making the case for impeachment – also with millions of views – depicts an elderly woman peddling fish and calling out the Senate for failing to hold a trial.
'You 18 senators, when it's the poor who steal, you want them locked up immediately, no questions asked. But if it's the vice-president who stole millions, you protect her fiercely,' she says in Tagalog.
Both clips bore a barely discernible watermark for the Google video-generation platform Veo.
AFP fact-checkers also identified visual inconsistencies, such as overly smooth hair and teeth and storefronts with garbled signage.
The man who created the fish peddler video, Mr Bernard Senocip, 34, told AFP it took about five minutes to produce the eight-second clip.
Contacted via his Facebook page, Mr Senocip defended his work in a video call, saying AI characters allowed people to express their opinions while avoiding the 'harsh criticism' frequent on social media.
'As long as you know your limitations and you're not misleading your viewers, I think it's fine,' he said, noting that – unlike the Facebook version – he had placed a 'created by AI' tag on the video's TikTok upload.
While AFP has previously reported on websites using hot-button Philippine issues to generate cash, Mr Senocip said his work was simply a way of expressing his political opinions.
The schoolboy video's creator, the anonymous administrator of popular Facebook page Ay Grabe, declined to be interviewed but said his AI creations' opinions had been taken from real-life students.
AFP, along with other media outlets, is paid by some platforms, including Meta, Google and TikTok, for work tackling disinformation.
'Grey area'
Using AI to push viewpoints via seemingly ordinary people can make beliefs seem 'more popular than they actually are', said Mr Jose Mari Lanuza of Sigla Research Centre, a non-profit organisation that studies disinformation.
'In the case of the impeachment, this content fosters distrust not only towards particular lawmakers but towards the impeachment process.'
While some AI firms have developed measures to protect public figures, Mr Jose Miguelito Enriquez, an associate research fellow at Nanyang Technological University, said the recent Philippine videos were a different animal.
'Some AI companies like OpenAI previously committed to prevent users from generating deepfakes of 'real people', including political candidates,' he said.
'But... these man-on-the-street interviews represent a grey area because technically they are not using the likeness of an actual living person.'
Crafting realistic 'humans' was also getting easier, said Mr Dominic Ligot, founder of Data and AI Ethics PH.
'Veo is only the latest in a string of rapidly evolving tools for AI media generation,' he said, adding the newest version produced 'smoother, more realistic motion and depth compared to earlier AI video models'.
Google did not reply when AFP asked if it had developed safeguards to prevent Veo from being used to push misinformation.
For Mr Ligot, guardrails around the swiftly evolving technology are a must, warning AI was increasingly being used to 'influence how real people feel, pressure decision-makers and distort democratic discourse'. AFP
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump says damage from Iran strikes severe despite ‘inconclusive' intelligence
The US Defence Intelligence Agency assessed that the strikes had set back Iran's nuclear programme by just a few months. PHOTO: AFP Follow our live coverage here. – US President Donald Trump said on June 25 that the damage to Iranian nuclear sites from missile strikes over the weekend was severe, though he also acknowledged that the available intelligence on the matter was inconclusive. His comments followed reports by Reuters and other media outlets on June 24 revealing that the US Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) had assessed that the strikes had set back Iran's nuclear programme by just a few months, despite administration officials saying the programme had been obliterated. 'The intelligence was very inconclusive,' Mr Trump told reporters before joining a Nato summit in The Hague. 'The intelligence says we don't know. It could've been very severe. That's what the intelligence suggests.' Later, during the same round of comments, he argued that Iran's nuclear deal had been set back 'basically decades, because I don't think they'll ever do it again'. Mr Trump was sitting alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, who both also cast doubt on the reliability of the DIA assessment. Mr Rubio said the US was opening an investigation into the leak of the DIA report. He also suggested the report's contents had been misrepresented in the media. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Amid Iran-Israel's fragile truce, Trump and Netanyahu battle to control war narratives
A ceasefire is now in force in the Middle East, and it appears to be holding, says the writer. PHOTO: AFP - There is little doubt that US President Donald Trump has emerged much strengthened as a result of his handling of what he calls the '12-Day War' between Israel and Iran. By ordering US jets to bomb Iranian nuclear installations, Mr Trump has reaffirmed America's close strategic bonds with Israel. Yet the US leader also managed something all his immediate predecessors in Washington had failed to achieve: get Israel to stop fighting at a time of America's choosing. After what a visibly angry Mr Trump described as an 'extraordinarily tough and direct' phone call with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on June 24, the Israeli leader ordered his jets to turn around in mid-flight and stop hitting Iranian targets. A ceasefire is now in force in the Middle East, and it appears to be holding. So, the American leader can claim with some justification that his immediate strategic objectives were met. 'It was my great honour to Destroy All Nuclear facilities & capability, and then, STOP THE WAR!' Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social, his favourite platform. The snag for Mr Trump is that at least some people in the US intelligence community do not believe that Iran's nuclear capabilities have been destroyed. And the current ceasefire is unlikely to give the US much respite, either. The US administration is embarrassed by a leaked report apparently compiled by the Defence Intelligence Agency, a branch of the American military, which seemingly suggested that Mr Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear facilities were 'obliterated' was overstated. US and Israeli raids on Iran's nuclear facilities – the leaked report allegedly concludes – may have succeeded only in delaying Iran's quest for nuclear weapons by around six months. Ms Karoline Leavitt, the White House spokeswoman, rushed to dismiss such claims as 'flat-out wrong' and as 'a clear attempt to demean President Trump'. The administration has promised to provide the US Congress with detailed briefings on the impact of the US attacks on Iran. Yet, almost regardless of what it does, the Trump White House is likely to remain on the back foot. It probably matters very little when the full bomb damage assessment on the US attacks is released, or what that assessment will say, for the Washington administration is certain to be accused of 'doctoring' the intelligence information to suit its political needs, and no assessment is likely to be accepted as either definitive or accurate by supporters or critics of the US government. Either way, the struggle to control the narrative about the latest war will plague Mr Trump for a long time. Meanwhile, Mr Netanyahu is struggling with his own battle to control the political narrative. Mr Trump's decision to name the Iran-Israel confrontation as the '12-Day War' represents a shrewd nod to Israel. The name evokes another brief previous conflict, the Six-Day War, which occurred in June 1967, when Israel decisively defeated the armies of all its immediate neighbours. That episode is regarded in Israel as a pivotal moment in the emergence of the Jewish state as a modern, technologically superior actor, able to reshape not only its immediate surroundings, but also the rest of the Middle East. Mr Trump evidently wants to flatter Israel into believing that the latest clashes with Iran are just as significant as the war fought more than half a century ago. And to some extent, the brief war between Israel and Iran is transformative for the Middle East. The Israelis not only hit hard Iran's nuclear installations but also destroyed Iran's air defences, the bulk of Iran's missile stocks and Iran's regional proxies, including the much-feared Hezbollah, until recently considered the world's most potent non-state militia. And, conversely, Iran is at its weakest since the establishment of the Islamic Republic back in 1979. So, soon after the ceasefire in the Iran-Israel war took hold in the early hours of June 24, Mr Netanyahu rushed to claim 'a historic victory' for Israel, and rumours spread that he may well dissolve the current Israeli Parliament and call early elections. But political euphoria in Israeli government circles soon subsided for at least three reasons. First, the fact that Israel was forced to stop the fighting under the direct and very public orders of Mr Trump reduced Mr Netanyahu's ability to claim a complete victory and his claims that he enjoyed a close strategic bond with the US President. Furthermore, although the Israeli Prime Minister's popularity ratings have risen as a result of the war with Iran, most of his new votes appear to come from the electorate of the far-right smaller parties in his current governing coalition, rather than at the expense of the centre-left opposition parties. So, although Mr Netanyahu is more popular at the moment, he still risks losing a snap election, because he has not succeeded in shifting the fundamental electoral balance. And then, there is the awkward fact that, try as hard as he may, Mr Netanyahu cannot ignore Gaza, where the Israeli military remains bogged down in a cruel war which continues to inflict untold suffering on Palestinian civilians, but does nothing to gain the release of the 50-odd Israeli hostages still kept by Hamas, the militant Palestinian organisation. Seven Israeli soldiers were killed in southern Gaza on June 24 – this was the single largest Israeli military loss in many months, and a sober reminder that the Gaza war remains one conflict in which Mr Netanyahu cannot claim any victory, let alone a supposedly 'historic' one. The received wisdom in Israeli political circles is, therefore, that Mr Netanyahu will not hold snap elections and continue in office until the end of his current electoral mandate in October 2026. The problem for the Israeli Premier is that, soon enough, whatever he claims to have achieved by striking Iran will be forgotten by his electorate. Ordinary Israelis are beginning to cast doubt on their country's legendary missile defence systems. While these worked well, intercepting around 90 per cent of all incoming Iranian rockets and drones, the missiles that got through inflicted quite a bit of damage in Israeli cities, and shattered many illusions about Israel's supposedly impregnable defences. Meanwhile, Iran's nuclear chief Mohammad Eslami has announced that his country will soon restart its nuclear programme. In the Middle East, a ceasefire remains a very relative and perishable concept. Jonathan Eyal is based in London and Brussels and writes on global political and security matters. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Taiwan says military drills will involve largest call-up
As many as 22,000 reservists would be called up to take part in the exercises. PHOTO: AFP TAIPEI - Taiwan said June 25 that military drills to be held in July will involve the largest ever mobilisation of reservists for the annual exercises, which are being extended to improve the island's response to 'grey zone' harassment by China. Beijing insists democratic Taiwan is part of its territory and has never renounced the use of force to bring the self-ruled island under its control. The Han Kuang exercises, which the Defence Ministry said would be held from July 9 to 18, are conducted every year across Taiwan to train its armed forces as China ramps up military pressure on the island. Defence Minister Wellington Koo told Parliament as many as 22,000 reservists would be called up to take part in the exercises, up from 14,647 in 2024. 'Our main objective is to verify how much time it takes for a reserve brigade to regain full combat capability after being called up,' Mr Koo said. Taiwan maintains a standing call-up system to train its reservists. In 2025, the mobilisation will be expanded as part of the annual Han Kuang military drills. The Defence Ministry also said the annual drills would be extended to 10 days and nine nights, compared with five days and four nights in 2024. Mr Koo said the most significant change would be the inclusion of 'grey zone harassment' scenarios, simulating a military escalation based on 'regional developments'. Taiwan accuses China of using 'grey-zone' tactics – actions that fall short of an act of war – to weaken its defences. Beijing regularly deploys fighter jets, warships and coast guard ships near Taiwan, and has held several major military exercises around the island in recent years. The Taiwan reservists called up will undergo a full 14-day training programme, 10 days of which will be dedicated to participation in the drills. In March, Taiwan's Defence Ministry said it would simulate possible scenarios for a Chinese invasion in 2027 during Han Kuang drills. Officials in the United States – Taipei's main backer and biggest arms supplier – have previously cited 2027 as a possible timeline for a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
