
Texas judge removes ESA protections from lesser prairie chicken
In an unusual ESA plot twist, U.S. District Judge David Counts vacated the Fish and Wildlife Service's 2022 rule determining the animal needs federal protections after the agency itself said it had found a 'serious defect' in the listing.
'Fish and Wildlife's concession points to serious error at the very foundation of its rule,' Counts reasoned in his opinion, adding that 'mere remand would not cure this error.'
Advertisement
Environmental groups that support continued federal protections for the lesser prairie chicken had urged the judge to keep the 2022 listing in place while FWS tried to fix the alleged problems.
'It's bitterly disappointing to see a federal judge accept the Trump administration's bad faith rationale for stripping the lesser prairie chicken's urgently needed protections,' said Jason Rylander, the legal director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute.
Rylander added that 'this ruling has nothing to do with science or the law and everything to do with kowtowing to the oil and gas industry.'
FWS has a policy of not commenting on litigation. The agency could not be immediately reached Wednesday afternoon.
Counts was nominated by President Donald Trump to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, where the lesser prairie chicken has long roosted in successive rounds of litigation.
FWS first listed the lesser prairie chicken as a threatened species under the ESA in 2014. Energy industry groups and others challenged the listing, which was vacated in 2015.
Following receipt of another listing petition and further study, FWS in November 2022 listed the northern distinct population segment of the lesser prairie chicken as threatened and the southern population of the species as endangered.
The state of Texas joined with industry groups including the Permian Basin Petroleum Association in filing suit against the ESA determination.
'Following the change in federal administration in January 2025, Fish and Wildlife re-evaluated [the challengers'] claims,' Counts observed, adding that 'Fish and Wildlife now believes it erred … and did not provide a sufficient justification' for the division into two distinct population segments.
Counts further declared that the federal agency 'commits no handwaving when it also concedes that this failure causes the Final Listing Rule to be 'unlawful'' and therefore subject to being entirely wiped off the books.
The lesser prairie chicken's full range extends across parts of five states. The 2022 listing identified the southern segment as extending from New Mexico to West Texas, while the northern population spanned Colorado, Kansas and Oklahoma.
FWS identified the primary threats in both segments as 'loss of large, connected blocks of grassland and shrubland habitat,' with the southern population facing higher risk of extinction due to the region's hotter climate and vulnerability to prolonged drought.
As such, the law places tighter restrictions on activities within the southern population segment than the northern segment.
In a previous court filing, the Trump administration said that local conservation efforts would be sufficient to protect the species while a new ESA listing petition and review process was underway.
Conservation groups disagree. They blasted the judge's decision, saying it all but dooms the bird.
'Removing protections for the lesser prairie chicken would be devastating news and would effectively sign an extinction warrant for the species,' Andrew Carter, director of conservation policy at Defenders of Wildlife, said in an emailed statement. 'As a bird that once numbered in the millions, it is now down to a fraction of that amount, having lost about 90 percent of its habitat.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Unifor condemns federal government's attack on CUPE flight attendants' right to strike and fair and free collective bargaining
TORONTO, Aug. 16, 2025 /CNW/ - Unifor strongly condemns the federal government's imposition of binding arbitration between Air Canada and CUPE Flight Attendants, cutting short a legal strike action just hours after it began. "This move by the federal government sends a clear message to federally regulated employers: don't bother bargaining fairly with workers because the government will step in to strip away your right to strike," said Unifor National President Lana Payne. "Our message is equally clear – Unifor will always defend workers' right to strike and any government or company that tries to rip that away is in for one hell of a fight." On the first day of the strike, Minister of Jobs and Families Patty Hajdu invoked Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code, directing the Canada Industrial Relations Board to arbitrate the dispute. "The government is condoning Air Canada's refusal to bargain fairly while blocking workers' legitimate fight against unpaid work. Workers have constitutional rights in this country, and we expect our own governments to uphold them," said Payne. "My message to these same federal employers, many of whom Unifor also bargains with, is to consider hard on what you are sowing, because here's the truth: suppressing the rights of workers will never bring you labour peace." Unifor stands shoulder-to-shoulder with CUPE flight attendants, having issued a solidarity letter earlier this week and pledging ongoing support in the fight for justice and respect on the job. Unifor is Canada's largest union in the private sector, representing 320,000 workers in every major area of the economy. The union advocates for all working people and their rights, fights for equality and social justice in Canada and abroad, and strives to create progressive change for a better future. SOURCE Unifor View original content to download multimedia: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Fox News
15 minutes ago
- Fox News
South Carolina Democratic gubernatorial candidate urged to drop out of race after shocking rant
Fox News correspondent Madison Scarpino has the latest on South Carolina Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mullins McLeod's arrest video on 'Fox Report.'


CBS News
15 minutes ago
- CBS News
West Virginia to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to D.C.
Hundreds of West Virginia National Guard members will deploy across the nation's capital as part of the Trump administration's effort to overhaul policing in the District of Columbia through a federal crackdown on crime and homelessness. The move comes as federal agents and National Guard troops have begun to appear across the heavily Democratic city after President Trump's executive order on Monday, federalizing local police forces and activating about 800 D.C. National Guard troops. Republican West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey announced Saturday that he was sending a contingent of 300 to 400 members. "West Virginia is proud to stand with President Trump in his effort to restore pride and beauty to our nation's capital," Morrisey said. By adding outside troops to join the existing National Guard deployment and federal law enforcement officers temporarily assigned to Washington, Mr. Trump is exercising even tighter control over the city. It's a power play that the president has justified as an emergency response to crime and homelessness, even though district officials have noted that violent crime is lower than it was during Trump's first term in office. A protest against Mr. Trump's intervention drew scores to Dupont Circle on Saturday afternoon before a march to the White House, about 1.5 miles away. Demonstrators assembled behind a banner that said "No fascist takeover of D.C.," and some in the crowd held signs that said "No military occupation." Mr. Trump was at his Virginia golf club after Friday's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. The West Virginia activation also suggests the administration sees the need for additional manpower after the president personally played down the need for Washington to hire more police officers. Maj. Gen. James Seward, West Virginia's adjutant general, said in a statement that members of the state's National Guard "stand ready to support our partners in the National Capital Region" and that the Guard's "unique capabilities and preparedness make it an invaluable partner in this important undertaking." Federal agents have appeared in some of the city's most highly trafficked neighborhoods, garnering a mix of praise, pushback and alarm from local residents and leaders across the country. City leaders, who are obliged to cooperate with the president's order under the federal laws that direct the district's local governance, have sought to work with the administration, though they have bristled at the scope of the president's takeover. On Friday, the administration reversed course on an order that aimed to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration as an "emergency police commissioner" after the district's top lawyer sued to contest. After a court hearing, Attorney General Pam Bond issued a memo that directed the Metropolitan Police Department to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. District officials say they are evaluating how to best comply. In his order on Monday, Mr. Trump declared an emergency due to the "city government's failure to maintain public order." He said that impeded the "federal government's ability to operate efficiently to address the nation's broader interests without fear of our workers being subjected to rampant violence." In a letter to city residents, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, wrote that "our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now." She added that if Washingtonians stick together, "we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy — even when we don't have full access to it."