'Monster' Omar Wilson found guilty of beating top chef to death near Notting Hill Carnival
A self-described "monster" has been found guilty of beating a top chef to death near Notting Hill Carnival - before going clubbing.
Omar Wilson, 32, was convicted of the murder of Mussie Imnetu at the Old Bailey after punching and kicking him during an altercation. Wilson claimed he acted in self-defence.
CCTV showed Wilson approach the 41-year-old chef and headbutt him outside the Dr Power restaurant in Queensway, near west London's Notting Hill Carnival on 26 August last year, the court heard.
Around a minute later, Wilson punched Mr Imnetu five times in the head, continued to repeatedly punch him while he was on his hands and knees, and then kicked him in the head.
Mr Imnetu, who worked under star chefs Gordon Ramsay and Marcus Wareing, was said to have been "heavily intoxicated" at the time and died from his injuries four days later in hospital.
Prosecutor Jacob Hallam KC had said: "The defendant had, by that point, struck him to his head more than a dozen times. Mr Imnetu had struck the defendant not once.
"At the end of that altercation, Mr Imnetu was dying on the ground and the defendant left and went clubbing in the Ministry of Sound."
As nearby officers went to help the chef, Wilson walked away from the scene. He dropped his sunglasses and keys as he left.
'There's a monster in me'
The court heard that after the assault, Wilson told an associate he "crossed the line" and said in a message: " There's a monster in me, man, and it's just like sometimes it comes out.
"And I think I've messed up now, I've messed up, everything's finished."
When asked how Notting Hill Carnival was in another message, the court heard that he replied: "Can't lie. I did the hands ting [sic] and I think it's a manslaughter," jurors heard.
Wilson's defence
After his arrest on 28 August 2024, Wilson told police officers that he had struck Mr Imnetu in "self-defence".
He also claimed that the chef was behaving erratically, harassing girls, and had a bottle.
Speaking in court, Wilson said he felt "trapped" and "scared" at the time because he believed Mr Imnetu was holding a broken bottle - which turned out not to be the case.
A jury found Wilson, of Leytonstone, guilty of murder on Thursday. He was remanded into custody and will be sentenced on Friday.
Detective Chief Inspector Brian Howie said Mr Imnetu "was in London for a few days to help train his colleagues and went out that evening to enjoy the post-Notting Hill Carnival atmosphere, where tragically he was violently assaulted".
Samantha Yelland, of the CPS, also said: "Omar Wilson's savage violence ultimately took the life of a much-loved man, and the Crown Prosecution Service was determined that he should face justice."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Neighbourhoods where people are most likely to be mugged, carjacked or robbed
The neighbourhoods and town centres where people are most likely to be mugged, carjacked or threatened and forced to hand over mobile phones have been revealed by a new crime map. A new interactive crime map has revealed the neighbourhoods in Britain where you're most likely to be mugged, carjacked or robbed, according to police data. Last year, police recorded more than 80,000 crimes of robbery in England and Wales. That is any crime where an offender uses force or the threat of force in order to steal. It can include mugging (where someone is attacked and robbed on the street), robbery by intimidation (making someone think violence or force will be used to steal from them), carjacking (using force to steal a vehicle), an armed robbery or a bank robbery. It is a more serious offence than simple theft and can leave victims suffering psychological harm, even triggering long-term mental health issues such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The maximum sentence is life imprisonment. As with most crime types, robberies are more likely to take place in busy town and city centres than in residential neighbourhoods. Last year, outside central London - where tourists are far more likely to be targeted than anywhere else - Leeds City Centre witnessed the highest number of robberies with 365, the equivalent of one per day. Next was the North Central & Dartmouth Circus (287) and Central (262) districts of Birmingham city centre. You can see how crime rates compare near you using our interactive map. Crime rates - the number of crimes in each area for every 1,000 people living there - allow for a fairer comparison of the likelihood of being robbed in places with widely different population sizes. However, in some busy city centres, the results may be skewed by the number of visitors. After Leeds City Centre and districts within Birmingham's city centre, the risk of a robbery was greatest in Central Bradford. There were 133 robberies last year in Central Bradford, a rate of 20 crimes for every 1,000 people, or one robbery for every 50 residents. Next was Bristol's City Centre & Harbourside neighbourhood (17 robberies per 1,000 residents), Leicester City Centre (16 per 1,000 people), Central Blackpool (14), and Nottingham City Centre & Trent Bridge (14). However, robbery is far more likely in London than anywhere else in England and Wales. The 32 local authority areas with the highest rates of robbery are all boroughs of London. Of neighbourhood areas, robberies were most common in Fitzrovia West & Soho, a total of 1,285 last year. That's the equivalent of a robbery every seven hours, or at least three each day. Figures are available for every one of more than 7,000 neighbourhoods in England and Wales apart from areas covered by Greater Manchester Police, as the force has not supplied crime data for last year. Crime figures are available for neighbourhoods with between 7,000 and 10,000 residents, which the government designates as Middle Super Output Areas (MSOAs). The statistics do not include crimes reported at train stations, as British Transport Police record them.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Pro-Palestinian activist who avoided prosecution after chanting 'I love the 7th of October' is Islamist refugee granted asylum in Britain
