
Tax Breaks: The Millions Breathe A Sigh Of Relief After Tax Day Edition
Millions of taxpayers breathed a sign of relief this week.
getty
That sound you heard earlier this week? It was the sound of millions of taxpayers and tax professionals breathing a sigh of relief now that Tax Day is over.
April 15 is Tax Day for most of the country—some exceptions apply—but that hasn't always been the case. The U.S. income tax system has changed quite a bit over the years, and that includes more than the due date for Form 1040.
What we know as the modern income tax system began in 1913 after a four-year push to get enough states to ratify the Sixteenth Amendment. By law, a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution once it is ratified by three-fourths of the States. At the time, 36 states were required (38 of 50 states would be needed today). On February 3, 1913, Delaware became the 36th state to ratify the Sixteenth Amendment. Eventually, 42 of the 48 states would ratify the amendment (Alaska and Hawaii weren't yet states, Florida and Pennsylvania refused to consider it, and Connecticut, Rhode Island, Utah, and Virginia voted no).
The first filing deadline was March 1, 1913. The deadline would change twice before Congress settled on April 15 in 1955 to give taxpayers and the IRS more time to prepare and process increasingly complex returns.
Statistically, most taxpayers have used a tax professional so far this season. Those taxpayers who self-prepared had a variety of options, including Direct File. That won't be the case next year. The Trump administration is planning to eliminate the IRS Direct File program. While Republican lawmakers had previously opposed the program, the free tax software program had been marked as safe for the 2025 season, with now Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent committing to the program during his confirmation hearing. "I will commit that for this tax season … Direct File will be operative," Bessent said. However, less than 48 hours after the end of the regular tax filing season, word circulated that the program would be axed.
Amanda Renteria, who serves as Chief Executive Officer for Code for America, a civic tech nonprofit, called it "a dark day for Americans who want a simple, free option to file their taxes electronically directly with the government."
"The decision to kill Direct File comes at a critical moment," she says, "when faith in public institutions is already at historic lows. This isn't just a step backward for tax administration—it's a betrayal of public trust at precisely the time government should be demonstrating its ability to deliver basic services effectively."
No matter how you filed your taxes this season, you need to keep great records–but for how long? Some taxpayers like to hang on to every piece of tax-related paper, from receipts to returns, forever. Others do just the opposite: they shred and purge immediately. When it comes to tax records, which is better?
For tax purposes, you need to find a middle ground. And that middle ground is more precise than somewhere between "forever" and "immediately." While it's true that you want to keep essential records, don't be afraid to toss out what you don't need.
The general rule is that you should hold onto your tax returns and the supporting documentation until the three-year statute of limitations–the time the government has for challenging your return–runs out. Supporting documentation for your tax returns includes not only your forms W-2 and 1099 but also credit card and other receipts, invoices, mileage logs, copies of checks, proofs of payment, and any other records that support income, deductions, credits, or tax breaks you reported or claimed on your return.
Of course, exceptions apply (the government gets longer to go after you for fraud and failure to file, for example)–and there may be non-tax-related reasons to hold onto records. Find out what works for you and follow through.
With Tax Day mostly in the rearview mirror, you are likely looking forward to a break this weekend. My family was planning to celebrate with an Easter egg hunt (yes, my kids are older, but they are all super competitive and would never turn down free candy), but my mom took a tumble, so our gathering will be a bit smaller than anticipated. There will, however, still be candy. I hope you're planning something similarly relaxing(ish).
Speaking of candy, don't skip out on this look at whether Mega Marshmallows, described as 'oversized, fluffy marshmallows,' should be classified as edible confectioneries, thereby subject to the standard U.K. VAT rate of 20 percent, or classified as a culinary ingredient that qualifies for VAT exemption. The case is HM Revenue & Customs v. Innovative Bites Limited, but you may have heard of Innovative Bites by a different moniker: the great British marshmallow decision of 2025.
