
Junior H's Coachella set proved he can be a ‘sad boy' and a trap corrido pioneer
Among the many faces was Jimmy Humilde, the chief executive of Rancho Humilde Records, who signed the singer after his track 'No Eh Cambiado,' a requinto-backed hustle anthem, went viral on YouTube.
Junior H, whose real name is Antonio Herrera Pérez, was a high schooler in Utah at the time. Now, almost seven years later, the 23-year-old artist, who was raised in Guanajuato, Mexico, is one of the biggest names in the increasingly popular world of música Mexicana.
'It feels really good for us to be here right now, representing Mexico and representing all this music we're doing,' said Junior H, switching between Spanish and English. 'Being the kind of artist that I am, I'm trying to get the most ears I can. That's why I'm here to get people's attention.'
Junior H and labelmate Natanel Cano are credited for pioneering corridos tumbados, a hybrid sound that blends traditional corrido instrumentation with elements of hip-hop and trap beats — Cano's 2019 album, 'Corridos Tumbados,' heavily featured Junior H.
In the realm of música Mexicana, there are the trap corrido makerswho sing about partying and drugs, and then there are 'the sad boys,' hopeless romantics who croon about being in love or about being brokenhearted. Junior H conveniently straddles the line between both.
'I don't really have a problem looking at who I am. I think the people gave me [the 'sad boy' title] a few years ago. They started categorizing me with sad and sentimental music. So I accepted and we kept it going,' said Junior H. 'Especially with men, I think it's important to show people that feelings are not bad and we can express them as we want.'
After his U.S. tour, Sad Boyz Mania, which took place last summer and included two sold-out nights at L.A.'s BMO Stadium, Junior H received a second-line billing on this year's Coachella's Day 3 lineup. His name appeared between electronic DJ Zedd and K-pop idol Jennie, and was one of three música Mexicana performers playing the entire fest — he's joined by fellow sad boy Ivan Cornejo and reggaetón Mexa up-and-comer El Malilla.
Festival organizers first began booking música Mexicana actst in 2018 — legacy cumbia group Los Angeles Azules was the first to play the three-day event. As global interest in the genre has grown, Goldenvoice, the company behind Coachella, has booked acts like Los Tucanes de Tijuana, Grupo Firme, Banda MS and Cano. Last year, Peso Pluma, Carin León and Santa Fe Klan were on the lineup.
It was during Peso Pluma's set that Junior H made his desert debut, making a guest appearance to sing 'El Azul,' a narcocorrido believed to be about a Sinaloan drug lord. Now with his own 50-minute set, Junior H says he was excited to be in a position where he could return the gesture to Pluma and bring his own 'sad boy' flair to center stage.
'You know, it's not an opportunity for him, because he was the first one who opened all this way for us,' said Junior H. 'It's a really beautiful thing between artists, and especially between friends like us when we work really hard for this genre, and then get the privilege to perform on stages like this one.'
As the Sunday evening set's start time lingered over his head, Junior H traded his casual, pink jersey for an all-white outfit that would contrast his band's all-black attire. In the dimmed trailer, journalists, friends and VIP fans all shared a few moments of his sought-after attention. The softspoken singer remained quiet and seems to be in a relaxed state of mind. Outside, the tololoche player tuned his instruments as the guitarists gathered in a corner to run through a few chords and the horn players blew a few trial notes — all while intermittently taking shots of Clase Azul Tequila. When it was time for them to all head over to the stage, they moved in a dense pack where Junior H was barely visible.
On stage, Junior H took the role of a conductor overseing the 25 musicians backing him. The sheer amount of people created a showstopping spectacle, with each group of instrumentalists on different raised levels. The ensemble even included someone whose sole purpose was to deliver tequila shots to the musicians and hold Junior H's red solo cup, generating a party atmosphere both onstage and in the audience. As the música Mexicana sensation crooned the heartbroken lyrics of 'Y Lloro' and a symphony of 'Rockstar's' horns rang out, he commanded the stage's catwalk and hit every note from the pits of his diaphragm.