A pro-Palestine activist who avoided prosecution after he chanted 'I love the 7th of October' is a Muslim refugee granted asylum in the UK, it emerged today. Mohammad al-Mail, a 27-year-old Kuwaiti national granted refugee status in the UK in 2017, also shouted 'I like an organisation that starts with H' through a megaphone at an anti-Israel protest in Swiss Cottage, north-west London, last September. Mr Al-Mail was arrested by police after the chants over alleged terrorism offences, but after eight months a decision was taken by the CPS not to charge him. He is said to have avoided prosecution by telling officers that the organisation he claimed to love was actually the Home Office, and not terror group Hamas. This is despite him operating a campaign group which states its aim is to achieve 'Islamic supremity' and which has criticised terror groups such as Al-Qaeda for failing to advance global jihad. Meanwhile at the same rally, a Jewish counter-protester was also arrested for holding a placard mocking deaths during attacks involving explosive pagers in Lebanon. The attack targeted Hezbollah members and leaders, and the placard depicted the leader of the proscribed terror group holding a pager, with the word 'beep' repeated three times. The man was charged over the incident in May, but the case has since been dropped. Earlier this year, Mr Al-Mail appeared to make light of the accusations against him, telling an Arabic language podcast the case 'fell apart', the Telegraph reports. He described his answer to police when asked what he meant by the letter H: 'Immediately, I answered, 'It could be the Home Office', you know, the ministry of the interior. 'I love the ministry of the interior', and so on. 'Truly, as the saying goes, 'The worst calamity is the one that makes you laugh'. The Met referred the case twice to the CPS, but both times it decided not to press charges - reportedly due to the issue of it relying on 'speculation' to infer support for a proscribed terror organisation. During the podcast, Mr Al-Mail told listeners to 'take advantage' of October 7, which saw 1,200 people killed by an Hamas incursion into Israel. The resulting war has resulted in almost 57,000 Gazans being killed, many of whom civilians. 'Not every day is like October 7,' Mr Al-Mail added. 'If an opportunity arises, we must fully exploit it. If you strike, make it hurt.' The refugee's views are reiterated by his campaign group Upper Hand Organization, which lists its 'pillars' as 'rightism' and 'Islamic Supremacy'. The English version of his site reveals the group was founded in 2016 in Kuwait, before being banned. It states: 'The Upper Hand Organization is a global movement dedicated to working with and for Muslims worldwide through all means and fields - committed to channeling resources toward strategic projects to achieve Islamic dominance.' It adds that the group 'operates as an entity that asserts its responsibilities extend beyond national borders, with a revolutionary agenda grounded in Islam.' In November, some two months after the march, Mr Al-Mail told his supporters he would surrender to police over the chants but told his followers to 'continue the path of Jihad', claiming peaceful followers of Islam are 'slaves and dwarves'. He added: 'What is coming to you is terrifying – either our annihilation or yours.' After leaving Kuwait, Mr Al-Mail was convicted of 13 offences including defaming the Emir and sentenced in his absence to 53 years in prison. Claiming asylum, he said these were politically and religiously motivated and was granted allowed to remain in the UK on May 5 2017. He later received a partial pardon. Shadow Policing Minister and Conservative MP Chris Philp told the Telegraph: 'The police must urgently re-investigate the incident with a view to re-arresting the man concerned'. He added: 'I am deeply worried that someone came here, was granted asylum and then abused the UK's generosity by expressing extremist views. This is why our human rights and asylum laws need to be changed.' Lord Walney, the Government's former extremism tsar, said the revelations are 'disturbing and raises serious questions for the Metropolitan Police'. 'The fact officers were apparently unaware of this open source material when they submitted the case to the Crown Prosecution Service suggests an alarming lack of rigour in their initial investigation,' he said. 'In light of this, it is vital that the police reopen the case to ensure national security can be protected.' It is understood the CPS is 'urgently' reviewing the decision not to charge Mr Al-Mail.