Enjoy your weekend, and don't eat too many sweets,
Kelly Phillips Erb (Senior Writer, Tax)
Articles marked with (☆) are premium content and require you to log-in with your Forbes membership credentials. Not a subscriber yet? Click here to sign up.
Paying off your tax debt with an installment agreement can relieve some anxiety.
getty
This week, a taxpayer asked:
I recently got into a car accident and received some money from the insurance company. I have put the $11,000 in my savings account. I'm on a payment plan to pay off back taxes. Can the IRS take the money from my savings to pay off my debt?
One of the ways the IRS ensures it gets paid is through a levy. A levy is a legal seizure of your property. It's often confused with a lien, but they are very different. A lien is filed against you to act as security—for example, an IRS lien will prevent you from selling a significant asset like your home and taking the proceeds without paying the IRS. In comparison, a levy is the actual taking of your property to satisfy your tax obligations.
A levy is never a first step. The IRS gives you the opportunity to resolve your debt through a lump sum payment, an installment plan, or another arrangement.
Here's where you get some good news. Typically, so long as you are making regular payments on an installment agreement, the IRS won't levy your assets or garnish your wages. However, it's important to make your payments as scheduled, file your tax returns on time, and otherwise comply with the terms of your installment agreement. If you default, all bets are off, and the IRS can resume collection activities, including levies (seizing your assets).
Note, however, that your tax refund could still be seized and applied to your outstanding balance.
That said, even with a payment plan, the IRS may choose to keep a federal tax lien in place. The IRS will release the lien once you pay the debt. For certain types of taxes, the IRS will withdraw the lien if you enter into a direct debit installment agreement and meet certain other conditions.
—
Do you have a tax question or matter that you think we should cover in the next newsletter? We'd love to help if we can. Check out our guidelines and submit a question here.
IRS numbers from the 11th week of the tax filing season—the week ending April 11, 2025—confirm that tax filings lag behind the numbers from last year. That isn't likely to turn around. With just a few days before the end of the filing season, the number of tax returns received dipped again, a trend that hasn't changed since the season opened on January 27, 2025.
In January, the IRS noted that it expects more than 140 million individual tax returns for tax year 2024 to be filed by the April 15, 2025, federal deadline. The IRS received 117,588,000 individual income tax returns as of April 11, 2025, compared to 116,295,000 as of April 12, 2024. The dip is 1.7%, with nearly two million individual tax returns filed to date in 2025 as compared to 2024.
(The data that includes the last day of the filing season, April 15, 2025, will be available on April 25, 2025. The IRS reports the filing data for each week based on the prior week's numbers.)
Notably, web visits to IRS.gov continued to lag far behind last year's numbers. There have been 296,470,000 visits to the website as of April 11, 2025, compared to 533,981,000 visits by April 12, 2024.
Tax season data for weeks ending April 12, 2024, and April 11, 2025
Kelly Phillips Erb
Those numbers reflect a drop of about 45%, but you won't see that statistic on the IRS website. For most of the tax season, the percentage drop was calculated. A footnote on the website now reads, 'Changes were made from 2024 to 2025 in the analytics methodology used to evaluate the number of visits to IRS.gov. Previously a session-based approach was used. In 2025, an event-based model is being used. As a result, comparison of data sets from year to year should not be made.'
A session-based approach tracks users within a defined timeframe and includes metrics like page views, bounce rate, and traffic source. If you have a blog or website, this is akin to what you learn from a platform like Universal Analytics.
In contrast, an event-based approach tracks the kinds of actions that a user takes, like clicks and form submissions. This is similar to what you'd learn using a platform like Google Analytics.
I've suggested the dip could also be attributed to a slowdown in content on the website. It likely won't help that the chief information officer at the IRS will leave his position at the end of the month. Rajiv Uppal's departure follows several high-profile defections from the tax agency since the beginning of the year. Uppal's position was created as part of former IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel's plans for a new leadership structure at the agency, and his domain included the IRS information technology division, previously touted as a key area of focus for the agency.