Throughout the show, he continually shouted out Mexico and encouraged the crowd to yell out the lyrics. Toward the end of his set, he brought out Peso Pluma to sing 'Luna,' and followed it up by inviting Tito Double P on stage to join him for '5-7.'
Many expected a different setlist from the corridos tumbados originator, as he neglected many of his most popular corridos such as the newly released 'El Chore' and one of his early hits, 'El Hijo Mayor.' There was online speculation surrounding the exclusion of these tracks, especially after Los Alegres del Barranco's U.S. visas were revoked for showing an image of drug lord Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes during a recent concert. But Junior H shared that he wanted to put more of a spotlight on his 'Sad Boy' sound.
'[Sad Boyz 4 Life II] is one of the most, most important albums in my career. We've been forcing ourselves to prove and show the people what we can do and that we can change our music. It doesn't have to be typical. We can also do nice and beautiful music, not just music for the streets or the narcos and all that s—,' he says, apologizing for cursing. 'We want people to see that we don't only do that type of music. We also do beautiful music and poetry. That's our goal: to show them that we do more than that.'
Before heading off the stage, a massive image of the Mexican flag appeared on the main stage's biggest screen. The explosive guitar riffs of 'Disfruto Lo Malo,' a collaboration with Cano, prompted a ground-shaking roar from the crowd. Junior H made one final lap around the mega stage, making eye contact with every screaming individual and paying homage to his musical roots.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
11 minutes ago
- New York Post
How to tell if that song is AI-generated? Here are some things to check
Is it The Velvet Underground or Velvet Sundown? The fictitious rock group, Velvet Sundown, which comes complete with AI-generated music, lyrics and album art, is stoking debate about how the new technology is blurring the line between the real and synthetic in the music industry, and whether creators should be transparent with their audience. Computer software is widely used in music production, and artificial intelligence is just the latest tool that disc jockeys, music producers and others have added to their production pipeline. But the rise of AI song generators such as Suno and Udio is set to transform the industry because they allow anyone to create songs with just a few prompts. 4 If you encounter a new song that leaves you wondering whether it's 100% made with AI, there are some methods that could reveal how it was created. StockPhotoPro – While some people do not care whether they're listening to AI-generated music, others might be curious to know. If you encounter a new song that leaves you wondering whether it's 100% made with AI, there are some methods that could reveal how it was created. Do a background check If you're wondering who's behind a song, try some old-fashioned detective work. The 'most obvious cues' come from 'external factors,' said Manuel Mousallam, head of research and development at streaming service Deezer. Does the band or artist have social media accounts? Lack of a social presence might indicate there's no one there. If they do exist online, examine the kind of content they post, and how long it goes back. Is there any sign that the artist or band exists in real life? Are there any upcoming concerts and can you buy a ticket for a gig? Is there footage of past concerts on YouTube? Has an established record label released their singles or albums? Try going to the source. Song creators often — but not always — publish their generated tunes on the Suno or Udio platforms, where they can be found by other users. The catch is that you'll have to sign up for an account to get access. Users can look up songs by track name or the creator's handle, and browse genres and playlists. But it can still be difficult to spot a song, especially if you don't know the name of the song or creator. Song tags 4 The 'most obvious cues' come from 'external factors,' said Manuel Mousallam. AP Deezer has been flagging albums containing AI-generated songs, as part of its efforts to be more transparent as it battles streaming fraudsters looking to make quick money through royalty payments. The Deezer app and website will notify listeners with an on-screen label — 'AI-generated content' — to point out that some tracks on an album were created with song generators. The company's CEO says the system relies on in-house technology to detect subtle but recognizable patterns found in all audio created by AI song generators. The company hasn't specified how many songs it has tagged since it rolled out the feature in June, but says up to 18% of songs uploaded to its platform each day are AI-generated. Song scanners 4 The Deezer app and website will notify listeners with an on-screen label to point out that some tracks on an album were created with song generators. InfiniteFlow – There are a few third-party services available online that promise to