logo
Why do US prosecutors want a one-day sentence for Breonna Taylor shooting?

Why do US prosecutors want a one-day sentence for Breonna Taylor shooting?

Al Jazeera3 days ago
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) is seeking a shortened prison sentence of just one day for an ex-police officer convicted of using excessive force during a raid in Louisville, Kentucky that led to the death of Breonna Taylor, an African-American medical worker, in March 2020.
Brett Hankison was convicted in November last year of blindly firing several shots during a failed drug raid, which resulted in Taylor's death. Although his shots were not the ones which hit Taylor, prosecutors argued his actions were a violation of Taylor's rights and others present at the scene.
After it spent several years pursuing a conviction under the previous administration, the DOJ's recommendation on Thursday represents a 180-degree turn, which has caused anger in the Black community.
Hankison's sentencing will take place on Monday, when a federal judge will decide his term at a hearing.
Here's what we know about the case:
What happened to Breonna Taylor?
Taylor, an emergency medical technician, was shot dead during a raid by police from the Louisville Metro Police Department in her apartment in the early hours of March 13, 2020.
Seven plain-clothed officers executed a 'no-knock' search warrant. Three officers broke down the door to her two-bedroom apartment, where Taylor was in bed with her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker.
Walker, who possessed a licensed firearm, fired one shot. He later told police he thought the men were intruders.
One officer, Jonathan Mattingly, was struck and wounded in the thigh. Mattingly and his colleague, Miles Cosgrove, directly returned fire into the apartment. Cosgrove delivered the fatal shot that killed Taylor. She was shot six times and died in the hallway.
Hankison ran to the side of the building and fired 10 shots into the apartment through a window and sliding door covered with blinds. Some of the bullets hit an occupied apartment adjacent to Taylor's. A report by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) determined that the police fired 32 shots in total.
Jamarcus Glover, Taylor's ex-boyfriend, had been the original target of the search, as authorities believed he hid narcotics at Taylor's apartment. He was arrested at a separate location in Louisville that night, before Taylor's killing. It is unclear if the same team of officers arrested Glover.
Taylor's murder, and an initial absence of charges against the police officers involved, triggered mass, months-long protests across the country.
No officers faced direct charges over Taylor's death. Only Hankison faced charges for firing blindly.
Taylor's case and the killing of George Floyd in May 2020, fuelled a national reckoning on racism and police brutality as part of the Black Lives Matter movement. Taylor's family received a $12m settlement from the city of Louisville in September 2020. The city also banned no-knock raids with the introduction of the 'Breonna Law'.
Why are prosecutors recommending a one-day sentence?
Prosecutors under the Trump administration are recommending that Hankison serve no further jail term for the case, and that he should instead be sentenced to time already served plus three years of supervised probation.
Hankison served one day in jail after he was arrested in 2023 for his first court appearance. At the time, federal prosecutors under the Biden administration sought a conviction against him that could have amounted to a maximum life sentence.
In November 2024, a federal jury found Hankison guilty of using excessive force and depriving Taylor of her civil rights.
However, in a memo on Thursday, the DOJ said there 'is no need for a prison sentence to protect the public' from Hankison.
The memo added that although Hankison's response in the 'fraught circumstances was unreasonable' in hindsight, 'that unreasonable response did not kill or wound Breonna Taylor, her boyfriend, her neighbours, defendant's fellow officers, or anyone else'.
What happened to the other officers?
Hankison is the only one of the three officers at the scene to face charges. He was fired from the police force in June 2020, and Cosgrove was fired in 2021, after local investigations determined they had violated standard practice by shooting blindly. Mattingly retired in April 2021.
Another ex-officer who was not at the scene pleaded guilty to federal charges of violating Taylor's civil rights by falsely stating on the search warrant that Taylor received packages for Glover. Two other former officers pleaded not guilty to similar charges.
If the court heeds the DOJ's advice, none of the officers involved in the case would have faced jail time. It is not certain that the court will agree to the recommendation.
How have Taylor's family responded?
Ben Crump, the civil rights lawyer who helped Taylor's family secure the $12m settlement against Louisville, said in a statement on the social media site X that the DOJ's recommendation was an 'insult to the life of Breonna Taylor and a blatant betrayal of the jury's decision'.
'This sets a dangerous precedent,' Crump wrote on Thursday. 'When a police officer is found guilty of violating someone's constitutional rights, there must be real accountability and justice. Recommending just one day in prison sends the unmistakable message that white officers can violate the civil rights of Black Americans with near-total impunity.'
What was the verdict in Hankison's trial?
The DOJ, under a different leadership, charged Hankison in 2022 on one count of violating the civil rights of Taylor and her boyfriend, Walker, as well as Taylor's neighbours, when he blindly fired into her home.
