Children under 16 will be BANNED from social media to protect them from 'harmful content' under plans put forward in New Zealand
New Zealand could ban children under 16 from accessing social media to protect them from 'harmful content, cyberbullying and exploitation', the Prime Minister has said.
Christopher Luxon has unveiled proposals that would force social media companies to verify users were at least 16 years old or risk fines of up to NZ$2 million - equivalent to around £900,000.
The draft laws, drawn up by National Party MP Catherine Wedd, were modelled on strict legislation recently passed by Australia.
Luxon said today: 'It's time that New Zealand acknowledged that, for all the good things that come from social media, it's not always a safe place for our young people to be.
'It's time we put the onus on these platforms to protect vulnerable children from harmful content, cyberbullying, and exploitation.
'Parents are constantly telling us that they are really worried about the impact that social media is having on their children.
'And they say they are really struggling to manage access to social media.'
Wedd added: 'As a mother of four children I feel very strongly that families and parents should be better supported when it comes to overseeing their children's online exposure.'
The proposals follow the nation's decision to ban children from using mobile phones while at school - a policy designed to turn around the country's plummeting literacy rates.
The move appears fairly popular domestically, with a 1News Verian poll in December finding that more than two-thirds of New Zealanders supported restricting social media access for under-16s.
To become law, the bill will either need the support of the National Party's two other coalition partners, ACT and New Zealand First, or opposition parties.
But ACT leader David Seymour said a 'hastily drafted' plan was not the solution to problems caused by social media.
Officials are yet to solve basic questions surrounding the laws, such as how the ban will be policed.
'I'm really worried about social media's effect, but for every problem there's a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong,' he said.
'Just slapping on a ban hastily drafted won't solve the real problem. The real problem has to involve parents, the solution proposed by National doesn't.
'What I'd like to see is the people worried about this, the educational psychologists, the social media companies themselves, everybody come before a select committee, really thrash it out, and get a solution that is technologically feasible.'
Meanwhile, Labour's Chris Hipkins, the leader of the opposition, told Radio New Zealand he was open to the idea.
The move appears fairly popular domestically, with a 1News Verian poll in December finding that more than two-thirds of New Zealanders supported restricting social media access for under-16s
'This is a conversation we need to have as a country. The Australians have been courageous and tackled it. I think New Zealand needs to do the same.'
The Prime Minister said he was encouraged by the positive comments made by Hipkins and suggested he may be able to garner enough support across the House to pass it.
'It's not a political issue, it's a New Zealand issue,' Luxon claimed.
Australia
The ban is set to come into effect by December.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
5 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Ruth Jones MP on need to ban fur imports and sales
We have a real history of leading the way on animal welfare. Two years ago, Wales became the first part of the UK to ban the use of snare and glue traps. Scotland then followed, and last year Labour committed to do the same in England. Twenty-five years ago, we did the same with the Fur Farming (Prohibition) Act, raising the bar and setting an example for our neighbours to follow. Countries like Austria (2005), France (2021) and even Norway (2025) have all implemented 'fur bans' of their own, showing we were ahead of the curve. I am proud of our record on animal welfare. But before we absolve ourselves of being complicit in the fur trade, there is another step we can and must take: banning imports and sales. Two decades ago, we were right to ban fur farming on moral grounds – but still it is legal to import fur from beautiful, intelligent animals like foxes, mink and chinchilla. I have seen footage from a fur farm in Finland showing foxes with raw wounds, deformed feet and infected eyes. Then there were the obese, 'monster foxes' which were the result of selective breeding to increase their yield. Make no mistake – our ancestors may have used fur to survive the winter, but there is nothing natural about the fur industry today. Five years after covid, experts are warning us the next pandemic might come from one of these farms, where conditions are appalling for animals but perfect for viruses to mutate and make the leap to humans. This issue is urgent as the risk of a zoonotic outbreak looms large. I have been pushing for this change with my own piece of legislation, called the Fur (Import and Sale) Bill. If passed, it would ban the import of real fur products into Britain. Last week I carried a petition to Downing Street for the Fur Free Britain campaign with more than a million signatures and support from singer Will Young and TOWIE star Pete Wicks. Carrying the signatures to the famous black door, we were greeted by Chief Mouser, Larry, who showed great interest in our box. Afterwards an X account belonging to 'Larry the Cat' shared our photos, asking his nearly 900,000 followers to 'leave the fur wearing to the professionals'. I know Argus readers will agree that if an animal product like fur is too cruel to make in Britain, it's also too cruel to import from overseas. It is cruel and unnecessary, and high time we put the fur trade out of fashion. Ruth Jones is MP for Newport West and Islwyn.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Aussies unleash after Scott Morrison receives top accolade in King's Birthday Honours: 'Baffles me'
Australians have lashed out after Scott Morrison was awarded the highest accolade in the King's Birthday Honours List. The former prime minister, who led the nation for four years from 2018 to 2022, was recognised for his 'eminent service to the people and the parliament of Australia, particularly as prime minister'. A Companion of the Order of Australia (AC) is the highest award of the Order of Australia honours system. It is followed by Officer of the Order (AO), Member of the Order (AM), and Medal of the Order (OAM). Former prime ministers are typically honoured in the King's Birthday awards, but the 30th prime minister's recognition sparked widespread criticism. Mr Morrison's term as prime minister was overshadowed by multiple controversies, including his secret appointment to several ministerial portfolios, involvement in the Robodebt scandal, and his widely criticised remark during the 2019 Black Summer bushfires: 'I don't hold a hose, mate'. On Monday, Australians took to social media to blast the former PM. 'If you get a shiny trinket just because your a*** has occupied the PM's chair then what is that trinket worth?' one Australian wrote on X. 'Someone should have intervened to deprive Australia's worst ever Prime Minister of this award.' 