Joy Reid claims ‘horrified' MSNBC bosses pressured her to stop social media posts before she was fired
Joy Reid claimed MSNBC bosses were 'horrified' by her presence on social media and repeatedly pressured her to stop tweeting before ultimately canceling her primetime show, The ReidOut.
In a wide-ranging conversation with Katie Couric released Monday on Reid's new podcast, the former MSNBC host claimed that management at the left-leaning Comcast-owned network discouraged her from engaging with audiences online, fearing it gave her too much autonomy.
'Anytime I would tweet anything, I would get calls — I would get, 'Please get off Twitter, we hate it,'' Reid said.
4 Former MSNBC host Joy Reid (right) told Katie Couric on Monday that her bosses at the network were 'horrified' by her social media activity.
YouTube / The Joy Reid Show
'They just don't like that it pulls their talent and their reporters out of their control because now you're not running what you're tweeting through Standards and Practices. It's giving your personality directly to the audience, which they don't like because it's no longer managed and curated by them.'
Reid's MSNBC program 'The ReidOut' was canceled in February as part of a broader programming overhaul led by the network's new president, Rebecca Kutler. Reid's final broadcast aired on Feb. 24.
The cancellation occurred amid a network-wide restructuring that also affected other hosts, including Alex Wagner and Katie Phang.
Reid's remarks come ahead of the June 9 launch of 'The Joy Reid Show,' a new podcast and YouTube series.
She posted the interview with Couric to her website and YouTube channel, marking her most candid remarks yet about her February departure from MSNBC.
4 Reid's primetime show 'The ReidOut' was cancelled by MSNBC in February.
MSNBC
The network gave no public explanation when it canceled 'The ReidOut,' sparking speculation that the decision was part of a broader post-election shakeup following Donald Trump's return to the presidency.
Several non-white anchors were let go around the same time. Former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann called it 'an MSNBC purge so brutally racist it makes you think it was done by [Elon] Musk.'
When Couric asked her directly what led to her dismissal, Reid said she's still unsure.
'I've been asked this so many times,' she said. 'And people think that I'm just saying it to BS, but I'm being honest with you — I don't know.'
4 MSNBC is the left-leaning all-news cable channel owned by telecommunications giant Comcast.
Ralf – stock.adobe.com
Reid said she learned about the cancellation not long after exchanging emails with MSNBC's public relations team celebrating the show's NAACP Image Award win.
Reid insisted the cancellation wasn't related to poor ratings.
'It wasn't ratings,' she said. 'We had just had a ratings meeting a couple of weeks before that talking about the fact that our show… other than Rachel Maddow, we were down the least' in the wake of Trump's win.
'We were just told that we were doing… that we were holding on pretty well,' Reid added. 'And then, you know, it's not like the ratings have gotten better since I've been gone.'
She described the way the news was delivered as 'scripted' and 'just very perfunctory,' noting she received no specific reason for the show's end.
'I wasn't told 'The ratings were terrible,' 'It's something you did,' 'You tweeted a terrible thing,'' she said, adding that she had already been 'extra careful' online amid growing concerns inside the network about talent on social media.
Although Reid said she doesn't necessarily believe her outspoken criticism of Trump was the reason for her show's cancellation, she acknowledged it may have played a role.
'I'm a black woman doing the thing. You know what I mean?' she said.
'I think that there's a difference for Trump in hearing the kinds of criticisms, specifically, out of a black woman. It bothers him in a way it doesn't bother him like anything else.'
'There's a fear of him,' Reid added. 'We're seeing it everywhere.'
4 The Post reported on Reid's exit from MSNBC earlier this year.
Reid has faced multiple controversies over the years, beginning with the resurfacing of homophobic blog posts from her defunct site, 'The Reid Report.'
Initially claiming her blog was hacked, Reid later admitted there was no evidence to support that, though she maintained the posts didn't reflect her views.
She also apologized for past tweets mocking Ann Coulter and Lindsey Graham with sexist and homophobic language.
In 2020, Reid was accused of Islamophobia after comparing Trump's rhetoric to that of radical Islamic leaders, prompting backlash from Muslim-American groups.
More recently, during MSNBC's 2024 election coverage, she called Florida a 'fascist-type government' and criticized white women voters in North Carolina for not supporting Kamala Harris, blaming them for the state's failure to protect abortion rights.
Reid also stirred controversy with her response to the assassination attempt on Trump, suggesting his own rhetoric may have helped incite political violence.
Critics accused her of downplaying the seriousness of the attack and called for her show to be canceled.
The Post has sought comment from MSNBC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Should Boston Celtics coach Joe Mazzulla worry about Knicks coach Tom Thibodeau's firing?
