Supreme Court upholds 20-year sentence for former Icasa chairperson Rubben Mohlaloga
Convicted former Independent Communications Authority of SA (Icasa) chairperson Rubben Mohlaloga will have to serve his 20-year jail sentence for his role in defrauding the Agri-Broad-Base Black Economic Empowerment Fund (AgriBBBEE), which was established to assist previously disadvantaged farmers.
The Supreme Court of Appeal turned down his appeal against his conviction and sentence, and Judge Fayeeza Kathree-Setiloane, who wrote the judgment, had strong words regarding the conduct of Mohlaloga.
Mohlaloga, formerly ANC Youth League deputy president, turned to the SCA after the high court rejected his appeal bid. He was earlier convicted in the regional court of fraud and contravention of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act (POCA). The regional court sentenced him to 15 years' imprisonment on each count and ordered that he serve an effective 20 years' imprisonment.
Mohlaloga, a member of Parliament and Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Agriculture at the time, colluded with others to secure a R6-million grant under false pretences. The AgriBBBEE was approved by Parliament to assist previously disadvantaged farmers financially. Its objective was to facilitate broad-based black economic empowerment in the agricultural sector.
The fund was managed and administered by the Land Bank on behalf of the National Department of Agriculture (DoA). It received R100 million from the National Treasury.
In February 2008, R6 million was transferred from the fund to the trust account of a law firm, and this payment was disbursed largely to Mohlaloga. Within three months, the grant money was depleted, and not a cent had been spent for the purpose for which it had been originally designated by the Land Bank.
Among Mohlaloga's grounds for appeal was that his 20-year sentence was shockingly harsh. He also appealed against the high court's refusal to grant him leave to appeal his conviction. He argued that the high court had misapplied legal principles regarding several aspects of his trial, including the doctrine of common purpose.
In rejecting his grounds for appeal, the SCA noted that he played a vital role in committing the crimes. It was also noted that at the time, he was an elected and trusted member of Parliament.
In once again turning down his appeal, Judge Kathree-Setiloane remarked that he abused that trust by perpetrating the crime of fraud against the fund, which was funded by taxpayers' money.
'It is inconceivable that Mr Mohlaloga did not know what the purpose of the grant was, and that it was directed at empowering previously disadvantaged people. Despite being given an opportunity to repay the money by the regional court, Mr Mohlaloga failed to do so,' the judge added.
The judge stated that corruption and white-collar crime in state-owned entities lead to economic decline, job losses, more poverty, and reduced public trust.
'Unless those convicted of such crimes receive appropriate sentences, public confidence and participation in government institutions would be completely eroded, leading to increased inefficiencies and possible collapse,' Kathree-Setiloane said in turning down his appeal.
[email protected]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
18 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Letter to Mahlamba Ndlopfu — standards of bribes have plummeted in South Africa
Ah, Chief Dwasaho! This week, the ANC's Integrity Commission (what integrity?) cleared King Paul Mashatile of the Alex Mafia nation of corruption allegations relating to his 'family homes'. No case existed to begin with. Is this the time to say: I told you so – or is it too early? Integrity Commission finds no fault… Shock! Horror! Gasp! According to eNCA, 'the ANC's integrity commission has cleared the party's Deputy President, Paul Mashatile, of any wrongdoing concerning his luxury homes'. What law was supposedly broken by spending a night – or perhaps several years – with the in-laws? One is tempted to ask: can the mere fact of maternal hospitality constitute prosecutable misconduct? Surely not. The law of evidence should not be twisted into a pretzel to suit weak gossip, nor should the ANC display such feeble moral imagination as to call this a scandal. You'd think there would be a law against unethical behaviour and a criminal offence for serious misunderstandings of our legal system. But sadly, no such legislation exists – so spare us the dramatics, the moral grandstanding, and the moral panics. His Deputyship is a man of high moral standing. He once told the 'now-disgraced' broadcaster, JJ Tabane, the unvarnished truth: 'I don't steal, I've never been involved in corruption.' I have no doubt he was right. I see no reason to believe that poorly educated journalists with sleeping problems, an affinity for adult beverages, and, some might say, poor judgement in choosing life partners, can hold a man – or men – to account. Who guards the guardians? Guardians, bribes and Dior bags Speaking of guardians, my esteemed colleague Pieter-Louis Myburgh swears he's delivered what could be the first exposé to catch a bribe recorded on video. The stars of this production? The recently suspended Independent Development