South Korea exports seen falling as Trump's tariffs start to weigh
SEOUL, April 29 (Reuters) - South Korea's exports are expected to have fallen in April, as U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, including those on autos and steel, started to weigh, a Reuters poll found on Tuesday.
South Korea is the first major exporting economy to report trade figures each month, providing an early look at the state of global trade.
here.
Exports out of Asia's fourth-largest economy are forecast to have fallen 2.0% this month from a year earlier, after a rise of 3.0% last month, according to a median of 22 economists in the survey conducted on April 23-28.
That would be the first year-on-year loss in three months. In January, exports dropped 10.1%, which was aggravated by unfavourable calendar effects from the timing difference in Lunar New Year holidays.
Trump imposed 25% tariffs on auto imports from April 3, after introducing 25% duties on steel imports from March 4. His 10% blanket tariffs also took effect from April 5, while higher "reciprocal" tariffs on major countries, including 25% duties on South Korea, are currently paused for 90 days.
"The impact of tariffs is starting to show up, not only on soft data, but also on hard data," said Stephen Lee, an economist at Meritz Securities.
Chun Kyu-yeon, an economist at Hana Securities, also said: "There is a possibility that the adverse effects of tariffs are starting to come into reality."
"And, there will be further downward pressure from upcoming tariffs on auto parts and semiconductors as well as ongoing trade conflict between the U.S. and China," Chun added.
Still, the chip sector, South Korea's biggest export item, remained resilient at least this month, likely providing some support to the headline figure, economists noted.
In the first 20 days of this month, exports fell 5.2%, as automobiles and steel products dropped 6.5% and 8.7%, respectively, whereas semiconductors rose 10.7%. By destination, shipments to the United States dropped 14.3%, while those to China fell 3.4%.
South Korean automakers are turning more pessimistic about the outlook for the sector due to tariffs, but chipmakers are optimistic amid robust demand, according to the country's central bank.
Meanwhile, imports are projected to have fallen 7.0% in April, according to the survey. That would be the biggest drop since June 2024.
The median estimate for the country's trade balance stood at a surplus of $4.35 billion, narrower than the previous month's $4.92 billion.
South Korea is scheduled to report trade figures for April on Thursday, May 1, at 9 a.m. (0000 GMT).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
21 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Ash Regan to Elon Musk: 'Forget Trump and bring SpaceX to Scotland'
Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination'. Trump criticised Mr Musk in the Oval Office, and before long, he and Mr Musk began trading bitterly personal attacks on social media, sending the White House and Republican congressional leaders scrambling to assess the fallout. As the back-and-forth intensified, Mr Musk suggested Mr Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the President's association with infamous paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Now Ash Regan says that the country should 'be quick' to take advantage of such situations. The Alba MSP believes that with Scotland's emergence in the Space and satellite industries, attempts should be made to tempt Musk to relocate his business ventures to Scotland. With Trump's family and business ties to Scotland, her party said that such a move by Musk could 'prompt a bidding war between the President of the United States and one of the worlds richest men as to who can invest more in Scotland.' Commenting, Ash Regan said: 'The Scottish space industry, including satellite-related activities, is projected to be worth £4 billion to the Scottish economy by 2030. Glasgow is already known as the satellite manufacturing capital of Europe, and we are on the verge of becoming a global player in the industry. 'We have the sites, the people and the vision to match Elon Musk's aspirations for SpaceX so the Scottish Government should be opening the door and advertising Scotland is the go to place if he wishes to relocate his business ventures here if contract cancellation threats in the US are upheld. 'I previously proposed Scotland as the site for the next Tesla Gigafactory and unfortunately Elon Musk ruled out investment due to the policies of the UK Labour Government. However, the Scottish Government have been a key partner in the growing success of our satellite industry, so in Scotland we would have a much opportunity of attracting such investment where the UK Government has previously failed. 'Scotland has the potential for abundant renewable energy, which is needed to power emergent technologies. By creating innovative investment opportunities, we can then capitalise on Scotland's USP, ensuring we invest this bounty to benefit Scotland's businesses and communities. "No more being left behind as passengers while Westminster squanders the power of our own resources. We need to think independently and act like a forward looking nation to show our people we can thrive with independence.'
