logo
Fat liberation vs body positivity: How brands and influencers are reshaping the movement

Fat liberation vs body positivity: How brands and influencers are reshaping the movement

Tess Royale Clancy has made it their mission to "centre fat joy".
The activist and advocate aims to reject the stigma associated with living in a fat body and encourage support, confidence and community for "fat babes" via advocacy work and social events.
But changing the conversation starts with changing the words used to describe bigger bodies.
For example, the word "fat", which has long been used as an insult, has been reclaimed by Clancy and other activists, who use it with pride.
"It's a descriptor; it shouldn't have anything negative [projected] onto it," Clancy says.
But for Clancy and others, it's a very different story when it comes to the much-touted phrase "body positivity".
Widely circulated on social media, by celebrities and in the news, the concept is meant to encompass self-love and acceptance.
But experts and advocates say it has been co-opted by brands and influencers who want to appear inclusive but fail to follow through.
So, how did body positivity go from a radical movement to a marketing tactic?
While body positivity is often thought of as a social media phenomenon, its history goes back half a century before the invention of Instagram.
The first social and political movements about the rights of fat people began in the US in the 1960s.
In 1967, fat activists staged a "fat-in" in New York's Central Park, during which around 500 people protested fatphobia, burning diet books and carrying signs.
Two years later, also in New York City, a young engineer named Bill Fabrey grew angry at the fatphobia he saw directed at his wife, Joyce. Together with a journalist who had written about anti-fat bias, he formed the National Association to Aid Fat Americans, now the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance.
Around the same time, fat activism was gaining traction in Los Angeles. A group of feminists, many of whom were queer and women of colour, formed the Fat Underground and published their Fat Liberation Manifesto in 1973.
"We believe that fat people are fully entitled to human respect and recognition … We demand equal rights for fat people in all aspects of life," it read.
The manifesto denounced the "reducing industries" associated with dieting. It also aligned the struggle for fat liberation with those of "other oppressed groups against classism, racism, sexism, ageism, financial exploitation, imperialism and the like".
By the 1990s, fat activists were protesting on many fronts, from picketing the White House to rallying against fatphobic advertising. Fat liberation movements began to form in other parts of the world, too.
With the rise of social media in the 2000s, the concept of body positivity, which drew on the ideals of the fat liberation movement, began to emerge in hashtags, blogs, and magazines.
Platforms like Tumblr and LiveJournal offered a safe space for plus-size writers, models, and commentators to share their experiences of fatphobia.
Many of these conversations sparked change, from magazine covers featuring fat bodies to viral campaigns urging clothing brands to offer more inclusive sizing.
Since then, celebrities like Adele, Lizzo, Mindy Kaling and Jameela Jamil have spoken out about authentically embracing body positivity.
Studies have also shown that some exposure to body-positive content on social media can improve body image, especially to counteract idealised or unrealistic bodies depicted online.
Yet the body positivity movement looks very different today from its early activist-led origins, explains Tess Royale Clancy.
"I think body positivity is a very individualised approach to feeling comfortable in our bodies … [It] doesn't look at the systemic issues that discriminate against fat people," they say.
"It kind of just leaves it up to the individual to be OK in their body, but how can you be OK in your body when the world is constantly discriminating against you?
"I have experienced quite a lot of fatphobia and anti-fat bias. I may not feel as comfortable in my body as I'd like to be all the time, but I truly do believe that I don't have a hatred for my body, that that has always been put on me by people, by society and their views of what fatness is."
A 2021 La Trobe University survey found that weight stigma is pervasive in Australia, with 38 per cent of respondents agreeing that "obese bodies are disgusting" and 29 per cent saying they would give up 10 years of life to be able to effortlessly maintain their ideal weight.
Almost half of the people surveyed who identified as fat said they had changed their behaviour to avoid unwanted attention due to their weight.
A 2024 ABC investigation into weight stigma found those who had experienced fatphobia, especially in medical settings, felt judged, neglected and victimised. Research has also found that societal stigma about weight leads to negative health outcomes, including high blood pressure, inflammation and increased levels of cortisol.
