Sports Direct ‘ripping off' customers with misleading deals
Sports Direct has been accused of potentially misleading customers by using Recommended Retail Prices (RRPs) to suggest deals that may not be as advantageous as they appear, according to consumer group Which?.
The watchdog has reported the retail giant to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) after receiving tip-offs regarding the use of RRPs.
Sports Direct frequently uses comparative RRP figures to imply that customers are getting a cheaper deal.
However, Which? researchers were unable to find some items sold at Sports Direct's stated RRP price anywhere else online.
In addition to RRPs, the chain also uses terms such as Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) or Suggested Retail Price (SRP), which the watchdog believes consumers would interpret as equivalent to an RRP.
Which? initiated its investigation into the pricing of 160 popular products on SportsDirect.com after receiving tip-offs from its readers about "suspicious" RRPs.
Overall, for 58 of the 160 products investigated, Which? found no retailer selling them online at or above the Sports Direct reference price.
For a further 53, Which? did find the product at or above the reference price at another retailer, but in each case that retailer was part of the Frasers Group, Sports Direct's owner. All of these items were Frasers Group own-brand products.
Mike Ashley 's Frasers Group has a large portfolio of brands under its umbrella including Jack Wills, Slazenger, Everlast and Lonsdale.
Frasers Group also owns various retailers such as USC, Studio, and Get the Label, which sometimes appeared to be the only sellers of these particular brands, Which? said.
Which? found a Jack Wills Hunston graphic logo hoodie in green for £24 at Sports Direct, with the item advertised as having a Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of £54.99.
Which? researchers could not find the item sold or supplied by anyone other than Frasers Group retailers.
It was £40 on Amazon – which is supplied by Sports Direct – but all the other retailers sold it at £24.
Which? also found a pair of Slazenger men 's tennis shoes selling at Sports Direct for £32.99 – nearly half the MSRP of £64.99.
Which? found the trainers sold on eight other websites, but the owner or seller was always part of the parent company.
Seven retailers sold them for £32.99, or in one case £33. Only one retailer, Slazenger itself, sold them at the MSRP.
A Whitaker Somerfield long sleeve base layer for equestrian sports was also selling at Sports Direct at £8 with an RRP of £35.
Unlike the other examples, Whitaker Somerfield is not a brand owned by Sports Direct or Frasers Group, but Which? researchers could not find it sold or supplied by anyone else online other than Frasers Group retailers.
The highest price found was £18 – still a long way short of the supposed £35 reference price, Which? said.
Which? said it believed some of Sports Direct's uses of RRPs and MSRPs could be 'misleading actions' under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, as they could mislead people about the value of a product and savings they could make.
Which? legal expert Lisa Webb said: 'If Sports Direct is misleading customers by inappropriate use of RRPs to dupe them into thinking they are getting a good deal, then the competition regulator needs to step in and take strong action to stop this from happening.
'In the meantime, shoppers should take any big discounts at SportsDirect.com with a pinch of salt and make sure they compare prices with other retailers before parting with any hard earned cash.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
33 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Diesel clothing advert banned for objectifying Katie Price
An ad for clothing brand Diesel featuring the model Katie Price was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by objectifying and sexualising women, a watchdog has ruled. The ad, which appeared on the Guardian news website on March 26th, included an image of Price wearing a bikini and holding a handbag in front of her chest. Advertisement The UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received 13 complaints that the ad objectified and sexualised women and featured a model who appeared to be unhealthily thin. The banned Diesel ad featuring Katie Price (ASA/PA) Diesel said the ad was part of a brand campaign called 'The Houseguests', which was designed to challenge stereotypes and support diversity and inclusion in the fashion industry by reflecting a wide range of body types. It believed the ad was compliant with the advertising rules but said it removed the ad from the Guardian website. The brand said Price was 46 years old and had a body type that was not usually included in high fashion campaigns, explaining that the average age for editorial models was between 16 and 23. Advertisement Diesel believed the image was a 'celebration of Ms Price's sexuality and empowerment and was not objectifying, degrading or sexualising', and 'showed Ms Price clearly in control in an active and dynamic pose where she proudly showed off her body and the handbag'. Diesel added that Price was 'well-known for her exaggerated appearance and larger-than-life personality and her large lips and breasts formed part of her curated public image', and this 'exaggerated, eccentric and altered appearance' formed part of the creativity of the campaign. Finally, Diesel said although Price was slender, she had excellent muscle tone and was not unhealthily underweight. The Guardian said it received a complaint directly about the ad on April 4th and blocked it from appearing again because it did not consider it complied with their policies. Advertisement Partly upholding the complaints, the ASA said the bikini only partially covered Price's breasts, and it considered the positioning of the handbag, in front of her stomach with the handle framing her chest, drew viewers' attention to, and emphasised, that part of her body. The ASA said: 'While we acknowledged that Ms Price was shown in a confident and self-assured pose and in control, we considered that because of the positioning of the handbag, which had the effect of emphasising and drawing attention to her breasts, the ad sexualised her in a way that objectified her. 'We therefore considered the ad was likely to cause serious offence, was irresponsible and breached the Code.' The ASA did not uphold complaints about Price appearing to be unhealthily thin, and concluded that the ad was not irresponsible on that basis. Advertisement The watchdog ruled that the ad must not appear again, adding: 'We told Diesel to ensure their future ads were socially responsible and did not cause serious or widespread offence.' Diesel said: 'Diesel's latest Houseguests campaign continues its tradition of challenging norms and embracing individuality. A key image features model Katie Price, 46, showcasing a body type rarely seen in high fashion, proving that women of all shapes and ages deserve representation. The photo celebrates confidence and empowerment without objectification. 'Shared in over 100 countries, it has not received any regulatory complaints, highlighting Diesel's commitment to respectful, inclusive storytelling.'