determine whether a song is human-made or generated by AI. I uploaded a few songs I generated to the online detector from IRCAM Amplify, a subsidiary of French music and sound research institute IRCAM. It said the probability that they were AI-generated ranged from 81.8% to 98% and accurately deduced that they were made with Suno. As a cross-check, I also uploaded some old MP3s from my song library, which got a very low AI probability score. The drawback with IRCAM's tool is that you can't paste links to songs, so you can't check tunes that you can only hear on a streaming service. There are a few other websites that let you both upload song files and paste Spotify links for analysis, but they have their own limitations. When I tried them out for this story, the results were either inconclusive or flagged some AI songs as human-made and vice versa. Check the lyrics 4 There are a few third-party services available online that promise to determine whether a song is human-made or generated by AI. doidam10 – AI song tools can churn out both music and lyrics. Many serious users like to write their own words and plug them in because they've discovered that AI-generated lyrics tend to be bad. Casual users, though, might prefer to just let the machine write them. So bad rhyming schemes or repetitive lyrical structures might be a clue that a song is not man-made. But it's subjective. Some users report that Suno tends to use certain words in its lyrics like 'neon,' 'shadows' or 'whispers.' If a song includes these words, it's 'a dead giveaway' that it's AI, said Lukas Rams, a Philadelphia-area resident. He has used Suno to create three albums for his AI band Sleeping with Wolves but writes his own lyrics. 'I don't know why, it loves to put neon in everything.' No easy answers AI technology is improving so quickly that there's no foolproof way to determine if content is real or not and experts say you can't just rely on your ear. 'In general, it can be difficult to tell if a track is AI-generated just from listening, and it's only becoming more challenging as the technology gets increasingly advanced,' said Mousallam of Deezer. 'Generative models such as Suno and Udio are constantly changing, meaning that old identifiers – such as vocals having a distinctive reverb – are not necessarily valid anymore.'


Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
One Tech Tip: Can you tell if that song AI-generated? Here are some things to check
LONDON (AP) — Is it The Velvet Underground or Velvet Sundown? The fictitious rock group, Velvet Sundown, which comes complete with AI-generated music, lyrics and album art, is stoking debate about how the new technology is blurring the line between the real and synthetic in the music industry, and whether creators should be transparent with their audience. Computer software is widely used in music production, and artificial intelligence is just the latest tool that disc jockeys, music producers and others have added to their production pipeline. But the rise of AI song generators such as Suno and Udio is set to transform the industry because they allow anyone to create songs with just a few prompts. While some people do not care whether they're listening to AI-generated music, others might be curious to know. If you encounter a new song that leaves you wondering whether it's 100% made with AI, there are some methods that could reveal how it was created. Do a background check If you're wondering who's behind a song, try some old-fashioned detective work. The 'most obvious cues' come from 'external factors,' said Manuel Mousallam, head of research and development at streaming service Deezer. Does the band or artist have social media accounts? Lack of a social presence might indicate there's no one there. If they do exist online, examine the kind of content they post, and how long it goes back. Is there any sign that the artist or band exists in real life? Are there any upcoming concerts and can you buy a ticket for a gig? Is there footage of past concerts on YouTube? Has an established record label released their singles or albums? Try going to the source. Song creators often — but not always — publish their generated tunes on the Suno or Udio platforms, where they can be found by other users. The catch is that you'll have to sign up for an account to get access. Users can look up songs by track name or the creator's handle, and browse genres and playlists. But it can still be difficult to spot a song, especially if you don't know the name of the song or creator. Song tags Deezer has been flagging albums containing AI-generated songs, as part of its efforts to be more transparent as it battles streaming fraudsters looking to make quick money through royalty payments. The Deezer app and website will notify listeners with an on-screen label — 'AI-generated content' — to point out that some tracks on an album were created with song generators. The company's CEO says the system relies on in-house technology to detect subtle but recognizable patterns found in all audio created by AI song generators. The company hasn't specified how many