Failure to file an FBAR report can follow you... even to the grave.
getty
Family members often want to know what might happen if a spouse or parent dies with outstanding tax obligations. That can be a complicated question, but a recent decision out of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has made clear that FBAR penalties 'accrue' on the date the form is due (but fails to be filed) and not when the IRS assesses the penalties. The assessment could happen after the taxpayer has died, and the court found death does not end the obligations or render them excessive under the Eighth Amendment.
The case revolves around David Benishai, a U.S. citizen who held financial interests in multiple bank accounts in Israel from 2004 to 2010. Benishai failed to timely file FBARs.
Under the FBAR rules, each "US person" with an interest in, signature or other authority over, one or more bank, securities, or other financial accounts in any foreign country must file an FBAR if the aggregate value of such accounts at any point in a calendar year exceeds $10,000. In other words, if the total of your interests in all of the foreign accounts in which you have an interest reaches $10,000 or more at any point in the calendar year, you may need to file an FBAR. That applies even if you've been faithfully reporting the income on your federal income tax return and even if you've never, ever repatriated a single dollar to the U.S. It also applies even if the account produces no taxable income.
Benishai didn't timely file his FBARs, but he did file delinquent FBARs and agreed to extend the statute of limitations for the IRS to assess penalties. He passed away a few months before the IRS finalized its assessment.
Benishai's estate, administered by his wife, Hanna Hendler, challenged the assessment of 'nonwillful' penalties, which the IRS had assessed at $10,000 per report. The estate argued that the FBAR penalties could not be enforced after his death, that the statute of limitations had expired, and that they violated constitutional protections.
The court found that FBAR penalties are primarily 'remedial,' which means they are designed to compensate the government for the costs of investigating non-compliance and enforce tax collection, not purely punitive and designed to punish the taxpayer. (This is consistent with the court's approach in Bittner, a Supreme Court case that held that the maximum penalty for the non-willful failure to file should be calculated per report, not per account.)
When a penalty is remedial in nature, the penalty can survive the taxpayer's death.
📅 May 1, 2025. Due date for individuals and businesses in the entire states of Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina and parts of Florida, Tennessee, and Virginia affected by severe storms and flooding from Hurricane Helene (☆) and Hurricane Milton.
📅 June 16, 2025. Due date for individuals living and working abroad to file their 2024 federal income tax return and pay any tax due.
📅 September 30, 2025. Due date for individuals and businesses impacted by recent terrorist attacks in Israel.
📅 October 15, 2025. Due date for individuals and businesses affected by wildfires and straight-line winds in southern California that began on January 7, 2025.
📅 November 3, 2025. Due date for individuals and businesses affected by storms in Arkansas and Tennessee that began on April 2, 2025.
📅 May 8-10, 2025. American Bar Association Section of Tax May Meeting. Marriott Marquis Washington, DC. Registration required.
📅 May 13-14, 2025. National Association of Enrolled Agents 2025 Capitol Hill Fly-In, Washington, DC. Registration required (NAEA members only).
📅 June 16-19, 2025. Latino Tax Fest. MGM Grand Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, Nevada. Registration required.
📅 July 18-19, 2025. Tax Retreat 'Anti Conference'. Denver, Colorado. Registration TBA.
📅 July 21-23, 2025. National Association of Tax Professionals Taxposium 2025, Caesars Palace, Las Vegas, Nevada. Registration required.
According to the IRS, the average taxpayer spends how many hours preparing their return?
(A) 5
(B) 13
(C) 35
(D) 72
Find the answer at the bottom of this newsletter.
The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has signaled its strong support for bipartisan legislation establishing the accounting profession as a career pathway through Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM). H.R. 2911, the Accounting STEM Pursuit Act, introduced by Representatives Young Kim (R-CA) and Haley Stevens (D-MI), would allow K-12 grant funding to be used for accounting education, with a focus on improving access for underrepresented students.