Should Boston Celtics head coach Joe Mazzulla be worried about the firing of New York Knicks head coach Tom Thibodeau? The Knicks front office recently came to the decision that it was time to move on from Thibs despite the former Boston assistant coach having gotten New York farther than they have been in the playoffs for the last quarter-century. Mazzulla, for his part, saw his Celtics fall to the Knicks on their way to the 2025 NBA Eastern Conference Finals series many assumed Boston was a shoo-in to make at the start of the postseason. If the now-former Knicks coach is not safe, does that mean Mazzulla could also be at risk of losing his job? Or is this move by New York more indicative of their internal culture and lack of patience, and less of the league more generally? Advertisement The folks behind the "NESN" YouTube channel put together a clip from their "Boston has Entered the Chat" show to talk it over. Take a look at the clip embedded below to hear what they had to say. This article originally appeared on Celtics Wire: Should Joe Mazzulla worry about Knicks coach Tom Thibodeau's firing?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Steelers Afternoon Drive: Tight End Interest Real?
Welcome to the Steelers Afternoon Drive, our new daily podcast featuring all the latest Steelers news and analysis. Alan Saunders and Zachary Smith discuss all things Pittsburgh Steelers. On today's episode, we discuss the team's renewed interest in acquiring a tight end whether it be Jonnu Smith or somebody else following Donald Parham's injury. Despite their global popularity, the team isn't the team with the most fans and is very much a small market. What does Alan think about the progress of the offensive line? Does the team have too many 'but if' situations that they need to have go right in order to be good? Let's go for another Steelers Afternoon Drive and discuss all this! Advertisement Let's go for another Steelers Afternoon Drive and discuss all this and more! Check out the show on our YouTube page, or find it on Megaphone or wherever you get your podcasts. Got a question for the guys? Leave a comment on YouTube, here on the website, or find them on Twitter at @ASaunders_PGH and @ZacharySmithPGH Hey fans! We want to see your black and gold rides! Show us your car, truck or van that's painted in Pittsburgh colors, decorated with logos or Terrible Towels, covered in bumper stickers, or uses some other way to show off your dedication to the Black and Gold. Click to check out more from Alan Saunders and the gang on the SN YouTube page. Click for full archives of the Steelers Afternoon Drive with Alan Saunders and Zachary Smith. This article originally appeared on Steelers Now: Steelers Afternoon Drive: Tight End Interest Real? Advertisement Related Headlines
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Will small-market Finals bother the NBA? Not necessarily. 'This is the league's future here'
OKLAHOMA CITY – Big stars. Small markets. That's been the verdict on these NBA Finals since the Pacers closed out the Eastern Conference playoffs over the weekend and sealed their place opposite Oklahoma City in this year's NBA Finals. And in the most basic telling, that is an accurate summation of the forthcoming series. But the public's (and the media's) love of easily digestible Nielsen ratings and viewership numbers glosses over what is in many ways a more nuanced discussion. Will Indianapolis and Oklahoma City make for a less commercially successful Finals? Not necessarily. It's important to acknowledge upfront there is some truth to the basic maxims of the TV-market discussion. In most cases, yes, pulling a major audience share like New York, Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles or even Dallas-Fort Worth makes for a better-watched series. That just doesn't paint a full picture, according to Patrick Crakes, a former senior vice president at Fox Sports who now runs his own media consulting firm. 'The NBA Finals is a national event. It's better to have a base from big-market teams, from a mass of viewing, but the whole ecosystem is much more complicated than that,' Crakes said. Think of a television distribution deal as an ecosystem serving three key constituencies: The league (the rights seller), the carriers (Turner Sports, ESPN, etc.) and the distributors (Comcast, DirecTV, YouTube TV, etc.). Those constituencies are concerned with their own self-interests, yes, but in many cases, those interests overlap or align. These deals are also negotiated as large packages, with inventory (games) from the regular and postseasons all bundled together. ESPN/ABC did not secure the rights solely to these Finals. The money culled from the Finals is just a portion of the overall measure of the commercial success of the deal in a fiscal year. Per Crakes, advertising often constitutes approximately 20-30% of the overall financial pie, a meaningful number but not a decisive one. And much of that income that's attached to the playoffs is derived not from the showpiece Finals, but from the early rounds, where TV partners broadcast the largest sheer quantity of games. Yes, bigger markets in later rounds makes a difference, but sometimes not as much of one as a busy, engaging start to the postseason. Good, long series in rounds one and two will fill the advertising-dollars bucket long before the Finals. Short, uncompelling sweeps can leave a hole no big-city viewership or last-minute dramatics will fill. 