Award judges resign after Queensland state library strips writer's prize over Hamas tweet
At least four judges for the Queensland literary awards have resigned over the past 24 hours, protesting against the State Library of Queensland's decision to withdraw a prestigious $15,000 fellowship from First Nations writer Karen Wyld over comment she made last year about the Gaza conflict.
The 2022 Stella award winning poet Evelyn Araluen, Wiradjuri academic and writer Dr Jeanine Leane, writer and reviewer Nigel Featherstone and Gamilaroi poet Luke Patterson all confirmed to Guardian Australia on Friday they have resigned from the awards' judging panels. It is believed several other judges have also resigned, but wish to remain anonymous.
Wyld, who now writes under the name K A Ren Wyld, first learned her black&write! fellowship for her manuscript on the Stolen Generations had been withdrawn from a News Corp journalist on Tuesday morning, just hours before she was due to accept the award in Brisbane. Wyld said at a meeting called shortly after the journalist made contact, the library chief executive, Vicki McDonald, referred to a tweet Wyld had posted about the death of the Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar in October, which referred to him as a martyr. Wyld deleted the tweet shortly after posting it.
On Friday, the State Library of Queensland confirmed it had received a written direction from the state arts minister, John-Paul Langbroek, on Monday stating: 'It is my firm view and direction under Section 23 of the Libraries Act 1988 and I am sure the view of most Queenslanders, that Ms Wyld should not receive the award in a Queensland Government or State Library of Queensland venue.'
A spokesperson for Langbroek told the Guardian the minister supported the library's decision to postpone the awards, and stood by the comments he made in parliament where he said that taxpayer-funded awards should not be granted 'to individuals who justify terrorism'.
Earlier this week, a statement by a spokesperson for McDonald said the library's decision to 'postpone the black&write! ceremony' had been made after Langbroek's comments in parliament, in which he said he had 'taken the decision that this award should not be presented' at the state library.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
In Araluen's letter of resignation to the library, the Dropbear author told McDonald she was 'disgusted' by the library's decision to rescind Wyld's fellowship and the Queensland government's 'flagrant ministerial overreach', and was withdrawing as a judge in the Queensland literary awards' Judith Wright Calanthe award.
'I will not participate in a system that values thought-policing and the silencing of anti-genocidal sentiments over the integrity of artists,' she wrote.
'By conceding to this flagrant weaponisation of the mere perception of a bad-faith assumption of anti-Semitism, wielded against a First Nations author who has been so central to the Blak literary community, the State Library have made themselves liable for the consequences of this decision.
'The reputational harm of this choice will not be ignored by the literary and First Nations community.'
Featherstone, a judge in the awards' fiction category, said he was unwilling to participate in a process where a panel's recommendations could be overruled by the arts minister, 'in effect, imposing further political silencing'.
He told the Guardian there were two 'eminently competitive' books nominated in the category he was judging that dealt directly with the conflict in Gaza.
'Should the panel decide that those titles and their authors be shortlisted, or if one is recommended as the winner, will the minister be overturning those decisions too?' he asked.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Fellow fiction prize judge Leane said after careful thought she decided she had no other option than to resign.
'I cannot be complicit in this discourse that denies genocide and that tries to shut down any artist, not just First Nations, any artist or writer who wants to speak out against what is happening in Palestine,' she said.
'Ren's manuscript was not about Palestine, it was actually about the cultural genocide here … they're shutting down two discussions here … they're shutting down two truths.'
The Australian Society of Authors said it intended to write to the Queensland premier and the arts minister to 'call for a strong stance on freedom of expression and independent arts funding processes'.
'This represents yet another alarming instance of the undermining of freedom of expression and arms-length arts funding,' the ASA said in a statement.
'It sets a dangerous precedent for creators – irrespective of their political views – that opportunities awarded on the basis of literary merit can be retracted if the creator is subject to complaints about their political ideas and expressions. It is vital that arts funding opportunities are independent from government interference.'
