logo
Education Department Clarifies Anti-DEI Guidance

Education Department Clarifies Anti-DEI Guidance

Yahoo04-03-2025
The Education Department has released a document with additional guidance for schools trying to implement an earlier "Dear Colleague" letter. That letter, released last month, directed educational institutions to halt a wide range of racially discriminatory behavior.
While the original letter mostly directed schools to follow civil rights law and Supreme Court precedent, a passage restricting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs caused concern among some First Amendment experts. The letter stated that such programs frequently "teach students that certain racial groups bear unique moral burdens that others do not" and thus "deny students the ability to participate fully in the life of a school."
"The way 'teach' is going to be interpreted, is going to be very important when looking at this 'Dear Colleague' letter," Robert Shibley, special counsel for campus advocacy at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), told Reason last month. "I do think there's legitimate concerns to be had there. And I think it's important that the department clarify that sooner rather than later."
This document attempts to do just that. Thankfully, the letter attempts to assuage free speech concerns, stating that nothing in the new policy "requires or authorizes a school to restrict any rights otherwise protected by the First Amendment." The document also declared that the department wouldn't go after any program solely because it uses "specific terminology such as 'diversity,' 'equity,' or 'inclusion,'" but rather would focus on outright racial discrimination, which may be part of some DEI programs.
"Schools may not operate policies or programs under any name that treat students differently based on race, engage in racial stereotyping, or create hostile environments for students of particular races," the letter reads. "For example, schools with programs focused on interests in particular cultures, heritages, and areas of the world would not in and of themselves violate Title VI, assuming they are open to all students regardless of race." The letter also clarified that identity-based observances like Black History Month are acceptable, as long as the events are open to all students.
But some ambiguity remains, given the friction between wide-ranging free speech protections and laws that bar colleges from allowing a "hostile environment."
The "First Amendment rights of students, faculty, and staff, and the curricular prerogatives of states and local school agencies do not relieve schools of their Title VI [of the 1964 Civil Rights Act] obligations not to create hostile environments through race-based policies and stereotypes," the document reads. "Nor does it relieve them of their duty to respond to racial harassment that creates a hostile environment." Will this be interpreted so expansively as to go after, say, a peaceful Palestinian protest that is accused of being antisemitic? We'll soon see.
The post Education Department Clarifies Anti-DEI Guidance appeared first on Reason.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US attorney will no longer bring felony charges against people for carrying rifles or shotguns in DC
US attorney will no longer bring felony charges against people for carrying rifles or shotguns in DC

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US attorney will no longer bring felony charges against people for carrying rifles or shotguns in DC

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors in the nation's capital will no longer bring felony charges against people for possessing rifles or shotguns in the District of Columbia, according to a new policy adopted by the leader of the nation's largest U.S. attorney's office. That office will continue to pursue charges when someone is accused of using a shotgun or rifle in a violent crime or has a criminal record that makes it illegal to have a firearm. Local authorities in Washington can prosecute people for illegally possessing unregistered rifles and shotguns. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro said in a statement that the change is based on guidance from the Justice Department and the Office of Solicitor General and conforms with two Supreme Court decisions on gun rights. Pirro, a former Fox News host, has been a vocal critic of local officials' crime-fighting efforts since Republican President Donald Trump installed her in office in May. Her policy shift means federal prosecutors will not purse charges under the D.C. law that made it illegal to carry rifles or shotguns, except in limited cases involving permit holders. The change also overlaps with Trump's declaration of a crime emergency in the city, flooding the streets of Washington with patrols of hundreds of federal agents and National Guard members. The White House says 76 firearms have been seized since the crackdown started this month. The new policy also coves large-capacity magazines, but it does not apply to handguns. 'We will continue to seize all illegal and unlicensed firearms, and to vigorously prosecute all crimes connected with them,' Pirro said, adding that she and Trump "are committed to prosecuting gun crime.' Pirro said a blanket ban on possessing shotguns and rifles violates the Supreme Court's ruling in 2022 that struck down a New York gun law and held that Americans have a right to carry firearms in public for self-defense. She also pointed to the high court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller striking down the city's ban on handguns in the home.

