I wanted Nintendo to wow me with the Switch 2 – instead it's made me hug my ROG Ally X handheld even closer
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
If you were following our live blog ahead of Nintendo's big Switch 2 event, you might have seen my contribution, where I said I was hoping Nintendo would blow me away with its new hardware, and finally convince me to buy one of its consoles for the first time since the GameCube.
Now that the dust has settled after the event, I can safely say that unfortunately, Nintendo failed. I was holding out for a killer gaming handheld, an affordable price and exclusive games that would make me fall in love with Nintendo again. We got none of that.
The hardware itself, from what Nintendo showed, was fine. I like the new, larger 7.9-inch screen in particular, as I think the larger the screen the better for gaming on, and I'm seeing an encouraging trend with PC gaming handhelds coming with larger screen options.
The 1080p resolution and 120Hz variable refresh rate support were also big ticks for me, though I was disappointed that the screen was LCD, not OLED. The optimist in me thought this might be a sacrifice for a more tempting overall price of the console. The pessimist in me, however, expects that this is more so Nintendo can flog an OLED version later on.
I also like the look of the new Joy-Con controllers that attach via magnets (hopefully they'll have the same satisfying pull that you get when you attach a MagSafe 3 charger to a MacBook), and being able to use them like mice means the Switch 2 could be a great platform for oft-neglected genres such as real time strategy games. Of course, you'll need to be sitting near a flat surface to use them like a mouse, which seems to defeat the object a bit of the Switch 2.
After those few bright spots, my interest in the Switch 2 plummeted, however. The new C button means Nintendo has finally realized that online chat between friends is a thing, and the Switch Camera, which just looks like a Nest Camera, isn't that exciting either. The demonstration video also seemed to show that video streams suffer from low frames per second, leading to rather janky and distracting footage.
The game footage shown was also a disappointment to me, with some very underwhelming graphics that looked distinctly last-gen. Now I know a lot of people say 'but it's Nintendo, it's never about pure power' but while that's been true of recent generations, that wasn't always the case – both the SNES and N64, for example, were more powerful than the competition.
Anyway, graphical fidelity certainly isn't the be-all and end-all (the game I'm still mostly obsessed with is Balatro, which isn't exactly cutting-edge), as long as there's a charming art style. But when third-party games look noticeably worse than on competing devices, you need to pull out all the stops in other departments to get people to pick your console.
One of these is with first-party exclusive games that you can only play on the console. Traditionally, this is something Nintendo has excelled at, and with its refusal to port games to PC, if you want to play a Mario or Zelda game you have to buy a Nintendo console.
The problem with this week's announcement was that there was a real lack of first-party exclusives. Unless I missed something, the big announcements were a new Mario Kart (oh yey a franchise that has now had well over 10 instalments) and a Kirby racing game which… well, it's Kirby. Consider me distinctly underwhelmed.
Another way to win people over is with an extremely competitive price that undercuts the competition. Again, Nintendo has done this well in the past, and again with the Switch 2 it seems to have forgotten that.
With a launch price of $449.99 / £395.99 / AU$699.95, this is an expensive console. Sony's rival PS5 now regularly sells for less than that, and the problem for Nintendo is that the Switch 2 isn't just competing with the PS5 and Xbox Series X, but also PC gaming handhelds such as the Steam Deck and Asus ROG Ally X.
PC gaming handhelds are a rapidly growing product category, and because companies like Valve, Asus and Lenovo are all building their own devices, there's already a lot of choice for people looking for a handheld gaming console.
This means there are handhelds out there that have more powerful hardware than the Switch 2, so offer better gaming experiences, and there are lower-powered models that are cheaper than the Switch 2.
I was also shocked at the price of Switch 2 games, with the new Mario Kart World apparently being sold for $79.99 / £74.99, and I've seen some people speculate that we could get Switch 2 games as expensive as $90.
This is horrendously expensive, and would mean if I were to get a Switch 2, my library of games would be pretty small, as I just couldn't justify spending that kind of money on games regularly.
Nintendo games also have a habit of stubbornly keeping their prices, even several years after their release, so I probably wouldn't be able to pick up a Switch 2 later on in the generation and buy older games at lower prices.
This is another area where PC gaming handheld beat the Switch 2. PC games on the whole are cheaper than console versions, and because PC is an open platform, there's a wide range of stores you can buy your games from (such as Steam, Epic Games Store or Amazon), which increases competition that leads to sales and special offers to tempt gamers.
On the Switch 2, if you want to buy a digital game there's only one company you will be able to buy it from: Nintendo. So you'll be relying on it cutting prices for its games, and that's something Nintendo doesn't like doing.
