logo
Here's what Putin really wants from Trump – and it's not peace in Ukraine

Here's what Putin really wants from Trump – and it's not peace in Ukraine

CNN2 days ago
Alaska is unlikely to have been on many peoples' bingo cards as the venue for a key summit between the leaders of the United States and Russia.
Yet America's biggest, remotest state is where Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are now set to meet for one of the most potentially consequential encounters of their presidencies.
That's certainly the view from Moscow, where pro-Kremlin propagandists are already flushed with anticipation at the benefits this much-anticipated face-to-face meeting will deliver.
Or, more specifically, will deliver for Putin.
Firstly, the fact a summit with the US president is being held at all is a massive win for the Kremlin.
'No one is talking about Russia's international isolation anymore, or about our strategic defeat,' wrote Alexander Kots, a prominent pro-Kremlin military blogger on his popular social media channel. He added that the Alaska meeting had 'every chance to become historic.'
He may be right. A presidential summit allows Putin to be seen back at the top table of international diplomacy, while thumbing his nose at critics and nations who want him shunned if not arrested on charges of war crimes in Ukraine.
And a summit in the US state of Alaska, of all places, is red meat to resurgent Russian nationalists who still bluster about the territory being rightfully theirs.
Just across the Bering Strait from the Chukotka region in the Russian Far East, Alaska was once a remote possession of the Russian Empire before being sold to the United States in 1867 for what was, even then, a paltry sum of $7.2 million, about 2 cents an acre.
The idea that Moscow got a raw deal still lingers and a visit to 'our Alaska,' as one prominent Russian state TV host dubbed it, bolsters Putin's nationalist credentials. Video clips of Trump misspeaking at a White House news conference ahead of the summit, saying he was going to 'Russia' to meet Putin, have also been trending on Russian social media with captions saying the US president had finally 'admitted it is ours.'
For the rest of the world, though, the sole focus of this presidential summit is the war in Ukraine and whether Russia is prepared to make any concessions to end it. The White House has said Trump expects to focus squarely on ending the war in Ukraine, leaving other issues Moscow has said could be up for discussion for another time.
On Wednesday, Trump promised 'very severe consequences' if Putin doesn't agree to end his war, following a call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders.
But so far there's been little sign of real compromise from the Kremlin, which regards itself as having the upper hand on the grinding Ukrainian battlefield. As recently as last month, on a phone call with Trump, Putin reportedly reiterated that Russia would 'continue to pursue its goals to address the root causes' of the conflict in Ukraine – these 'root causes' having previously included long-held Russian grievances that include Ukraine's existence as a sovereign state, and NATO's eastward expansion since the end of the Cold War.
More likely, Putin is up to something else.
Details have emerged of a Russian peace offer reportedly made to US presidential envoy, Steve Witkoff, before the Alaska summit was hastily arranged. In essence, the proposals involve Kyiv surrendering territory in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine, in exchange for a ceasefire, an idea the Ukrainian leadership has firmly ruled out.
'I am not going to surrender my country because I have no right to do so,' said Zelensky ahead of the summit, which he was not invited to. 'If we leave Donbas today, our fortifications, our terrain, the heights we control, we will clearly open a bridgehead for the preparation of a Russian offensive.'
But Trump, who is expected to discuss the idea with Putin in Alaska, appears to like the sound of a land-for-peace deal, even one so unpalatable to Ukraine and its European partners.
That clear difference of opinion represents an opportunity for Putin to portray the Ukrainians and the Europeans – not Russia – as the real obstacle to peace, potentially undermining Trump's already shaky support for the Ukrainian war effort. Trump has lost patience with Zelensky before, the Kremlin will have noted, and may do so again. If he were to cut off the remaining US military aid and intelligence sharing with Kyiv, Ukraine would struggle to continue its fight even with bolstered European support.
Ahead of the summit, the White House appeared to downplay expectations of a peace deal, characterizing the high-stakes meeting as a 'listening exercise.'
That may suit Putin just fine.
It was, after all, the Kremlin who solicited the summit, according to the White House – possibly as a way of heading off a threat of US tariffs and secondary sanctions that Trump said would kick in last week. Keeping Trump talking may be an effective way of pushing back that deadline indefinitely.
More broadly, Putin sees a unique opportunity with Trump to fundamentally reset relations with Washington, and separate Russian ties with the US from the fate of Ukraine, a scenario that would also divide the Western allies.
For months, Kremlin officials have been talking up possibilities for economic, technological and space cooperation with the US, as well as lucrative deals on infrastructure and energy in the Arctic and elsewhere.
The fact the Kremlin's top economic envoy, Kirill Dmitriev – a key interlocutor with the Trump administration – is part of the Russian delegation to Alaska suggests that more talk of US-Russian deal-making will be on the agenda.
And, if Putin gets his way in this summit, the 'Ukraine question' may find itself relegated to just one of many talking points between the powerful leaders of two great powers – and not even the most pressing one.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott immediately calls second special session for redistricting
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott immediately calls second special session for redistricting