Lutnick Says Intel Must Give U.S. Equity for CHIPS Act Funds
Lutnick Says Intel Must Give U.S. Equity for CHIPS Act Funds

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lutnick Says Intel Must Give U.S. Equity for CHIPS Act Funds

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Tuesday that Intel (INTC, Financials) must hand the government an equity stake in return for CHIPS Act funding, shifting billions in subsidies into ownership. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 10 Warning Signs with INTC. We should get an equity stake for our money, Lutnick said on CNBC, adding that the Trump administration would convert what were grants under the Biden administration into nonvoting shares. Nonvoting, he emphasized, ruling out governance rights. Shares of Intel rallied nearly 7% Tuesday before sliding 7.5% Wednesday, amid reports the White House is weighing a 10% stake that would make Washington its largest shareholder. Bloomberg first reported the talks. The move comes as Intel secured a $2 billion investment from SoftBank, giving the Japanese conglomerate about 2% ownership and ranking it the fifth-largest holder. FactSet data show Intel had already finalized an $8 billion CHIPS Act grant last fall for new factories. President Donald Trump has pushed for more domestic chipmaking to reduce reliance on Asian suppliers like Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSM, Financials), which itself received $6.6 billion under the act. Intel is spending billions to build its Silicon Heartland complex in Ohio, but CEO Lip-Bu Tan told employees in July that construction would slow, with the first plant now set to open in 2030. Trump met with Tan last week after publicly questioning his ties to China. Intel has struggled to capture AI chip demand while funding its costly manufacturing ambitions. Lutnick suggested other CHIPS Act recipients may also face equity demands. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action, he said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Texas classrooms won't have to display the Ten Commandments — for now
Texas classrooms won't have to display the Ten Commandments — for now

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Texas classrooms won't have to display the Ten Commandments — for now

In news that's being hailed as a win for religious freedom advocates — but also has major implications for public school parents — the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction Wednesday halting the state's enactment of legislation that requires all public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments. Texas Senate Bill 10 was slated to take effect September 1, but U.S. District Court Judge Fred Biery has temporarily blocked the law, citing the likelihood of it infringing upon the First Amendment's Establishment and Free Exercise clauses. While the Establishment clause bars the government from forcing a specific religious doctrine on the public, the Free Exercise clause safeguards individuals' rights to observe their religious faith free of government influence. In Rabbi Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District, Judge Biery ruled that SB 10 could cause students to experience unconstitutional religious coercion and violate their parents' rights to guide their religious instruction. Displays of the Ten Commandments in classrooms, he stated, 'are likely to pressure the child-Plaintiffs into religious observance, meditation on, veneration, and adoption of the State's favored religious scripture, and into suppressing expression of their own religious or nonreligious background and beliefs while at school.' Rabbi Mara Nathan, the lead plaintiff in the case, said in a statement that, as both a faith leader and public school parent, she welcomed the ruling. 'Children's religious beliefs should be instilled by parents and faith communities, not politicians and public schools,' she said. The plaintiffs in the case are public school parents from Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Unitarian Universalist and nonreligious backgrounds. The American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, the national ACLU, Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation represented the families, with Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP participating as pro bono counsel. 'Today's decision will ensure that Texas families — not politicians or public-school officials — get to decide how and when their children engage with religion,' said Rachel Laser, president and CEO of the nonprofit Americans United for Separation of Church and State, in a statement. 'It sends a strong and resounding message across the country that the government respects the religious freedom of every student in our public schools.' Religious freedom advocates have argued that blurring the lines between church-state separation in public schools not only marginalizes students from religious minority groups but may also send harmful messages to girls and students of color. The 10th commandment states, for example: 'You shall not covet your neighbor's house. You shall not covet your neighbor's wife, or his male or female servant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.' This scripture alone could be viewed as framing women as solely the property of others, no different from livestock, be they wives or servants. The Bible has also been used to justify enslavement, which the final commandment also alludes to — an ideological argument that could cause psychological or emotional harm to students whose ancestors were enslaved. More broadly, biblical scriptures that take aim at fornication and same-sex relations have been criticized for instilling shame in youth and adults who have sex before marriage or are LGBTQ+. 'Public schools are not Sunday schools,' said Heather L. Weaver, senior counsel for the ACLU's Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief, in a statement. 'Today's decision ensures that our clients' schools will remain spaces where all students, regardless of their faith, feel welcomed and can learn without worrying that they do not live up to the state's preferred religious beliefs.' Texas is not alone in its failed bid to display the Ten Commandments in all public school classrooms. In November, a federal judge blocked Louisiana's attempt to blur church-state separation in this way. In June, a group of Maryland parents on the opposite side of the political spectrum emerged victorious when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that they could object to LGBTQ+ picture books in their children's classrooms on religious grounds. The ruling has sparked fears that parents will cite their religious beliefs to wield more power over the public school curriculum nationwide. The post Texas classrooms won't have to display the Ten Commandments — for now appeared first on The 19th. News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday. Subscribe to our free, daily newsletter. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store