UN Conference Seeks Foreign Aid Rally As Trump Cuts Bite
Spain will host a UN conference next week seeking fresh backing for development aid as swingeing cuts led by US President Donald Trump and global turmoil hinder progress on fighting poverty, hunger and climate change.
French President Emmanuel Macron, South Africa's Cyril Ramaphosa and Daniel Noboa of Ecuador will headline the around 70 heads of state and government in the southern city of Seville from June 30 to July 3.
But a US snub at the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development underlines the challenges of corralling international support for the sector.
Joining the leaders are UN chief Antonio Guterres, more than 4,000 representatives from businesses, civil society and financial institutions, including World Bank head Ajay Banga.
Such development-focused gatherings are rare -- and the urgency is high as the world's wealthiest countries tighten their purse strings and development goals set for 2030 slip from reach.
Guterres has estimated the funding gap for aid at $4 trillion per year.
Trump's evisceration of funding for USAID -- by far the world's top foreign aid contributor -- has dealt a hammer blow to humanitarian campaigns.
Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium are among the other rich nations that have announced recent aid cuts as economic and security priorities shift and national budgets are squeezed.
From fighting AIDS in southern Africa to educating displaced Rohingya children in Bangladesh, the retreat is having an instant impact.
The UN refugee agency has announced it will slash 3,500 jobs as funds dried up, affecting tens of millions of the world's most vulnerable citizens.
International cooperation is already under increasing strain during devastating conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine, while Trump's unpredictable tariff war plunges global trade into disarray.
Reforming international finance and alleviating the huge debt burden under which low-income countries sag are key points for discussion.
The budgets of many developing nations are constrained by servicing debt, which surged after the Covid-19 pandemic, curbing critical investment in health, education and infrastructure.
According to a recent report commissioned by the late Pope Francis and coordinated by Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz, 3.3 billion people live in countries that fork out more on interest payments than on health.
Critics have singled out US-based bulwarks of the post-World War II international financial system, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, for reform.
Seville represents "a unique opportunity to reform an international financial system that is outdated, dysfunctional and unfair", Guterres said.
At a preparatory meeting at UN headquarters in New York in June, countries except the United States unanimously agreed a text to be adopted in Seville.
The document reaffirms commitment to achieving the 2030 UN sustainable development goals on eliminating poverty, hunger and promoting gender equality.
It focuses on reforming tax systems, notably by improving the Global South's representation within international financial institutions.
The text also calls on development banks to triple their lending capacity, urges lenders to ensure predictable finance for essential social spending and for more cooperation against tax evasion.
The United States said it opposed initiatives that encroach on national sovereignty, interfere with international financial institutions and include "sex-based preferences".
While the European Union celebrated achieving a consensus, NGOs have criticised the commitment for lacking ambition.
For Mariana Paoli, global advocacy lead at Christian Aid, the text "weakens key commitments on debt and fossil fuel subsidies -- despite urgent calls from the Global South".
"Shielded by US obstructionism, the Global North continues to block reform. This isn't leadership -- it's denial."
Previous failures by rich countries to keep their promises have eroded trust.
After promising to deliver $100 billion of climate finance a year to poorer nations by 2020, they only hit the target in 2022.
Acrimonious negotiations at last year's UN climate summit in Azerbaijan ended with rich countries pledging $300 billion in annual climate finance by 2035, decried as too low by activists and developing nations.
Independent experts have estimated the needs upwards of $1 trillion per year.
Spain will be the first developed country to host the UN development finance conference. The inaugural edition took place in Mexico in 2002, followed by Qatar in 2008 and Ethiopia in 2015.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
The 'Revenge Tax' Revolution: How Governments Are Clamping Down On Corporate Giants
In recent months, governments around the world—including the U.S. and European Union members—have accelerated efforts to clamp down on multinational corporations with what's increasingly called the "revenge tax." This global push aims to reclaim billions lost to corporate tax avoidance, signaling a new era where loopholes are closing and accountability is rising. But what exactly is this revenge tax, and why is it reshaping the global business landscape? What Is the "Revenge Tax"? At its core, the revenge tax is a series of new laws and policies designed to prevent companies from dodging their fair share of taxes. Multinationals have long used strategies like profit shifting—moving earnings to countries with low or no taxes—to minimize their tax bills. In recent years, governments have fought back by creating rules that limit these practices. Notably, the OECD's 2021 global minimum tax agreement, which sets a 15% minimum tax on multinational profits, has become a foundation for this fight. As Reuters reports, countries are now adding penalties and tighter regulations to ensure corporations comply. Why Now? The Political and Economic Stakes The revenge tax reflects growing frustration among citizens and policymakers. The public's outrage over tax avoidance—especially against the backdrop of rising inequality and strained public services—has fueled momentum for tougher measures. As highlighted in The Guardian, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed glaring revenue shortfalls, intensifying calls for governments to secure funds through fair taxation. The revenge tax thus symbolizes a broader shift toward fiscal responsibility and economic justice. What It Means for Businesses and Consumers For corporations, the crackdown means increased compliance burdens and potential penalties if they fail to meet new tax obligations. Some companies might respond by raising prices to offset higher costs. Analysts at Bloomberg argue, however, that the additional tax revenue could bolster public services and help reduce economic inequality—potentially benefiting society in the long run. More Than Just "Revenge" Despite its dramatic nickname, the revenge tax isn't about retaliation. It's about leveling the playing field and ensuring that corporations contribute their fair share to the countries where they operate. This marks a departure from decades of lax enforcement and competition among countries to offer the lowest taxes. Instead, global cooperation and transparency are becoming the new norm, signaling a fundamental change in how the world handles corporate taxation. What's Next on the Horizon? Expect continued global efforts to tighten tax rules, increase transparency, and close remaining loopholes. Multinational companies must adapt quickly or face escalating penalties. For everyday taxpayers, the hope is clear: a fairer tax system that funds essential services without shifting undue burdens onto ordinary citizens.