The state of Kentucky arraigned Hankison on similar charges but cleared him of wrongdoing in March 2022.
However, after four days of deliberation, a federal jury declared a mistrial in November 2023, as jurors were unable to reach a joint decision.
Witnesses gave conflicting testimonies, including about whether the police officers had announced themselves at the scene of the shooting. Walker, for one, testified that the officers did not identify themselves before breaking in.
Other police officers, including Cosgrove, also testified that Hankison had violated standard practice when he shot into Taylor's apartment blindly, and without identifying a target.
Hankison, who took the stand, defended his 'helplessness' at the scene, saying he believed his team was being attacked. The officer claimed he saw Walker's figure illuminated by the muzzle flash from his weapon and said he thought the gun was an AR-15 rifle, which prompted him to go to the other side of the apartment and open fire.
Do police officers receive light sentences for killing or assaulting Black people in the US?
Many activists and rights groups believe the US law enforcement and justice systems allow officers, especially white officers involved in the wrongful deaths and assault of Black people, to get away with overly lenient punishment, compared with civilians.
Derek Chauvin, the officer who knelt on George Floyd for nine minutes until he died in May 2020, was seen as an exception when he was sentenced to 22 years in jail.
Some other cases which have drawn criticism for light sentences for police officers, however, include the following:
Police officer Kimberly Potter shot dead Daunte Wright, a 20-year-old Black man, during a traffic stop in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, in April 2021. Potter, who shot Wright at close range in the chest, later said she had meant to use her service Taser rather than her gun. Wright died at the scene.
Potter was found guilty of first-degree manslaughter and second-degree manslaughter and received a sentence of just two years, serving 16 months. The city of Brooklyn Center paid a settlement of $3.25m to Wright's family for his wrongful death.
Following public outrage and protests over Wright's death, the police department changed its policies about arresting people for misdemeanour offences. Wright's death also led to changes in police Taser procedures in Minnesota and other states.
Elijah Jovan McClain, 23, was arrested by police officers in Aurora, Colorado, while walking home from a convenience store on August 24, 2019. The police officers were responding to a call from a person concerned about an unarmed man wearing a ski mask and 'looking sketchy'.
McClain was handcuffed while one of the officers applied a chokehold. When paramedics arrived, they injected McClain with 500mg of ketamine to sedate him. He suffered cardiac arrest and died in hospital six days later.
Three police officers and two paramedics were charged with his death. Two officers were acquitted of all charges. Both paramedics and one of the officers were convicted of negligent homicide. One of the paramedics was also found guilty of second-degree assault and sentenced to five years in prison and three years' probation.
Chicago ex-officer Jason Van Dyke was sentenced to just seven years in 2019 on charges of second-degree murder and 16 counts of aggravated battery over the October 2014 shooting of Laquan McDonald, a 17-year-old African American.
Initial police reports claimed officers had responded to alerts of a teenager behaving erratically, and that McDonald had slashed the tyres of a truck with a knife and lunged at officers.
Van Dyke fired 16 shots at McDonald as he walked away from police, according to dashcam footage released a year later. The officer was released early in 2022 for good behaviour.
In 2019, the Chicago Police Board fired four officers for allegedly covering up the shooting. The nine-member board found the officers had exaggerated the threat posed by the teenager.
Former Dallas police officer Amber Guyger was sentenced to 10 years for murder after she killed her 26-year-old African-American neighbour and accountant, Botham Jean, in Dallas in September 2018. The sentence was far less than the 28 years prosecutors had sought.
Guyger claimed she had entered Jean's apartment, which was directly below hers, by mistake, and thought he was an intruder.
Mark Bessner was sentenced to five-to-15 years for involuntary manslaughter after he fired his Taser at African-American teenager Damon Grimes during a police car chase in Detroit in August 2017. Grimes crashed and died from his injuries.
Los Angeles Officers Laurence Powell, Timothy Wind, Theodore Briseno and Stacey Koon were charged with excessive force but later acquitted after severely assaulting Rodney King, an African American, in March 1991.
King was pulled over on suspicion of intoxicated driving but was severely assaulted, resulting in scores of fractures and brain damage. A court's decision to acquit the officers led to widespread riots in the city, during which 63 people died.
Officers FH Pascal, WF Stevenson, and PL Whalen were sentenced to 20 years on manslaughter charges for the March 1938 death of Berry Lawson, a 27-year-old African American, but were pardoned within a year.
Lawson was sleeping in the lobby of the Seattle hotel where he worked when he was arrested for loitering.
The officers claimed Lawson was intoxicated and had fallen down a set of stairs during the arrest; however, evidence later emerged that they had beaten Lawson to death and arranged a fake witness to testify that Lawson had fallen.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ecuador's biggest drug lord ‘Fito' extradited to US
Ecuador's biggest drug lord ‘Fito' extradited to US

