US court to hear California Governor's challenge against Donald Trump's troop deployment for LA immigration raids
A US federal court is set to hold a hearing on Thursday to determine if President Donald Trump's administration can deploy National Guard and Marines to assist with immigration raids in Los Angeles, the Associated Press reported.
In a recent move, President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles following protests over his heightened enforcement of immigration laws.
California Governor Gavin Newsom argued that the federal military intervention in the nation's second-largest city is the beginning of a much broader plan by Donald Trump to overturn political and cultural norms at the heart of the nation's democracy. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has echoed these concerns, saying the deployment of troops was unnecessary and designed to undermine local jurisdictions and intimidate the city's large immigrant population, reported AP.
AP reported that Newsom filed an emergency motion requesting the court intervene in President Donald Trump's aggressive approach to protests.
AP reported that the Trump administration called the lawsuit a 'crass political stunt endangering American lives' in its official response on Wednesday.
The Democratic governor argued the troops were originally deployed to protect federal buildings and said sending troops to help support immigration raids would only promote civil unrest.
The protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles heated up after Trump called up the National Guard and have since spread to other cities, including Boston, Chicago and Seattle.
AP reported that Federal immigration agents have been conducting arrests in public areas such as the Home Depot parking lots and other businesses, leading to a widespread fear in immigrant communities, especially after the Trump administration said it wanted to dramatically increase arrests under its immigration crackdown.
AP reported that Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth.
While most demonstrations have been peaceful, this weekend's protests in downtown Los Angeles turned violent, with cars being set on fire. The city has imposed a nightly curfew covering a 1-square-mile (2.5-square-kilometre) section where protests have occurred in the sprawling metropolis of 4 million people, said AP.
The Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters.
Newsom filed the motion on Tuesday, the same day the military announced that some National Guard members were now positioned to protect federal agents. This change moves troops closer to engaging in law enforcement actions like deportations, as Trump has promised as part of his administration's immigration crackdown. The Guard can temporarily detain people who attack officers, but any arrests ultimately would be made by law enforcement, AP reported.
Senior U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer chose not to rule immediately but set the hearing for Thursday in federal court in San Francisco.
Dozens of mayors from across the Los Angeles region banded together Wednesday to demand that the raids stop and the troops leave.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tensions soar: Why did Israel strike Iran? What makes the timing crucial
Israel strikes Iran. (AP photo) Israel on Friday initiated a significant military operation against Iran. Explosions occurred in Tehran as Israel conducted strikes on Iranian nuclear and military installations. Iranian media confirmed the deaths of the Revolutionary Guard commander and two prominent nuclear scientists. Israeli forces targeted nuclear facilities and eliminated the Revolutionary Guard leader. Israeli officials stated the operation aimed to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, as the country approaches weapons-grade uranium enrichment capabilities. Iran maintains its programme's peaceful nature, and US intelligence assessments indicate Iran isn't actively developing weapons. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that the strikes targeted the Natanz enrichment facility and prominent nuclear scientists, alongside Iran's ballistic missile arsenal. Iranian state television confirmed Gen. Hossein Salami's death, a crucial Revolutionary Guard commander. Tehran residents witnessed significant explosions. State television showed damaged residential buildings with collapsed walls, fires, and broken windows throughout the capital, reporting the Revolutionary Guard headquarters was ablaze. Why has Israel launched a military operation? Israel has launched a military operation in response to what it views as an immediate and existential threat posed by Iran's nuclear program. According to the Israeli government, the current regime in Iran has consistently promoted the destruction of the State of Israel—not merely as a political stance, but as a core directive. Israel said in a statement that Iran made substantial military investments to strengthen its capability, including the clandestine development of a nuclear weapons program. Israel alleges that while Iran engaged in diplomatic negotiations, it continued advancing its nuclear capabilities in secret, using diplomacy as a cover. Israel quoted findings from International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that claim that Iran's nuclear activities are aimed at military objectives rather than peaceful energy production. Alongside its uranium enrichment efforts, Iran also reportedly developed advanced missile delivery systems