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Heathrow Airport expansion 'essential' after busiest May
Heathrow says expansion of the airport is "essential", after experiencing its busiest May on than 7.2 million passengers travelled through its four terminals last month, up 0.4% from a year ago.A Heathrow spokesperson said: "As these record numbers become the norm, it's time to start an honest conversation about the challenges this presents for an already space-constrained yet highly efficient hub."Opponents of the west London airport's expansion say increasing air travel would make it much harder for the UK to meet its climate change commitments. The Mayor of London, Sir Sadiq Khan, opposes a third runway at Heathrow for this reason as well as because of noise and air pollution. Heathrow's spokesperson said: "Heathrow continues to deliver excellent service, but to sustain this performance and meet future demand, expanding capacity will be essential."The airport has previously said it will submit detailed plans for building a third runway to the government in the Rachel Reeves used a speech on growth in January to give her support to the project, which has been repeatedly delayed over several decades because of environmental concerns. Friends of the Earth has previously described the expansion plans as "hugely irresponsible".Alethea Warrington, head of aviation at climate charity Possible, said in January: "This huge increase in emissions won't help our economy, and would just encourage the small group of frequent flyers who take most of the flights."People living in nearby Harmondsworth told the BBC earlier this year that if the expansion plans went ahead, "three-quarters of the village would be demolished" and it would no longer be a "viable community".
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Closure of Natwest in Bridgwater criticised by local MP
An MP has said he is "deeply disappointed" by NatWest's decision to close its bank branch in a Somerset Fox, the Conservative MP for Bridgwater, said the move not only "risks excluding" vulnerable residents but will impact the number of shoppers on the high said over the last five years counter transactions have dropped by nearly 65% in the town as more customers "than ever before" switch to digital Bridgwater branch is due to close on 27 October, along with branches in Midsomer Norton and Portishead. Scott Thomas, who has been banking at NatWest since he was a teenager, said closing the branch was "disgusting"."This bank has been my bank for my whole life - I do my business banking with NatWest, they've always been so helpful and now what am I going to do?," he said."Without NatWest, I wouldn't have been able to set that [business account] up. I'm dyslexic and have ADHD. They sat there with me, done it with me, helped me and now to be told I have to do something online with no help, it's absolutely ridiculous." Madeleine Vann, said the closure was "sad"."It's all computers now and you're not dealing with a human being now, are you?" she said."That's why I've come in [to the bank] today, I wanted to see a human."Another local resident, Mary Cornish said she was "really, really shocked" by the news."I do online banking and that won't change but I like to go into the bank to get money out," she said."Such a shame isn't it. I will really miss it - popping in once a week." Other branches across the West earmarked for closure include Yate, Fishponds, Chippenham, Trowbridge and Fox, said the Bridgwater closure "risks excluding some of our most vulnerable residents"."Especially those who rely on in‑branch support to manage their finances with confidence," he added."It will also be a hit to our town centre, where the loss of regular footfall will add further strain to local high street businesses."He said he is "formally requesting" a meeting with NatWest to ensure they maintain "meaningful human support for those who need it most"."I will be pressing them to consider alternative face-to-face provision to ensure no one is left behind," he said. According to NatWest, nearly three quarters of customers using the Bridgwater branch have chosen to use online banking and the mobile app in the last the number of personal customers using the branch on average each month, was just over 220.A NatWest spokesperson said most of its customers were shifting to its "digital services" because of the "speed and convenience".In a statement, the spokesperson added that branch closures were "disappointing" but it was committed to ensuring the move online was "managed compassionately"."[We] proactively contact branch users who we know may need additional support when a branch closes," the said."And where there's a need we install community pop-ups to help customers become familiar with alternative banking services."