The library declined to comment on the judges' resignations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Labour splits over assisted dying debate heat up ahead of crucial vote
Kim Leadbeater has been warned by a Labour colleague that an article she promoted on assisted dying has only served to sway undecided MPs against her end of life legislation. The shot across the bows from former political journalist-turned Labour Rochdale Paul Waugh has come just days ahead of the final stages in the Commons of Ms Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. Ms Leadbeater had tweeted and quoted an article by Sharnee Rawson in The Guardian highlighting how her grandparents in Australia ended their lives together not long after their 70th wedding anniversary. Ms Leadbeater pulled out the touching quote: 'When they chose to die together, my grandparents wrote the final chapter of a love story spanning 70 years.' But in a warning Mr Waugh responded: 'I have the utmost sympathy for this family. But this article is precisely why more MPs are turning against the Assisted Dying Bill. Neither of the couple involved appears to have had a terminal illness, yet their deaths went ahead despite 'strict' eligibility rules.' He went on: 'The piece even spells out that the implementation of the rules was far from strict: 'It was unclear whether the spinal condition would qualify as a terminal illness.' He added: 'I voted against the UK bill at 2nd reading and will certainly do so again at 3rd reading.' Ms Leadbeater retorted to the criticism online by highlighting the strict legal criteria in Australia for end of life assistance. 'The criteria in New South Wales are quite clear,' she said. Since Ms Leadbeater won a majority of 55 for her bill at second reading last November a series of heated arguments at committee stage have seen support dwindling. At least 12 MPs who backed her previously or abstained now plan to vote against it. Concerns have been raised over Ms Leadbeater's decision to move proposals away from a judge making the final decision in court towards leaving the job to an expert panel. Ms Leadbeater argues this strengthens the process, but critics have claimed it makes coercion more likely. If it clears the Commons, there is a threat that the bill could clog up business in the Lords with strong opposition from peers, including cross bench former Paralympian Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson. The row comes amid concerns that attempts to decriminalise abortion beyond the legal limit of 28 weeks will also become a distraction for the government, with divisions among the parliamentary party. The Independent has learned of plans to derail the government's Crime and Policing Bill in the Lords if amendments by Labour MPs Stella Creasy and Tonia Antoniazzi decriminalising late abortions are passed. Already, there are expected to be splits within Labour in the Commons and what is a 'conscience vote' even though it is attached to government legislation with York Central Labour MP Rachael Maskell at the forefront of arguing against the move. But a peer has told The Independent that a cross party group in the Lords are 'ready to play ping pong' with a crucial government bill over the issue. 'There will be attempts to move criminal responsibility to providers instead of women and other moves which will be difficult for the government,' a source said. 'There will be new attempts to control home abortion pill provision as well. It will be opening a can of worms. 'Because this [abortion reform] was not in the manifesto we can hold up the bill without the government being able to use the Parliament to bypass the Lords.' It is understood that opponents have been boosted by some polling last week by Whitestone Insight. Asked if 'having an illegal abortion should continue to be a criminal offence to protect both the unborn and vulnerable women who could be coerced into losing a baby they may have wanted, for example by an abusive partner', more than six in 10 (62 per cent) agreed, while less than one in five (17 per cent) disagreed. A similar number (64 per cent) agreed with the statement that 'abortion is a matter of life and death and it is therefore appropriate that the criminal law provides a clear boundary to protect everyone involved'. Just 14 per cent of those surveyed disagreed. The poll of more than 2,000 members of the public, commissioned by the pro-life group SPUC.