Al Jazeera

time40 minutes ago

  • Al Jazeera

Ecuador's biggest drug lord ‘Fito' extradited to US

Ecuadorean gang leader Adolfo Macias Villamar, also known as 'Fito', is set to appear in a federal court in the United States, where he will plead not guilty to international charges of drug and weapons trafficking, his lawyer says. The Ecuadorean government on Sunday extradited the notorious drug trafficker, a month after he was recaptured following a 2024 escape from a maximum-security penitentiary, the country's prison authority said. Macias, the leader of the Los Choneros gang, was serving a 34-year sentence at a prison in Guayaquil for a slew of crimes, including drug trafficking, organised crime, and murder. The flight transporting Macias landed in New York state on Sunday night, the report said. His lawyer told the Reuters news agency that Macias 'will plead not guilty' before the Brooklyn federal court on Monday. Details of the handover to the US government and the extradition were not specified. The US government has yet to issue an official statement following the extradition. The US Attorney's Office had filed charges in April against Macias on suspicion of cocaine distribution, conspiracy and firearms violations, including weapons smuggling. The former taxi driver turned crime boss agreed in a Quito court last week to be extradited to the US to face the charges. He is the first Ecuadorean extradited by his country since a new measure was written into law last year, after a referendum in which President Daniel Noboa sought the approval of moves to boost his war on criminal gangs. Ecuador, once a peaceful haven between the world's two top cocaine exporters, Colombia and Peru, has seen violence erupt in recent years as rival gangs with ties to Mexican and Colombian cartels vie for control. Cult following Soon after Macias escaped from prison in January 2024, Noboa declared Ecuador to be in a state of 'internal armed conflict' and ordered the military and tanks into the streets to 'neutralise' the gangs. The move has been criticised by human rights organisations. As a drug lord, Macias cultivated a cult status among fellow gang members and the public. While behind bars in 2023, he released a video addressed to 'the Ecuadorian people' while flanked by armed men. He also threw parties in prison, where he had access to everything from liquor to roosters for cockfighting matches. Macias's Los Choneros has ties to Mexico's Sinaloa cartel, Colombia's Gulf Clan, which is considered the world's largest cocaine exporter, as well as Balkan mafias, according to the Ecuadorian Organised Crime Observatory. His escape from prison prompted widespread violence and a massive military and police recapture operation, including government 'wanted' posters offering $1m for information leading to his arrest. On June 25, Macias was found hiding in a bunker concealed under floor tiles in a luxury home in the fishing port of Manta, the centre of operations for Los Choneros. Noboa declared he would be extradited, 'the sooner the better'. 'We will gladly send him and let him answer to the North American law,' Noboa told CNN at the time. More than 70 percent of all cocaine produced in the world now passes through Ecuador's ports, according to government data. In 2024, the country seized a record 294 tonnes of drugs, mainly cocaine.