The Guardian
36 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump-Musk feud shows what happens when unregulated money floods politics
Elon Musk said, very loudly and very publicly, what is usually the quiet part of the role of money in US politics. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. Such ingratitude,' he wrote on his X social media platform amid an ongoing feud with Donald Trump. When rightwing commentator Laura Loomer wrote that Republicans on Capitol Hill had been discussing whom to side with in the inter-party feud, Musk replied with a nod toward the long tail of his influence. 'Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years … ,' Musk wrote on X. Billionaires in the US often seek to influence politics in big and small ways, throwing their money and influence around to extract what they want from the government. But few are as explicit and influential as Musk has proven in the past year – and it's showing just how transactional and broken US governance has become. The Trump-Musk battle exemplifies the post-Citizens United picture of US politics: the world's richest person paid handsomely to elect his favored candidate, then took a formal, if temporary, role with a new governmental initiative created for him that focused on dismantling parts of the government he didn't like. We're sitting ringside to a fight between the mega-rich president and the far richer Republican donor to see who can cut more services from the poor. As one satirical website put it: 'Aw! These Billionaires Are Fighting Over How Much Money to Steal From Poor People.' Fifteen years ago, the US supreme court ruled that corporations and outside groups could spend as much as they wanted on elections. In that ruling, conservative justice Anthony Kennedy said: 'The appearance of influence or access, furthermore, will not cause the electorate to lose faith in our democracy.' In the years since, it's become clear that these infusions of wealth have eroded democracy, with Musk's ostentatious example accelerating an already out-of-control level of money in politics. Musk spent nearly $300m to elect Trump in 2024. It's the billionaire's government now. 'Fifteen years after that decision, we're seeing the full culmination of living under a Citizens United world – where it's not just elections that are for sale, but it's that our entire government, and the apparatus of our government, is up for sale,' Tiffany Muller, the president of End Citizens United, told the Bulwark earlier this year. Musk isn't alone here: in races up and down the ballot, ultra-rich donors are throwing around their cash to get their favored candidates elected. This is the standard state of play for politics in the US now, in both political parties. Bernie Sanders confronted Democrats at their convention last year to say: 'Billionaires in both parties should not be able to buy elections, including primary elections.' Earlier this year, Musk poured big money into a Wisconsin judicial election, but lost to the Democratic candidate. And he's sent small-dollar donations to Republicans who wanted to go after judges who ruled against the Trump administration. The threat of his money, even if it is uneven and has an inconsistent success record, looms large for both political parties. But, by virtue of his unelected role, Musk couldn't do as much as he wanted to stop Trump's signature spending bill – or so it seems so far. Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' didn't cut enough spending or favor Musk enough or otherwise meet his litmus test for a budget. And when the administration stopped working for him, he turned on it, blazing out the door in a chaotic fashion. It's a fitting coda to the uneasy alliance between Trump and Musk that started with a warm embrace and front-row status for the ultra-wealthy when Trump took office. The fact that Musk holds such sway over the budget process is in itself corruption. Trump has said Musk knew what was in the bill, the undertone being that the administration sought his approval before the public explosion. Musk embraced a brawling style of political spending that is rare among the uber-wealthy, who tend to let their money speak louder than their public words. One expert in philanthropy previously told the Guardian Musk stood out because of his 'complete eschewal of discretion as a mode of political engagement'. Musk is now rallying his followers on X to reach out to their members of Congress and kill the bill, a quest that could be successful, depending on how Republican lawmakers shake out when they're forced to decide between their ideologue president and a megadonor known for his vindictiveness. In rightwing media, the feud has created a chasm. On Breitbart, one commentator noted how Trump was 'sticking his finger in the eye of his biggest donor and that never happens'. In the American Spectator, one writer opined that Musk did not elect Trump: 'the American people did.' But in the pages of the Washington Examiner, Musk's stance on the bill was praised because Trump's budget plan 'deserves to die'. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,' Trump wrote to cap off a series of posts and public comments about Musk. Musk has 'lost his mind', the president said in a TV interview Friday. So far, Republican officials are lining up behind Trump. 'President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads,' JD Vance said. If Musk ultimately loses, he could take his money and run elsewhere. He floated the idea of creating a third political party, a prospect that's been tried many times before but without the wealth infusion and bully pulpit he'd offer to the cause. Democrats, themselves quite reliant on rich donors, will lobby for him to switch sides. The Democratic representative Ro Khanna suggested the party should 'be in a dialogue' with Musk. Although Khanna, who represents Silicon Valley and has called for the left to embrace economic populism, saw intense backlash against his comments from his party, he doubled down. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day,' he wrote on X. 'When we refused to meet with @RobertKennedyJr, Trump embraced him & won. We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority.'
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
ECB's Escriva sees scope for minor monetary policy easing
MADRID, June 8 (Reuters) - The path of monetary policy easing in the euro zone could require further adjustments if the current macroeconomic and inflation outlooks are confirmed, ECB policymaker Jose Luis Escriva said. Last week, the ECB cut interest rates and hinted at a pause after inflation in the euro zone returned to its 2% target. Escriva, who is also Bank of Spain Governor, said in an interview to newspaper El Pais on Sunday that he "was very comfortable" with the current, gradual approach of successive 25-basis-point rate cuts. "Our central scenario – GDP growth of around 1%, inflation of 2% – could require some fine-tuning if it is confirmed," Escriva. The ECB has cut rates 2 percentage points since last June, to prop up a euro zone economy also hit by erratic U.S. economic and trade policies. Escriva said confidence in the dollar and U.S. assets had decreased since U.S. President Donald Trump took office and that since April, the dollar had not been a "safe haven" and its dominance as a global reserve currency appeared to have peaked. He also said the Bank of Spain was expected to revise downwards on Tuesday the forecast for Spanish economic growth by a few decimal points from the current 2.7% for 2025.