For advocates like Clancy, this is all the more reason to highlight systemic fatphobia and return to the concept of fat liberation.
They say that unlike conversations about body positivity, the Fat Liberation Manifesto sends a clearer and more vital message "that fat people are entitled to human respect and recognition".
"That's something that we don't often have," they say.
Jane Williams, a public health researcher at the University of Sydney, says body positivity puts the onus on individuals to monitor "the way you talk to yourself about your body", which is still ultimately spending time and energy worrying about weight.
It's also more likely to drive people to unhealthy weight loss tactics, she says.
"We all know that it is very difficult to change the shape and size of your body," Dr Williams says.
"Encouraging people to make lifestyle changes without really supporting them … or understanding why that might not be possible or desirable — [that] becomes harmful."
April Hélène-Horton, an advocate, model and 2025 ambassador for the Butterfly Foundation, says today's understanding of body positivity serves the beauty and fashion industries more than individuals.
"Body positivity as most people know it is something that's being given to us as an antidote to feeling bad about yourself," Hélène-Horton tells ABC Radio National's God Forbid.
"The phrase has been co-opted and misconstrued as the idea that we accept ourselves without any kind of nuance or inward [reflection].
"The body positivity movement was originally started by queer Black activists and not established for the purpose of making everybody feel better about the flaws that the beauty industry has told us that we have."
One of the first high-profile branding campaigns to incorporate body positivity was Dove's Real Beauty campaign in 2004, which featured a photoshoot of six ordinary women (all slim) in their underwear. The campaign was hugely successful and inspired other brands to follow suit.
Many of these campaigns have been criticised as inauthentic, especially as some of the brands using diverse bodies in their advertising did not make products designed for bigger bodies.
At the same time, body positivity was embraced on social media — but not necessarily by fat people.
Clancy says the movement has been overtaken by "thin white women" who want to "normalise that their stomachs aren't always flat all the time".
"I see a lot of that on social media. We talk about body positivity a lot, but it's more about that individual view, rather than, 'Hey, what's happening in the world that makes people not like their bodies?'"
While they encourage self-love in all bodies, they say that this shift alienates the people the body positivity movement was originally designed to help.
Other advocates have spoken out about this too: singer Lizzo said in 2021 that body positivity had been "co-opted by all bodies" and had become about celebrating "medium and small girls".
In a 2023 essay, UK writer, content creator, and body image advocate Stephanie Yeboah wrote "the mid-size movement has killed body positivity". Actress and body-positive influencer Georgia Sky told Dazed Magazine she felt "kicked out" of the movement and victimised by "TikTok's body shamers".
Research has found that Instagram content labelled as "body positive" overwhelmingly features "lean, white, cis-gendered individuals" with a "remarkable absence" of people who are fat, queer, racially diverse or disabled.
For Tess Royale Clancy, body positivity in its current state doesn't go far enough to support marginalised people.
"I've gone away from body positivity and into fat liberation because it doesn't actually address any systematic oppression," they say.
"Fat liberation is more of a community-mindset approach … It is more political; it is about changing the systems that oppress us and recognising that our liberation is linked to other liberations."
April Hélène-Horton says the fat liberation movement represents "what body positivity was meant to be".
"A fat body becomes political the minute that it stops apologising for itself and experiences joy," she says.
"That is what I try to do: to allow people to see that I experience joy and that I have success and that my fatness isn't something that holds me back. I think that's resistance and I think that's political."
Clancy also embraces fat joy, both in the communities they have established and in their personal life.
"I get to float in the ocean. I'm so good at floating because I'm so buoyant — that's fat joy for me; being able to wear the clothes I like and have a style that I like is fat joy; my community is fat joy," they say.
"I have a group of fat friends … and when we get together, we have amazing laughs and our bellies jiggle. It's so beautiful to have people in your life that have the same experience as you.
"I really do see a lot of goodness in fatness, which I think in this world is quite radical."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albanese and Macron speak about crisis in Gaza, agree to meet at UN summit
Albanese and Macron speak about crisis in Gaza, agree to meet at UN summit

