
Lake Lynn Generation annual report looks back at summer drought at Cheat Lake
Jan. 29—MORGANTOWN — Lake Lynn Generation's annual elevation and flow report gives a retrospective look at its response to the summer drought conditions that stirred — and is still stirring opposition ot its management of its hydroelectric project.
Lake Lynn is required to file the report with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission each year. From May 1-Oct. 1, it's supposed to maintain Cheat Lake's elevation between 868 and 870 feet ; Nov. 1-March 31, 857-870 feet ; April 1-30, 863-870 feet.
The summer drought put Lake Lynn in a trilemma — having to choose between three competing FERC license requirements: maintain the summer level of 868-870 feet ; maintain a flow rate of 212 cubic feet per second (cfs) into the Cheat, with an absolute minimum of 100 cfs ; and maintain dissolved oxygen at 5 milligrams per liter for the aquatic life.
Lake Lynn's report, submitted to FERC on Tuesday and posted by FERC on Wednesday, shows a brief variation on May 10, 2024 — 3 hours 30 minutes — where the lake rose about a third of a foot above the maximum elevation.
The drought stretch began on Sept. 7 and ran through Sept. 30 — a total 22 days. The elevation reached 1.1 below minimum Sept. 7-13 ; 2 /7 feet below minimum Sept. 13-20 ; 3.3 below minimum Sept. 20-27. The last three-day stretch says "end of the event."
Lake Lynn told FERC, "Extremely low inflow into the project reservoir and severe drought conditions made it impossible to maintain all three license requirements during the month of September 2024." It chose to maintain spillway flow and dissolved oxygen levels. "LLG operation staff acted appropriately to prioritize complying with its license requirements to minimize adverse aquatic ecosystem impacts to the Cheat River downstream of the project."
Lake Lynn reminded FERC that anticipating the drought, it submitted a request for a temporary variance to the lake level requirement in July. The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection first approved the request then withdrew the approval in the face of public concerns. FERC then requested more information. Seeing that the process would extend beyond the drought period, Lake Lynn withdrew its request on Sept. 11.
Lake Lynn has told FERC that to help remedy the competing license requirements in the future, the company has proposed, in its Final License Application, to develop an Operation Plan that will include standard operating procedures to be implemented during periods of low inflow and low dissolved oxygen, "which will document the prioritization of license requirements and how Lake Lynn will comply with the operational requirements of the license."
Public protests, filed with FERC, mentioned such issues as largely empty marinas, dock damages, boats stranded on mud flats, vast swaths of hydrilla covering portions of the lake surface, and effects on tourism, recreation and the area economy.
Other issues Lake Lynn's Lake Lynn Hydroelectric Project license expired Nov. 30. FERC in December issued an annual license to allow Lake Lynn to continue operating while FERC processes its license renewal application.
Protests are stil trickling in to FERC, chiefly regarding Lake Lynn's proposal to remove 243.8 acres of project land no longer needed for project purposes from its project boundary.
A protest filed last week says, "I am in favor of them continuing to operate the electric generation facility. But they need to increase the maintenance and upkeep of the area surrounding Lake Lynn, the park and the trail that was created, and the public access to the area. However, I am opposed to them removing property from what they list as the park area.
"The representatives have said that they have no intention of selling this excess acreage, the letter continues. "But if it is removed and if the right price is offered, I think they will change their mind. I have a special interest as a property owner at Lake Lynn. Unfortunately, some of the property that they propose to remove is between my property and the lake. It would be totally unacceptable to have someone else come in and take ownership of that property and obstruct our access. ... Just leave it as it is."
Another protest, filed Jan. 6, notes that the acreage in question is valuable, with 5 nearby acres offered for $1.2 million. And Lake Lynn hasn't said what it will do with the land. "A sale of the acreage for millions of dollars is plainly in the offing, for why would the licensee bother to retain and care for land that in its judgment is no longer 'needed ?'"
Selling to a developer, the letter says, would be "to the everlasting detriment of water quality, wildlife, recreation, shoreline management, and natural aesthetics."
Meanwhile, a lawsuit filed by the Biafora family business Marina 1 LLC against Lake Lynn Generation continues to play out in federal court.
Marina 1 is seeking $50, 000 compensation for property damages, alleging that before the Labor Day weekend, Lake Lynn deliberately lowered the level of Cheat Lake below the 868-foot minimum in violation of its FERC license. This caused various damages, some of them irreparable.