So, throughout the Switch 2 event, I was just thinking how glad I am that I have an Asus ROG Ally X, which offers a convenient handheld gaming experience with excellent performance and a huge library of affordable games. Best of all, the games I buy for the Ally X can also be played on my gaming PC and Steam Deck without having to rebuy them – another big tick when it comes to affordability compared to the Switch 2.
Of course, the one thing the ROG Ally X can't do – nor any of the rival PC gaming handhelds – is officially play Nintendo games.
This is the Switch 2's biggest advantage, and while I've not been excited about the first party games that have been shown so far, if Nintendo brings out some brilliant new Mario, Zelda or Pokemon games (or even, god forbid, make a new franchise) that I'll be desperate to play but won't be able to unless I buy the new console, then it could win me over. Until then, I'll be sticking with my ROG Ally X, thank you very much.
Here are the Nintendo Switch 2 launch games that you'll be able to pick up and play on June 5
Furious fans hijack Nintendo Treehouse: Live stream with demands to 'drop the price'
Nintendo confirms that certain Switch 2 game cards will just have a download key, but I don't think it's as bad as we first thought
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geek Girl Authority
3 hours ago
- Geek Girl Authority
Nintendo Switch 2 Archives
Categories Select Category Games GGA Columns Movies Stuff We Like The Daily Bugle TV & Streaming Games Stuff We Like Think Pieces Video Games Pokémon Scarlet & Violet now play a lot better with the Switch 2 release. But the new console hasn't fixed the series' lacking graphics yet.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cillian Murphy Is Amazing In 28 Days Later, But I Was Shook By The A-Listers Who Originally Vied For The Role
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. I'm still amazed that director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland have reassembled to deliver a new tale of terror to the 2025 movie schedule in 28 Years Later. The occasion has left me also thinking about 28 Days Later a lot, a film that would eventually become known as Academy Award winner Cillian Murphy's star-making performance. But while the Oppenheimer lead has always been pitch perfect in the role of Jim, there's a long existing list of names that have been rumored to be up for the part back in the day. And when I say names, I truly mean 'names,' like Leonardo DiCaprio, Ryan Gosling and frequent Boyle collaborator Ewan McGregor. When the opportunity to watch the first 28 minutes of 28 Years Later was paired with an in-person interview with its intrepid director, I had to try and weed out fact from fiction, which saw all three names debunked in the process. However, that's when Danny Boyle gave CinemaBlend two names I never expected to be in the mix: I'll tell you who did audition for Jim. … Tom Hardy and Orlando Bloom, because they'd all finished either drama school or Black Hawk Down. … We didn't have very much money, we thought 'We'll never be able to afford a bigger actor.' And we wanted newbies who just didn't know which way it would break with them. So the trio of Leonardo DiCaprio, Ryan Gosling and Ewan McGregor were never going to even make the list for 28 Days Later's casting. With that being said, I'm very surprised that Tom Hardy and Orlando Bloom hadn't been reported more often - especially at that point in their careers. Although coincidentally enough, McGregor was in Black Hawk Down himself, as well as entrenched in the Star Wars prequel trilogy at the time. Likewise, by the time Danny Boyle's film was making the rounds in its initial 2002 release in the UK, Hardy and Bloom were going head to head at the box office thanks to their respective roles in Star Trek: Nemesis and The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. Honestly, either man would have been a distraction to the tense, harrowing journey 28 Days Later took, as audiences would know they'd survive the ride. The whole point of the third act is that by time Jim's on his rampage through Major West's estate, you're supposed to wonder if he's an Infected at that point. While we now know that wasn't the case, and with Cillian Murphy set to return for 28 Years Later's sequel The Bone Temple, that point tends to get a bit lost. However, Danny Boyle's perspective seemed to see him pick between two finalists, with the Christopher Nolan vet winning out in the end. At least, that's what it sounded like when the 28 Years Later mastermind shared this with CinemaBlend: And I remember seeing [them], and we saw Cillian, and I remember thinking, 'Whoa, he'll have an amazing career.' I remember thinking that. I was right. I remember thinking that about Orlando Bloom, I thought 'He'll do all right. ' The rest, as they say, is history. 2003's US release lit a fuse that saw both Cillian Murphy and Naomie Harris both launch into higher profile roles, and Danny Boyle and Alex Garland being heralded as the men who reanimated the zombie (and zombie-adjacent) subgenre. Seeing as Stephen King bought out showings of 28 Days Later just so he could give them out to spread the word, that was clearly the right choice. And as Danny Boyle himself suggested, Orlando Bloom and Tom Hardy did 'do alright' in the end. Let's hope that 28 Years Later renews its franchise's King Seal of Approval, when it opens in theaters on June 20th.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
