Warning: Why parents should check kids WhatsApp channels
Sadleir, founder of The Digital Law Company, said that an 'awful thread of communication' is spreading through WhatsApp Channels – a relatively new feature that allows users to broadcast messages to unlimited followers – with children being directly targeted.
'The type of content we're seeing includes child sexual abuse material, defamation, crimen injuria, and the unauthorised sharing of personal details, including social media handles,' Sadleir said.
While the disturbing trend has been noted across the country, she flagged Johannesburg as a particular hotspot for this illicit digital activity.
Unlike traditional WhatsApp groups, WhatsApp channels can host unlimited followers, making it harder to control who receives content – and who's behind it.
Sadleir revealed that children are being added or directed to channels containing explicit and criminal material, often without the knowledge of their parents or guardians.
The Digital Law Company is now actively working with legal professionals in preparation for court action aimed at identifying and holding the culprits accountable.
Sadleir urged parents to take immediate action: Check your child's WhatsApp Channels by going to the 'Updates' tab (bottom left corner on most devices).
Report any illegal or harmful content through WhatsApp's reporting function.
Talk to children about the risks of unknown or unsolicited channel invites.
'The only way we can bring these criminals to justice and put pressure on Meta [WhatsApp's parent company] to act, is if people report this content,' she said.
This alarming development underscores a broader issue facing South African families: the growing dangers of unsupervised screen time and digital communication platforms.
Recent studies have already linked excessive screen time to emotional and behavioural issues in children – but this latest warning adds an urgent criminal safety dimension to the concern.
Sadleir's message to parents is clear: 'Be proactive. Be present. Be vigilant.'
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
3 hours ago
- The South African
Domestic helper arrested after stealing designer items in viral video
A Tshwane woman has posted a series of TikTok videos in which she had her domestic helper arrested for stealing her designer clothing, alcohol, and household items. The clips, which were posted over the weekend, went viral and received over a million views. On TikTok, user @brasco posted several videos about discovering how the family's domestic helper had stolen a vast amount of her personal items from her Mamelodi East home. This included bottles of alcohol like Ice Tropez and Veuve Clicquot, designer Burberry T-shirts, and household items like detergents and hardware. 'Prioritise checking your helper's bags when they leave to go on holiday. You'll be shocked', the TikToker posted in a video amassing almost one million views. In another, with close to two million views, police arrive to arrest the domestic helper. @brascoza ♬ original sound – KHADEAIR @brascoza ♬ LEMENEMENE – King Monada Others reveal how the woman emptied the contents of her helper's bags to discover her items inside. The woman claimed she felt inclined to search the bags of her Lesotho-born domestic helper after another incident a few weeks prior. @brascoza ♬ original sound – brasco In the comment section, viewers were shocked at the volume of goods stolen by the domestic helper. However, the woman's decision to call the police and have her employee arrested had mixed views. Some felt sorry for the helper and felt that involving the police was unnecessary. @Morekotholethoko: 'The salaries we pay these people are so little. I wouldn't call the police on her. I will be a bit more gracious.' @Jackie: 'She envied having this life, that's why she did whatever she did. Forgive her' Others felt the domestic helper's actions justified the outcome. @luvleigh_leigh: 'Theft is a criminal offence.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The price of going viral – when political activism becomes very expensive
In an age where a single WhatsApp message can mobilise protesters and a Facebook post can shape public opinion about workplace disputes, the traditional boundaries between political activism and trade union representation are blurring in ways that would have been unimaginable a generation ago. The recent labour court judgment in Boomerang Fruits (Pty) Ltd v Umkhonto weSizwe and Others offers a stark reminder that these boundaries exist for good reasons and that crossing them can have serious legal consequences – particularly when amplified through digital platforms that can transform minor workplace grievances into viral political campaigns. From payroll error to digital political theatre The case began with a seemingly mundane payroll error. Agricultural workers at a fruit farm in Elgin in the Western Cape were underpaid overtime wages ranging from R120 to R176 per person – hardly the stuff of revolutionary politics. Yet within days, this minor administrative mistake had escalated into a full-blown industrial dispute involving police escorts, highway