The case originated in Monongalia County Circuit Court and Marina 1 wants it moved back there, and out of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia in Clarksburg.
Lake Lynn wants the case kept in federal court. It argues the case should be dismissed because it is "an impermissible collateral attack " on its FEC license, the federal court has no jurisdiction over how the company should prioritize competing FERC license requirements, and Marina 1's claims are preempted by federal law.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sun Pharma gets eight observations from USFDA for Halol plant
Drug major Sun Pharma on Saturday said the US health regulator has issued a Form 483 with 8 observations after inspecting its Halol (Gujarat) manufacturing plant. The US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) conducted a good manufacturing practices (GMP) inspection at the Halol facility from June 2-13 2025, the Mumbai-based drug maker said in a regulatory filing. At the conclusion of the inspection, the USFDA issued a Form-483 with 8 observations, it added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 혈압 안정화를 돕는 블러디션 배합 성분 메디셜 더 읽기 Undo As per the USFDA, Form 483 is issued to a firm's management at the conclusion of an inspection when the investigator has observed any conditions that may constitute violations of the Food Drug and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act and related Acts.


TECHx
3 minutes ago
- TECHx
Free ERP Is Like Building Your Own Car, Too Costly to Risk
Home » Expert opinion » Free ERP Is Like Building Your Own Car, Too Costly to Risk Free ERP may seem cost-effective, but it can undermine manufacturing, compliance & operational resilience in the Gulf. Choose a smarter solution. The manufacturing sector in the Gulf is in the midst of a major transformation. Driven by ambitious government initiatives like Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 and the UAE's Operation 300bn, both nations are making significant strides to localise production, reduce reliance on imports, and diversify their economies beyond oil. Industrial tariffs, global supply chain shocks, and rising geopolitical uncertainty are only adding urgency to this agenda. Against this backdrop, both established players, and a new generation of manufacturing firms, are racing to scale up and modernise fast. One thing is clear: whether it's a greenfield factory or a seasoned industrial group looking to expand capacity, success increasingly hinges on operational resilience. And at the heart of that is enterprise resource planning (ERP). A robust ERP system provides the foundation for streamlined operations, cost control, real-time visibility, and regulatory compliance. But once a manufacturer reaches the point of selecting an ERP, a critical fork in the road appears, and the allure of a 'free' open-source ERP can be hard to resist. At first glance, it sounds like a win: no licence fees, complete flexibility, and the promise of building something tailored to your exact needs. But in reality, choosing a free ERP can be like deciding to build your own car from a pile of parts and a workshop manual. What begins as a cost-saving project often turns into a drawn-out, complex journey, one that diverts energy from growth and innovation, and instead sinks valuable time into building what already exists. 1. Customisation Comes at a Cost Imagine starting your journey by choosing every individual car part, engine, transmission, steering, electronics, with the idea of creating a bespoke vehicle. For a manufacturer choosing a free ERP, this is what customisation often looks like. The core system might be sound, but it won't include the specific features that manufacturers in the region depend on, from production routing and BOM management to work orders and cost tracking. That means building everything from the ground up. Just as fitting an engine into a chassis designed for a different model takes time and expertise, shaping a generic ERP into a manufacturing-ready platform requires developers, consultants, and plenty of trial and error. The longer it takes, the more momentum is lost and the further behind competitors you may fall. 2. Shallow Manufacturing Capabilities Even if you manage to assemble a working vehicle, you may find that key components are missing. You've got a frame and wheels, but no suspension system or air conditioning. That's the experience many manufacturers have with open-source ERP when they reach the shop floor. Core modules like scheduling, quality control, production monitoring, and maintenance are either overly simplistic or absent entirely. As a result, manufacturers are forced to bolt on additional tools or write bespoke code, much like trying to retrofit a car with critical systems it was never designed to support. And even then, performance may remain patchy and inconsistent. 3. Integration Becomes a Maze Now imagine trying to hook up your DIY car to a smart traffic system, fuel sensors, or a self-parking garage. It might be possible, but you'll need to engineer those connections yourself. The same is true for integrating open-source ERP with the array of industrial systems found on a modern shop floor, be it machine sensors, PLCs, MES platforms, or IoT-enabled equipment. Out-of-the-box integration is rarely available in open-source ERPs. Manufacturers must invest in middleware, write custom APIs, and test repeatedly to ensure systems communicate reliably. This complexity adds not only cost, but risk, particularly for manufacturers under pressure to move fast and scale operations smoothly. 