Trust (IDT) CEO, Tebogo Malaka, and the entity's smooth-talking spokesperson, Phasha Makgolane. For the record, the IDT is a proud entity of the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure – yes, that very department which delivers on its promises with all the speed and efficiency of a one-legged tortoise on crutches. It appears Malaka has developed a sizeable property portfolio, including a R16-million mansion tucked neatly inside Gauteng's Waterfall Country Estate. And of course – courtesy of… well, you see, I have a weak heart, a single loving wife, type 2 diabetes, an unpaid bond, and 10 children who depend on me. In other words, I'm in no position to be sued. Death of corruption with class Still, the standards of bribes have plummeted in this country: R60,000, stuffed into a white Dior shopping bag and slipped into a white envelope – note, not the classic, respectable brown – handed over in broad daylight at a wine farm restaurant. That alone should have been the first red flag. The second? Conducting the handover at an outdoor table, in full view of fellow diners, as if corruption were now an Olympic spectator sport. Now, everyone knows bribes are meant to be exchanged in dull, smoke-filled, dimly lit rooms overrun with the gentle soundtrack of pole dancers, political crosstitutes, cross-dressers, prostitutes, drug dealers and well-built, tall Nigerian bouncers with menacing, bloodshot eyes. Men, in various stages of intoxication and ill-concealed lust, lean against sticky counters, while drug pushers glide from table to table, making furtive hand signs – two fingers to the nose – signalling that cocaine is on offer. In other words, Pieter-Louis was dealing with amateurs. And really, R60,000? What an insult. You attempt to bribe a youngish white male born after apartheid – no land, no farm, no guaranteed job – with R60,000, when a single bottle of Glenfiddich 50-year-old was going for R600,000 in Makro's festive-season catalogue in November 2023. Bribing in instalments: A 24-month, no-interest deal The amount of money exchanged is the kind of offer you make when trying to buy a second-hand 1912 Toyota Corolla with one missing hubcap. Worse, my leader, they promised Pieter-Louis regular R100,000 payments and easy access to IDT tenders… But here's the punchline: he'd have to do the work himself. Organise the contractors, submit the paperwork and launch a foundation to process the kickbacks before withdrawing the cash, leaving a paper trail thicker than the Zondo Commission's final report. What sort of bribery syllabus is this? 'How to Incriminate Yourself 101'? At this rate, the next bribe will be handed over at a Woolworths checkout counter, wedged between a rotisserie chicken and a packet of organic baby spinach. If IDT head honchos can't even organise a bribe with a bit of class, perhaps it's time they subcontracted the job to the real professionals – the ones who still believe in the brown envelope, a dingy club and the bouncer who knows when to look away. Public service announcement To all aspiring State Capturers, tenderpreneurs and amateur bribers – do not, under any circumstances, attempt to bribe anyone in instalments. It is bad form, unbecoming of the grand South African tradition, and frankly insulting to your intended target. Now, everyone understands there are rules. Bribes, like ANC branch annual general meetings and their elective conferences, require a ceremony of the disgraced. Instead, these two chose a Sunday afternoon in the Cape Winelands, perhaps thinking the chardonnay would pair well with their criminal intent. Bloody idiots. Comrades, at least have the decency to do it properly: one payment, no paper trail, and preferably somewhere without a wine list and cameras. Of bribes, low class and no manners On the subject of bribes, many moons ago, a journalist walked into my office at the legislature, where I was serving as a media liaison officer. He was a familiar face – the kind of reporter who was practically part of the furniture in the media gallery. Without ceremony, as he lowered himself into the chair opposite me, I calmly closed my laptop and flipped my documents facedown. In those days, this was a standard practice, part of what the then National Intelligence Agency said was 'protocol'. We exchanged the usual pleasantries and small political talk. Then he got to the point. He claimed to have a mobile broadcast truck that could revolutionise our media coverage in community radio. I nodded politely, letting him make his case. And then came the hook: if I gave his company the job (tender), we would 'share the spoils'. Imagine walking past tight security, through the body scanner, into my office, and proposing a bribe without even an imvula mlomo to sweeten the deal – not so much as a courtesy cold beer or even a token gesture like a Glenfiddich 12-year-old. Just the raw, unseasoned proposition, slapped onto my desk like a resignation letter. Covert operation or the dumbest criminals? I looked him squarely in the eye and delivered the classic ANC denial: 'I do not sit in tender committees.' He stood up and left, an egg on his face – clearly runny, dripping, and visible from across the corridor. I threw my hands in the air, defeated, displeased, disillusioned, disheartened, disgusted, and