The American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Taxation submitted comments in response to Executive Order 14178 titled 'Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology' and Executive Order 14219 titled 'Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's 'Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative.' These orders direct the Department of Treasury and other executive agencies to conduct a comprehensive review of substantive agency actions, including guidance documents, for guidance that 'affect[s] the digital asset sector,' 'imped[es] technological innovation,' or 'impose[s] undue burdens on small business and impede[s] private enterprise and entrepreneurship' and to suggest items that should be modified or rescinded.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP, announced that Michelle Rosenblatt joined the Private Wealth Services Practice as a shareholder. Rosenblatt has experience in tax, estate, and wealth preservation planning. She focuses her practice on U.S. and international tax, estate, business, and wealth preservation planning for high-net-worth individuals, families, and family offices.
William Fry announced that Cian O'Sullivan has joined the firm as a tax partner. O'Sullivan is a Chartered Tax Advisor and Chartered Accountant, managing corporate clients across various sectors and providing both domestic and international tax advice.
VWV has announced that Rod Smith has joined the firm as the new head of the London Office Estates, Tax and Trusts team. Smith brings over 25 years of experience advising on high-value, complex, and multi-jurisdictional estates and trusts.
The city of Venice (Italy) will charge day-trippers an arrivals tax for the second year, a measure to combat overtourism. Visitors who are not overnighting pay 5-10 euros (about $6-11 U.S.) to enter. Venice collected 2.4 million euros during a 2024 pilot program for the tax, but the costs for the new system totaled 2.7 million euros. This year, the city expects a surplus.
Pedestrians in Seattle were startled to hear crosswalk signals broadcast a recording purporting to be Amazon founder Jeff Bezos criticizing local tax policies. One message reportedly said, "Hi, I'm Jeff Bezos, this crosswalk is sponsored by Amazon Prime with an important message. Please don't tax the rich. Otherwise, all the other billionaires will move to Florida too." The recordings, which appeared to be a form of political protest, targeted multiple intersections in Seattle's tech-heavy South Lake Union neighborhood and the University District.
—
If you have tax and accounting career or industry news, submit it for consideration here or email me directly.
Here's what readers clicked through most often in the newsletter last week:
You can find the entire newsletter here.
The answer is (B) 13.
It takes taxpayers about 13 hours, on average, to file their taxes.
getty
The estimated average time burden for all taxpayers filing a Form 1040 or 1040-SR is 13 hours, with an average out-of-pocket cost of $290 per return. This average includes all associated forms and schedules, and taxpayer activities like recordkeeping.
Nonbusiness taxpayers have an average burden of about eight hours and an average cost of $160 per return, while business taxpayers have an average burden of about 24 hours and $620 per return. You are considered a 'business' filer if you file a Schedule C (self-employed and business owners), Schedule E (income from rental real estate, royalties, partnerships, S corporations, estates, trusts, and residual interests in real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs), Schedule F (farming income), or Form 2106 (Employee Business Expense) with your Form 1040.