The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘I'm not done fighting': diagnosed with MND, Victorian MP Emma Vulin still has a lot to achieve
Emma Vulin is zipping through Victoria's parliament in her motorised wheelchair, giving us a tour of her favourite spots. There's the back right-hand corner of the library, where she hides during sitting weeks, facing the window that looks out to St Patrick's Cathedral. There's the 45-year-old's office, in the members' annexe, opening on to a long hallway where MPs held a race the week she first brought her chair in to 'lighten the mood'. We reach the legislative assembly – and she stops. Black grab rails have been discreetly installed across the chamber. 'They've done it for everyone else. I'm not the odd one out,' Vulin says, her voice catching. 'This is really special.' The first set of rails were added last year, after Vulin was diagnosed with motor neurone disease (MND), a progressive condition that gradually robs people of their ability to move, speak and breathe. As it progresses, she's begun thinking about how long she can keep serving. But there's something she wants to do first. 'I want to speak on voluntary assisted dying,' she says. When Vulin's family migrated to Australia from the UK, they couldn't have known the political path that lay ahead. The family settled in Frankston, next door to Alan Griffin, who later became a federal Labor MP and a key figure in the party's socialist left faction. Griffin helped Vulin's mother get a job with a local state member, Jane Hill. Vulin first visited parliament in the late 1980s at an event with Hill. At a barbecue, the then premier, John Cain, offered her Fanta behind her parents' backs. 'I said, 'I'm not allowed to have soft drink'. And he said, 'I'm the premier of Victoria. Yes, you can',' Vulin says. Later, Griffin hired her mother to run his electorate office – a training ground for Labor MPs Daniel Andrews, Jill Hennessy and Julian Hill. Vulin, though, avoided politics, working in retail, a dental company and as a veterinary nurse, but joined Griffin's team after her mother retired. Then in 2016, at just 36, she had a stroke. 'It happened overnight, so when I got up in the morning, I was trying to get up and I fell to the floor,' she says. Her kids, then aged nine and seven, were downstairs. 'I had to drag myself to the top of the stairs and I was trying yell out to them but the words weren't coming out properly. Eventually they heard me and my daughter rang the ambulance,' Vulin says. Recovery was 'crap', she says, and it took eight months to walk and talk again. She returned to work in Andrews' office, who was by then premier. Though staffer to MP is a well-worn path, Vulin insists she wasn't chasing it. She says she only ran in Pakenham – the seat was created ahead of the 2022 election – because 'it was anyone's game'. 'Had there been a sitting member, had I had to fight someone for that seat, I wouldn't have done it,' Vulin says. 'I don't want to take someone's job.' She won by just 307 votes and credits the win to her local ties – her kids went to school and played basketball locally, and she volunteered with the Upper Beaconsfield CFA. 'I don't think that necessarily wins every seat, but it probably helped in mine.' Vulin had served less than half her term when she was diagnosed with MND in April 2024. 'It started as a feeling in my fingers – my hands were always numb,' she says. A neurologist noticed something was wrong and referred her to a surgeon, who initially suspected a pinched nerve. But as her arm weakened, he realised it was more serious. After a secondary diagnosis on Thursday 11 April, Vulin called the premier, Jacinta Allan. They released statements on the Sunday so her daughter could tell school friends on the Monday. Then she turned her phone off. 'The next day, I turned my phone on and I couldn't believe the amount of messages. That was probably more overwhelming than diagnosis,' Vulin says. Among them was former AFL player and coach Neale Daniher, who helped set up FightMND after his 2013 diagnosis and was named 2025 Australian of the Year. 'He said, 'Hi Emma, it's Neale Daniher, here's my number, you need to come see me',' Vulin says. So she did. Daniher gave her blunt advice: install a bidet, knobs on the steering wheel and doors, and 'all these other practical things that other people won't tell you'. 'At the time it was so confronting but it has come in handy,' Vulin says. A month later, she invited Daniher to parliament for a motion on FightMND and the Big Freeze, a fundraiser where celebrities and footy greats plunge into icy water during the annual king's birthday match. Vulin will host a Big Freeze of her own at parliament on 16 June, with the deputy premier, Ben Carroll, and the opposition leader, Brad Battin, among participants. Battin, her neighbouring MP in Berwick, has known her for years. 'When I was diagnosed he took me out for dinner near parliament and some Labor MPs came in – I was like, 'this is not what it looks like!'' Battin says they were 'both in tears' over that dinner. 'I have a lot of time for Emma and it's just one of those things in life that is so unfair,' he says. 'Why does stuff like this happen to good people?' Following Daniher's advice, Vulin began using a wheelchair to conserve energy and brought an occupational therapist into parliament, who produced a four-page report on how to make the heritage-listed building more accessible. 