Congress is sitting silently as Trump destroys the U.S. government
On July 14, the U.S. Supreme Court enabled the executive branch to cripple the Department of Education by firing 1,400 employees. Add these actions to the disastrous firings at the U.S. State Department; purges of expertise at Justice; massive layoffs at Interior, including 1,500 at the National Park Service; destruction of USAID; even the planned elimination of NOAA climate laboratories.
Why?
A good question that begs for more than bumper-sticker banality like, 'we are putting an end to Biden-era madness.'
Ask your congresspersons in what universe is the reckless expulsion of expertise a great idea? Ask them if the country is made great by tearing up international agreements, withdrawing from global organizations, treating international trade as buffoonery and empowering dictators like Russian President Putin?
Ask them if America is better if the balance of executive, legislative and judicial branches of government are obliterated under the unqualified leadership of a single man? Does anyone remember Fidel Castro?
We are seeing the destruction of government institutions that have served us not perfectly, but effectively, for decades. This is unforgivably stupid, sad and unnecessary. Yet it seems perfectly acceptable to our elected representatives. We should let them know they're tragically wrong.
Thomas Carsey,
Palmetto Bay
Narrow margins
Re: the July 16 Miami Herald online editorial, 'Brightline's deadly tracks: Why blaming train's victims is a lethal cop-out.' Did the Miami Herald or WLRN bother to notice the 'No Trespassing' signs along the FEC Right of Way (RoW)? Or note that railroad tracks are private property and that unauthorized people who cross onto the RoW are trespassers?
All the crossings where pedestrians and traffic are allowed to cross are protected with crossing gates, numerous flashing red lights and loud bells when a train is approaching. This means pedestrians and traffic must stop and not cross the tracks.
People who live near the train tracks (many have been present in South Florida for more than 100 years) had the audacity to complain about train horns, so now most South Florida rails are quiet zones and the engineers can only sound the horn in an emergency; by then, it is almost too late.
Virtually every person who was hurt or killed by Brightline, Tri-Rail, CSX and FEC is at fault and responsible for their actions. Perhaps it is way easier to blame the trains and that is what the people want to hear.
We live in an overdeveloped, overpriced, overcrowded area where self-centered, self-important people are distracted by their Smartphones as they walk and drive about. They are causing accidents or getting themselves and maybe others killed. That is the root of the problem.
The train always wins. When you see tracks, think trains and do not compromise safety features just to save 30 seconds in your life, because it could be the end of your life.
Cully Waggoner,
West Kendall
Fallen stars
Cuba's government recently said there are no beggars, just fakers in the island nation. In the U.S., our government cuts Medicaid and politicians claim that poor people don't really need it and are engaged in waste and fraud.
In Venezuela, the Maduro regime made political enemies disappear. In the U.S., ICE is making people disappear and has gone after visitors with legitimate visas but the 'wrong' political beliefs. The U.S. also has deported people to Venezuela, and Maduro can make them disappear.
In the past, Nazis built concentration camps, originally for political prisoners. Recently, Florida built one in the Everglades. Perhaps we are choosing the wrong role models.
Chris Cosner,
Pinecrest
Broken treaties
When is a contract not a contract?
When dealing with the federal government, which has clawed back monies already committed to PBS and foreign aid. These entities had promised jobs and commitments to other projects. Now it appears that any contract the United States agrees to is just day-to-day.
Our allies and citizens can no longer rely on the word of our government. What have we become?
Sol Yanowitz,
Miami
Sensible act
The 'Dignity Act,' as proposed by U.S. Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar, is a rational start to sorely needed immigration reform in this country. Introduce the bill and get started on meaningful debate.
If President Trump wants to be remembered for a popular and positive major domestic political shift, like Presidents Reagan and Nixon decades earlier, this is the perfect issue and time.
David Ward,
Reno, NV
Costly lots
Why is the Village of Islamorada considering spending $500,000 in taxpayer funds to create 30 parking spots — more than $16,000 per space — on public property to benefit the private, gated Angler's Reef community?