blockades, criminal charges and a sophisticated digital media campaign that branded the employer across multiple online platforms as racist and colonial. The transformation was breathtakingly swift. What might once have taken weeks of careful union organisation now unfolded in real time across social media networks. The Umkhonto weSizwe party (MK) didn't simply insert itself into the dispute – it digitally amplified it, using Facebook posts, press releases and WhatsApp groups to craft a narrative that reached far beyond the farm gates of the Western Cape. The digital disruption of industrial relations The involvement of the MK party demonstrates how political parties have learned to exploit the digital revolution in ways that fundamentally challenge traditional industrial relations. When employees contacted the party for assistance, the MK party didn't simply offer advice or direct workers to appropriate legal channels. Instead, it created a parallel digital infrastructure that bypassed established negotiation mechanisms entirely. The party's WhatsApp communications coordinated meetings with management, its Facebook posts generated public sympathy for workers, and its press releases shaped media coverage – all while maintaining the pretence of merely providing 'advisory' support. This digital orchestration allowed the MK party to function as a shadow trade union while avoiding the legal responsibilities that formal representation would entail. Judge Robert Lagrange's judgment methodically dissected this digital strategy, concluding that the MK party had 'consistently assumed the role of the representative of the strikers' while simultaneously 'launching a media attack on Boomerang, portraying it in villainous terms'. The court recognised that in the digital age, representation isn't just about formal negotiations – it's about controlling the narrative that shapes public perception and influences the balance of power. The legal principle at stake is both simple and profound, but its application has become infinitely more complex in the digital era. South Africa's industrial relations system was designed for an analogue world where disputes unfolded in board rooms and on factory floors, not on social media platforms where every statement can be screenshot, shared and weaponised. The social media amplification effect The court's analysis of the MK party's digital campaign reveals how social media has fundamentally altered the dynamics of labour disputes. Traditional negotiation assumes a degree of privacy that allows parties to make concessions without losing face publicly. Digital platforms destroy this privacy, creating performative pressures that make compromise virtually impossible. The MK party's Facebook posts describing the company as a 'colonial nest' and 'active site of colonial exploitation' weren't just political rhetoric – they were strategic digital content designed to generate shares, comments and viral engagement. The party understood that in the attention economy, inflammatory language performs better than nuanced analysis. The result was a digital firestorm that bore little resemblance to the original overtime payment dispute. WhatsApp democracy and workplace organising Perhaps most significantly, the case highlights how WhatsApp has become a significant organising tool for both legitimate trade union activity and political interference. The MK party's use of WhatsApp groups to coordinate with workers, arrange meetings and distribute talking points created an informal, but highly effective communication network that traditional employers and unions struggle to understand or counter. This 'WhatsApp democracy' operates outside formal industrial relations structures, creating new possibilities for worker organisation, but also new vulnerabilities to political manipulation. The platform's end-to-end encryption makes it nearly impossible for employers to understand how disputes are being coordinated, while its group messaging functionality allows political parties to influence large numbers of workers simultaneously. The judgment also reveals how digital platforms have created expectations of real-time transparency that clash with the traditionally private nature of labour negotiations. The MK party's social media strategy assumed that followers expected constant updates, behind-the-scenes content and immediate responses to developments. This digital transparency imperative makes the patient, confidential work of genuine dispute resolution nearly impossible. When every negotiation session can be livestreamed, every concession can be immediately scrutinised by online audiences, and every statement can be taken out of context and shared widely, the incentives shift dramatically towards performative confrontation rather than problem-solving. Political parties, with their natural understanding of digital engagement, are far better positioned to exploit these dynamics than traditional trade unions or employers. Digital accountability and legal consequences Judge Lagrange's decision to confirm the interdict against the MK party represents one of the first serious judicial attempts to grapple with