and other technologies essential for weaponizing its nuclear program. Why is Israel attacking now? Israel argues that immediate action was necessary because Iran is believed to be just moments away from acquiring a functional nuclear weapon. The volume of highly enriched uranium reportedly amassed by Iran is said to be sufficient for more than nine nuclear bombs, with a third of that quantity produced in just the past three months. "Recent intelligence shows Iran is nearing the point of no return in its race toward a nuclear weapon. The regime is producing thousands of kilograms of enriched uranium, alongside decentralized and fortified enrichment compounds, in underground, fortified sites. This program has accelerated significantly in recent months, bringing the regime significantly closer to obtaining a nuclear weapon," Israel Defence Forces (IDF) said in a statement. "The Iranian regime has been working for decades to obtain a nuclear weapon. The world has attempted every possible diplomatic path to stop it, but the regime has refused to stop. The State of Israel has been left with no choice. The IDF has the obligation to act in defense of the civilians of Israel and will continue to do so," IDF added. What was the operation's purpose? The military operation, according to Israel, is a last-resort measure undertaken in self-defense. The campaign is said to be highly targeted, focusing solely on military sites and facilities linked to Iran's nuclear weapons program. Israeli authorities emphasise that the Iranian people are not the target; rather, the operation aims at neutralizing the radical elements that pose a direct threat to Israel's security. Additionally, Israel claims it is taking all possible precautions to minimize civilian harm during the operation. This rapid escalation occurred even as Iran was involved in negotiations with the United States, which Israel sees as a sign of bad faith. Israeli officials believe that the pace and scale of Iran's nuclear advancement in recent months have not been seen in over two decades, further justifying the urgency of their response. Iran's primary enrichment facilities are located at Natanz and Fordo. These installations are fortified against aerial attacks, with Natanz built underground and Fordo constructed within a mountain. The facilities remain central to recent diplomatic efforts. The former US president cautioned Netanyahu against attacking whilst negotiations continued. US envoy Steve Witkoff was scheduled to meet Iranian representatives in Oman. The strikes' impact on future negotiations remains uncertain.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's 'peacemaker' pledge takes big hit as Israel strikes Iran
President Trump's promises of global peace face significant setbacks as Israel attacks Iranian targets, escalating regional tensions and defying Trump's diplomatic efforts. The strikes, a rebuke to Trump's envoy's negotiations, raise concerns about a broader conflict and the future of U.S.-Iran relations. With conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine unresolved, Trump's peacemaking aspirations are in jeopardy. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads "SPIRAL OF ESCALATION" On the campaign trail, U.S. President Donald Trump promised to end the world's hottest conflicts and usher in global peace, but nearly five months in, with Israel attacking Iran and bloodshed in Gaza and Ukraine unabated, those hopes are in shambles.U.S. ally Israel struck dozens of Iranian targets in a dramatic and multi-faceted attack on Thursday that analysts say threatens to eventually spiral into an all-out regional strikes appear to be a snub to Trump, who had repeatedly pushed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to attack Iran, though the president himself had threatened to bomb the Gulf nation if nuclear talks failed."Trumpian diplomacy is one of the first casualties of these attacks," said Brett Bruen, a former foreign policy adviser to Democratic President Barack Obama."He has struggled to even get close to a ceasefire (in Gaza), let alone peace in any major conflict. Iran was looking the most promising - and Netanyahu just spoiled it."The White House, the Israeli embassy in Washington and Iran's U.N. mission did not immediately respond to requests for strikes are also a rebuke of Steve Witkoff, Trump's Middle East envoy and close aide, who has been working intensively with Iranian negotiators towards a diplomatic solution to curb its nuclear had sought unsuccessfully to persuade Netanyahu to remain patient while U.S.-Iran negotiations proceeded. Those talks have been Trump allies privately acknowledge that his diplomatic efforts had been faltering even before Israel's second term in office started with what seemed like a foreign policy win. Shortly before Trump's inauguration, Witkoff worked with aides to then-President Joe Biden to secure a long-sought ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and Hamas that accord fell apart in U.S. has also made little discernible progress toward a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, whose conflict Trump vowed to end before even taking his administration has taken no visible steps toward expanding the Abraham Accords, a landmark pact brokered in Trump's first term to forge diplomatic ties between Israel and several Arab Trump has struggled to seal peace accords, foreign policy divisions have opened inside his own administration. Dozens of officials, from the National Security Council to the Pentagon to the State