Trump's big beautiful police state is here
Trump's big beautiful police state is here

Al Jazeera

timea day ago

  • Al Jazeera

Trump's big beautiful police state is here

On July 4, United States President Donald Trump signed into law his so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill', which will reduce taxes for the rich, punish the poor, and otherwise propel American plutocracy to ever more noxious heights. Just days earlier, Trump's Vice President JD Vance took to X to underline the key component of the legislation: 'Everything else — the CBO [Congressional Budget Office] score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy — is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions.' Indeed, the bill allocates the unprecedentedly ludicrous sum of $175bn to anti-immigration efforts, approximately $30bn of which will go directly to the notorious federal law enforcement agency ICE, known in long form as US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Another $45bn is earmarked for the construction of new immigration detention centres, which, as the American Immigration Council notes, 'represents a 265 percent annual budget increase to ICE's current detention budget'. Thanks to these budgetary machinations, ICE now occupies the position of the largest US federal law enforcement agency in history, with more money at its annual disposal than the military of any country in the world apart from the US and China. Given that ICE agents have as of late made a name for themselves running around in masks and kidnapping people, however, one would be forgiven for seeing this sudden windfall to the agency as something less than, um, 'beautiful'. Of course, the fanatical increase in ICE funding is no surprise coming from a president whose obsession with the idea of deporting millions of people has not prompted him to contemplate how, precisely, a US economy fundamentally dependent on undocumented labour will continue to function in the absence of said labourers. Anyway, the arrangement means big bucks for the detention-industrial complex, including detention companies like GEO Group and CoreCivic that are contracted by ICE. A July 4 Washington Post article on ICE's impending 'detention blitz' reported that each company coincidentally happened to donate half a million dollars to Trump's inauguration in January. The Post article also provided other clues as to how US 'democracy' really works: 'On calls with Wall Street analysts this year, Geo Group executives have primed shareholders for a government contract bonanza that could boost annual revenue by more than 40 percent and profits by more than 60 percent.' But since the government cannot come right out and say this is all about money, it has to invent other narratives, such as that ICE is protecting the US from 'vicious criminal illegal aliens'. Never mind that the vast majority of those detained by the agency have no criminal record whatsoever. Among ICE's ever-growing list of victims is a six-year-old Honduran boy with leukaemia, who was arrested in late May at the Los Angeles immigration courthouse where he had come with his family for a scheduled asylum hearing. This month, massive ICE raids on two California farms resulted in more than 360 arrests and the death of 57-year-old Jaime Alanis, a Mexican farmworker who fell from a greenhouse roof during the upheaval. Nor are all of ICE's detainees undocumented; after all, it is hard to be discerning when you are scrambling to meet detention quotas, and when you are well aware of the fact that you are totally above the law. One of the detainees from the farm raids was 25-year-old security guard George Retes, a US Army veteran, no less, who was pepper-sprayed and then jailed for three days, missing his three-year-old daughter's birthday party. He was released with no explanation. Now imagine the landscape with an additional $175bn in 'ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions', to borrow Vance's words. As if manic and arbitrary detention operations and the elimination of due process were not cause enough for concern, ICE is also being utilised as a force for political repression and the criminalisation of dissent. This was seen in the recent spate of abductions of international scholars opposed to the ongoing US-backed Israeli genocide in the Gaza Strip, including 30-year-old Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish doctoral student focusing on childhood development at Tufts University in Massachusetts. En route to an iftar dinner in March, Ozturk was surrounded by masked agents, forced into an unmarked vehicle, and disappeared to an ICE detention centre in Louisiana administered by GEO Group – all because she had co-authored an article for the university newspaper the previous year expressing solidarity with Palestinians. In a new essay for Vanity Fair, Ozturk reflects on her 45-day detention in appalling conditions that were only made bearable thanks to the solidarity of her fellow female detainees, hailing from an array of nations. Ozturk writes: 'One time, an officer came and took away all the cookie boxes, claiming we would use them to make weapons. Another time, we were shocked to witness an officer physically push two women in the kitchen.' When Tim Walz, the governor of Minnesota, recently had the nerve to refer to ICE as 'Trump's modern-day Gestapo', the US Department of Homeland Security threw a tantrum over his 'dangerous rhetoric', and issued a press release asserting that, 'while politicians like Gov. Walz fight to protect criminal illegal aliens, ICE officers will continue risking their lives to arrest murderers, kidnappers, and pedophiles'. This was itself 'dangerous rhetoric', no doubt, coming from the folks who are kidnapping doctoral students, six-year-old leukaemia patients, army veterans, and so on. Although undocumented workers might be the most immediate and visible victims of the super-funding of ICE stipulated by the One Big Beautiful Bill, the consequences for US society as a whole cannot be understated. At the end of the day, a rogue agency snatching people off the street while entire communities live in fear does not denote a 'land of the free', particularly when the president appears to view anyone who disagrees with him as potentially eligible for criminal punishment. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, has observed that 'you don't build the mass deportation machine without building the police state first'. And if we consider the Cambridge dictionary entry for police state – 'a country in which the government uses the police to severely limit people's freedom' – it seems the US already fits the definition to a big beautiful T. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.

