logo
Donald Trump to Invent Trade Deals for Countries That Refuse to Negotiate

Donald Trump to Invent Trade Deals for Countries That Refuse to Negotiate

Newsweek5 hours ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump may unilaterally decide the tariff rates that countries will face if they fail to strike a deal by the end of the 90-day pause on reciprocal duties, according to the White House.
Speaking to reporters on Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt commented on the imminent end to the pause announced on April 9. Leavitt said that the July 9 deadline was "not critical" and could be extended, before stating that Trump may decide on the rates applied to each country's imports himself.
"The president can simply provide these countries with a deal if they refuse to make us one by the deadline," Leavitt said. "And that means the president can pick a reciprocal tariff rate that he believes is advantageous for the United States and for the American worker."
Newsweek reached out to the Commerce Department and the U.S. Trade Representative's Office via email for comment.
Why It Matters
Since the pause on reciprocal tariffs was placed, only days after Trump unveiled them on April 2, the administration has been working to solidify deals with its most critical trading partners. However, besides one with the United Kingdom and a preliminary set of agreements with China, the White House has yet to confirm any major trade deals, raising questions about the administration's next steps once the pause ends.
What To Know
On April 2, Trump imposed country-specific duties on dozens of America's top trading partners, alongside a 10 percent global baseline rate, to address historic trade imbalances that he said had "devastated our industrial base and put our national security at risk."
The reciprocal rates included a 46 percent tariff on Vietnam, in response to what the administration calculated as Vietnam's 90 percent duty on U.S. imports, alongside a 34 percent rate for China and 20 percent for the European Union.
Trump's decision to suspend these new tariffs on April 9 was met with elation from abroad, as many countries voiced their desire to strike a deal with the U.S. within the 90-day window. The White House framed the move as a real-world demonstration of Trump's "art of the deal."
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in April that "more than 75" nations had approached the administration to negotiate a trade agreement more favorable to the U.S. in the hopes of reducing their reciprocal tariff rates.
President Donald Trump arrives at Huis ten Bosch Palace for a dinner during the NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 24, 2025.
President Donald Trump arrives at Huis ten Bosch Palace for a dinner during the NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 24, 2025.
PatrickHowever, in the months that have followed, only a deal with the U.K. has been cemented.
Trump and administration officials said this week that the U.S. and China have also struck a deal. Beijing confirmed on Friday that the two sides have finalized details of the trade framework first discussed during a meeting between representatives in Geneva, Switzerland.
In May, Bessent stated that countries that failed to reach a deal with the U.S. would see their tariffs revert to the rates announced on Liberation Day, telling CNN, "If you do not negotiate in good faith, you will ratchet back up to your April 2 level."
Earlier this month, Bessent told the House Ways and Means Committee that there were 18 "important" trading partners with which the U.S. was primarily focused on reaching a deal. He added that, in the case of those, such as the EU, who are "negotiating in good faith," the deadline could be extended beyond this date before their tariffs revert to the April 2 levels.
What People Are Saying
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, speaking at a press conference following an EU Summit in Brussels, said she was analyzing the latest trade proposals from the U.S. and that the EU is "ready for a deal."
"At the same time, we are preparing for the possibility that no satisfactory agreement is reached," she said. "And we will defend the European interest as needed. In short, all options remain on the table."
President Donald Trump, during an event at the White House this week, said the U.S. was "not going to make deals with everybody."
"Some we're just going to send them a letter and say thank you very much, you're going to pay 25, 35, 45 percent, that's the easy way to do it."
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Bloomberg on Thursday: "We'll announce some deals, but basically the deals we're going to announce are the ones that are sort of the head of the class, the structural spot in the line, and then all the other countries will fit behind those categories."
What Happens Next
The Trump administration has a few days left before the end of the pause and is likely to fall short of its previously promised goal of "90 deals in 90 days." However, as Leavitt said on Thursday, the president retains the choice to extend this deadline.
Lutnick said that the "top ten deals" would be announced by July 9, and that these would inform how other agreements would be set up, explaining that "you'll have South American deals, African deals—it'll all be structured and set up."
"Those who have deals will have deals, and everybody else who's been negotiating with us will get a response from us and then go into that package, and on July 9 we'll move forward," he said. "As the president said, if people want to come back and negotiate further, they're entitled to. But that tariff rate will be set, and off we'll go."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate scrambles to advance Trump's "big, beautiful bill" amid shifting deadline
Senate scrambles to advance Trump's "big, beautiful bill" amid shifting deadline

CBS News

time5 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Senate scrambles to advance Trump's "big, beautiful bill" amid shifting deadline