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
US Fed's Preferred Inflation Gauge Picks Up As Tariff Effects Loom
The US Federal Reserve's preferred measure of inflation edged up in May while spending weakened, government data showed Friday, with policymakers monitoring the effects of President Donald Trump's tariffs in the coming months. The personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index climbed 2.3 percent last month from a year ago, the Commerce Department said in a report. This was in line with analyst expectations and a slight acceleration from April's 2.2 percent increase. But excluding the volatile food and energy sectors, the PCE price index was up 2.7 percent, rising from April's 2.6 percent uptick, the report showed. But consumer spending declined, after Trump's fresh tariffs in April dragged on consumer sentiment. PCE dropped by 0.1 percent from the preceding month, reversing an earlier rise. While Trump has imposed sweeping tariffs on most US trading partners since returning to the White House in January -- alongside higher rates on imports of steel, aluminum and autos -- these have had a muted effect so far on inflation. This is partly because he held off or postponed some of his harshest salvos, while businesses are still running through inventory they stockpiled in anticipation of the levies. But central bank officials have said they expect to learn more about the impact of tariffs over the summer, meaning they will be scrutinizing data in the coming months. "The experience of the limited range of tariffs introduced in 2018 suggests that pass-through to consumer prices is intense three-to-six months after their implementation," warned economists Samuel Tombs and Oliver Allen of Pantheon Macroeconomics in a note. They also flagged weakness in consumer spending, in part due to a pullback in autos after buyers rushed to get ahead of tariffs. But spending on services was tepid even after excluding volatile components, they said. "There has also been a clear weakening in discretionary services spending, notably in travel and hospitality," said Michael Pearce, deputy chief US economist at Oxford Economics, in a note. This reflects "the chilling effect of the plunge in consumer sentiment," he added. Between April and May, the PCE price index was up 0.1 percent, the Commerce Department report showed. As a July deadline approaches for higher tariff rates to kick in on dozens of economies, all eyes are also on whether countries can reach lasting trade deals with Washington to ease the effects of tariffs. For now, despite the slowing in economic growth, Pearce said risks that inflation could increase will keep the Fed on hold with interest rates "until much later in the year."
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
World Leaders Conspire to Form Trade Org Without US As Trump Keeps Threatening Countries With Tariffs
As President Donald Trump threatens to hit European imports with tariffs as high as 50%, world leaders are quietly working to form a new global trade order that excludes the U.S. With a July 9 deadline looming for a new EU-U.S. deal, Trump has warned that punitive tariffs will return if the bloc doesn't agree to his terms. In response, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has proposed a bold counter. The proposal would mean uniting the EU's 27 countries with the 12-nation Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which includes the UK, to launch a new trade alliance without the United States, according to Politico. "CPTPP and the European Union is mighty," von der Leyen said at the EU leaders' summit, adding that the bloc could replace the WTO and decide later whether to admit the U.S. The idea has public backing from German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who likened the approach to Trump's own erratic style. "We need to be similar to our partners in some sense," Tusk said. Privately, EU leaders reportedly admit they are now scrambling to craft a face-saving deal with the U.S. before the deadline to avoid sweeping tariffs. Negotiations are expected to continue into next week. However, the bloc remains divided. Some leaders want to secure a basic agreement quickly to shield vulnerable industries like chemicals and steel, while others remain reluctant to concede to Trump's demands. French President Emmanuel Macron, once defiant, now concedes, "10% [tariffs] will be 10%." Originally published on Latin Times