how digital platforms are reshaping labour relations. The court recognised that social media posts and WhatsApp messages aren't just commentary – they constitute active participation in labour disputes with real legal consequences. The costs order against the MK party is particularly significant in the digital context. By requiring the party to pay the employer's legal costs, the court has established that viral social media campaigns carry financial risks. This digital accountability principle could fundamentally alter how political parties approach online labour activism. The broader implications extend far beyond this single case. Digital platforms don't just amplify existing power dynamics – they create entirely new ones. Political parties that master social media engagement can mobilise workers more effectively than traditional trade unions, but they lack the institutional knowledge and legal obligations that make genuine representation possible. The result is what might be called 'algorithm activism' – political engagement optimised for digital metrics rather than real-world outcomes. The MK party's campaign generated thousands of shares and comments, but it ultimately prolonged the dispute and harmed the workers it claimed to represent. The digital medium had become the message, drowning out the substance of legitimate workplace grievances. Towards digital industrial relations As South Africa grapples with persistent inequality and workplace exploitation, the intersection of digital technology and labour relations will only become more complex. The Boomerang Fruits case provides a crucial precedent for how courts might approach political parties that use social media to blur the lines between advocacy and representation. The challenge ahead is developing industrial relations frameworks that can harness the democratising potential of digital platforms while preventing their exploitation by political opportunists. This will require new forms of digital literacy among trade unionists, employers and judges, as well as clearer legal guidelines about what constitutes impermissible political interference in the social media age. The labour court's firm stance in this case demonstrates that legal principles can adapt to technological change, but only if we remain vigilant about protecting the institutional boundaries that make effective labour relations possible.
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Activists demand repatriation of Edgar Lungu's body as court reserves judgment
Activists under the Progressive Forces of South Africa are calling for the repatriation of the late former Zambian president Edgar Chagwa Lungu's body, as the Pretoria High Court reserves judgment on the landmark case until later this week. This follows the death of former Zambian president Edgar Chagwa Lungu on June 5 at Mediclinic Medforum in Pretoria, which has since triggered a tense standoff between his family and the Zambian government. Authorities in Zambia are pushing for the repatriation of former President Edgar Lungu's remains for an official state funeral, a move firmly rejected by his family, who insist he be laid to rest in South Africa after failed negotiations. The dramatic court ruling was delivered just moments before a private burial was due to take place on 31 July. Lungu served as president from January 25, 2015, until August 24, 2021. Following his departure from office, he faced a series of legal challenges and political isolation. His family, including his wife, Esther Lungu, and their children, have been implicated in various corruption charges, including allegations of money laundering and proceeds of crime. Esther Lungu has pleaded not guilty to charges of stealing cars. Lebogang Shovhote, Secretary General of the Progressive Forces of South Africa, voiced strong opposition to Edgar Lungu being laid to rest in South Africa. She pointed out that the country already struggles with ongoing land claim disputes, where burial sites are sometimes exploited to support land ownership claims. Shohote warned that permitting Lungu's burial in South Africa could set a troubling precedent, making the nation a refuge for those escaping legal consequences. 'The Lungu family has committed offences in Zambia and now wants to use South Africa as a place of refuge,' she said. Shovhote further alleged that Lungu entered South Africa using a passport under a different name, raising serious concerns about discrepancies in his documentation. 'Even hospital records don't reflect that Edgar Lungu was ever admitted to any South African facility,' she claimed. She added that burying Lungu in South Africa could set a dangerous precedent, potentially encouraging other African leaders accused of crimes in their home countries to view South Africa as a refuge to escape justice and avoid facing consequences for their actions. Shovhote emphasised that they are hopeful the court will order the Lungu family to repatriate his body to Zambia. The Pretoria High Court has reserved judgment, with Deputy Judge President Aubrey Ledwaba stating that a ruling will be delivered before the end of the week. The Star [email protected]