'It baffles me that we award public servants for doing the job they were paid for. I understand if they do something 'special', but politicians very rarely do,' another added. 'Morrison certainly did nothing 'special'. Not to mention the retirement package that they all enjoy.' 'It's demeaning of the honour system to be giving this cruel, disingenuous s***-bag any honour,' a third added. One Aussie kept a close tally of Mr Morrison's missteps. 'You lied to the public. Repeatedly. You appointed yourself to five secret ministries. Then claimed it was no big deal,' they wrote. 'You prayed the virus away, outsourced the vaccine rollout, then took credit when premiers fixed your mess. 'You fled to Hawaii during a bushfire crisis. Then blamed your daughters. 'Oh Scotty. Even your religion's ashamed of you. Jesus turned water into wine. You turned democracy into a private members club for gas executives.' Some Australians said Mr Morrison was 'underrated'. 'Respect, well deserved,' one wrote. 'Well deserved, Scomo is very underrated and deserves a lot more respect than what he is given,' another said. Since the establishment of the Order of Australia in 1975, every ex-prime minister has been appointed a Companion except Paul Keating. He declined because he believed the honours should be reserved for those whose community work went unrecognised. Mr Morrison's honour specifically points to his 'notable contributions to global engagement, to leadership of the national Covid response, to economic initiatives, and to national security enhancements, especially through leadership of Australia's contribution to AUKUS'. He received significant support during the early days of the pandemic, with an April 2020 Newspoll revealing he had the highest satisfaction rating for any prime minister since Kevin Rudd in 2009. But by the end of his second term, he had become the most unpopular major party leader since at least 1987, according to an Australian National University study. The King's Birthday Honours List names 581 people in the General Division of the Order of Australia, including academics, ex-sport stars, leaders and creatives. 'These honours recognise the selfless service, integrity, achievement, creativity, and care that flourish across our country,' Governor-General Sam Mostyn said. Fourteen people were appointed to the highest honour, AC. Baz Luhrmann and Catherine Martin, best known for their work on films including Moulin Rouge, The Great Gatsby and Strictly Ballroom, received the accolade for their service to the arts. Environmental scientist Mark Howden, who served as a vice chair on the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, was also appointed to AC alongside business leader Jennifer Westacott and NASA climate science centre co-director Graeme Stephens. Bangerang and Wiradjuri woman Geraldine Atkinson has been named an Officer (AO) of the Order of Australia for her work with Indigenous communities and reconciliation.
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Tim Wilson says Coalition won't revisit ban on working from home as ‘happy workers' are more productive
Shadow industrial relations minister Tim Wilson says work-from-home arrangements should be negotiated between employees and bosses, as 'happy workers tend to be more productive'. Wilson said Dutton's controversial policy to wind back flexible working for public servants – dumped midway through the election campaign in an embarrassing backdown – was a 'heavy solution' that the Coalition wouldn't resurrect in this term. The shadow minister said such working arrangements should be worked out in individual workplaces, based on productivity. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'If employers can find a pathway … and employees can find a pathway, together in partnership for working from home because it works in their best interest, then that would always be the baseline at which I'd approach workplace arrangements,' Wilson told Sky News on Sunday. 'It's not for me to dictate what those terms are.' Dutton's controversial policy to restrict working from home for public servants has been blamed in post-election analysis as a major factor in turning off professional women and young people from voting Liberal. Nationals leader David Littleproud, during the short-lived split between his party and the Liberals, claimed several times 'the work-from-home fiasco hurt us'. Other Liberal members have indicated since the election they were supportive of flexible working arrangements. Andrew Bragg, the shadow minister for productivity, last week said 'we believe in individual choice and back flexibility at work', citing studies showing such arrangements could boost productivity. Wilson, who bucked the nationwide trend and became the only Liberal to win a new seat by reclaiming the seat of Goldstein he lost in 2022 to Zoe Daniel, echoed similar sentiments. He told Sky News that workers should 'have a sense of ownership and responsibility of their workplace arrangements, in partnership with their employers'. 'When it comes to the politics of [Dutton's policy], I think a lot of people looked at it and ... it was probably interpreted, anyway, as a heavy solution to what should be, for the most part, a productivity managed problem between employers and employees.' Wilson said the WFH policy was raised with him 'from time to time' while campaigning for Goldstein, but that equally he had employers who felt they 'no longer had a balanced relationship with their employees and wanted redress'. 'We do know that happy workers tend to be more productive, and there's certainly circumstances where people working from home can be more productive than they might otherwise be,' Wilson said. 'Because of commute times, because of their capacity to balance out their work and family lives, based on what their needs are, but it can vary circumstance to circumstance.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion In a report last week, the Productivity Commission backed flexible working. 'Workers do not need to be in the office full-time to experience the benefits of in-person interactions. As a result, hybrid work (working some days remotely and some days in the office) tends to be beneficial to productivity, or at least is not detrimental to productivity,' the report said. 'Remote work also reduces breaks and sick days, and results in less distractions.' Also on Sunday, shadow finance minister James Paterson said he still believed Australia should boost defence spending to 3% of GDP – a policy outlined by Dutton. Dutton had committed to the figure late in the election campaign, but did not specify how it would be spent. Paterson, speaking on the ABC's Insiders, said the Coalition would provide details 'closer to the next election'. 'There's plenty of good advice out there in open source that suggests areas of investment. One is spending to resolve the recruitment and retention crisis facing the ADF. Another is to make sure that we have the munitions stockpile that we would need to survive a conflict, God forbid, if that should break out,' Paterson said. 'Other things [include] hardening the northern bases, the air and missile defence, drone defence, purchasing our own lethal drones.'
