‘He's a lot of fun to be with': Trump and Epstein were close friends for 15 years
The relationship would eventually break down, the men falling out over a bidding war on a property in Florida. And after Epstein was convicted of child sex offences in 2008, Trump distanced himself from the financier, claiming he was 'not a fan' and wondering, in recent days, why his supporters would 'waste time and energy' on demanding that FBI and Department of Justice files on Epstein be released.
But photos, videos and anecdotes paint a picture of a close friendship, of two middle-aged men who repeatedly partied together both alone and with their partners, including with Melania Knauss, who would go on to become Trump's third wife.
'I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,' Trump told New York magazine in 2002. 'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.'
Trump's insight into Epstein's predilections would be proved true in macabre fashion, when Epstein was found guilty in 2008 of sexually abusing girls aged between 14 and 17 years old. When Epstein was charged with sex trafficking of minors, in 2019, Trump attempted to play down their relationship, insisting: 'I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him.' Trump said the pair had fallen out years earlier, and claimed: 'I was not a fan of his.'
But during the 15 years that the men were friends, there were plenty of incidents that displayed Trump and Epstein's closeness.
The New York Times reported that in 1992, George Houraney, a Florida-based businessman, had organized a 'calendar girl' competition at Mar-a-Lago, Trump's private members' club where he would later live full-time.
Houraney flew more than two dozen women to Mar-a-Lago, but he had a surprise when they arrived.
'I arranged to have some contestants fly in,' Houraney told the Times. 'At the very first party, I said, 'Who's coming tonight? I have 28 girls coming.' It was him and Epstein.'
Houraney said he was surprised. 'I said: 'Donald, this is supposed to be a party with VIPs. You're telling me it's you and Epstein?''
It ended up being just Trump and Epstein.
Back then, Trump made no secret of the friendship. He was pictured with Epstein at events and parties from New York to Florida.
Video from a party at Mar-a-Lago in 1992 shows the pair in conversation as a dance track booms through the speakers. Trump whispers something into Epstein's ear, prompting Epstein to bend over laughing. The tape was aired by NBC News during Trump's first term as president, and the news channel reported that it showed both Trump and Epstein pointing out women, while at one point Trump gestures to a woman and says: 'Look at her, back there … she's hot.'
In 1993 Stacey Williams, then a professional model, visited Trump at Trump Tower with Epstein. On arrival, she would later tell the Guardian, Trump put his hands 'all over my breasts', waist and buttocks while Trump and Epstein smiled at each other, in what she believed was a 'twisted game' between the two men.
'It became very clear then that he and Donald were really, really good friends and spent a lot of time together,' Williams said in 2024. Karoline Leavitt, then a spokesperson for Trump's election campaign, described Williams's accusations as 'unequivocally false. It's obvious this fake story was contrived by the Harris campaign.'
What is undeniable is that the men maintained their relationship through the 1990s. They were photographed at Mar-a-Lago, and the same year were pictured together at a Victoria's Secret Angels event in New York. The relationship endured. Photos show Trump and Epstein with Melania Trump and Ghislaine Maxwell at an event in 2000. Maxwell would be sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2022 for procuring teen girls for Jeffrey Epstein for him to abuse – when she was charged with the crimes Trump responded: 'I just wish her well, frankly.'
The Wall Street Journal also reported on Thursday that Trump allegedly wrote Epstein a birthday card as part of a 50th birthday album organized by Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003. The letter was fashioned in the shape of a woman's body, and consisted of an imaginary dialogue between the two, the Journal said.
'Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.
Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it.
Donald: Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?' it read, with Trump's signature squiggled as it were pubic hair on the outline of the body.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
Trump once believed Epstein to be a terrific guy, but he wasn't the only one who talked up the friendship. Years later Epstein would tell the journalist Michael Wolff that he had been Trump's 'closest friend for 10 years', in audio tapes published on Wolff's Fire and Fury podcast last year. Epstein also told Wolff that Trump liked to 'fuck the wives of his best friends', and said the first time he slept with Melania Trump was on Epstein's plane. Trump's camp claimed that Wolff was engaging in 'false smears' and 'election interference'.
The close friendship wouldn't last. The relationship soured in 2004, according to reports, after the pair became embroiled in a bidding war over a property in Palm Beach. In 2019, after Epstein was arrested, he said he had not spoken to Trump for 15 years. And despite his own close relationship with Epstein, Trump would go on to criticize others for the same thing, with Bill Clinton a particular source of deflection. Trump even shared a conspiracy theory that the former president was involved in Epstein's death – ironically sparking more intrigue in the case. Trump told reporters days after Epstein died:
'The question you have to ask is, did Bill Clinton go to the island? Because Epstein had an island. That was not a good place, as I understand it, and I was never there.' Trump adds: 'So you have to ask, did Bill Clinton go to the island? That's the question. If you find that out, you're going to know a lot.'