Metro
13 hours ago
- Metro
'Taking my rapist to court was worse than what he did to me'
When Danielle* was raped, it was by someone she knew. A few years on, she still finds it hard to say the word. It's no surprise given all she's been through – but the damage isn't just down to her attacker, she's also been left traumatised by the justice system. Danielle tells Metro that the day after her assault, she phoned the police only to be told by an officer: 'Do you really think it's a good idea to report this?' 'He explained to me what I was likely to experience and implied that I shouldn't bother. He terrified me,' she remembers. It took nine months for Danielle to find the strength to officially report her assault and another four years before the case went to trial – only for the defendant to be found not guilty. Waiting years for a rape case to go to court only to see the person who assaulted you get off isn't unusual in the UK. Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) statistics reveal that of the 68,000 rapes reported to police in England and Wales in the year ending 2023, only 5% resulted in a charge. Of that figure, just 2.9% ended in a conviction. No one, simple reason explains such low conviction rates; but ongoing beliefs in rape myths and the huge burden placed on victims to supply evidence certainly helps to create barriers and prevent rape survivors from rarely get justice. According to the 2021 London Rape Review, 65% of rape cases result in the victim eventually withdrawing from the process. 'Throughout my whole case, the person who gathered the evidence was me,' explains Danielle, who is in her thirties. 'For example, I'd spoken to helplines the day after the rape, but the detective said they had tried to gain the transcripts and it wasn't possible. It took a lot of time, but I managed to get the transcripts myself.' Danielle also discovered that despite calling the police the day after her rape, no record of it had been logged. 'Thankfully, the day after it had happened, I wrote about it in a Word document so I didn't have to rely on my memory nine months later,' she says. 'Then, about a year and a half in, the police were just ignoring my emails. Eventually, it took another person coming forward, with a report about the same person, to give me the strength to carry on.' Gina* also faced challenges the moment she tried to report her rape by a family friend when she was 17. 'I attempted to put it in a statement – the whole history on one piece of paper – but I have dyslexia and ADHD and I can't write everything down the way I want to,' she explains to Metro. 'Afterwards, an officer rang and said: 'We're not going to take it further. Reading what you've put, we don't think he's done anything wrong'. I couldn't catch my breath.' Gina begged them to take the case and eventually it was handed to a different officer who invited her to a video interview. However, on the day, the officer rang to tell Gina she had missed her 10am appointment, which she had noted down as being at midday. After tearfully pleaded with them the officer relented, on the condition she came to the station immediately. According to Rape Crisis, 6.5million women in England and Wales have been raped or sexually assaulted, but 5 in 6 women don't report rape The number of sexual offences in England and Wales reached a record high of 193,566 in in the year ending March 2022 UCL research found that rape offences have the highest not guilty plea rate of any offence (85%) and this has been the case consistently for 15 years ONS data reveals almost half of all rapes are perpetrated by a woman's partner or ex-partner, and End Violence Against Women have said that the victim knows the perpetrator in 85% of cases The ONS also found that more than 1 in 5 victims were unconscious or asleep when they were raped 'I threw clothes on and got a taxi, then the officer came out and said, 'Oh, sorry, you were right, it was 12 o'clock'. I felt exhausted before I'd even started,' she remembers. 'Maybe, if the police had asked 'How do you want to communicate this to us?' it would give survivors more control of their story.' Gina adds that she also felt the female officer in charge of her case gave her many 'false promises'. 'She kept saying that she would ring every Friday. But every time I would stand beside my phone, shaking, and she never called. In the end I emailed her and she replied: 'you do realise we're busy? It isn't just you'. 'I was really upset, and I started to become quite anxious about asking if there were updates. I almost felt like I was forgotten about.' The 2025 Code of Practice for Victims of Crime in England and Wales states that victims should be 'provided with information about the investigation and prosecution' and includes a clause that police must ask victims how often they would like to receive updates, as well as their preferred method of contact. It took two years before Gina was finally told that her case wouldn't progress to court. 'Their attitude was, we can't do anything, there's no evidence. That was it – no support, nothing,' she recalls. It was only after speaking to a member of the CPS that Gina felt acknowledged. 