frankly disturbed. What on Earth gave him the idea that I was bribeable? Was this a loyalty test, or was I on some underground BlackBerry Messenger list of 'low-maintenance' targets? The audacity haunted me for years. In the old political underworld, such an approach would have been carefully choreographed: a discreet third-party intermediary, a plausible cover story, and a brown envelope slipped under a desk marked 'Confidential.' But here was a man pitching corruption like a Makro clearance sale – blunt, artless, shame-free. I could not decide which was worse: his insult to my principles or the craft of bribery itself. If you're going to try to buy my silence, at least have the professional courtesy to follow the rules of the game. This, Comrades, was corruption without class. My leader, askies. I read in the news that the pipe-smoking former president, Thabo Mbeki, has joined forces with the FW de Klerk Foundation, other foundations and the Freedom Front Plus to snub the National Convention – the supposed launchpad for the National Dialogue. What common cause does Mbeki have with the apartheid apologists? Is it now a bridge too far to bribe the foundations? Neither Woolworths nor Makro offered financial or material support for this article. No bribes were paid or accepted, no animals harmed, and no journalists killed, as in Gaza.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Draft terms of reference for Mkhwanazi inquiry incorporate party inputs
The Ad Hoc Committee to probe allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi will circulate the draft document integrating the inputs from parties to check if their submissions were correctly captured before the terms of reference are adopt on Monday. Image: Parliament The Ad Hoc Committee into serious allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi integrated all the submissions made by parties on the proposed terms of reference. This was after a marathon meeting where the committee took a break twice to allow the technical team to factor in the inputs of the parties that made written submissions prior to the deadline into one document. Committee Chairperson Soviet Lekganyane said the draft document would be sent to parties to check if their submissions were captured before they adopt the terms of reference. 'For the purpose of coherence in our engagements, it will be better, and also looking at the kind of document which must guide the work we will be doing, it will be important for parties and members of the committee to study it, especially the proposals that have been made here. 'I realise that there are so many areas of convergence on the draft that was released last week. You would need to study the proposal of the parties and agree when we make the final adoption,' he said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The integrated terms of reference will be discussed and then finally adopted at a meeting on Monday. MK Party MP Sibonelo Nomvalo said as soon as they were done with deliberations on the terms of reference, they should get started with their inquiry's work. 'Our proposal is that we must start next week. We know that such is not to be determined in this meeting,' Nomvalo said. EFF leader Julius Malema agreed that the sooner they start working, the better. Malema said they could not come up with the commencement date without adopting the terms of reference. 'It is not given when we meet next week on the terms of reference that we are to agree and immediately start the inquiry,' he said. DA MP Glynnis Breytenbach urged that the integrated document be shared with parliamentary legal services to advise on whether any proposals are problematic. ANC Chief Whip Mdumiseni Ntuli said the integrated document should incorporate all inputs of the parties. 'If we can get it before the end of the day tomorrow, it will allow us to go through the document over the weekend,' Ntuli said. Lekganyane said the document would be sent to all the parties to confirm their inputs were correctly captured. He confirmed that the document will be taken to the parliamentary legal services to have a look at to make sure it complies with the laws of the country. 'The sooner we start, the better. In the next meeting, there should be a draft programme on commencement of proceedings, but that is dependent on whether we agree on the terms of reference on Monday,' Lekganyane said. The draft terms of reference say the parliamentary inquiry will be inquisitorial. The document proposes that the committee uses the services of an external legal counsel in an advisory capacity to assist it in carrying out its work and lead evidence from witnesses, but some want this function to be done by the parliamentary legal services. It also proposes that the committee may invite any interested parties to provide input if they wish to do so. 'In the event that an invited witness refuses to submit a sworn statement and/or avail themselves as requested, the committee may use its power of subpoena as provided for in the Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Act.' The document also proposes that legal representation be allowed to those who will testify, but they will be allowed to have their legal assistance at their own cost if they choose. 'Witnesses will be allowed to have their lawyers with them and, within reason, consult with and take advice from their lawyers. The committee will not allow lawyers to speak on behalf of their clients at all,' reads the document.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Former ANC MP Vincent Smith denied R2m for legal defence in fraud case