How did we do? We'd love your feedback. If you have a suggestion for making the newsletter better, submit it here or email me directly.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans and Economists at Odds Over Whether Megabill Will Spur Growth Boom
WASHINGTON—Republicans see a golden age of prosperity ahead, driven by the tax-and-spending megabill they are trying to push through Congress by July 4. Nonpartisan experts project far more modest effects, forecasting a slight near-term economic expansion and larger federal budget deficits. The growth debate is at the core of this summer's fiscal fight. Republicans are trying to focus public attention on growth—from tax cuts, deregulation and fossil-fuel production—and play down the Congressional Budget Office estimate that the bill would increase budget deficits by $2.4 trillion through 2034. The White House highlights growth to bolster congressional support, countering claims from Elon Musk and others that the package irresponsibly darkens America's fiscal picture. 'Sextortion' Scams Involving Apple Messages Ended in Tragedy for These Boys The U.S. Economy Is Headed Toward an Uncomfortable Summer I Got Burned by the 401(k) 'Hierarchy Trap' Test Yourself Against These Teen Personal-Finance Whizzes, Round 2 Republicans and outside economists agree on the basic direction: tax cuts increase consumer spending and business investment, accelerating short-term growth. But they differ vastly on how large and meaningful that jump would be. The bill, according to public- and private-sector economists, would fall far short of Republicans' hoped-for boom. 'We would expect some dynamic revenue, some revenue feedback in that larger economy,' said Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation, which favors lower tax rates and a simpler system. 'But it wouldn't come close to paying for itself.' President Trump said in a social-media post last month that the U.S. annual growth rate would triple or even quintuple the 1.8% in CBO's January forecast, which doesn't incorporate the effects of any GOP policies. Since 2005, real U.S. gross domestic product growth hit or exceeded 3% twice: in 2018 after the 2017 tax cuts, and in 2021 during the recovery from the pandemic. House Republicans assume a 2.6% growth rate, yielding enough revenue to cover the megabill's deficits. 'The economy is going to explode in capital formation. Jobs will increase. Wages will increase,' Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R., Idaho) said after meeting with Trump last week. 'We're going to see the kind of growth and strength that this country wants.' Broadly, economists across the political spectrum discount elected officials' predictions. Tax Foundation: The conservative-leaning group estimates that the bill would boost long-term GDP by 0.8%, generating enough revenue to cover about one-third of its costs. That is compared with doing nothing and letting tax cuts expire Dec. 31. The gain is like adding an average of 0.1 percentage point to the annual growth rate; reaching 3% would require much larger changes, Watson said. Penn Wharton: Its budget model projects a 0.4% increase in GDP over the first decade. That is equivalent to raising the annual growth rate to 1.85% from 1.8%. 'Basically, I would call this flat,' said Kent Smetters, who runs the Penn model. 'We all know this is all going to get swamped by all the randomness.' Joint Committee on Taxation: The nonpartisan congressional scorekeeper projected that the bill's tax components would produce short-run growth through increased labor supply and capital stock. That would be counteracted by rising budget deficits, with a net effect of taking 1.83% annual growth to 1.86%. JCT estimates that the bill's tax provisions would cover less than 3% of their costs with revenue from economic growth. Yale Budget Lab: The think tank says the bill would bump the growth rate roughly to 2% from 1.8% through 2027, before the drag of federal debt weakens and reverses that effect. Those all contrast with the view of the White House's Council of Economic Advisers, which has a far rosier scenario. It projects a 4.2% to 5.2% increase in short-term GDP and a long-term gain of 2.9% to 3.5%. That gain would be three to four times the Tax Foundation estimate, which itself is larger than Penn Wharton, Yale or JCT. Economists caution that tax policy can't move the needle much in the U.S. economy, particularly given higher costs and uncertainty caused by tariffs. Still, putting money in taxpayers' pockets could increase demand for goods and services. Lower business taxes—especially faster write-offs for equipment and factories—encourage investment and have the biggest bang for the buck. Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran said growth after 2017 demonstrates that the Republican formula can work. The economy and incomes grew solidly in 2018 and 2019 before the Covid-19 pandemic scrambled everything. 'When Americans elected President Trump, they did so knowing that he was a pro-growth president,' Miran said. 'The bill is going to create a vibrant, dynamic economy.' Miran added that federal taxes as a share of GDP was barely unchanged from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2024. According to CBO, revenue was 17.3% of GDP in 2017 and 17.1% in 2024. 'There was no long-term hole in revenues,' Miran said. But before the tax cuts passed, CBO forecast revenue increasing to 18.3% in 2024, and the law changed that trajectory. One of the most thorough academic studies found that the 2017 law increased domestic business investment but didn't come close to paying for itself. The Tax Foundation's Watson said policymakers should expect a more muted response from extending the 2017 tax cuts than from creating them. The bill includes new and revived business incentives but schedules them to expire. 