'She told me, 'Professionally we can't prove that he's done this, but I believe you, and so does everybody else'. They were really compassionate.' According to Michaela-Clare Addison, Sexual Violence National Lead at Victim Support, police investigations into rape are a long, complex process for victim-survivors. 'Most come to the investigation with no idea what to expect or how long it could take. Many say they felt like the ones being investigated,' she tells Metro. A 2024 report from Victim Support found that one-third (36%) of respondents had been asked what they did to stop the offence while it was happening, while 33% had faced accusations that they were pursuing justice as a way to seek revenge. Addison adds that someone's experience during the court process is just as important as the outcome or verdict. 'Some have described not feeling like they had received justice, despite a guilty conviction,' she explains. 'Victim-survivors need to be treated with dignity and respect, know they have been listened to and believed. Yet critical support has been put in jeopardy by recent government cuts to victims' services funding, which has far-reaching implications.' Although police are mandated to investigate every rape allegation they receive, it is often a lengthy and fraught process, where survivors report being forced to repeat details to different professionals with varying levels of training. Julia* is one of the 50% of rape survivors attacked by her then-partner, and has experienced this. Her relationship involved narcissistic abuse 'which I know not everybody understands, but when you're trying to explain it to a police officer that doesn't have a clue, it makes you feel worse,' she tells Metro. After reporting her assault, Julia became scared of what her partner might do, so tried to withdraw her statement. However, she was told they had to follow it up and an officer would come to her home. 'I was very anxious,' she recalls. 'When she turned up she was bright and breezy and straight away said, 'I don't know why I'm here, I don't know any details'. That was my first shock.' Then, at one point, the officer told Julia: 'something along the lines of, ''Don't worry, you'll meet someone else'. I didn't feel that she was very professional or understood at all. I really couldn't wait for her to leave.' Several days later, Julia was informed by the police that she'd been noted as 'refusing' to cooperate. 'They kept using words like 'unwilling'. I felt like I was in trouble, like I'd done something wrong – that I was a problem.' Despite her officially withdrawing from the process, Julia couldn't shake the feeling that it meant her partner had got away with attacking her. Eventually she went back to the police, only to be told it was too late, as over six months had elapsed between the rape and her reporting it. 'But that's actually not correct information,' she explains. 'If it's a sexual assault, there is no time limit.' The challenge of providing physical evidence is another major barrier to justice for many rape survivors. Forensic examinations, though optional, can be painful, humiliating and stressful, and have to be carried out within seven days of the rape. The issue is even more pronounced for historical rapes. For Julia, providing evidence meant handing over her phone. 'My phone was initially taken for just a few days, then the CPS wanted it looked at in more detail and it was gone for about a month. Most victims want to be as helpful as possible, so we say yes to pretty much everything.' However, she points out: 'His phone wasn't taken. I'm still quite angry about that. His messages, his photos, his everything – they weren't of any interest'. At 85%, rape offences have the highest not guilty plea rate of any crime (this has been the case consistently for the last 15 years) and many survivors feel the odds are against them from the outset. 'I met my barrister for the first time about half an hour before going into court,' recalls Danielle. 'I said to him that I had called the police after the rape and he gave the detective a look like, 'why the hell do I not know that?' In that moment my heart sank; I thought, 'he's not done his job and there is nothing I can do'.' And it only got worse for her. 'Whoever was cross examining me, destroyed me. She claimed that I'd led him on, that it was my fault and said the actual physical rape didn't happen at all. My god, she did a fantastic job of tearing me to pieces. I have strength in me, I can speak up, but she broke me.' When the not guilty verdict came through, Danielle says her whole world 'collapsed'. 'I remember thinking, my life has been ruined for the last four plus years, and for what? I hadn't had any income as I couldn't work, no relationships, friendships broken. I do believe in justice and speaking up,' she adds, 'but it destroyed my life.' For Julia, the court process was 'worse than what he did. When he raped me, it was just me and just him. However, when you go to court you are humiliated and degraded in front of a whole courtroom of people. 'I was with my independent sexual violence adviser (ISVA) in a little room and waited for hours to be called to give evidence. Eventually my ISVA went to investigate and came back saying, 'They've been to lunch!' No-one told us so we just sat there, thinking I could be called anytime. 