BBC hits retirement home pensioners with £167 licence fee increase
Pensioners have been hit with an 'outrageous' £167 licence fee increase after the BBC said their retirement home had broken discount rules.
Residents of St Crispin Village in Northampton are considering fighting the BBC in court amid an ongoing dispute in which a 102-year-old woman was sent 'threatening' letters demanding payment.
Retirees over 60 are entitled to a discounted annual TV licence costing £7.50 if they live in an eligible residential care home or supported housing.
Until recently, residents in St Crispin's 270 bungalows and apartments, which share one TV aerial, were paying this discounted rate.
But after a former storage room in the complex was converted into an additional space for visitors to stay the night, the residence's management was informed that it had contravened the TV Licensing Act.
TV Licensing sent letters to nearly 100 residents telling them they would now have to pay the full £174.50 or risk visits from enforcement officers and £1,000 fines.
Stan Fitton, 83, told The Telegraph that the letters had 'frightened the life' out of his neighbours at St Crispin, some of whom suffer from dementia.
He added: 'If you receive a letter with a big official stamp saying that we're going to send the heavies in and you must pay – if you're a 90-year-old widow you're going to be terrified. It's outrageous.'
Lesley, a widowed St Crispin Village resident in her 80s, said: 'I feel most aggrieved. Those letters are so aggressive and rude. I've had four or five in total.
'I'm still quite active, but there are a lot of people here who are not and rely on the television to keep them occupied. It's like a friend. So they will have to cough up.
'A lot of people have been so scared that they've gone and bought the licence. They're like most pensioners on a limited budget.'
The BBC has ramped up its enforcement of the TV licence fee as it battles to reverse tumbling revenues.
The broadcaster's latest financial results revealed it had suffered from an £80m drop in licence fee revenues, its main source of income.
The Telegraph revealed in February that the corporation bombarded British households with 41 million letters urging them to pay the licence fee between 2023 and 2024, a 13pc increase year-on-year.
The licence fee rose from £169.50 to £174.50 this month, in line with inflation. Retirees aged over 75 who receive pension credit are exempt from paying the licence fee.
TV Licensing said: 'We continue to liaise with the managers of St Crispin Retirement Village and hope to have this matter resolved as soon as possible.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Fresh Florian Wirtz transfer talks emerge as Leverkusen eye Liverpool star
Liverpool are already making moves in the transfer market as they seek more star power to bolster Arne Slot's title-winning squad ahead of the upcoming 2025-26 campaign Liverpool mean business in the summer transfer window. And after swiftly securing a replacement for the outgoing Trent Alexander-Arnold, the Reds are now closing in on a British record transfer. Arne Slot and Co are in a strong position after winning the Premier League and will be out to defend their domestic crown. The Dutchman will be given the funds to strengthen the squad after predominantly working with the same group of players he inherited from Jurgen Klopp last summer. While the focus is on incomings, a number of outgoings are expected, too. Darwin Nunez could be the biggest name to depart with Liverpool weighing up a move for a new No.9. With things heating up, Mirror Football rounds up all the latest transfer news and gossip from in and around Anfield... READ MORE: Fresh Wirtz talks We're getting closer to a deal but talks between Liverpool and Bayer Leverkusen are ongoing over the finer details of the monstrous package that will see Florian Wirtz head to Anfield. The Reds will not be meeting the £126million price tag that Leverkusen have slapped on their sought-after star. But they are prepared to offer the Bundesliga outfit a guaranteed £100m, with the deal likely to eclipse the current British transfer record with add-ons. Talks are set to continue with a deal edging closer... Leverkusen eye Quansah There has been plenty of speculation that players could be included in a deal to get Wirtz over the line and Bayer Leverkusen have now been credited with an interest in Jarrel Quansah. The Athletic have confirmed that the £40million-rated centre half is indeed on the German outfit's radar, with Leverkusen in the market for a new defender. Any deal for Quansah would be separate to the blockbuster one involving Wirtz, who will likely become the most expensive Premier League player of all-time should a move to Anfield be finalised. Leverkusen are in the market for a new central defender after losing Jonathan Tah on a free transfer to Bayern Munich. Kerkez gets green light for move Milos Kerkez has been given the green light to join Liverpool - by his Bournemouth team-mate, Justin Kluivert. Kerkez is known to be the Reds' top target as they seek another left-back. Talks over a deal with one of the Cherries' star performers are ongoing with Kerkez keen on joining Arne Slot's side. And Kluivert has now told Voetbal Primeur: 'He'll probably go there. I hope so for him. He hasn't really said goodbye yet, but I hope he'll make it happen there.'
