logo
PETRONAS to expand LNG exports to Asian markets

PETRONAS to expand LNG exports to Asian markets

The Stara day ago
The firm plans to expand beyond its traditional markets – Japan, China and South Korea – to countries in South-East Asia, including Vietnam and the Philippines.
KUALA LUMPUR: Petroliam Nasional Bhd (PETRONAS) is seeking to expand its liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports to growing Asian markets while also supporting Malaysia's rising energy needs, which are partly driven by a data-centre boom.
The state-owned company's diversified portfolio – which includes a newly operational export plant in Canada – will enable it to meet overseas demand for gas, said PETRONAS' gas and maritime business chief executive officer (CEO) Datuk Adif Zulkifli.
The firm plans to expand beyond its traditional markets – Japan, China and South Korea – to countries in South-East Asia, including Vietnam and the Philippines, he said in an interview.
But the gas-producing country is also eyeing more imports because its reserves are dwindling at a time when its energy requirements are growing thanks to a proliferation in power-hungry data centres serving the artificial intelligence industry.
Malaysia imported about 3.3 million tonnes of LNG in 2024, up from 2.1 million tonnes in 2021, according to Bloomberg's vessel-tracking data.
PETRONAS will continue exploration for more resources to sustain its domestic production, which has already peaked, Adif added. It operates one of the world's largest LNG terminals in Bintulu on the Sarawak coast, and has enough gas to fill up its plant there 'for as long as we need,' he noted.
'We have brought in a number of upstream projects to make sure that we are able to deliver gas and sustain that for the next 20 to 30 years,' Adif said yesterday. — Bloomberg
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Petroleum Development Act can't supersede relevant Sarawak laws, says senator
Petroleum Development Act can't supersede relevant Sarawak laws, says senator

Free Malaysia Today

time3 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Petroleum Development Act can't supersede relevant Sarawak laws, says senator

Senator Ahmad Ibrahim disputed law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said's statement that Petronas's rights on O&G resources in Sarawak remain protected under the PDA. (Petronas pic) PETALING JAYA : The Petroleum Development Act (PDA) 1974 cannot supersede the relevant laws in Sarawak, especially the Oil Mining Ordinance (OMO) 1958, a senator said in disputing a statement by a federal minister. Ahmad Ibrahim said Sarawak had been producing oil and gas since the discovery of oil in Miri in 1910, some 53 years before Malaysia was formed, the Sarawak Public Communications Unit reported. Ahmad said Sarawak had developed the industry under the state's own laws way before the PDA was enacted. Apart from the PDA, he said, the other relevant laws were the Distribution of Gas Ordinance (DGO) 2016, the Sarawak Land Code, and the State Sales Tax regime. He said Section 73 of the Malaysia Act 1963 preserved all state laws in force before Malaysia was formed, which included the OMO. Moreover, the ordinance, following its amendment in 2018, granted the state full authority over petroleum licensing onshore and on its continental shelf. 'The PDA (only) applies fully in states that do not have their own petroleum laws like the OMO, and therefore, in those states, Petronas is the sole aggregator of oil and gas,' he was quoted as saying. On Tuesday, law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said said the national oil company's rights on oil and gas resources in Sarawak remained protected under the PDA. In a written parliamentary reply, Azalina said the PDA would remain in force, in accordance with existing legal provisions. 'Petronas is vested with the ownership of petroleum, and the rights, powers, freedoms, and exclusive privileges to explore, exploit, obtain, and acquire petroleum, whether onshore or offshore Malaysia, as provided for under the Act,' she was quoted as saying. Ahmad said that under the DGO, Sarawak has exclusive authority to license and regulate domestic gas distribution, with state-owned Petroleum Sarawak Bhd (Petros) having been formally recognised by the federal government as the sole gas aggregator for Sarawak's domestic market, excluding liquefied natural gas. As for the State Sales Tax, he said, a 2020 High Court ruling upheld Sarawak's right to impose such a tax on petroleum products, noting that Petronas withdrew its appeal and settled the dues. On Feb 5, Azalina said Sarawak had accepted that the PDA, not the state ordinances, dictated the operation of Malaysia's petroleum sector. She said Sarawak's concession was among key matters agreed upon by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Sarawak premier Abang Johari Openg during a meeting on Jan 7. On Feb 7, Anwar said the federal and Sarawak governments had agreed to Petronas and its subsidiaries retaining all existing contractual obligations, domestic and international. However, to fulfil Sarawak's aspirations in the oil and gas sector, it was agreed that the DGO will come into force on March 1, he said. 'The DGO will be read together with the PDA, and therefore Petros will act as Sarawak's aggregator,' he had said. Anwar said this after Abang Johari reiterated the state's contention that it had regulatory authority over oil and gas activities within its territory.

Crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow
Crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow

New Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow

THE crude oil market's rather sanguine reaction to the United State s' threats to India over its continued purchases of Russian oil is effectively a bet that very little will actually happen. President Donald Trump cited India's imports of Russian crude when imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India on Aug 6, which is due to take effect on Aug 28. If the new tariff rate does come into place, it will take the rate for some Indian goods to as much as 50 per cent, a level high enough to effectively end US imports from India, which totalled nearly US$87 billion in 2024. As with everything related to Trump, it pays to be cautious given his track record of backflips and pivots. It's also not exactly clear what Trump is ultimately seeking, although it does seem that in the short term he wants to increase his leverage with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of their planned meeting in Alaska this week, and he's using India to achieve this. Whether Trump follows through on his additional tariffs on India remains uncertain, although the chances of a peace deal in Ukraine seem remote, which means the best path for India to avoid the tariffs would be to acquiesce and stop buying Russian oil. But this is an outcome that simply isn't being reflected in current crude oil prices. Global benchmark Brent futures have weakened since Trump's announcement of higher tariffs on India, dropping as low as US$65.81 a barrel in early Asian trade on Monday, the lowest level in two months. This is a price that entirely discounts any threat to global supplies, and assumes that India will either continue buying Russian crude at current volumes, or be able to easily source suitable replacements without tightening the global market. Are these reasonable assumptions? The track record of the crude oil market is somewhat remarkable in that it quickly adapts to new geopolitical realities and any price spikes tend to be shortlived. The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 sent crude prices hurtling towards US$150 a barrel as European and other Western countries pulled back from buying Russian crude. But within four months, the price was back below where it was before Moscow's attack on its neighbour as the market simply rerouted the now discounted Russian oil to China and India. In other words, the flow of oil around the globe was shifted, but the volumes available for importers remained much the same. But what Trump is proposing now is somewhat different. It appears he wants to cut Russian barrels out of the market in order to put financial pressure on Moscow to cut a deal over Ukraine. There are effectively only two major buyers for Russian crude, India and China. China, the world's biggest crude importer, has more leverage with Trump given US and Western reliance on its refined critical and other minerals, and therefore is less able to be coerced into ending its imports of Russian oil. India is in a less strong position, especially private refiners like Reliance Industries, which will want to keep business relationships and access to Western economies. India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, according to data compiled by commodity analysts Kpler. About 90 per cent of its Russian imports came from Russia's European ports, mainly Urals grade. There are some Middle Eastern grades of similar quality, such as Saudi Arabia's Arab Light and Iraq's Basrah Light, but it would likely boost prices if India were to seek more of these crudes. If Chinese refiners were able to take the bulk of Russian crude given up by India, it may allow for a reshuffling of flows, but that would not appear to be what Trump wants. Trump and his advisers may believe there is enough spare crude production capacity in the US and elsewhere to handle the loss of up to two million bpd of Russian supplies. But testing that theory may well lead to higher prices, especially for certain types of medium crudes which would be in short supply. For now, the crude oil market is assuming that the Trump/India/Russia situation will end as another TACO, the acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. The writer is from Reuters

Senator: Sarawak's O&G rights protected by state laws, not overridden by PDA 1974
Senator: Sarawak's O&G rights protected by state laws, not overridden by PDA 1974

Borneo Post

time5 hours ago

  • Borneo Post

Senator: Sarawak's O&G rights protected by state laws, not overridden by PDA 1974

Ahmad says the PDA 1974 is 'not a shield of immunity' that overrides existing Sarawak laws such as the OMO 1958 which have been in place before the formation of Malaysia. – Bernama photo KUCHING (Aug 13): Pasir Gudang MP Hassan Abdul Karim's remarks on Sarawak's oil and gas jurisdiction are one-sided and ignore the governing laws that have been in force since the formation of Malaysia, said Senator Datuk Ahmad Ibrahim. Ahmad said the Petroleum Development Act (PDA) 1974 is 'not a shield of immunity' that overrides existing Sarawak laws such as the Oil Mining Ordinance (OMO) 1958 which have been in place before the formation of Malaysia. 'Firstly, Sarawak has been producing oil and gas since the discovery of oil in Miri in 1910—53 years before Malaysia was formed. This industry developed under Sarawak's own laws long before the PDA existed. 'Secondly, the Malaysia Agreement 1963 and the Malaysia Act 1963 preserve state laws. Section 73 of the Malaysia Act 1963 preserves all state laws in force before Malaysia, including the OMO 1958 which remain valid today,' he said in a statement today. In chiding Hassan for saying that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was wrong to grant Sarawak additional power over the state's oil and gas sector, Ahmad said all MPs need to understand both legal and historical facts before making their remarks public, adding that ignorance of the law is not an excuse. He said the OMO 1958, which was amended in 2018, grants Sarawak full authority over petroleum licensing onshore and on its continental shelf. 'The PDA 1974 applies fully in states that do not have their own petroleum laws like OMO 1958. In those states, Petronas is the sole aggregator of oil and gas. 'In Sarawak, the PDA cannot override the OMO, the Distribution of Gas Ordinance (DGO) 2016, the Sarawak Land Code, or the State Sales Tax (SST),' said Ahmad. He said under the DGO 2016, Sarawak has exclusive authority to license and regulate domestic gas distribution, with state-owned Petroleum Sarawak Berhad (Petros) formally recognised by the federal government as the sole gas aggregator for Sarawak's domestic market, excluding liquefied natural gas (LNG). 'Why exclude LNG? LNG is an international export commodity regulated under PDA 1974 due to long-term sales contracts between Petronas and overseas buyers like Japan, Korea and China. 'The 2020 Commercial Settlement Agreement between Sarawak and Petronas retained LNG under Petronas' management to maintain market stability and avoid breaching export contracts, while granting Sarawak full control over the domestic gas market,' he added. He also pointed out that on March 13, 2020, the High Court upheld Sarawak's right to impose SST on petroleum products, with Petronas withdrawing its appeal and settling the dues. 'To the MP for Pasir Gudang, before politicising on hearsay, acquaint yourself with these legal facts. Sarawak's constitutional, historical, and legal position is not subject to political convenience,' said Ahmad. In a recent parliamentary reply to Hassan, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said the PDA 1974 would remain in force in accordance with existing legal provisions. She said Petronas had signed two key agreements to strengthen cooperation, namely a Commercial Collaboration Agreement with Sabah, and a Commercial Settlement Agreement with Sarawak. The agreements outline the framework of commercial cooperation between Petronas and Sabah's SMJ Energy and Sarawak's Petros, she said in her reply. Ahmad Ibrahim lead oil and gas OMO PDA

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store