'They've done everything on the list,' she says – including installing automatic toilet doors, a new gate, filling a divot in a concrete path, accessible cabinet handles and a ramp to her friend and upper house MP Harriet Shing's office. Vulin initially refused her occupational therapist's suggestion to install rails in the chamber, saying she 'didn't want to ruin the building'. But Trish Burrows, the secretary of parliamentary services, pushed back, telling her: 'This is not just for you, this is for the people of Pakenham … If you can't get to your seat to represent your community, then we're not the parliament of Victoria.' They're now considering installing a ramp to the backbench for when she can no longer walk. How long will she keep going? 'I do have days where I'm exhausted and I think, 'do I still want to do this?' Then I wake up the next day and I think, 'no, I really do have more to give'. 'Maybe it's selfish but my community is growing and I'm not done fighting for Pakenham … It's good for them to have a voice. And for me, it gives me a purpose … [Her partner] Matt's at work and the kids are at school. If I was at home, I would just sit and cry all day.' She trains monthly on eye-gaze technology for when speech becomes difficult and plans to start using it to reply to emails. But she wants the health minister, Mary-Anne Thomas, to bring proposed changes to voluntary assisted dying (VAD) laws to parliament now, while she can still speak on them. 'There's a timeline for me to be able to,' she says. Her interest in VAD began soon after diagnosis, when she met Jane Morris and Andrew Denton from Go Gentle. 'They were like, 'would you like some information on this for your constituents?' and I looked at them and said, 'I've just been diagnosed with motor neurone disease, I actually want it for myself', and then I broke down in tears.' She later learned Victoria's once-leading VAD laws had fallen behind other states and include a gag clause preventing doctors from raising it with patients – a restriction Thomas plans to scrap. Other proposed changes include extending the life expectancy limit for non-neurodegenerative diseases from six to 12 months, removing the third assessment for neurodegenerative conditions and shortening the timeframe between VAD requests. Faith leaders have written to Vulin, asking her not to support changes. 'I write back saying, as someone that's been personally diagnosed with a terminal, neurodegenerative illness, I've had the opportunity to speak to many, many people who are terminal or have lost people to terminal illnesses and … these changes are necessary,' Vulin says. 'There are barriers in place and I respect that everyone won't want to use it – no problem. But for those that do, it needs to be accessible.' Vulin has also written to the federal health minister, Mark Butler, lobbying for changes to telehealth to allow VAD services, and for better support for people with MND over 65 who aren't eligible for the NDIS. When she's not at parliament, she spends time with Matt, daughter Sienna, 18, and son Sage, 16. Sienna recently did work experience at the Florey Institute, which researches MND. 'She's more comfortable talking about it,' Vulin says of Sienna. 'Sage doesn't, but he hugs me more.'
The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
How did you get my number? Inside the shadowy world of data brokers
Priya Dev has a clue on how political spam ended up in her inbox during the 2025 federal election campaign. Like many Australians, Dev endured an unwanted flood of Trumpet of Patriots text messages – Clive Palmer has admitted to sending 17m of them. But it was email spam from one of the major political parties that she thought she could do something about. Political parties are exempt from privacy law, so they have no obligation to tell individuals how they find your data, and there is no way to opt out. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email But the Australian National University data science academic had a clue: the emails were addressed to a fake name she had used for online purchases years ago – a name also used when she received spam from one of the minor political parties in 2020. 'It looks like it's come from a transaction,' she says. 'It would likely be some sort of online e-commerce transaction, or energy transaction or something like that.' Tracking down how organisations gain access to individual contact information is 'really hard with political parties because they just ignore you,' Dev says. 'If I can find out the origin of my data from this mission, it would be really amazing.' It's the second time Dev has attempted to track how someone got her data, working through the labyrinthine web of data brokers who – often without our awareness – buy and sell information on the public to advertisers or others who want to know more about us. Last year, after receiving dozens of unwanted calls, Dev was able to track who held her phone number back to real estate giant CoreLogic Australia, who told her they had been able to legitimately buy her data from another data broker firm in 2023, who had bought her data from another data broker in 2016. That company told her it obtained her data through a 2014 marketing campaign and had probably passed on her information to at least 50 other companies. Dev's experience is not an isolated one. Crikey reported in April that a child's email address that was signed up for a charity