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
BBC expert HMRC tax £2,900 alert over pensions mistake
BBC expert HMRC tax £2,900 alert over pensions mistake In just three months of this year £44 million was paid wrongly due to pensioners being placed on emergency tax A financial expert on BBC's This Morning Live has revealed a simple monetary trick that could help individuals avoid being hit with a 'super tax' by HMRC over their pensions. Finance expert Laura Pomfret joined presenters Helen Skelton and Gethin Jones on the popular programme, where she discussed how people are being heavily impacted by being incorrectly placed on an emergency tax code. The issue arises when individuals, entirely within the law, access their pension lump sum early. Often, this is a one-off sum used to fund a significant purchase such as home improvements. However, HM Revenue and Customs assumes the person will withdraw the same amount each month, potentially leading to thousands in unnecessary tax payments. Ms Pomfret highlighted that in the first quarter of 2025, £44 million needed to be reclaimed by over-55s who had overpaid to HMRC. She elaborated: "To put that in context, it's around 15,000 people and an average of £2,900 each. This isn't a little bit of tax that's going off to HMRC. It's a lot." "This situation arose because, as you may recall, we had quite a significant change in the pensions industry 10 years ago. It was the introduction of pension freedoms, which gave you the liberty to access chunks of your cash that was in your pension and withdraw it flexibly. However, this has meant that people have been inadvertently overtaxed with these withdrawals." Article continues below Coletta Smith, the BBC's Cost of Living correspondent, outlined: "Crucial thing is that the 1st 25% of whatever you take out is tax free. Anything above that, you get taxed on. And what happened was that HMRC didn't change the rules that they had when this new freedom was introduced." She further explained: "So over the last decade, when people drew down some money from their pension. The tax man looks at that, say you take out £5,000 pounds one month, and that's all you're going to take out for that year. But the tax man assumes that that's month one and that every month you're going to be taking out £5,000 pounds, and that pushes you over the limit as a result. "So what happens is you get given an emergency tax code, that means that you are taxed at a much higher rate as a result and you have to reclaim as a consequence, and that's the process that people have been having to go through up until this point." When Helen queried the current status, Ms Pomfret responded: "So it has changed a little bit since then, so in April the government introduced um uh a better tax code process, which means that people taking regular income out of their pension get the correct tax code faster, ideally within a month rather than waiting until the end of the tax year. But it still doesn't help those people making these one-off withdrawals." Content cannot be displayed without consent She outlined a scenario involving a 60 year old withdrawing a £10,000 lump sum and being assigned an emergency tax code by HMRC. She explained: "This means it's treated as though he's going to do £10,000 every single month not just a one-off. So he's going to be taxed as though he's taking out £120,000. She said he could be taxed as much as 40 per cent." Ms Pomfret then highlighted how to recognise if you're paying emergency tax: "You need to know the tax code that you're actually on. It would either have a W1, and M1 or an X on the end if it's an emergency tax code." She noted that although HMRC will eventually rectify the situation, the individual might have to wait until the end of the tax year. However, there is an option to claim the tax back within 30 days using a specific form. Helen Skelton inquired: "What's this about £1 to protect your pension?" Ms Pomfret replied: "If you think about Arthur's situation he wants to withdraw a chunk, so what we want Arthur to do is withdraw a small amount first and let's pick £1. Article continues below "By doing so as the initial withdrawal instead of the £10,000, this action would activate the system allowing him to check the tax code set by the pension provider and determine its accuracy. If it's incorrect, there's the opportunity to amend it before proceeding. Once the correct tax code is established, then Arthur can confidently withdraw the larger sum, knowing it will be taxed properly."
