A Ukrainian Mother and Filmmaker Goes to War: Director Alisa Kovalenko Premieres ‘My Dear Theo' at CPH:DOX (EXCLUSIVE)
When Russian forces launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine on this day three years ago, filmmaker Alisa Kovalenko ('Home Games,' 'We Will Not Fade Away') bid farewell to her partner and four-year-old son and joined the Ukrainian Volunteer Army.
As she traded her camera for a rifle, she couldn't leave behind her instinct to document. What emerged is 'My Dear Theo,' a poignant video diary for her son, set to premiere in the main competition at the Copenhagen Intl. Documentary Festival (CPH:DOX) in March.
More from Variety
'Leaving Neverland' Sequel 'Surviving Michael Jackson' Set for March
CPH:DOX Summit to Consider Media Accessibility as a Human Right
AI in Non-Fiction, Immersive Storytelling, Investigative Journalism and Climate Justice to Be Debated at CPH:DOX
Kovalenko filmed her fellow soldiers during moments of camaraderie and reprieve, including conversations with their children, offering an intimate and rarely seen portrait from the frontline. As time passed, she also filmed her own calls with her son, who had taken refuge in France with his father.
'I still believe that documentary cinema is a key to the heart,' she tells Variety in an exclusive interview. 'You can feel connected and you can feel empathy. And I wanted to show this other side of the frontline, the human faces, the love and the tenderness. Many people still think these are abstract soldiers fighting, but it's all of us fighting. We are all soldiers.'
After four months in service, she faced a critical decision: enlist permanently or return home. She chose to finish editing 'We Will Not Fade Away,' a film about Ukrainian teenagers in the war-torn Donbas, which went on to win multiple festival awards.
Kovalenko's commitment to telling Ukraine's story stems from personal experience. A seasoned documentarian, she has chronicled Ukraine's struggles since the 2014 Maidan protests and the annexation of Crimea.
While filming in the Donbas region, she was detained at a Russian checkpoint and endured conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV) at the hands of a Russian officer. 'He let me go with the words, 'Be thankful you're still alive,'' she recalls.
Today, she is a member of SEMA Ukraine, part of a global network supporting survivors of wartime sexual violence, backed by Nobel laureate Denis Mukwege.
As 'My Dear Theo' prepares for its world premiere, Kovalenko is focused on finishing her next project, 'Traces,' co-directed with Marysia Nikitchuk. The film investigates the silent epidemic of CRSV in Ukraine, a subject long shrouded in stigma. 'Since 2014, many cases have gone unspoken,' she says. 'I want to finish this project to help women who survived.'
Looking ahead, she is uncertain about the future: 'I don't know what will happen with all these political games of 'Trump the peacemaker,' it's hard to predict anything. But if the frontline is not frozen in the coming months of 2025, I will return to the army.'
Her broader concern, however, extends beyond Ukraine. '[French president Emmanuel] Macron recently said that Trump is like an electric shock for Europe, but the sad thing is I'm not sure Europe is ready to wake up.
'And if it doesn't happen, if we don't feel this common solidarity, if we don't feel that we are fighting for the survival of the values of a civilized, democratic world, that we are fighting against total evil, we will all lose, not just Ukraine.'
A Haka Films production, 'My Dear Theo' is co-produced by Moon Man and Ji.hlava & JB Films, with executive production by Monica Hellström, and additional support from the Polish Film Institute, Chicken & Egg Pictures, and Meadow Fund. Kirsten Johnson provided mentorship thanks to the Chicken & Egg Award.
Stranger Films Sales is handling international sales.
CPH:DOX runs in Copenhagen from March 19 through 30.
Best of Variety
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
Grammy Predictions, From Beyoncé to Kendrick Lamar: Who Will Win? Who Should Win?