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott immediately calls second special session for redistricting

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott immediately called another special session to pass a new congressional map, after the first attempt failed due to Texas Democrats leaving the state to deny Republicans the ability to carve out additional GOP seats. The second special will begin just two hours after the first special wrapped, at noon central time on Friday. Texas Democrats left the state nearly two weeks ago in protest of the redraw, which GOP leaders are pursuing at the request of President Donald Trump. Abbott's proclamation was largely the same as the first one, which lays out 19 agenda items, including redistricting and disaster relief for Central Texas flood victims. 'Delinquent House Democrats ran away from their responsibility to pass crucial legislation to benefit the lives of Texans," the Republican governor said in a statement. 'We will not back down from this fight. That's why I am calling them back today to finish the job.' Most Texas Democrats on the lam are stationed in Illinois but the stalemate appears to be winding down, with the House Democratic Caucus setting conditions for their return.

Washington DC Sues Trump, Calling Police Takeover Illegal
Washington DC Sues Trump, Calling Police Takeover Illegal

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Washington DC Sues Trump, Calling Police Takeover Illegal

(Bloomberg) -- Washington DC is asking a federal court to immediately block the Trump administration's effort to take over the city's police force, saying that the move is illegal and risks public safety. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets The lawsuit filed by Washington's Attorney General Brian Schwalb on Friday follows an escalation between city officials and the Justice Department over President Donald Trump's moves to take control of the Metropolitan Police Department and deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to the nation's capital. The complaint, which was filed in Washington federal court, alleged that Trump exceeded the authority granted by Congress in taking those steps. City officials also asked a judge Friday to block the federal government from assuming control of the metropolitan police force or issuing any further orders. A hearing on the issue is set for 2 pm. 'The administration's unlawful actions are an affront to the dignity and autonomy of the 700,000 Americans who call DC home,' said Schwalb in a statement issued by the Washington Attorney General's Office. 'We are fighting to stop it.' The Justice Department declined to comment. 'The Trump administration has the lawful authority to assert control over the DC police, which is necessary due to the emergency that has arisen in our nation's capital as a result of failed leadership,' Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, said in a statement. Trump cited a 'crime emergency' in exercising rarely-used presidential powers to ramp up the federal presence in Washington's local affairs, even though recent data — including from the Justice Department — show sharply declining crime rates. More than 1,750 people, including DC National Guard members, participated in an overnight operation as part of Trump's executive order, said a White House official. The multi-agency sweep across Washington led to 33 arrests, nearly half of them involving people in the country illegally, the official said. Tensions between city officials and Attorney General Pam Bondi flared Thursday when DC Mayor Muriel Bowser and Schwalb rejected an order from Bondi that would strip the Metropolitan Police Department's chief of her authority and place the agency under federal control. Bondi's directive named the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Terrence Cole, as 'emergency police commissioner' giving him the full powers of the city's police chief. The missive orders Washington's police leaders to seek Cole's approval before issuing directives, rescinds several department orders and instructs officers to fully enforce laws against blocking streets and occupying public spaces. In her order, Bondi criticized the city's sanctuary policies for shielding criminals who are in the US illegally 'from the consequences of federal law.' The DC attorney general's lawsuit warned that Bondi's order would upend the command structure of the local police and 'sow chaos among the more than 3,100 officers serving the District, endangering the safety of the public and law enforcement officers alike.' Washington has a unique relationship with the federal government. Congress passed a law in 1973, known as the Home Rule Act, that empowers the city to elect its own leaders and run its own day-to-day affairs. But the district is still subject to congressional oversight, its local judges are nominated by the president and confirmed by the US Senate, and the US attorney's office handles a large proportion of local prosecutions. The home rule law includes a section that allows the president to exercise control over the city's police force if 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist.' The takeover can last as many as 30 days, at which point it can only continue if Congress votes to approve the extension. The president also controls the city's National Guard reserve force, another dynamic that sets it apart from states. Washington's lawsuit alleged that Trump doesn't have the authority to 'seize command and control over the police force himself,' but can only require the mayor to offer assistance from the police in 'certain emergency circumstances.' The city also argued that Trump's use of rising crime as a reason to assert his authority was so sweeping that it 'would undermine Congress's decision to transfer control for day-to-day governance of the city to locally elected and accountable leaders.' Bowser supports statehood for the district and has pushed back on Republican calls to repeal the home rule law and federalize the city. Still, she's sought to avoid an aggressively adversarial relationship with the White House during Trump's second term. Bowser said her administration has complied with the DC Home Rule Act's requirement to provide police services for federal purposes during a declared emergency but added, 'there is no statute that conveys the District's personnel authority to a federal official.' Schwalb has taken a confrontational approach, releasing a statement calling Trump's actions 'unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful.' He sent a letter to Washington Police Chief Pamela Smith dated Aug. 14 saying that in his opinion Bondi's order 'is unlawful, and that you are not legally obligated to follow it.' --With assistance from Kate Sullivan. (Updates with details of law enforcement sweep, White House comment.) Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Twitter's Ex-CEO Is Moving Past His Elon Musk Drama and Starting an AI Company ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump's Plan for 300% Semiconductor Tariffs Weighs on Chip Stocks, Except Intel. Here's Why
Trump's Plan for 300% Semiconductor Tariffs Weighs on Chip Stocks, Except Intel. Here's Why