'The only reason every single person was in that courtroom was because of me, and they forgot about me.' As with other crimes, the burden of proof to secure a rape conviction is 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. Yet the task of convincing a 12-person jury that a rape undisputedly took place, that there is no alternative explanation, is formidable and exhausting, especially in cases where it's one person's word against another's. For Gina, Danielle and Julia, the main motivation for reporting their rapist was to protect others. But they are all still reckoning with their decision. 'Before the trial, I felt really powerful, and hopeful, and I felt like I was doing such a good thing,' remembers Julia. 'But the trial and the not guilty verdict takes all of that away. After, I would wake up at night, thinking I wish I'd said this or that. It was just horrendous.' More Trending Gina says she still suffers nightmares and flashbacks every day. 'It's always on the front of my brain, especially the way the police were. I think if we were treated with more kindness I could accept things a bit more. ' He wasn't convicted, but there are triggers I have to deal with every day – it could be like a certain song or a certain smell. He's living his life whileI've got this prison sentence.' * Names have been changed A Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson said: 'The number of rape cases we charge has more than doubled since January 2021 from 491 to 1,122 this quarter. 'Although the burden of proof is on prosecutors to provide the evidence to get a guilty verdict, no victim should ever be made to feel as if they are on trial. 'We are working alongside others in the criminal justice system to deliver a more supportive service for victims so fewer drop out of the process and reduce delays – and recent figures show we are making vital progress in both these areas. 'We now have dedicated victim liaison officers in every CPS area working with Independent Sexual Violence Advisors to help victims of rape navigate court proceedings, and offer them a pre-trial meeting with a member of our prosecution team to discuss the trial process and support we can put in place.' Chief Constable Sarah Crew, national policing lead for rape and sexual offences, told Metro: 'The effective investigation and prosecution of rape is one of the most important challenges facing the criminal justice system. 'We are working hard in policing to improve our response to rape and sexual offences, and all 43 police forces in England and Wales have signed up to Operation Soteria, a transformational approach to the investigation of rape and sexual offences. 'One of the key principles of Soteria is placing the needs of the victim at the heart of an investigation, ensuring transparency and communication throughout the investigative process. 'By providing better support for victims and shifting our focus to the perpetrator's behaviour, we are starting to rebuild trust and confidence, and we are seeing a steep increase in arrests and charges. 'If you have been a victim of rape or sexual assault, I urge you to come forward and report this to the police. Your report will be treated sensitively, and we will listen and investigate with respect and empathy. We work closely with Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs) and Independent Sexual Violence Advisors (ISVAs) and we would urge anyone who is not comfortable with going to the police to use these independent specialist services instead.' APCC Joint Victims Leads, PCCs Clare Moody and Matthew Scott, said: 'It takes great courage to report a rape, so it is vital that victims and survivors of this terrifying and traumatising experience are placed front and centre of the criminal justice system. Far too few cases of rape make it to court and those that do can take years to reach trial, so the process must ensure victims are – and feel – listened to, informed, and treated with fairness and dignity if we are to encourage the reporting of sexual offences. 'Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs), elected to act as the public's voice in policing, are key to ensuring victims know and understand the support to which they are entitled, and to ensuring that the highest quality and consistent support is available. We provide vital services such as Independent Sexual Violence Advisers, therapy and counselling in order to help victims directly. 'As PCCs, we hold our Forces to account to make sure they are delivering their obligations under the Victims Code. We promote victims' rights and support them in challenging the system when things go wrong. 'PCCs fully support the government's pledge to halve violence against women and girls within a decade. In the meantime, it is critical victims of crime can access timely support as they cope with and recover from the trauma they have experienced and navigate their way through an unfamiliar and complex criminal justice system. We will continue to work with our partners to deliver the best outcomes for victims.' Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: I asked my partner to choose the porn I watched for a week MORE: Married teacher posed as boy, 14, to get young girls to send him explicit photos MORE: The forgotten UK social networking site that wrecked and rekindled relationships