'Postseason economics, a lot of it gets determined by the first couple rounds. That's where all the inventory is,' Crakes said. There are also headwinds untethered to a market share, or an individual sport's popularity. The rapidly fragmenting viewer ecosystem has prompted small dips in ratings for even America's most popular sports. Consumers no longer need easier-to-quantify access points to live sports like traditional carriers (Comcast, DirecTV, and so forth), with cord cutters eating into wider TV share. More fans come to games via social media, be it through highlights, real-time updates or other links back to the games themselves. There is an extent to which these Finals will be impacted by shifting viewer habits no matter the markets involved, whether it's No. 1 New York, No. 25 Indianapolis or No. 47 Oklahoma City (per SportsMediaWatch). Which circles back to one of Crakes' basic points: The Finals can also appeal across a wider base irrespective of market size. 'If you think about a total package of how NBA rights work,' Crakes said, 'it's important to keep in mind that small-market finals, like what we're about to see, that feature some of the game's best young players, that are going to be around for the next 15 years, being showcased, is not a bad thing for the league.' Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's star turn this season has included a scoring title, his first-career MVP nod and a center-stage role for the winningest team in the NBA. There has been perhaps no more compelling individual storyline in these playoffs — certainly in the Eastern Conference — than Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton's ascension into the elite tier of the league's guards. Around them orbit meaningful subplots (Jalen Williams' remarkable year, Pascal Siakam's impact in Indy, the dynamism presented by Indiana's backcourt depth, Chet Holmgren's continued development). The sport by nature puts fewer players on the floor, offering a bright spotlight to its stars. And unlike in football or baseball, those stars are often involved in games for long stretches, unfettered by offense-defense swaps or at-bat limits. In many ways it's easier to sell stars in the NBA, so long as they deliver their best. Whether the uniforms they wear say New York, Indiana or OKC, compelling performances from those players will go a long way toward determining the commercial success of the series upcoming. 'This is the league's future here,' Crakes said. 'The Thunder are fantastic. If the Pacers give them a series, my guess is everybody gets interested, even in New York and L.A., and it carries along just fine.' Which leads into the most fundamental determining factor in this discussion: The series has to entertain. Crakes worked at Fox Sports in October 2000, when the Yankees and Mets delivered their famed 'Subway Series." Top to bottom, the company was energized by the prospect of capturing a compelling championship dominating the country's biggest market. Instead, despite the fact that every game was decided by one or two runs, national interest never materialized. The favored Yankees eased to a 4-1 series win in front of a national audience that delivered what was at that time the lowest-rated World Series in history. 'The thing was a giant dud, because the rest of the America (wasn't interested),' Crakes said. 'You can be the dog that caught the car when you wish for these things.' Which means, of course, the same can be said in the opposite direction. Oklahoma City and Indiana have been, across the season's final months, arguably the two best teams in the NBA. Their records since Jan. 1 are first (Thunder) and fourth (Pacers) in the NBA. The Thunder finished with the league's best record and, while Indiana's path might have been smoothed slightly by Boston's bow-out, by almost any measure the Pacers have been playing championship-level basketball for five months. If that continues in this series — if Indiana can stand toe-to-toe with Oklahoma City and turn this into a six- or seven-game series — it will drive viewership everywhere. Likewise, an uneventful series decided in five games or fewer wouldn't do well, regardless. 'The real component in how successful something like this is, is a seven-game series,' Crakes said. 'That's where the gold is. Game 6, Game 7, and if we get to that with this series, this Finals will do just fine.' Of course, there's an extent to which the Finals will own the airwaves anyway. With football in hibernation, and baseball entering its summer dog days, the NBA Finals are virtually always a ratings winner. Crakes pointed out there can be long-term benefits for the league in small-market success. The last decade has seen Cleveland, Toronto, Denver and Milwaukee all win the NBA championship, strengthening the league's exposure in those markets and suggesting efforts to even the playing field between big- and small-market teams are paying dividends. 'The system's working. The small-market teams are figuring out ways to compete with the big-market teams,' Crakes said. 'This is an opportunity for these smaller markets to continue to have a deeper relationship with the NBA.' As with so much in sports, the impact of this series will be determined foremost by what the NBA makes of it. Does Oklahoma City complete a season of dominance? Do the league's two best teams at this time of year deliver a compelling Finals? Does this mark the transcendent moment for one of the NBA's young stars? All those things can, in the long term, matter as much as raw viewer data. The tendency to compare across years is reflexive. The sport's ownership of the national stage at this point in the annual calendar, though, is undeniable. 'This is going to be a gigantic number,' Crakes said. 'It's going to rate better than anything else, probably anything else at this point in the summer, and the economics are already largely in the bank.'