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Plan for 300% Semiconductor Tariffs Weighs on Chip Stocks, Except Intel. Here's Why

A potential deal with the Trump administration is shaping up to be a saving grace for Intel (INTC), which saw its shares climb Friday while other semiconductor stocks slid. President Trump told a group of reporters aboard Air Force One Friday morning that he could put tariffs on imported chips as soon as next week."I'll be setting tariffs next week and the week after, on steel and on, I would say chips—chips and semiconductors, we'll be setting sometime next week, week after," the president said in-flight, on the way to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. "I'm going to have a rate that is going to be 200%, 300%," Trump said. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The PHLX Semiconductor Index (SOX) was recently down more than 2%. Intel was among a handful of the index's constituents that was unscathed; shares were up nearly 6%. Reports that the Trump administration is considering taking a stake in Intel are giving the stock a boost. Discussions have included tapping the Chips Act—of which Trump has been a critic—to partially fund a stake in Intel, according to Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter. Deal talks follow on the heels of Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan's meeting with President Trump on Monday, after Trump publicly called for Tan's resignation, citing purported China conflicts. A White House spokesperson told Investopedia any discussions "should be regarded as speculation unless officially announced by the Administration." Intel did not immediately respond to queries about the talks. Some analysts see the Trump administration as a potential "hero customer," which Intel could use to fund development for its 14A process, a next-gen chip manufacturing technology that could boost chip speeds. "Intel could of course use money to help capitalize the fabs given the heavy losses and cash burn, and help to support them during the (likely) years it will take to build up substantial customer base," Bernstein analysts led by Stacy Rasgon wrote in a report Friday. Intel is already leaning on private equity deals to support building out semiconductor fabrication plants in and outside the U.S. However, what Trump might want in return is an outstanding question, with investors waiting to see if Trump can "Make Intel Great Again," the analysts said. The administration recently secured revenue-sharing deals with Nvidia (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) in exchange for export licenses to resume sales of key AI chips to market observers including Jim Cramer, and Morningstar's Brian Colello also said Intel could likely use the help. "A stake could go a long way toward finishing what Gelsinger couldn't afford to build but did it anyway," Cramer tweeted Friday, referencing former Intel CEO Patrick Gelsinger, who stepped down in December. Read the original article on Investopedia

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store