Department, have been jettisoned amid the before Israel's attack, several administration officials had begun to privately question if Witkoff, who lacks diplomatic experience but has emerged as Trump's top negotiator, had overstayed his Israel's attacks unfolded on Thursday, some prominent Democrats expressed frustration that Trump had scrapped during his first term a deal between the United States, Iran and European allies forged during the Obama and Republicans had condemned that deal, saying it would not have kept a nuclear bomb out of Tehran's hands. Democrats fault Trump for not yet coming up with a credible alternative."This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu's own making, and now the region risks spiraling toward a new, deadly conflict," Democratic Senator Chris Murphy said in a post on Thursday's strikes will trigger a regional conflict remains unclear. Even so, analysts said, Tehran could see U.S. assets in the region as legitimate example, Tehran-aligned Houthi rebels in Yemen could resume their bombing campaign against ships transiting the Red unclear is Israel's ability to permanently impede Iran's nuclear doubt in particular the ability of Israel to destroy Iran's Fordow enrichment plant, which is buried deep underground. While Israel could probably do extensive damage, experts say a more lasting blow would require U.S. military assistance, which U.S. officials said was not question mark is just how effectively Tehran can respond. Israel has indicated that it has targeted several Iranian leaders in the bombing campaign, which is expected to continue in coming these factors will decide if the blow to Trump's aspirations to be seen as a global peacemaker will be a terminal one, or merely a setback."If Israel is to be taken at its word that tonight's strikes were the first round in an all-out Israeli campaign against Iran's nuclear and missile programs, Iran's regime is now knee-deep within a potentially existential, life-or-death moment," said Charles Lister, head of the Syria Initiative at the Middle East Institute."That paints tonight's strikes in a whole new, unprecedented light and makes the risk of a major spiral of escalation far more real than what we've seen play out before."
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
An overview of Iran's energy industry and infrastructure
Israel launched strikes on Iran targeting nuclear and military sites. Iran's oil facilities reportedly sustained no damage. Iran produces about 3% of global oil. Sanctions have impacted Iran's oil exports, which peaked in the 1970s. China is a major buyer of Iranian oil, despite sanctions. Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members might compensate for any supply drop. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads SANCTIONS AND OPEC Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads WHO IS THE MAIN BUYER OF IRANIAN OIL? PRODUCTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Israel carried out strikes on Iran on Friday, targeting its nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders at the start of what it warned would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic National Iranian Oil Refining and Distribution Company said refining facilities and oil storage did not sustain any damage in the the third largest producer in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, extracts about 3.3 million barrels of oil per day (bpd), or around 3% of global are some facts on the country's energy industry, exports and the impact of previous Western oil production was at its peak in the 1970s with record output of 6 million bpd in 1974, according to OPEC data. That amounted to over 10% of world output at the 1979, the United States imposed the first wave of sanctions on Tehran and since then the country has been the target of several waves of U.S. and European Union United States tightened sanctions in 2018 after Trump exited a nuclear accord during his first presidential term. Iran's oil exports fell to nearly zero during some rose steadily under Trump's successor President Joe Biden's administration with analysts saying sanctions were less rigorously enforced and Iran had succeeded in evading is exempt from OPEC+ output crude exports have risen to a multi-year high of 1.8 million bpd in recent months, the highest since 2018, driven by strong Chinese says it does not recognise sanctions against its trade partners. The main buyers of Iranian oil are Chinese private refiners, some of whom have recently been placed on the U.S. Treasury sanctions list. There is little evidence, however, that this has impacted flows from Iran to China has for years evaded sanctions through ship-to-ship transfers and hiding ships' satellite consultancy says Iran refines about 2.6 million bpd of crude and condensate and exports 2.6 million bpd of crude oil, condensate and refined country also produces 34 billion cubic feet of gas per day, according to FGE, accounting for 7% of global production. All gas is consumed hydrocarbon production facilities are primarily concentrated in the southwest, in the Khuzestan province for oil and in the Bushehr provinces for gas and condensate from the giant South Pars exports 90% of its crude via Kharg say Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members could compensate for the drop of Iranian supply by using their spare capacity to pump more. Though with a number of producers in the group currently in the process of raising output targets, their spare capacity is becoming more strained.