Washington — Republicans' goal of sending President Trump's "big, beautiful bill" to his desk within the next week appears to be on shaky ground as the legislation runs into obstacles in the Senate, with changes that risk bleeding GOP support in the House. A day after Mr. Trump hosted an event at the White House to pressure lawmakers to pass the bill that includes tax cuts and funding for his border and national security priorities, the president signaled he's open to Republicans' self-imposed deadline slipping past July 4. "It's important, it's not the end-all," Mr. Trump told reporters Friday about the deadline. "We'd like to get it done by that time, if possible." Later in the day, Mr. Trump changed the goal posts again, posting on Truth Social that it "must be ready to send it to my desk before July 4th." House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, also acknowledged the date may slide past the holiday, but said "I don't want to even accept that as an option right now." "We'll see," Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota, said Friday afternoon when asked if Mr. Trump's initial comments on the timeline bought him more time to get the package through the Senate. Senate Majority Leader John Thune takes the stage to speak during a Congressional Gold Medal ceremony on Capitol Hill on June 26, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Andrew Harnik / Getty Images Senators expect to begin voting on the bill Saturday, but have yet to release the final legislative text. The parliamentarian is continuing to determine which provisions comport with the rules governing the reconciliation process that allow Republicans to pass it with a simple majority. House Democratic leadership issued guidance to members that votes are not expected over the weekend in the lower chamber and members would receive 48 hours notice before any potential votes next week. "We can't make any of these final decisions until we see their bill," said House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican. "I'm going to give all of my members plenty of time to digest that. The House will not be jammed by anything. I made that commitment." Johnson said members would have 72 hours to review the legislation before a vote. The Senate parliamentarian's guidance has delivered several blows to key GOP provisions, including an effort to exclude undocumented immigrants from receiving Medicaid benefits and a plan to lower provider taxes, which states use to help fund their portion of Medicaid costs. Republicans have already struggled to reach a consensus on the provider tax as a handful of senators have expressed concern about the effects it could have on rural hospitals. Other recent ruled-out provisions include rolling back regulations on gun silencers, a religious carveout from an expansion of the college endowment tax, a $1,000 fee for anyone applying for asylum and fees on diversity immigrant visas. But Republicans can rework provisions that violate the rules and go back to the parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, with revised language. One such provision that received a green light from MacDonough was a revised plan to push some of the costs of food assistance benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program onto states. The benefits are currently funded by the federal government. The revision gives states more flexibility in calculating what their cost share requirement will be beginning in 2028. The parliamentarian also approved a revision on a proposal on a 10-year moratorium on state regulations on artificial intelligence. The updated provision provides federal aid to states as long as they do not regulate AI. According to Democrats on the Senate Budget Committee, the parliamentarian determined that the provision is in compliance "as long as the conditions only apply to the new $500 million provided by the reconciliation bill." Meanwhile, House Republicans have drawn red lines on issues including the state and local tax deduction, known as SALT, and clean energy tax credits. Blue-state Republicans threatened to withhold their support for the bill before it passed the House in May if the SALT cap was not increased from $10,000. They ultimately reached an agreement with leadership to increase the deduction to $40,000. Johnson said he believed the blue-state Republicans would ultimately get on board with a proposal that would set the cap at $40,000 for five years and then revert back to $10,000. Republican Rep. Nick LaLota of New York said Friday he hasn't "seen a deal to which I can say yes." , , , and contributed to this report.

Families of D.C. plane crash victims urge Congress to do more on air traffic control reform
Families of D.C. plane crash victims urge Congress to do more on air traffic control reform

CBS News

time5 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Families of D.C. plane crash victims urge Congress to do more on air traffic control reform