'It's pro-growth,' Watson said. 'The more you add in some of these gimmicks and temporary changes, the more watered-down it gets.' Senators including James Lankford (R., Okla.) and Steve Daines (R., Mont.) are seeking changes to encourage growth. They are particularly focused on making permanent some business-tax provisions such as immediate deductions for equipment purchases. 'If you have an expiration, you just don't get predictability,' Lankford said. Capital-investment incentives would be muted because tariff uncertainty complicates business planning, said Seth Carpenter, global chief economist at Morgan Stanley, which estimates that the bill would boost growth in 2026 before turning neutral and then negative. Some projects might make sense with high tariffs but not lower ones. Even with the bill's new deduction for factory expenses, without tariff certainty, Carpenter said, 'I don't think you're going to be in any sort of hurry to start breaking ground.' Kimberly Clausing, a former Biden administration economist now at the University of California, Los Angeles, said she worries about the drag from budget deficits. 'If they failed,' she said, 'I actually think that would be the best possible macroeconomic outcome.' Write to Richard Rubin at How Hydrogen, the Fuel of the Future, Got Bogged Down in the Bayou Chinese-Owned Company Halts Work on Factory to Make Batteries in U.S. It's the Republicans, Not Musk, Who Are Serious About Cutting Spending Trump's New Steel Tariffs Look Vulnerable to a Courtroom Challenge Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Business of Fashion
18 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
This Week: Are Tariff Price Hikes Finally Here?
What's Happening: On Wednesday, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics will release inflation data for May, the first inflation reading taken entirely after Trump's tariffs went into effect. In April, consumer prices rose 2.3 percent, just under the economists' consensus. Delayed Impact: Forecasters are calling for a mild uptick in prices, if that. Many fashion and beauty brands have announced price increases, often to be implemented on select products over the summer rather than right away. This gives consumers a bit of time to acclimate to their new, more expensive reality. And it builds in room to change course on the off chance Trump calls the whole trade war off in the meantime. Rock and a Hard Place: This strategic approach to price increases is savvy, but for many brands also borne out of a lack of options. After raising prices so much in the post-pandemic years, companies are worried they'll lose customers by hiking further, even if they have a good reason. Questioning Reality: Whether consumers believe prices are rising can have a big impact on inflation, so all those early warnings from brands may become a self-fulfilling prophecy even if Trump doesn't announce a single new tariff. There are also growing questions about the numbers themselves. Last week, economists raised questions in the financial press about whether inflation data could still be trusted, noting hiring freezes and layoffs had curtailed the government's ability to conduct its massive monthly survey of consumer prices. What to Expect at The Business of Beauty Global Forum 2025 What's Happening: On June 9 and 10, The Business of Beauty holds its third annual gathering in Napa Valley. A second class of entrepreneurs will also receive The Business of Beauty Global Awards. In the News: Speakers include Hailey Rhode Bieber, fresh off her $1 billion deal. Tracee Ellis Ross will share her observations on the needs of the Black and texturised hair community at a time when DEI is under siege. Global Perspective: Founders from international brands including Beauty of Joseon, Ultra Violette, Byoma and Nykaa will address challenges and opportunities in the global beauty market. Attorney Lindsay Toczylowski will speak on her efforts to help her client, Andry José Hernández Romero, the Venezuelan makeup artist currently detained in an El Salvador prison. See for Yourself: If you won't be in Napa Valley, catch these speakers and more on the livestream. The Week Ahead wants to hear from you! Send tips, suggestions, complaints and compliments to


Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
LA Protests: Trump's National Guard Move Sparks Legal Concerns
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's announcement of the deployment of the National Guard in California to quell protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions has raised legal concerns. Why It Matters Federal immigration enforcement operations sparked protests across California for a second day in a row on Saturday. ICE carried out raids in Paramount, Los Angeles County, following similar actions at several locations throughout other parts of city on Friday. Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the move, saying that local law enforcement was already mobilized and the presence of the National Guard was "purposefully inflammatory," would "escalate tensions" and "erode public trust." What To Know On Saturday, the White House ordered the deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles under a provision called Title 10 to "temporarily protect ICE and other United States government personnel who are performing federal functions." The National Guard is a state-based military force that serves as both a state and federal reserve branch of the U.S. Army and Air Force. It typically operates under state command and is funded by the state. However, in some cases, troops may be assigned to federal missions while still under state control, with funding provided by the central government. The law referenced in Trump's proclamation allows National Guard troops to be placed under federal command, and permits this under three conditions: if the U.S. is invaded or faces the threat of invasion; if there is a rebellion or imminent rebellion against federal authority; or if the president is unable to enforce federal laws using regular forces. A protester stands on a burned car holding a Mexican flag at Atlantic Avenue on June 7, 2025, in Paramount, Los Angeles County, California. A protester stands on a burned car holding a Mexican flag at Atlantic Avenue on June 7, 2025, in Paramount, Los Angeles County, California. Apu Gomes/GETTY The memorandum from the White House reads: "To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States." However, the law also stipulates that such orders should be "be issued through the governors of the states." It is not immediately clear if the president can activate National Guard troops without the order of that state's governor. Newsweek contacted the White House for clarification via email outside of regular working hours. "President Trump's deployment of federalized National Guard troops in response to protests is unnecessary, inflammatory, and an abuse of power," said Hina Shamsi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's National Security Project. The Trump administration has not invoked the Insurrection Act, according to anonymous U.S. officials who spoke to Reuters this weekend. The act of 1807 serves as the primary legal authority allowing a president to deploy the military or National Guard during times of rebellion or civil unrest. A memo issued by the White House on the matter specifies that the National Guard has been deployed to "temporarily protect ICE and other United States government personnel who are performing federal functions, including the enforcement of federal law, and to protect federal property, at locations where protests against these functions are occurring or are likely to occur based on current threat assessments and planned operations." This means that National Guard troops will not be permitted to aid local law enforcement—they will be used to protect and provide logistic support to federal ICE agents. "There's nothing these troops will be allowed to do that, for example, the ICE officers against whom these protests have been directed could not do themselves," Steve Vladeck, a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center who specializes in military justice and national security law, wrote in a blog post. "There is the obvious concern that, even as they are doing nothing more than 'protecting' ICE officers discharging federal functions, these federalized troops will end up using force—in response to real or imagined violence or threats of violence against those officers. In other words, there's the very real possibility that having federal troops on the ground will only raise the risk of escalating violence—not decrease it." What People Are Saying A White House memo reads: "Numerous incidents of violence and disorder have recently occurred and threaten to continue in response to the enforcement of federal law by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other United States government personnel who are performing federal functions and supporting the faithful execution of federal immigration laws. In addition, violent protests threaten the security of and significant damage to federal immigration detention facilities and other federal property." Border czar Tom Homan on Fox News: "We're already mobilizing. We're gonna bring the National Guard in tonight and we're gonna continue doing our job. This is about enforcing the law." He continued: "American people, this is about enforcing the law, and again, we're not going to apologize for doing it." California Governor Gavin Newsom on X, formerly Twitter, following the National Guard announcement: "The federal government is moving to take over the California National Guard and deploy 2,000 soldiers. That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions. L.A. authorities are able to access law enforcement assistance at a moment's notice. We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need." Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project: "By taking this action, the Trump administration is putting Angelenos in danger, creating legal and ethical jeopardy for troops, and recklessly undermining our foundational democratic principle that the military should not police civilians." Newsom's office also told Newsweek on Friday: "Continued chaotic federal sweeps, across California, to meet an arbitrary arrest quota are as reckless as they are cruel. Donald Trump's chaos is eroding trust, tearing families apart, and undermining the workers and industries that power America's economy." Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law, told the Los Angeles Times: "It is using the military domestically to stop dissent. It certainly sends a message as to how this administration is going to respond to protests. It is very frightening to see this done." What Happens Next After Trump announced he was deploying National Guard troops on Saturday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said other measures could follow. Hegseth wrote on X that active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton, south of Los Angeles, were on "high alert" and could also be mobilized "if violence continues."