Former ANC MP Vincent Smith, pictured here appearing in court, has been unsuccessful in his bid to access just over R2 million to fund his defence in his upcoming criminal trial. Image: Supplied Fraud and corruption-accused former ANC MP Vincent Smith has suffered a major blow after he was refused access to over R2 million to fund his defence in the looming criminal trial. The former chairperson of the National Assembly's Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services is facing charges that he received payments totalling R600,000 from former Bosasa (now African Global Operations) chief operations officer Angelo Agrizzi, who is his co-accused in the matter alongside Smith's company, Euroblitz 48. The 65-year-old Smith and Euroblitz 48 together face seven counts of corruption and 18 of fraud, as well as money laundering and offences relating to the Tax Administration Act. Smith maintains that the funds were a loan and had electric fencing and a security system installed in one of his properties in Johannesburg by Bosasa. In addition, Agrizzi also facilitated payments totalling R277,000, and some of the funds were used to pay for Smith's daughter's studies abroad in tranches between R10,000 and R220,000. Smith failed to declare the benefits he received from Bosasa as required of all members of Parliament by the Code of Ethical Conduct and Disclosure of Members' Interests. The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) also accuses Smith of trying to return the favour to Bosasa by rubbishing a high-level probe into tender fraud at the Department of Correctional Services conducted by the Special Investigating Unit when the matter came before the Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services, which he chaired in Parliament at the time. Earlier this year, the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, Acting Deputy Judge President Thifhelimbilu Mudau dismissed with costs Smith's application for the release of funds in terms of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act (Poca) for legal expenses in his criminal trial limited to R2m. Smith's two properties registered at the Johannesburg and Pretoria deeds registries were placed under a preservation order granted in April 2021, in accordance with Poca. The application was brought by National Director of Public Prosecutions Shamila Batohi and dealt with the properties and was meant to safeguard them to satisfy a possible confiscation order to the value of nearly R47m. Smith disclosed a monthly pension from his annuity of R88,459 after tax deductions and R7,500 from property rental. He explained that his actual expenses amounted to R77,545 a month, which left him with a surplus of approximately R18,415 monthly. Smith complained that the amount was inadequate to fund his trial for the anticipated entire term and insisted that he had made a full disclosure of all assets relating to the determination of the value of realisable property. However, Batohi told the court that Smith has never filed any application for living and legal expenses since the restraint order was granted, and admitted he could meet his expenses from unrestrained assets. She said Smith saved over R18,000 a month for the last four-and-a-half years since he was arrested and could have had nearly R1m available towards his legal expenses, but instead continued with his exorbitant monthly expenses. The exorbitant monthly expenses include R11,550 on credit cards and overdrafts, R16,500 on groceries, R7,200 on rent, despite owning properties, R8,100 on a domestic helper and garden services, R2,098 on a cellphone, R2,000 for clothing, R1,480 for satellite television, R899 for Wi-Fi, R5,500 on petrol while he is unemployed, R9,000 for medical fees, R1,000 on his tithe, and R3,200 on printing. Additionally, the court heard that Smith's disclosed income and expenses increased exponentially between the period May 2023 to March 2025, and he failed to provide a declaration of the increase in his income and/or expenses or supporting documents in support of the increase. Smith failed to challenge the allegation that his income and/or expenses had increased, and his legal representative argued that the failure to file a replying affidavit was merely a mistake. Judge Mudau also dismissed with costs his application for leave to appeal, for which he provided reasons on Tuesday this week. Smith indicated that the court erred in reading into the clear provisions of Poca that he must make a full declaration of his assets and liabilities. 'The application for leave to appeal is wholly unmerited,' ruled Judge Mudau. On Thursday, Smith said he is yet to discuss the way forward with his legal team and has nothing to say at this point. Henry Mamothame, spokesperson for the NPA's Investigative Directorate Against Corruption, said Smith's criminal trial is set down for October at the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg.