fundraiser more than a decade ago received Liberal party political spam at the most recent election. The answer to how marketers and others find out your contact details and other personal information is a complicated one. Katharine Kemp, an associate professor who leads the public interest law and tech initiative at the University of New South Wales, says it often occurs through a data-matching service that joins up your personal information across different service providers who then sell that via data brokers. Kemp said she had the experience where a mortgage broker had called her asking if she was in the market for a mortgage – she suspects they got her information from a real estate agent during an open house visit. But finding out how they got that information can often be hard, Kemp says. When she asks those who contact her where they got her details, 'they will obfuscate or sometimes just immediately hang up or … give a silly answer, and then when you press them, they very quickly end the call.' The federal privacy commissioner, Carly Kind, describes the data broking industry in general terms as 'very opaque', with 'a very complex value chain of personal information'. 'So because people don't really know what's going on, they're not really empowered to complain about it,' she says. 'I think people find it creepy, the way in which their personal information has been passed around through data brokers and ends up in places that they don't expect.' One global data broker organisation has described its work as 'enabling the exchange of information between businesses in the consumer interest and in the support of Australian corporates and small businesses,' according to a 2023 submission to the Australian consumer watchdog's inquiry into data brokering. The kinds of information collected includes names, addresses, age, browsing behaviour, purchasing behaviour, financial status, employment, qualification, tenancy history and other socioeconomic and demographic information. A Australia report last year found the types of data bought and sold by brokers could include location and movements over time, sexual interests, financial concerns, banking and utility providers, personal problems, gambling or drinking habits, and recent online purchases. Data broker companies include credit reporting companies, fraud and identity verification companies, news corporations, property companies, tenancy data brokers, marketers, loyalty programs, and social media platforms. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission found in its report last year on data brokering that privacy policies used by companies to allow the sharing of data can use 'ambiguous language', making it hard for consumers to identify who their data is being shared with and for what purposes. They also make it harder, the report found, for people to figure out who holds their data and to opt out of its collection. The average number of words in a typical privacy policy is 6,876 and it would take 29 minutes to read, the report found. Research conducted as part of the report found 74% of Australians are uncomfortable with the idea of their personal information being shared or sold. Some companies seek to downplay concern and privacy obligations – such as providing data held on a person by request – by de-identifying the data collected on consumers. Consumer group Choice found last year data brokers claimed to not hold data on consumers who were members of their loyalty programs, with names taken off the data held. Kind, the privacy commissioner, says the assertion that de-identified data may not be considered personal information under the Privacy Act could be 'creative interpretation' of the law by the companies collecting such data. The ACCC said de-identified data still carries risks of consumers being identified when combined with data points from other sources. Kind, speaking generally and without naming any companies in particular, said many Australians would find some of the practices of some data brokers to be 'quite uncomfortable to say the least, and often veering on affronting or outrageous'. 'The data is changing hands numerous times. So it is a very complex space, and I think undoubtedly, a big chunk of it is legitimate and in compliance with the [privacy] act. But that's quite fuzzy – where that stops and where less legitimate activity starts.' The ACCC report did not make any recommendations, but supported the implementation of strengthened privacy laws in Australia. Kind says the ACCC's work has cleared the way for her office to begin looking into the practices of the sector, saying the Privacy Act today 'has many elements which could be applied to data brokers to rein in their practices'. 'It's an issue that I'm keen to prioritise and my regulatory team is currently looking into potentially using our powers in this space,' Kind says. Dev says there needs to be a debate about extending the privacy obligations to political parties, which would force them to be transparent with the public about how they acquire personal data. The exemption means that political parties do not have to respond to her requests about what data they hold on her, Dev says. Kemp says she thinks there is some prospect of tighter rules around data brokering, but there will be no appetite from politicians to change the law on political party obligations. 'But I don't think we should give up on it as an issue in an area that requires reform.'