4. Compliance Isn't Plug-and-Play Finally, consider roadworthiness. A car that technically runs is not the same as one that passes inspection, meets emissions standards, and complies with safety regulations. Likewise, many open-source ERPs fall short when it comes to supporting regulatory requirements out of the box. Whether it's ISO certifications, FDA traceability, or aerospace standards, compliance in manufacturing is rigorous and unforgiving. Adding these capabilities after the fact, building audit trails, validation rules, secure data logs, is expensive and risky. There's no guarantee your custom-built system will meet all criteria, and retrofitting those controls can be more complex than if they'd been embedded from day one. A Smarter Road for Manufacturers That's not to say free ERP has no merit. For tech-savvy start-ups with in-house developers and niche needs, it can be a springboard for innovation. But for most manufacturers in the UAE and Saudi Arabia, especially those scaling to meet national growth targets, a generic platform simply won't deliver the control, speed, and reliability required. The smarter route is to choose an ERP system that's been purpose-built for manufacturing, one that, like a car designed by engineers and built in a factory, includes all the core capabilities needed to operate safely, efficiently, and at scale. These systems offer integrated production control, quality management, and regulatory support as standard, not afterthoughts. They also come with pre-built integrations for industrial systems, reducing complexity and ensuring smoother implementation. Most importantly, they offer relevance from day one. Manufacturers don't need to spend months under the bonnet just to get the basics running. Instead, they can focus on delivering products, growing their business, and adapting to changing customer demands. Don't Let 'Free' Cost You the Future The manufacturing sector in the Gulf is on the cusp of something extraordinary. Governments are investing, demand is rising, and the region is fast becoming a serious industrial player on the global stage. But to seize this opportunity, manufacturers need to move with speed and confidence, not get bogged down with tools that slow them down. Choosing an ERP solution is a pivotal decision. And while 'free' can sound like a shortcut, it often turns out to be the long way around. In a market where timing and execution are everything, manufacturers simply can't afford systems that don't match their ambition. Like building a car from scratch, it's technically possible. But wouldn't you rather drive something built to go the distance? By Vibhu Kapoor, Regional Vice President – Middle East, Africa & India, Epicor


TECHx
3 minutes ago
- TECHx
UAE National Media Office Hosts London Roundtable
Home » Latest news » UAE National Media Office Hosts London Roundtable The UAE National Media Office (NMO) has announced the successful hosting of a strategic roundtable in London. This initiative is part of its preparatory efforts for the upcoming BRIDGE Summit. The event was held on the sidelines of London Tech Week. It included the participation of Abdulla bin Mohammed bin Butti Al Hamed, Chairman of the NMO and Chairman of the UAE Media Council. Officials revealed that the roundtable aimed to enhance collaboration and knowledge exchange with global media institutions and experts. The goal is to help build a future-ready media ecosystem. Al Hamed affirmed the UAE's commitment to becoming a global hub for media innovation. He said the BRIDGE Summit would focus on creating a resilient and effective media environment. He emphasized the importance of transparency, cultural respect, and responsible journalism in today's digital world. He added that the London event marks a key milestone in a series of international engagements leading up to BRIDGE. Dr. Jamal Mohammed Obaid Al Kaabi, Director-General of the NMO, opened the event. He outlined the Summit's mission to strengthen the media sector and boost global cooperation. He noted that: The Summit will support advanced technologies and adaptive strategies A global media network will be developed to foster innovation and entrepreneurship Dr. Al Kaabi also highlighted the UAE's vision of shaping the future of collaborative media. In a session titled 'Media Leadership: Rebuilding Trust in the Digital Age' , Al Hamed addressed the growing crisis of trust in media. He called for combining technological innovation with ethics, transparency, and responsible AI use. Dr. Al Kaabi participated in a session on 'Funding the Future of News' , where speakers discussed new revenue models like philanthropy and digital platforms. Another panel, 'Entertainment and Cultural Power' , saw Maryam BinFahad examine how media can influence culture and diplomacy. Dr. Amna Al Hammadi, NMO Advisor, led a session on future media curricula. She stressed the need to equip upcoming media professionals for an AI-driven, polarized environment. In the session on 'Automation and AI in the Newsroom' , Alia bin Sheikh explored how technology is reshaping workflows. Finally, Omar Al Hemeiri shared insights in 'Voices Shaping Tomorrow' . He focused on storytelling, ethical challenges, and redefining media's future role. The UAE National Media Office reported that these discussions are key to its ongoing efforts to build a more connected, transparent, and innovative media landscape.