SBS Australia

time33 minutes ago

  • SBS Australia

Albanese and Macron speak about crisis in Gaza, agree to meet at UN summit

In July, France announced its intention to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly meeting in New York. More than 140 of the 193 UN member states already recognise the State of Palestine. Foreign Minister Penny Wong has revealed Australia is working with other countries on the statehood issue. The leaders of Australia and France have made plans to meet at a United Nations gathering, where Palestinian statehood and the crisis in Gaza will be major issues. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and President Emmanuel Macron spoke overnight on Tuesday, almost two weeks after France announced its intention to recognise a Palestinian state at the general assembly meeting in New York in September. France was followed by Canada and the United Kingdom , which also stated their intentions, with conditions including the exit of Hamas from the Gaza Strip, the reform of the Palestinian Authority and demilitarisation of the state. "The leaders spoke about the crisis in Gaza and their ongoing commitment to getting aid to civilians," according to a readout of the call between Albanese and Macron. "Both leaders discussed their longstanding support for a two-state solution." "The leaders agreed to stay in close touch and meet again at the United Nations General Assembly in September." More than 140 of the 193 UN member states already recognise the State of Palestine, including European Union members Spain and Ireland. Albanese has said recognition by Australia is a matter of "when, not if", but has been hesitant to set a timeline. He's previously stated any UN resolution would need to guarantee the designated terror group Hamas played no role in the future nation. "We understand the urgency, we also understand the importance of having impact, we are obviously discussing and co-ordinating these issues with many countries," she said on Tuesday. "Everybody understands that there is a risk that there will be no Palestine left to recognise unless the international community work together towards two states. "We want to ensure work with others to ensure that Hamas has no role in a future Palestinian state, and we do have a unique opportunity at this time with the international community to isolate Hamas." Albanese spoke with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas on Tuesday morning, when he reiterated Australia's commitment to a two-state solution in the Middle East that would allow a Palestinian state and Israel to peacefully co-exist. Israel has bombarded Gaza since Hamas' October 7 attack in 2023, in which more than 1,200 people, including an estimated 30 children, were killed and over 200 hostages taken, according to the Israeli government. More than 60,430 people have been killed in Gaza since October 7, according to the health ministry in Gaza. The October 7 attack was a significant escalation in the long-standing conflict between Israel and Hamas. Israel has denied the population in Gaza is facing, or succumbing to, starvation. Albanese also stressed to Abbas the need for the immediate delivery of aid to Gaza, a permanent ceasefire and the release of all Israeli hostages taken by Hamas. Abbas thanked Australia for its humanitarian support for Gaza and agreed to meet him on the sidelines of the UN meeting starting on 9 September. In late July, Albanese also had a call with his UK counterpart Keir Starmer about support for a two-state solution. France was the first of the G7 group of major industrialised nations to announce it would recognise a Palestinian state. The G7 includes France, the United States, the UK, Italy, Germany, Canada and Japan.

NFL bans smelling salts over concussion treatment concerns previously flagged by NRL
NFL bans smelling salts over concussion treatment concerns previously flagged by NRL

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

NFL bans smelling salts over concussion treatment concerns previously flagged by NRL