Clinton has denied going to Little St James island, which Epstein owned and later became synonymous with his crimes.
Trump now finds himself in a mess that is partly of his own making. The 'Epstein didn't commit suicide' conspiracy theory in which he dabbled quickly spread among rightwing commentators and media figures – many of whom demanded that documents related to Epstein's associates be released. When the Department of Justice failed to do so last week, it caused a rarely seen rift between Trump and his supporters, with Trump trying to brush off the saga, and his supporters angry at a perceived lack of transparency.
When Trump was elected in 2024, his supporters believed they were getting an administration that was anti-swamp and pro-open government, the kind of government that holds back no secrets. But looking back at Trump's statements on the Epstein files during the campaign, the president appeared to be leaving himself wriggle room.
Asked in an interview in September if he would declassify 'the 9/11 files' and 'the JFK files', Trump said yes. He is then asked if he would declassify 'the Epstein files', and initially said yes, but added:
'I think that [declassifying the Epstein files], less so, because you don't know – you don't want to affect people's lives if there's phoney stuff in there, because there's a lot of phoney stuff with that whole world.'
That wavering hasn't helped Trump, however, as he has attempted to quash his supporters' rebellion. In a cabinet meeting last week the president expressed surprise that people were 'still talking' about Epstein, later pleading with his base to 'not waste time and energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about'.
How wrong he was. It turns out loads of people care about Jeffrey Epstein – particularly the people who support Trump. It was something Trump addressed on Wednesday, when he explicitly attacked his supporters in a post on Truth Social. 'My PAST supporters have bought into this 'bullshit,' hook, line, and sinker,' Trump wrote.
He added: 'I have had more success in 6 months than perhaps any president in our country's history, and all these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the fake news and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein hoax. Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!'
Trump revels in his relationship with rank-and-file rightwing Americans, a relationship that has benefited him to the tune of two presidential terms and hundreds of millions of dollars. For the past decade it has seemed as if that relationship could endure any scandal, any broken promise.
But now, for the first time, Trump is finding cracks in his support. That past friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the 'terrific guy' turned 'creep', could prove to be the president's undoing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump reportedly considers reclassifying marijuana as less dangerous drug
Donald Trump is considering reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. At a $1m-a-plate fundraiser at his New Jersey golf club earlier this month, Trump told attendees he was interested in making such a change, the people, who declined to be named, told the newspaper. The reclassification, to remove marijuana from the list of Schedule I controlled substances and make it a Schedule III drug, was proposed by the Biden administration, but not enacted. The change would make it much easier to buy and sell marijuana and make the legal multibillion-dollar industry more profitable. The guests at Trump's fundraiser included Kim Rivers, chief executive of Trulieve, one of the largest marijuana companies, who encouraged Trump to pursue the change and expand medical marijuana research, the report said. During Trump's first term, two Soviet-born Republican donors, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, directly appealed to Trump for help with their plan to sell marijuana in states where recreational use was legal. Audio of the 2018 dinner, which was secretly recorded by the two men, revealed that Trump was skeptical, telling the two men that he believed marijuana use 'does cause an IQ problem; you lose IQ points'. In the same conversation, the Ukrainian-born Parnas first suggested to Trump that he should remove the US ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, and shared a false rumor that the diplomat was badmouthing the president by 'telling everybody, 'Wait, he's gonna get impeached.'' Parnas and Fruman later helped Rudy Giuliani search for dirt on Joe Biden in Ukraine, before being indicted and found guilty of campaign finance violations, for secretly using a Russian oligarch's money to donate hundreds of thousands of dollars to Republican campaigns and committees, including Trump's, in pursuit of favors for their planned legal marijuana business. Reuters contributed reporting
Daily Mirror
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Campaigners raise £4,500 from Brits who want to ruin JD Vance's holiday
The group 'Everyone Hates Elon' were behind huge posters of Donald Trump with dead paedophile Jeffrey Epstein that appeared around the UK to mark the US President's golf holiday in Scotland A campaign group has raised almost £4,500 from Brits who want to "ruin" JD Vance's holiday. The group 'Everyone Hates Elon' were behind huge posters of Donald Trump with dead paedophile Jeffrey Epstein that appeared around the UK to mark the US President's golf holiday in Scotland. They also added a plaque to the sign outside his Turnberry golf course saying it was "Twinned with Epstein Island". Now they're planning to welcome the US Vice President with billboards and flags of a meme of Mr Vance with a ruddy face, a beard and a bald head - which it's claimed he hates. A Norwegian tourist who was refused entry to the US earlier this year claimed he was told it was because he had a copy of the meme on his phone. A spokesperson for the group said: "JD Vance says the UK has a free speech problem - but a tourist was banned from entering the USA simply for having this image on his phone. "So we thought we'd show him what free speech looks like here by welcoming him with the image he apparently hates so much." Appearing on TV alongside David Lammy yesterday ahead of a day of talks at the Foreign Secretary's country residence, Chevening, Vance said he had "raised concerns" about free speech in the US, and had accused the west of "censoring rather than engaging" with different opinions." He said: "I think the entire collective West, the transatlantic relationship, our NATO allies, certainly the United States under the Biden administration, got a little too comfortable with censoring rather than engaging with a diverse array of opinions. So that's been my view. "Obviously, I've raised some criticism, concerns about our friends on this side of the Atlantic. "But the thing that I'd say to the people of England or anybody else, to David, is many of the things that I worry most about were happening in the United States from 2020 to 2024. "I just don't want other countries to follow us down what I think was a very dark path under the Biden administration."