Family members of the victims of American Airlines flight 5342 — which collided with an Army Black Hawk helicopter outside Washington, D.C., in January — are urging Congress to do more to address the nation's aging air traffic control system. As the Senate aims to vote on President Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill ahead of the president's July 4 deadline, some advocates — including relatives of people killed in the American Airlines crash — say the current funding in the mega-bill is just the beginning of what is needed to overhaul the antiquated airspace system. "We are very aware that [the funding] is a down payment only," Amy Hunter, cousin to Peter Livingston, who died in the Jan. 29 crash alongside his wife and two daughters, told CBS News. A total of 67 people died in the collision over the Potomac River, including American Airlines passengers and crew as well as the Black Hawk crew members. "We have been assured that they understand, and the administration understands, that it has to be followed up basically immediately with the completion of funding for this project," Hunter said. As it stands, the Senate's version of the legislation — known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — dedicates $12.5 billion to modernizing the air traffic control system. A version passed by the House last month also allocated $12.5 billion to transition from copper wires to fiber optics, buy new radios and build new radar systems in air traffic control facilities nationwide. This funding is just a fraction of what experts say is needed to completely overhaul the antiquated national airspace system. A coalition of industry groups and airlines has said at least $31 billion is needed for the overhaul. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has been clear-eyed that completely overhauling the national airspace system will require more funding. "So $12.5 billion is really important. That gives us a start to build this project, which is why I aggressively support the big beautiful Bill. But it's not enough. Again, we need more money," Duffy said in a May press conference. The administration's plans to completely rebuild the air traffic control system include replacing outdated communication technologies, installing new software systems and building six new air traffic control centers for the first time since the 1960s. The White House has not provided a price tag for what the overhaul would cost, but said they hope to complete the project within four years. But for the families of AA5342 victims, more action is needed to address the nation's air traffic control system, particularly in the crowded airspace around Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, where a National Transportation Safety Board review found there were over 15,214 close calls between 2011 and 2024. The advocates have called for an independent safety review of that airspace, which can be enacted by Congress or asked for by Duffy. Additionally, several family members of victims told CBS News the Army has not spoken with their family about the crash, which was the deadliest airline accident in the U.S. since November 2001. CBS News has reached out to the Army for comment, but has not received a response. "We are grieving families and we are advocates, but we are Americans. We benefit from a strong prepared military and that's what we want to make sure of," Rachel Feres, another cousin of the Livingston family, said. Families say they aren't looking for blame and want to look forward, but they feel that they shouldn't be the only advocates for making the nation's skies safer. "We know it's a very long path. For clarity, we think that it shouldn't be a requirement that the families are involved. We should be able to grieve in private," Hunter said. "That is not a reality of today."

Newsom sues Fox News, alleging defamation over how it covered a phone call with Trump
Newsom sues Fox News, alleging defamation over how it covered a phone call with Trump

CNN

time8 minutes ago

  • CNN

Newsom sues Fox News, alleging defamation over how it covered a phone call with Trump

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is suing Fox News for $787 million, accusing the media outlet of defamation in its coverage of a recent phone call between him and President Donald Trump. The legal action comes as Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential contender, has intensified his pushback against Trump. The lawsuit stems from a public dispute between Newsom and Trump over the timing of a phone call that occurred as protests took hold in Los Angeles over the Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts earlier this month. In a lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Court, Newsom's attorneys allege Fox News defamed him by airing deceptively edited videos and making false statements claiming the Democratic governor lied about the phone call. 'Why would Newsom lie and claim Trump never called him?' Fox News anchor Jesse Watters said in one segment cited in the lawsuit. Newsom's attorneys also noted the segment featured a chyron reading, 'Gavin Lied About Trump's Call.' Newsom's attorneys argued the network attempted to damage Newsom's future political prospects. 'Individual viewers who heard Fox's statement that Governor Newsom was 'lying' about when he last spoke to President Trump are less likely to support Governor Newsom in future elections and are less likely to support Governor Newsom's causes or contribute to his political organizations,' the attorneys wrote. Newsom's attorneys also sent a letter to Fox News saying the governor will drop the lawsuit if the network retracts the claims and Watters issues an on-air apology. The request for $787 million damages mirrors the figure Fox News paid Dominion Voting Systems in a settlement to avert a defamation trial over the media outlet's 2020 election lies. 'If Fox News wants to lie to the American people on Donald Trump's behalf, it should face consequences – just like it did in the Dominion case,' Newsom said in a statement. 'Until Fox is willing to be truthful, I will keep fighting against their propaganda machine.' Fox News rejected Newsom's claims. 'Gov. Newsom's transparent publicity stunt is frivolous and designed to chill free speech critical of him,' a Fox News spokesperson said. 'We will defend this case vigorously and look forward to it being dismissed.' Newsom is suing Fox News in his personal capacity. His attorneys include Mark Bankston, who represented the families of the children killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School when they sued InfoWars host Alex Jones over his false claims about the 2012 massacre, and Michael Teeter. The California governor has appeared on Fox News in several high-profile moments, including a debate with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in 2023. The moves come amid speculation about Newsom's future presidential ambitions. Newsom, who is term-limited, has stepped up his pushback against Trump, a longtime rival, as California has become a target for the Trump administration. In his official capacity, Newsom has sued the Trump administration over tariff policy and the president's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles earlier this month. Shortly after the lawsuit was announced, Newsom sent a fundraising email noting the suit in the subject line and asking for contributions to his political group.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store