These $52 million-plus homes already provide private parking. If they need overflow space for guests, trailers, or renters paying $930 nightly, that's a private planning issue — not a public burden. When nearby Hog Heaven Sports Bar & Grill needed parking, it bought adjacent land.
Why can't Angler's Reef lease or buy its own parcel, or pave over a few overpriced and overbuilt condos?
The proposed lot would destroy natural vegetation on Windley Key's median, degrading the landscape for 22,000 passing vehicles and contradicting our Village's environmental goals.
Angler's Reef doesn't even allow public access. Allowing well-connected and well-represented private HOAs to offload costs onto taxpayers sets a dangerous precedent, not to mention legal liability.
The taxpayer funds could go to real community needs, like road safety for all 7,000 residents, not just the wealthy, many of whom are absentee landlords. Public funds should serve the public, not subsidize gated luxury. Islamorada must choose capitalism over cronyism.
Ken Thomas,
Islamorada
Clean up MIA
Though we live in Southwest Florida, we most often fly out of Miami International Airport. Signage to the airport is confusing and frustrating; most troubling however, is the airport's condition: dirty and disorganized, with elevators, people movers, or escalators usually (or always) out of order.
This is especially striking when we return from Asian or European airports, which are beautiful and efficient. I am always ashamed when I land at MIA and think this is the first impression foreign travelers have of our country.
If this is the best that MIA Director and CEO Ralph Cutié can do, then maybe it is time for a new director.
Eva Sands,
Bonita Springs
Detention camp
As a board member of the Interfaith Alliance of Southwest Florida, I condemn the establishment of the Everglades detention center known as 'Alligator Alcatraz.' As a member of the Jewish community of Naples, I am against this abomination that sits an hour from our home.
The Florida Immigration Coalition — and now a Democratic delegation — have seen for themselves the deplorable conditions inside the detention camp that echos our own Jewish history over the centuries.
We, as Floridians, as Jews and as human beings cannot be silent in the face of this pure evil.
Lisa Freund,
Naples
Horrible planning
A recent plane crash near Perry Airport in Pembroke Pines has been horrible for the nearby residents who must deal with this. The city wants a safety study done, but no one has addressed the actual problem.
The airport was built in 1943 by the U.S. Navy for training. Over the years, the city allowed housing developments near and around the airport. How short-sighted by city leaders.
The small planes are sometimes flown by inexperienced pilots in training. There is no place for them to go if they have an emergency. There must be a clear swath for emergencies. This can be accomplished by purchasing, then razing, nearby homes. The cost would be tremendous. And who will pay for relocating the displaced residents?
Robert Lynch,
Davie

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Russia's rumored jet-powered versions of the Iranian Shahed are appearing in Ukraine's air defense reports
More signs are emerging that Russia is launching a new exploding drone said to fly much faster than its current Shaheds. Ukraine's Air Force Command reported on Wednesday that it had encountered jet-powered attack drones while defending its airspace the night before. "A notable feature of the night attack was the use of up to eight jet-powered UAVs in the northern direction," it wrote in a regular update. The announcement marks one of the first official reports of Ukraine's forces encountering the new loitering munition in combat. In total, the Air Force Command counted 78 Shahed attack drones launched on Tuesday night. The statement added that 51 drones were shot down or disabled by electronic warfare, interceptor drones, anti-air missiles, and mobile fire groups, which typically use truck-mounted machine guns. The Ukrainian air force did not specify if any jet-propelled drones were shot down. "There were 27 drone impacts recorded at 7 locations, and falling debris from downed drones at 2 locations," Air Force Command wrote. On Thursday, a Ukrainian Telegram channel that monitors the flight paths of Russian drones also wrote that it recorded launches of jet-propelled drones. "On the map we've drawn for you, you can see the movement of cruise missiles, jet-powered Shaheds, and regular strike/decoy UAVs," it wrote. While not an official government channel, it's widely followed in Ukraine for city-specific alerts on incoming drones. A major problem for Ukraine's air defenses Russian jet-propelled drones are believed to be closely modeled after Iran's Shahed-238, an upgraded long-range loitering munition Tehran unveiled in November. Moscow has not officially detailed its own version of the new weapon, but Ukraine's intelligence and Western analysts have reported that it's likely building a model with the Tolou‑10/13 jet engine to vastly increase the drone's