The NFL is banning the use of smelling salts during games, saying the products are not proven to be safe and also could mask signs of a concussion. The league sent a memo to teams explaining the decision to ban smelling salts and any other ammonia inhalants during pre-game activities, games and half-time on the sideline or locker rooms. "In 2024, the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) issued a warning to companies that produce commercially available ammonia inhalants (AIs), as well as to consumers about the purchase and use of AIs, regarding the lack of evidence supporting the safety or efficacy of AIs marketed for improving mental alertness or boosting energy," the memo read. "The FDA noted potential negative effects from AI use. AIs also have the potential to mask certain neurologic signs and symptoms, including some potential signs of concussion. "As a result, the NFL Head, Neck, and Spine Committee recommended prohibiting the use of AIs for any purpose during play in the NFL." San Francisco 49ers tight end George Kittle first disclosed the ban during an interview with NFL Network, crashing an interview with teammate Fred Warner to "air a grievance" about the league's ban. "I've been distraught all day, I considered retirement," he joked, adding he used them before "every drive". "We've got to figure out a middle ground here, somebody help me out, somebody come up with a good idea." Smelling salts and other similar products have been used in numerous sports for decades, with athletes from boxing to ice hockey given them after head knocks, although usage has become less prevalent recently. The practice has been banned as a concussion treatment in rugby league for years, with official concussion management documents in 2021 saying: "Smelling salts (ammonium carbonate) or similar substances must never be used following a head injury." But many players believe they can provide a sudden jolt of energy or alertness and NRL players were seen using them as recently as this year, with a number of Bulldogs players grimacing and coughing after inhaling a powerful substance in a bottle with the label covered and being held by a trainer before a preseason game in Redcliffe. Many teams use a bucket filled with eucalyptus oil and hot water, covered with a towel, with players taking a whiff before games. Melbourne halfback Jahrome Hughes said the vapour "gives you that buzz" on an episode of the 167 Podcast he hosts with Storm teammates Ryan Papenhuyzen and Cameron Munster. They tried smelling salts in the episode to hilarious effect, with Papenhuyzen joking he felt like he had been pepper-sprayed. "I don't know if I could do that before a game," Hughes said. The NFL's memo explicitly prohibits any club personnel from providing or supplying products such as ammonia capsules, inhalers, ammonia in a cup, or any form of smelling salts. A 2023 study titled Ammonia Inhalants: Use, Misuses, and Role in Sports Performance by orthopaedic sports medicine experts from the University of Washington and Columbia University found the treatment could boost an athlete's heart rate and increase stamina, "only during repeated bouts of high-intensity exercise". "In contrast, there is no performance benefit to ammonia inhalants in a short burst of maximal effort despite elevated arousal and an associated perception of performance enhancement," the research from Dr Joshua Bender and Dr Charles Popkin found. "Importantly, ammonia inhalants have no role in medical management of head injuries, as they have the potential to exacerbate an underlying brain injury due to the involuntary withdrawal reflex associated with ammonia inhalation. "Furthermore, the signs and symptoms of a concussion or more threatening head injury may be masked by ammonia inhalation and lead to continued participation in competition, causing additional harm." The NRL and AFL have been contacted for comment. ABC/AP

Donald Trump threatens pharmaceutical tariffs of 250 per cent
Donald Trump threatens pharmaceutical tariffs of 250 per cent

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Donald Trump threatens pharmaceutical tariffs of 250 per cent

Donald Trump has threatened to slap tariffs of up to 250 per cent on foreign-made pharmaceuticals – a move that would hit Australian producers hard. The US President last month flagged his administration was planning imposts of up to 200 per cent on pharmaceuticals, giving drugmakers up to 'a year and a half to come in'. But in an interview overnight, he said he wanted to tighten the timeline. 'We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals,' Mr Trump told US business news channel CNBC. 'In one year, 1½ years maximum, it's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent because½ we want pharmaceuticals made in our country.' He did not say what the initial rate would be, but earlier in the year he said duties on the sector would start from 25 per cent. Mr Trump caused a stir in Canberra when he first announced he was mulling over tariffs on pharmaceuticals, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers saying the Albanese government was 'urgently seeking' details. Australian pharma exports to the US were worth more than $2bn in 2024. Exports are mostly blood products and vaccines but also include packaged medicines and miscellaneous products, such as bandages. But Mr Trump's threat to hit the industry with steep levies is driven by ire over high prices in the US rather than animosity towards allies. A RAND Corporation report found that Americans pay nearly four times than Australians for medicines and about three times more than the average in other developed economies. In Australia, that is largely due to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, which compels drugmakers to negotiate prices with the federal government if they want to sell their products. Similar mechanisms exist in New Zealand, Canada, the UK and Europe. Mr Trump last week wrote to 17 major pharmaceutical firms demanding they lower their prices for American consumers and bring them in line with prices overseas.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store