songs it has tagged since it rolled out the feature in June, but says up to 18% of songs uploaded to its platform each day are AI-generated. Song scanners There are a few third-party services available online that promise to determine whether a song is human-made or generated by AI. I uploaded a few songs I generated to the online detector from IRCAM Amplify , a subsidiary of French music and sound research institute IRCAM. It said the probability that they were AI-generated ranged from 81.8% to 98% and accurately deduced that they were made with Suno. As a cross-check, I also uploaded some old MP3s from my song library, which got a very low AI probability score. The drawback with IRCAM's tool is that you can't paste links to songs, so you can't check tunes that you can only hear on a streaming service. There are a few other websites that let you both upload song files and paste Spotify links for analysis, but they have their own limitations. When I tried them out for this story, the results were either inconclusive or flagged some AI songs as human-made and vice versa. Check the lyrics AI song tools can churn out both music and lyrics. Many serious users like to write their own words and plug them in because they've discovered that AI-generated lyrics tend to be bad. Casual users, though, might prefer to just let the machine write them. So bad rhyming schemes or repetitive lyrical structures might be a clue that a song is not man-made. But it's subjective. Some users report that Suno tends to use certain words in its lyrics like 'neon,' 'shadows' or 'whispers.' If a song includes these words, it's 'a dead giveaway' that it's AI, said Lukas Rams, a Philadelphia-area resident. He has used Suno to create three albums for his AI band Sleeping with Wolves but writes his own lyrics. 'I don't know why, it loves to put neon in everything.' No easy answers AI technology is improving so quickly that there's no foolproof way to determine if content is real or not and experts say you can't just rely on your ear. 'In general, it can be difficult to tell if a track is AI-generated just from listening, and it's only becoming more challenging as the technology gets increasingly advanced,' said Mousallam of Deezer. 'Generative models such as Suno and Udio are constantly changing, meaning that old identifiers – such as vocals having a distinctive reverb – are not necessarily valid anymore.' ___ Is there a tech topic that you think needs explaining? Write to us at onetechtip@ with your suggestions for future editions of One Tech Tip.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
If the BBC bows to YouTube, everyone loses
YouTube is the biggest beast in the attentional infrastructure of modern media,' Amol Rajan, presenter of Radio 4's flagship Today programme, announced this week. Listeners around the country – the older ones, at least – must have been left perplexed. What is the 'attentional infrastructure'? And isn't YouTube just a website for sharing videos of kittens mewing or post-operative children high on trace sedatives? No. According to the media regulator Ofcom, YouTube is now the second-most watched service in the UK, ahead of ITV and behind only the BBC. Linear TV – the old tradition of live broadcast – has been staving off doom-mongers for the past decade but now stands on a precipice. Generations Z and Alpha (the youngest set of pre-teen media consumers) have already migrated overwhelmingly to streaming, whether via video sharing platforms (such as YouTube) or subscription video-on-demand services (such as Netflix). The former is now the premier TV destination among the fresh-faced four-to-15 demographic. As the Today programme showed, there will undoubtedly be some at New Broadcasting House and ITV HQ who are getting antsy about this digital coup d'état. But Ofcom's latest report is only the latest glance at a gradual, longstanding shift in the way that people view television. There have always been inflection points: the launches of ITV in 1955 and Channel 4 in 1982; the introduction of Sky in 1989 and digital terrestrial in 1998; Netflix's arrival in the UK in 2012. Since John Logie Baird's first TV broadcast in 1926, the technology has been (somewhat ironically) charting a linear trajectory away from linearity. And the diversifying of content providers has increasingly coincided with the arrival of more flexible viewing options. Ofcom has, however, stumbled upon something of a classification error. Comparing BBC One to YouTube is like comparing Penguin Classics to the British Library. YouTube has an estimated 2.7 billion active users, of whom a reported 65.3 million are 'creators', people who upload content to the site. The BBC, meanwhile, provides thousands of hours of content each year. Its 2025-26 Annual Plan announced 1,000 hours of drama programming on its linear TV channels, alongside 1,200 hours of comedy and 1,800 of documentary and factual programming – an amazing return for a single television station, but pales in comparison to the 20 million videos uploaded to YouTube every day. BBC One is a single point of light; YouTube is the full