What's Coming to Netflix in February 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
9 minutes ago
- Politico
What Trump Doesn't Understand About Putin
Russian leader Vladimir Putin looks increasingly cornered. The Ukrainians just staged a stunning drone attack on strategic bombers in far-flung Russian air bases. Putin's battered troops are struggling to gain significant territory in Ukraine, and the frontline has barely shifted in two years. His economy is a mixed bag, with inflation slowing growth and other danger signs flashing. President Donald Trump, who has long admired Putin's brash leadership style, is now questioning the Russian leader's sanity and urging him to 'STOP!' his attacks on Ukraine. And U.S. lawmakers are mulling a heavy new sanctions and tariffs package aimed at Moscow — the type one senator describes as 'bone-crushing.' Given all these challenges, why won't Putin abandon his goal of conquering Ukraine? I have been asking former U.S. officials versions of this question in recent days. Finally, I realized it's the wrong question — and the wrong way to think about this whole war. Putin will never abandon his ambition of conquering Ukraine, and convincing him to do so shouldn't be the aim of Ukraine's global supporters. Instead, the goal should be to make it impossible for Putin to fulfill that ambition. In simpler terms: You can't make Putin walk away from Ukraine; you have to put Ukraine out of his reach. Trump and some of his top aides do not seem to understand this about Putin. They've sent mixed signals about their views of Russia's strongman, with Trump acting as if the carrots of economic deals and Truth Social posts can sway him. With new sanctions on the table, many Russia watchers hope Trump will seize the moment to show Putin that even if he can't control his ambitions, he can make it too painful for Putin to achieve them. But those same analysts warned that new sanctions alone won't make Putin back down. Neither will continued military aid to Ukraine, nor tough-talking posts on social media. Showing Putin that he absolutely cannot subsume Ukraine will require all these tactics and more. It will also require patience. 'That's why you do these missions, like Ukraine taking out some of their strategic bombers. That hurts. It's expensive,' said Andrea Kendall-Taylor, a former U.S. intelligence official. 'Can we impose enough costs that he eventually says, 'I cannot do this indefinitely?'' I'm not the first person to posit that Putin will never change his belief that Ukraine belongs to Russia. Putin's own writings make clear that he's convinced Kyiv must be under Russia's thumb if Moscow wants to achieve new heights on the global stage. Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken suggested Putin's view is 'theological.' One analyst has argued that the West's best strategy on the war may require waiting until Putin dies. A White House official, in response to a request for comment from the administration, told me Trump 'has always been tough on Putin.' The official, whom was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomatic issues, added: 'This president's foreign policy is unique in that he can be tough on our adversaries, but he is simultaneously able to look anyone in the eye to try to deliver peace.' But many of Trump's words and actions indicate that he has limited appreciation for how hard-core Putin is about pursuing Ukraine. During the campaign, Trump declared numerous times that he could end the war in his first 24 hours back in office — a claim that he now says was in jest but which nonetheless cast Putin as easy to persuade. In the months since, the president has seemed bewildered that Putin isn't easing up on Ukraine. Trump recently said, with a tone of surprise, that the Russian leader has gone 'absolutely CRAZY.' Trump also seems frustrated with Putin's lack of seriousness in ceasefire talks. The tough talk from Trump is striking given his past efforts to win Putin over. But his methods are not always consistent. Trump came across as passive in a social media post Wednesday after speaking to Putin, saying the Russian made it clear he'd have to retaliate against the Ukraine drone strikes. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace,' Trump wrote, not saying if he'd urged Putin to avoid escalation. Comments and moves by others in the administration also suggest a lack of clarity about the Kremlin boss, who first invaded Ukraine more than a decade ago. Vice President JD Vance's dismissal of Ukrainian concerns that Putin will not uphold a peace deal — most famously in that awkward Oval Office meeting in February with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy — indicates that he doesn't fully grasp the depth of Putin's desires. It also likely boosted Russian confidence that its efforts to drive wedges between Washington and its allies, including Ukraine and the European Union, are working. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's assertion that the United States may simply walk away from trying to resolve the crisis didn't exactly help Kyiv, either. It suggests the U.S. lacks patience and that the Russians should forge ahead in seeking a decisive edge in the war. And if there's one thing Putin believes he has on his side, it's time. What exactly is Putin's breaking point, or the point at which he'll give up on taking over Ukraine? 