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
A ‘bias monitor' for CBS News is a bad idea. Here's why
For years before I became the public editor at the New York Times, I admired the work of journalists doing the job of holding their own newsrooms accountable to high standards. And when I heard that CBS News would get a position something like that, I thought – briefly – that this could be a positive development. After all, the network's credibility and independence has come under fire after its parent company settled a frivolous lawsuit brought by Donald Trump. Paramount Global, the CBS parent company, was bashed for capitulating to political pressure in order to get federal approval for a merger with another media company. I quickly changed my mind once I learned the details. This is not a traditional ombudsman but what some have dubbed a 'bias monitor' who will receive and evaluate claims of bias in the network's journalism and report on them to the corporation's president. Appointing such a person was part of the FCC's recent approval of Paramount's merger with Skydance. Other conditions included agreeing to Trump priorities such as rooting out diversity programs. The new job 'seems designed to ensure little critical is aired about the current administration', said Glenn Kessler, the longtime Washington Post journalist and editor of the Fact Checker, who is now writing a Substack newsletter. Kessler also noted that the Trump-appointed FCC chair, Brendan Carr, in commenting on the new position, compared it to the creation of an ombudsman decades ago when General Electric bought NBC. But that regulator was designed to ensure NBC's editorial independence and to guard against interference from the new owner, a business conglomerate. In sharp contrast, Kessler told me, this 'newfangled ombudsman suggests CBS will not have independence from political interference'. Public editors are there to serve the reader and to provide transparency and accountability. It's to the Guardian's credit that it maintains a 'readers' editor'; NPR boasts a similar position. Elisabeth Ribbans recently unpacked how the Guardian handled a controversial story about a malnourished child in Gaza; Kelly McBride examined complaints that NPR had failed to give sufficient coverage to anti-Trump demonstrations. But many news organizations have terminated the role, sometimes stating that it is redundant since social media gives voice to critics. I never bought that explanation. Public editors can do something that even the most impassioned outside critics can't do – get response from internal decision makers, consider all points of view, and publish their conclusions on the very site in which the journalism originally appeared. Decades ago at the Washington Post, Bill Green did an exemplary investigation of how the paper came to publish 'Jimmy's World' – a fabricated story about an eight-year-old heroin addict. The Post gave him free rein and then published his 18,000-word findings over several pages. At the New York Times, Clark Hoyt wrote columns criticizing the overuse of anonymous sources and considering complaints about how the Jerusalem bureau chief's son had served in the Israeli military. Job requirements for public editors, therefore, include fairness, independence and a thick skin. The Times position was sometimes called 'the worst job in journalism' because you were often writing something that would tick off your newsroom colleagues. That didn't scare me. When I heard, in 2012, that the Times job was going to be open, I applied and got the gig. My nearly four years weren't easy, but I had the great advantage of a publisher – Arthur O Sulzberger Jr – who believed in the role and supported my work. The best part by far was hearing from Times readers how much they appreciated the opportunity to be heard, and to understand what was going on behind the scenes. I always felt I reported not to the newsroom editors, or to Sulzberger, but to the Times readership. I was disappointed when the paper – on the verge of getting a new publisher in Sulzberger's son – decided to abolish the role in 2017. By then, I had settled into my new job as Washington Post media columnist; there was no ombudsman there any more. The Post had ended that role a few years earlier. In both cases, I thought it was a loss for readers, for credibility and even for the papers' own staffs, who often appreciated the work, especially when they weren't the ones under the magnifying glass. It's simple, really. As journalists, we hold others to account. A good public editor can do the same for the newsroom itself. But a 'bias monitor' set up in a highly politicized environment – as part of corporate maneuvering to clear the path for a merger – is not designed to continue that tradition. Margaret Sullivan is a Guardian US columnist writing on media, politics and culture