speed. Open-source intelligence sources said as early as January that Ukraine may have shot down at least one Shahed-238-type drone, indicating limited Russian use. In June, images published by Ukrainian Telegram channels appeared to show destroyed fragments of such drones in the country. In both earlier reports and the Air Force Command's update on Wednesday, it's unclear if these were prototypes or finalized drones. But if deployed en masse against Ukraine, the new upgraded drone could pose a major problem for Kyiv's air defenses. The Shahed-238 is said to be much faster than the Shahed-136, which is locally produced in Russia as the Geran-2 — the Kremlin's main attack drone against Ukraine. While the Shahed-136 is known to fly at top speeds of 115 mph, a Russian general told state media in December that the Shahed-238 could fly as fast as 500 mph. Extended independent analyses on the drone's still aren't publicly available, and it's possible that the munition can only fly that fast while diving. At such speed, however, the jet-powered drone would be nearly as fast as a cruise missile. That would be a nearly impossible target for Ukraine's mobile fire groups, or the vehicle-mounted machine gun crews it's relied on to fight off Shahed-136s. This year, mobile fire groups are already being overwhelmed by the sheer number of Russian Shahed-136s launched every night. To shore up the gap, Ukraine has started prioritizing interceptor drones, which also risk being rendered obsolete if jet-powered Shaheds become mainstream. Interceptor drones, built secretly by Ukrainian companies, already need to fly much faster than the Shahed-136 since they must catch up to the loitering munition after it's detected. A Shahed-238 or Geran-3 moving at 500 mph would require an intercepting drone to fly nearly three times as fast as before. "In such a case, promising antiaircraft interceptor UAVs, unfortunately, will be powerless," wrote a Ukrainian military blogger in late June. Ukraine does have advanced anti-air missile defenses for faster targets, such as the US-made Patriot system, which has even been reported to take down the hypersonic Kinzhal missile. Still, Ukraine typically reserves these expensive anti-air munitions for ballistic missiles; expending them to neutralize waves of Shahed drones would be unsustainable.

USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
'Doing its best to dismantle the Constitution': Biden slams Trump administration
Former President Joe Biden on Thursday accused President Donald Trump and his administration of trying to "dismantle the constitution." At the National Bar Association's 100th Annual Awards Gala, Biden said the Trump White House "is doing its best" to go after the nation's core principles and that "they've been doing it all too often with the help of a Congress that's just sitting on the sidelines and enabled by the highest court in the nation." The speech echoed the "Soul of the Nation" theme in Biden's 2020 and 2024 presidential campaigns. "In the life of our nation there are moments so stark that they divide all that came before from everything that follows. Moments that force us to confront hard truths about ourselves, our institutions and democracy itself," Biden said in his July 31 speech. "We are, in my view, at such a moment in American history." The former president also swiped at law firms that have made deals with the Trump administration, saying they were "bending to bullies." Biden, who accepted the association's C. Francis Stradford Award, called on lawyers in the room to defend the rule of law. "It means take the client that can't write the big check but needs protecting of basic fundamental rights. It means sign on to that brief that may draw the ire of people in power, but you know its the right thing to do," Biden said. Biden, Obama contrast on Trump responses Biden's remarks came just over a week after former President Barack Obama issued a statement in response to Trump's accusations of treason and the posting of an AI generated video of the 44th President being arrested. The statement, attributed to a spokesperson, called Trump's comments a "ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction" from the ongoing controversy surrounding the Trump administration's handling of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's criminal files. Trump has had his own share of criticism for Biden, both recent and in the past. In April, Trump blamed his predecessor for a poor economy, saying "This is Biden's Stock Market, not Trump's," adding that "we have to get rid of the Biden 'Overhang.'' He's also ordered an investigation of Biden's alleged "cognitive decline." At a 2022 rally in Arizona, Trump said "Biden has utterly humiliated our nation." In the rare post-presidency public appearance Thursday evening, Biden said that "the hard truth" of the Trump administration was that it aimed "to erase fairness, equality, to erase justice itself." Biden's remarks echoed his first post-presidency speech in April, when he accused Trump of "taking a hatchet" to the Social Security Administration.


Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump sharpens sanctions threat on Russia, while admitting it may not work
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Administration officials gave no reasons to believe the latest engagement with Russia would be any more useful. And Trump himself, usually a true believer in the power of economic sanctions to alter the decisions of foreign leaders, admitted for the second time this week that Putin appears to be immune. Advertisement 'I don't know that sanctions bother him,' he said Thursday. Nonetheless, Trump has now executed a 180-degree turn on Russia, at least in tone, in roughly 180 days. He came to office questioning whether Russia was truly the invader of Ukraine, and hinting that the Ukrainians were responsible for their own troubles. His famous blowup with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office in February led him to briefly cut off aid to the Ukrainian military. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared that Ukraine would never join NATO -- a reversal of stated American policy -- and Vice President JD Vance spoke out against arming the Ukrainians. Russia was exempted from most tariffs. Advertisement That has been followed by a series of apparent reversals, with no public acknowledgment from Trump that he is changing strategy. He no longer relies on what he has framed as a deep past relationship with Putin in an effort to win him over. In fact, he has been quite open about his frustration that conversations about ceasefires are usually followed by Russian escalation, often in the pace of drone and missile attacks. 'I think what bothers the president the most is he has these great phone calls where everyone sort of claims yeah, we'd like to see this end, if we could find a way forward,' Rubio said in his Fox interview, 'and then he turns on the news and another city has been bombed, including those far from the front lines.' 'So at some point,' Rubio told his interviewer, Brian Kilmeade of Fox News Radio, 'he's got to make a decision here about what -- how much to continue to engage in an effort to do ceasefires if one of the two sides is not interested.' On Monday, Trump said he would give Russia about 10 to 12 days to end the war before imposing 'sanctions and maybe tariffs, secondary tariffs,' a reference to sanctions on countries that trade with Russia. But there is reason to question how far Trump will push for full secondary sanctions, which would involve threatening the three countries buying much of Russia's oil and gas: China, India and Turkey. All are key to other American interests, and Trump is likely to need future favors and cooperation from them. And it is hard to imagine that China's president, Xi Jinping, would abandon Putin, his most critical partner in challenging American power. Advertisement Rubio took up the hard choices in his conversation with Kilmeade, arguing that 'the president has a lot of options.' He noted that if the United States could get at Russia's oil sales, it 'is a huge part of their revenue.' For their part, Russian officials who have long been presumed to speak with Putin's blessing have dismissed Trump's threats, portraying him in Russian media as erratic and unpredictable. 'Fifty days, it used to be 24 hours, it used to be 100 days,' Sergey Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, said a few weeks ago, as Trump kept moving the deadlines. 'We've been through all this.' Democrats say Trump has other options: He could provide direct military aid to Ukraine, as Congress did during the Biden administration. Instead, he has an elaborate plan to sell arms and related technologies to Europe, which will then donate them to Ukraine. Trump once suggested he could end the war in 24 hours simply by negotiating with Putin, man to man. But now, as Trump's frustration over the conflict grows, his threats have raised questions about how much leverage the United States has with Russia -- and whether Trump is willing to use it. This article originally appeared in Advertisement