'This kind of stuff — it's very hard to quantify. It's the psychology of one man,' Eddie Fishman, a former State Department official who dealt with Russia sanctions, told me. Some of these Russia specialists said Putin is likely aware of the concept of 'TACO Trump' — the 'Trump Always Chickens Out' notion that's swept Wall Street and other realms. Trump's policy inconsistency and his frequent backtracking, such as on tariffs, may suggest to Putin that the U.S. president will try to drive a hard bargain but ultimately cave, giving Moscow wiggle room. The sanctions bill is a test of sorts for Trump and whether he truly understands Putin's mindset. It has garnered support from the majority of U.S. senators and includes harsh provisions aimed at choking off Russia's last major source of income: its energy exports. The legislation would impose 500 percent tariffs on countries that continue buying Russian oil, gas, uranium and other materials. It's questionable whether the 500 percent figure will survive talks between the White House and Capitol Hill. The tariffs would land on major U.S. trading partners in Europe, China and India and wreak havoc on the global economy. Still, whatever version of the bill survives could deal a major blow to Russia. If Trump signs the bill, the Kremlin should worry because it will mean he's not afraid to escalate things with Moscow. But if he signs the bill and then delays, waives or otherwise doesn't enforce the sanctions and tariffs involved, Putin will believe Trump is backing down yet again and that he can take advantage of the American leader's capriciousness. If Trump also fails to take other meaningful steps to help Ukraine, especially on the military aid front, it could further boost Putin's confidence that he and his troops can ultimately overpower Kyiv. Of course, the Kremlin chief could still agree to peace talks — he already has, in a way, though he tends to send powerless underlings to the sessions in his place. Those motions seem to be about buying time with Trump, a self-styled dealmaking expert who is eager for a compromise. Even if Putin agrees to a sustained ceasefire or other type of pause in the fighting, Russia analysts I spoke to believe he'll use the downtime to regroup and eventually make another move against Kyiv. One Trump tactic unlikely to work on Putin is promising him economic deals, should he come to terms with Ukraine. To be fair, Putin himself has raised this prospect in a bid to get sanctions relief from Trump, who largely sees the world through a business lens. The reality is that the Russian economy has been transformed since the February 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. It is now heavily fueled by the war itself. There are signs that this cannot go on forever, but it has continued longer than many Western officials and analysts predicted. Putin is also likely aware that even if Trump were to lift all U.S. sanctions on Russia, American businesses are unlikely to jump into the Russian market anytime soon. There are too many risks, including the possibility that a future U.S. president could reimpose the sanctions. Besides, European sanctions are likely to remain in place. 'Given sanctions and export controls that need to be lifted, not to mention the reputational risk and the operating environment in Russia, it's hard to see that Western companies would be rushing to go back to that market,' Randi Levinas, a former chief operating officer of the now-dissolved U.S.-Russia Business Council, told me. Putin is in a corner. But while everyone is watching him, he's still got his eye on Ukraine — all of Ukraine.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ukrainian forces hit Iskander ballistic missile launchers in Russia's Bryansk Oblast
Ukrainian defence forces launched a precision missile strike on a Russian missile unit near the town of Klintsy in Russia's Bryansk Oblast on 5 June. Source: General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Details: It is reported that a Russian unit of the 26th missile brigade was preparing a strike, presumably on Kyiv. Due to operational reconnaissance and coordination of Ukrainian units, the attack was prevented. Early reports indicate that as a result of the strike, one Russian Iskander missile launcher detonated, and two more were seriously damaged. Russian losses are being confirmed. There were no casualties among the civilian population. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Russia launches over 100 drones and Iskander missiles on Ukraine
Russia attacked Ukraine with 103 Shahed-type attack UAVs and various types of decoy drones on the night of 4-5 June. Ukraine's air defence forces downed 74 Russian drones, 46 UAVs disappeared from radar. Source: Air Force Quote: "As of 10:00, air defence forces destroyed 74 enemy Shahed-type UAVs (and other types of drones) in the east, south and north of the country. Of them, 28 were shot down with firepower, and 46 went off radar or were suppressed by electronic warfare. Enemy airstrikes were recorded in 16 locations." Details: It is reported that on the night of 4-5 June (from 22:30 on 4 June), the Russians attacked Ukraine with 103 attack UAVs from the following directions: Kursk, Oryol, Millerovo and Primorsko-Akhtarsk in the Russian Federation, and Chauda in temporarily occupied Crimea; an Iskander-M/KN-23 ballistic missile was launched from Rostov Oblast, Russia. The main targets of the air attack were Chernihiv, Kharkiv and Odesa oblasts. Ukrainian aircraft, anti-aircraft missile forces, electronic warfare units and UAV units, as well as mobile fire groups from the Ukrainian defence forces, all took part in repelling the attack. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