I Saw 28 Years Later's First 28 Minutes, But It Turns Out That Wasn't The Director's Idea In The First Place
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. While we're a couple years shy of 28 Years Later's specified timeframe, that hasn't stopped director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland from returning to the horror franchise they first launched back in 2002. The first of a planned trilogy will be debuting on the 2025 movie schedule in a matter of weeks, and anticipation couldn't be greater for the full feature. So when I was invited to recently check out just the first 28 minutes of this picture, I was a bit bummed... despite loving what I saw. And in speaking with director Danny Boyle, I learned about a scene that may have played a part in Sony's decision to keep the film under a veil of secrecy. This afternoon, I was on hand for a screening of what's basically the first act of this upcoming horror movie. A lot of what we know about 28 Years Later was featured, but with more detail. Before we got started, Boyle introduced the footage with a huge amount of excitement, while also noting that he really wished the entire film was being shown to us. The filmmaker shared some thoughts on why we weren't getting the full experience: That's not my idea. I'd much prefer you to watch the whole movie, but … they don't want any spoilers about … well, you're not gonna see it. I was about to discuss the second half of the movie with you. You're not about to see that. … And I'm sorry you're not seeing the other 92 minutes or whatever the rest of it is. One quick note here, before we move on: despite my theory, we're not seeing the origins of 28 Days Later's church scene. However, if you've been worried about 28 Weeks Later's canonical standing, this opening will answer your questions once and for all - as that sequel is properly tied into the narrative fabric. And with that, let's get into a light overview of what was seen at the screening. Most of what we saw in 28 Years Later's sizzle reel deals with the community of Holy Island and introduced how it's run. Before we got to that point, we were shown the entirety of the Teletubbies flashback, with a boy watching his family overtaken by the first wave of Infected. Jumping head in time, Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) prepares to take Spike (Alfie Williams) on his first Infected hunt. There's also a moment with the ailing Isla (Jodie Comer), who is supposedly not Infected... but is having moments of anger, a constant fever, and pain. Also, part of what was shown included the previous 28 Years Later clip that was included with the re-release of 28 Days Later where we see Spike's second kill, exploding the head of a hanging Infected. Throughout this final section of the presentation, father and son interact with the two new variants of Infected they know about: 'slow lows' and 'Alphas.' Both operate at different speeds and strengths, but they prove one thing: the Rage Virus' evolution has started to switch things up. And just as we get to the end of the reel, before abruptly smashing to the title card, an Alpha does something you wouldn't expect. It yells out a command: 'RUN!' 28 Years Later's promising start is just as chilling and horrific as you'd expect; and it certainly left me wanting more. Which brings us to the subject of why Danny Boyle thinks the rest of the movie is currently under lock and key. When I had the chance to speak with Danny Boyle about both the past and present of the franchise, the filmmaker shared a number of interesting anecdotes that fill in some of the history in the 28 franchise's past that points toward what waits for audiences. While I've omitted most of the defining details of this particular scene, it's a moment that the Sunshine helmer shared was based on a makeshift COVID-19 memorial in London. The details sounded akin to the scene where Jim (Cillian Murphy) finds his parents dead in his childhood home in 28 Days Later, which ties into how Boyle feels this particular moment is responsible for the hold up: I think the real reason they won't show you the rest of the film is because there's a bit in it that is very moving. And I think [that] they think if horror fans think it's too sentimental, they won't come along and watch it. And if it leaks out that it's, but for me, it's kind of all part of horror is all, it's, it is not just a limited [genre], it's not just horror. It's not just a slasher movie or something. It's about all the emotions that are within that, that contain within that. And you have that in the first film. Thinking back, this philosophy seems to share commonality with how 28 Days Later was marketed prior to its theatrical release. As you can see in the trailer below, the marketing went hard on haunting imagery and rock music, but light on the emotional moments that audiences still remember: Based on the 28 minutes we saw, what I can say for certain is that more of Danny Boyle's signature style is present – reteamed with the meticulous brutality Alex Garland has honed through his career from Ex Machina to Warfare. Knowing that the tender heart of the first film will be present is a huge tease for a die hard fan like myself, and it ensures that I'll partake in the finished feature as soon as possible. If you're of the same mind, I suggest you don't walk, but ruuuuun to get your tickets for 28 Years Later, once they go on sale June 3.
