Pakistan police arrest 240 protesters demanding ex-PM Khan's release
At least 122 were arrested trying to block roads and threatening law and order in the eastern city of Lahore, capital of Punjab province, said Deputy Inspector General of police Faisal Kamran. The remainder were picked up in overnight raids in the province, two security officials said.
Thousands rallied in support of Khan in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, which is ruled by his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, officials said. Police fired teargas in the cities of Karachi and Muzaffarabad.
"Free Imran Khan!" chanted supporters outside a Lahore courthouse, while smaller groups staged protests across the city.
Party spokesperson Zulfikar Bukhari said over 200 activists were detained in Lahore alone.
"Down with the government!" shouted a group of PTI women supporters rallying in Quetta, while nearly 2,000 activists in Karachi held demonstrations on bikes, rickshaws, and other vehicles, carrying posters of Khan and party flags before police dispersed them by firing teargas.
Islamabad and nearby Rawalpindi remained quiet, with heavy police deployments on main roads.
Uzma Bukhari, a spokesperson for Punjab's provincial government, said the PTI cannot be allowed to create chaos by holding the protests, a charge the party's spokesperson denied.
In a message attributed to Khan on his party's X account on Monday, he urged supporters to "come out and hold peaceful protests until a true democracy is restored".
The former cricket star was elected prime minister in 2018 but once in office, he fell out with the powerful military and was ousted in 2022 by parliament.
His arrest in May 2023 sparked protests against the military nationwide, leading to a crackdown on the party.
Khan denies any wrongdoing and has dismissed as politically motivated the dozens of cases against him, ranging from terrorism to disclosure of official secrets. He was convicted in January in a corruption case, but was acquitted of other charges or received suspended sentences.
Hundreds of Khan's party members including several parliamentarians were convicted late last month on charges related to the 2023 protests against his arrest. By law, nine of the parliamentarians were disqualified on Tuesday, the Election Commission of Pakistan said.
Khan's party emerged as the single biggest in the 2024 election, and it says that vote rigging robbed it of more seats.
Other parties joined forces to form a government under Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who denies coming to power through electoral fraud.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Revealed: Trump planning new military unit to rapidly crush civil unrest
The Trump administration is reportedly weighing plans to establish a 'domestic civil disturbance' force of hundreds of National Guard troops to deal with protests and unrest. Internal Pentagon documents reportedly outline a proposal for 600 troops stationed across military bases in Alabama and Arizona, ready to go at a moment's notice. The plan, seen by The Washington Post, suggests a rotation model using troops from units in multiple states, with personnel equipped with weapons and riot gear, and deployments lasting 90 days to 'limit burnout'. The first 100 servicemen would be ready to be deployed within one hour, according to the plans, with the second and third waves mobilised within two and 12 hours. If military aircraft and aircrews were needed on standby, the plans could cost hundreds of millions of dollars, according to documents seen by the Post. The proposal suggests Donald Trump plans to continue using US forces domestically. It comes after the US president made the extraordinary move to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington DC to tackle crime in the capital. National Guard soldiers were seen arriving in the city on Tuesday morning. Pictures showed troops, dressed in camouflage, reporting for duty in the capital. As well as deploying 800 National Guard troops to Washington, Mr Trump said he would bring the city's police department under federal control, becoming the first president in history to do so. Critics questioned Mr Trump's true intentions with the move, pointing to police data showing violent crimes in Washington had been in decline since 2023. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris's former running mate, said of the move: 'The road to authoritarianism is littered with people telling you you're overreacting.' Meanwhile, rumoured Democrat 2028 hopeful, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker warned Mr Trump that he has 'absolutely no right and no legal ability' to send troops to Chicago, adding: 'I have talked about the fact that the Nazis in Germany in the '30s tore down a constitutional republic in just 53 days. 'It does not take much, frankly, and we have a president who seems hell-bent on doing just that.' Muriel Bowser, the city's mayor, called the move 'unsettling and unprecedented,' although she conceded that more policing in high-crime neighbourhoods could be a good thing. Hours after Mr Trump made the announcement, a man was shot dead close to the scene of two attacks raised by the US president during his announcement on Monday. The suspected homicide happened within half a mile of where a congressional intern was killed by a stray bullet last month and where a former government official was killed in his car last year during a failed carjacking attempt. The numbers floated in the Pentagon proposal amount to a fraction of the 5,000 National Guard troops and Marines Mr Trump deployed to Los Angeles after anti-ICE protests erupted across the city earlier this year. A similar idea to the proposed 'domestic civil disturbance quick reaction force' was floated following Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, with around 600 troops put on notice in Arizona and Alabama. It is not clear whether the Pentagon proposal has been reviewed by Pete Hegseth, the defence secretary. The documents were compiled by National Guard officials, with at least one action memo prepared by Elbridge Colby, a national security policy chief, which recommends the forces should receive extra training for this mission. Mr Colby is said to have frustrated Mr Trump earlier this year when he reportedly froze military aid to Ukraine because US stockpiles were low. The move was rapidly reversed by Mr Trump amid criticism of government incohesion. The proposal suggests the earliest the rapid response taskforce could be funded through the Pentagon is 2027. Concerns highlighted in the proposal include the depleted availability of troops for local emergencies, such as wildfires and hurricanes, as well as questions over the appropriate use of the force. The Telegraph has contacted the DoD for comment.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
As Trump militarises DC, Pentagon plans 24/7 force for every city
Pentagon plans for a new military force to respond to protests at a moment's notice have been revealed as President Trump deploys the National Guard in Washington. The 'domestic civil-disturbance quick-reaction force' would make it easier for Trump to send troops into cities like New York, San Francisco and Chicago, according to documents reviewed by the Washington Post. The force of 600 troops, split evenly between military bases in Alabama and Arizona, would be on call 24/7 and ready to deploy nationwide in as little as an hour. This would be faster than mobilising the National Guard, the reservist wing of the military based in every state. The quick-reaction force could cost hundreds of millions of dollars, given the expense of using military aircraft to fly them across the country instantly.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Council seeks High Court ban on asylum seekers being housed at protest-hit Epping hotel
Epping Forest District Council has applied for an interim High Court injunction in a bid to stop asylum seekers being housed at the Bell Hotel in the town. Documents were lodged with the High Court in London on Tuesday, the council said in a statement. It comes after a series of protests in recent weeks outside the hotel, after an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Councillor Chris Whitbread, Leader of Epping Forest District Council, said: 'The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub we could have closed it down long ago. 'So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals who might only have been in the country a matter of days before being housed at the hotel. 'There are five schools and a residential care home within the vicinity of the hotel. The use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community. 'This will only increase with the start of the new school year. We are frustrated that the Home Office continues not to listen. 'In our view placing asylum seekers in the Bell Hotel is a clear breach of planning permission. It is not in use as a hotel, and it doesn't function as a hotel. 'The establishment of a centre to accommodate asylum seekers in this particular location, in close proximity to five schools, a residential care home, and the shops and amenities of the market town of Epping is not appropriate in planning terms.'