US attorney general paves way for more convicted criminals to own guns
US attorney general paves way for more convicted criminals to own guns

Al Jazeera

time2 days ago

  • Al Jazeera

US attorney general paves way for more convicted criminals to own guns

Washington, DC – United States Attorney General Pam Bondi has begun a process to make it easier for individuals with criminal convictions to own guns. The move on Friday comes amid a wider push by the administration of President Donald Trump to make good on campaign promises to gun rights groups, which criticise restrictions on firearm ownership as violations of the Constitution's Second Amendment. Trump ordered a review of government gun policies in February. Gun control advocates, meanwhile, have voiced concerns over the administration's ability to adequately assess which convicted individuals would not pose a public safety risk. In a statement released on Friday, Bondi said individuals with serious criminal convictions have been 'disenfranchised from exercising the right to keep and bear arms — a right every bit as constitutionally enshrined as the right to vote, the right to free speech, and the right to free exercise of religion — irrespective of whether they actually pose a threat'. 'No longer,' she added. Under the plan, Bondi seeks to return the power to determine which individuals convicted of crimes can own firearms directly to her office. That exemption process has currently been overseen by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. However, Congress has, for decades, used its spending approval powers to stem the processing of exemption requests. The Department of Justice said the proposed change 'will provide citizens whose firearm rights are currently under legal disability with an avenue to restore those rights, while keeping firearms out of the hands of dangerous criminals and illegal aliens'. The US attorney general would have 'ultimate discretion to grant relief', according to the department. It added that, 'absent extraordinary circumstances', certain individuals would be 'presumptively ineligible' for the restoration of their gun rights. They include 'violent felons, registered sex offenders, and illegal aliens'. The plan was outlined in a 'proposed rule' submitted to the Federal Register on Friday. It will undergo a final public comment period before it is adopted. In Friday's statement, US Pardon Attorney Edward Martin Jr said that his team was already developing a 'landing page with a sophisticated, user-friendly platform for Americans petitioning for the return of their gun rights, which will make the process easier for them'. When details of Bondi's plan initially emerged in March, the gun control group Brady was among those who voiced opposition. 'If and when gun rights are restored to an individual, it needs to be through a robust and thoughtful system that minimizes the risk to public safety,' the group's president, Kris Brown, said in a statement. She added that Trump's restoration of gun rights to those who were convicted — and later pardoned — for their role in the storming of the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, raised concerns over how the administration would exercise its discretion. 'This would be a unilateral system to give gun rights back to those who are dangerous and high risk, and we will all be at greater risk of gun violence,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store