Spectator
6 hours ago
- Spectator
OnlyFans is giving HMRC what it wants
Fenix International occupies the ninth floor of an innocuous office block on London's Cheapside. The street's name comes from the Old English for marketplace, and once upon a time Cheapside was just that: London's biggest meat market with butcher shops lining either side of the road. Today, the street houses financial institutions and corporate HQs. But Fenix still runs a marketplace. Some may even call it a meat market, albeit one that operates on the phones of hundreds of millions of users worldwide. Its name: OnlyFans. OnlyFans is best understood not just as a porn site, but as a social media platform with a paywall. Creators – mostly women – post photos, videos and voice notes behind monthly subscriptions. Users pay extra to tip the women, customise content and have one-to-one chats with their favourite models. Not everything on OnlyFans is X-rated, but that's the content that makes the money. An entire ecosystem has grown around OnlyFans since it was founded nine years ago by two British brothers, Tim and Thomas Stokely. One 'e-pimp' explained that successful models outsource much of their work to offshore call centres to give the illusion of intimacy with customers. Low-paid workers in Venezuela or the Philippines are hired to impersonate creators over text chats, maintaining dozens, even hundreds, of relationships with lonely men. OnlyFans' profits are enormous. In 2023, it generated nearly £5 billion in sales – up more than 2,000 per cent in four years. The company paid £127 million in tax last year, £110 million of that in corporation tax. Because Fenix is based in London, the bulk of that cash is flowing straight into the Treasury. For comparison: Britain's fishing industry – supposedly a red-line issue in Brexit – brings in just £876 million and pays next to nothing in corporation tax, while also receiving £180 million a year in tax concessions. We don't think of OnlyFans as a media company (if we think of it at all) and so we ignore what it is in business terms: a staggering success. With more than four million 'content creators' and 305 million subscribers, it would easily rank in the top three British publishing companies. It is perhaps the most successful creator-based subscription service ever. Traditional platforms can't compete – OnlyFans' revenues are twice that of North America's Aylo, which operates the world's biggest porn websites. Britain's sex industry brings in far more to the economy than politicians are comfortable admitting Britain's sex industry brings in far more to the economy than politicians are comfortable admitting. The Office for National Statistics estimates Britons spend in excess of £6 billion annually on it. It is one of the few British industries which remains a net (digital) exporter. Indeed, OnlyFans is perhaps the strongest unicorn (a privately held start-up worth more than $1 billion) in the country. It's more profitable than any other British tech start-up. And it's doing something our other digital start-ups can't: exporting to America while keeping tax revenues onshore. Two-thirds of its revenue now comes from the US, proving that even in a global tech economy dominated by Silicon Valley, British firms can still compete. OnlyFans' success makes it all the more striking that, according to Reuters, Fenix is in talks to sell. Los Angeles-based Forest Road Company is leading a group of investors in negotiations to buy the business for £6 billion. It's rumoured that other suitors are vying for attention and that shares may be sold on the stock market. Either way, one of Britain's few successful exports could soon be gone. It's awkward to defend pornography, and so politicians don't try. Parliament hosts thousands of lobbying events every year – payday lenders, bookies, vape companies, even arms dealers turn up for drinks and canapés. There is no 'sex tech reception'. Ministers fall over themselves to visit impressive-looking factories that are in fact barely relevant. For example, Glass Futures, a research and production plant for the glass industry based in St Helens, was recently picked by Keir Starmer as the perfect location for his speech decrying 'Farage's fantasy economics'. The plant is a not-for-profit that makes £7 million in annual sales. OnlyFans pays more in tax in a month than Glass Futures earns in a year. But no MP would be caught dead at OnlyFans' Cheapside HQ, despite, I'm told, many invitations to visit. Neither has any politician ever defended the porn industry in a debate on innovation, exports or growth. The most recent House of Lords research note on 'the impact of pornography on society' contains no mention of the words 'economy', 'tax' or 'finance'. Of course, money isn't everything. The harms of porn – to women, to relationships, to the minds of teenage boys – are real and considerable. We might well be better off banning the whole thing. But if we are going to wage a moral war on porn, we should at least be honest about what we're sacrificing. The money is real – and it's already in the bank of HMRC.