spectrum. The latest data will be read by some as a sign that traditional, longer-form broadcasting is dead: now, 60-second micro-videos are king. But outdated clichés – perpetuated in earlier paragraphs – belie YouTube's evolution. Videos up to 15 minutes (excluding their popular TikTok dupe, Shorts) remain the most popular length, but shorter-form content is declining in popularity. For adult watchers, YouTube's most popular areas were 'music' and 'how to' content, such as recipes and DIY. Just throw in a documentary about canal boats, and that's sounding a lot like BBC Four. The tricky thing for the BBC is working out which concessions are worth making as it seeks to maintain its place at the head of the industry. There might be fears that the Beeb will employ Amelia Dimoldenberg to host Newsnight from a Morley's, or bring in the musician and influencer KSI as a roving Autumnwatch correspondent. The reality is that there's a (slightly less terrifying) happy medium to be achieved here. YouTube launched in 2005 and it was only a couple of years later that Netflix – at the time a mail-order DVD service – announced that it would pivot to streaming video. Shortly after that, the BBC opened its proprietary streaming service, iPlayer, to beta testing. It might make you feel old, but iPlayer has been live now for 18 years and has become an essential part of the BBC's strategy. Streaming offers real accessibility gains – subtitling, audio description, dubbing – that had proven tricky before, and the uptake among older licence fee payers has been slow but steady. In 2024, iPlayer accounted for 22 per cent of BBC content views, in line with the 4 per cent year-on-year growth experienced since 2022. With audiences acclimatising to streaming, YouTube should be seen not only as a threat to the BBC but also as an opportunity. The BBC already has a huge presence on the platform: the main BBC YouTube channel has 15 million subscribers, while there are also much-followed subsidiary accounts, such as BBC News (18 million subscribers) and BBC Earth (14 million). The BBC is a major player on the platform internationally, with 21 million subscribers to BBC News Hindi and 12.5 million to BBC News Arabic. BBC Persian, BBC Uzbek and BBC Mundo (in Spanish) all have over a million subscribers. While core TV brands such as Doctor Who (2 million subscribers), Strictly Come Dancing (835,000) and Top Gear (9.36 million) maintain healthy communities. So, when YouTube does well, the BBC does well. For many broadcasters, this presents a tricky paradox. Success on YouTube can provide huge audiences and new commercial pathways (such as brand deals via digital agencies), but risks forsaking traditional advertisers and opportunities to sell subscriptions. For a publicly funded broadcaster like the BBC, the question is less vexed. ITV and Channel 4 have entered into a licensing agreement where YouTube publishes full programmes while they retain control over the advertising inventory. But all these traditional broadcasters have an obligation to meet their audience at the most likely point of contact: for younger people, that is now YouTube, just as it is still by switching on the gogglebox for anyone over the age of 35. And yet, the BBC and ITV should not get lost in the pursuit of younger viewers. Ofcom's report contained another piece of telling data: no demographic spends more cumulative time watching video at home than the over-75s. On average, over-75s spend 386 minutes per day watching video, compared to just 184 minutes among ages four to 15. And these screen-addled retirees are only spending a microscopic amount of time on YouTube; the most reliable fix to their addiction is live telly, which accounts for the biggest block of watched minutes (compared to video sharing, streaming or playback) for every age group over 45. British terrestrial TV is constantly being pushed towards modernity. The core question it faces is whether to pursue the demographics who are departing or ignoring its services, or to consolidate its position among devoted user groups. Increasing media plurality inevitably means increasing competition from the private sector. Where the BBC has fought that tide (such as the ill-fated BBC Sounds experiment, which attempted to create a closed ecosystem for audio content), its success has been limited. Just as the creation of YouTube catalysed the building of iPlayer – which is now an essential part of the BBC's multi-generational offering – so too will the natural changes to the landscape shape the corporation's future direction. With the BBC's charter up for renewal at the end of 2027, there will be enormous pressure to cut costs. The organisation's critics will be bolstered by headlines about the challenge from YouTube. But for long-term stability, terrestrial broadcasters shouldn't pick a losing battle with Big Tech. They need to instead focus on the continued delivery of elite programming, allowing the methods by which audiences find that content to evolve naturally. Adaptation is fine. But if what we're left with no longer resembles the BBC, we'll all be poorer for it.