logo
Former New Zealand Supreme Court judge set to join Hong Kong's top court following exodus of foreign justices

Former New Zealand Supreme Court judge set to join Hong Kong's top court following exodus of foreign justices

HKFP09-05-2025

A former New Zealand Supreme Court judge is set to join Hong Kong's top court following a slew of foreign judges' departures over the past year, with some citing political reasons.
William Young will serve as a judge at Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal (CFA) after he receives the Legislative Council's endorsement, the government said on Thursday.
The approval of the legislature is part of the standard procedure for appointing foreign judges to the top court.
Chief Executive John Lee has already green-lit Young's appointment after the New Zealand judge's name was put forward by the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission (JORC), the body responsible for advising judicial appointments.
According to Young's curriculum vitae, the 73-year-old was a permanent judge at New Zealand's highest court – the Supreme Court – from 2010 to 2022. Before that, he served as a judge in the High Court and the Court of Appeal. He became the Court of Appeal president in 2006.
As a barrister in the 1980s and 1990s, his practice involved fraud, competition law and tax. He also prosecuted for government bodies, including New Zealand's fraud and tax departments.
'He is a judge of eminent standing and reputation. I am confident that he will contribute substantively to the Court of Final Appeal,' Lee said in a statement on accepting the JORC's recommendation on Young's appointment.
Young will be the sixth foreign judge at the CFA, joining five other justices from the UK and Australia.
Since the start of last year, six foreign justices have left and one – James Allsop from Australia – joined the CFA.
Top court exodus
Since its establishment in 1997, the CFA has sporadically extended invitations to judges from other common law jurisdictions to join its appeal panel.
This practice has been regarded as a testament to the international community's trust in the city's judicial system. But the top court has seen a number of foreign judges resign or not extend their tenures over the past year, with some citing political changes since Beijing imposed a national security law in 2020.
Last year, the apex court lost five judges. Anthony Murray Gleeson from Australia did not renew his term when it ended in February 2024, citing old age; UK judges Jonathan Sumption and Lawrence Collins quit in June before their terms ended; while Canada's Beverly McLachlin and the UK's Nicholas Phillips did not extend their terms.
Among them, British judge Jonathan Sumption wrote in an opinion piece in June, just days after his resignation, that Hong Kong was 'slowly becoming a totalitarian state.' Judges operate in an 'almost impossible political environment created by China,' he said.
Australian judge Robert French resigned last month, saying that the role of foreign justices in the top court had become 'arguably cosmetic.'
Before the recent string of departures, two British judges in 2022 – Robert Reed and Patrick Hodge – quit the CFA, citing an erosion of political freedom.
The government has defended the city's legal system amid the resignations, saying in April that the 'presence or absence of individual judges will not undermine the integrity of the system, nor impair the HKSAR Government's determination in upholding the rule of law.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Supreme Court allows Doge to access sensitive Social Security data of millions of Americans
US Supreme Court allows Doge to access sensitive Social Security data of millions of Americans

South China Morning Post

time12 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

US Supreme Court allows Doge to access sensitive Social Security data of millions of Americans

The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration two victories on Friday in cases involving the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), including giving it access to Social Security systems containing personal data on millions of Americans. The justices also separately reined in orders seeking transparency at Doge, the team once led by billionaire Elon Musk. The court's conservative majority sided with the Trump administration in the first Supreme Court appeals involving Doge. The three liberal justices dissented in both cases. The Doge victories come amid a messy break-up between the president and the world's richest man that started shortly after Musk's departure from the White House and has included threats to cut government contracts and a call for the president to be impeached. The future of Doge's work isn't clear without Musk at the helm, but both men have previously said that it will continue its efforts. In one case, the high court halted an order from a judge in Maryland that had restricted the team's access to the Social Security Administration (SSA) under federal privacy laws. 'We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA Doge Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work,' the court said in an unsigned order. Conservative lower-court judges have said there's no evidence at this point of Doge mishandling personal information.

Postecoglou sacked by Spurs despite Europa League win
Postecoglou sacked by Spurs despite Europa League win

RTHK

time15 hours ago

  • RTHK

Postecoglou sacked by Spurs despite Europa League win

Postecoglou sacked by Spurs despite Europa League win Ending Tottenham's 17-year trophy drought was not enough to save Ange Postecoglou. File photo: AFP Ange Postecoglou was sacked as Tottenham manager on Friday, just 16 days after the Australian ended the club's 17-year trophy drought by winning the Europa League. Postecoglou led Tottenham to a 1-0 victory over Manchester United in Bilbao to clinch the north Londoners' first European prize in 41 years and secure a place in next season's Champions League. But the Australian paid the price for Tottenham's worst domestic season since they were relegated from the top flight in 1976-77. "Following a review of performances and after significant reflection, the Club can announce that Ange Postecoglou has been relieved of his duties," a statement on Tottenham's official X account said. Exactly two years after he was hired from Celtic, Postecoglou's eventful spell in north London was brought to an end by chairman Daniel Levy. Tottenham lost 22 of their 38 Premier League games to finish 17th in the table, above only relegated trio Leicester, Ipswich and Southampton. "The Board has unanimously concluded that it is in the best interests of the club for a change to take place," the statement said. "Whilst winning the Europa League this season ranks as one of the club's greatest moments, we cannot base our decision on emotions aligned to this triumph." (AFP)

US$92b Fukushima damages order overturned
US$92b Fukushima damages order overturned

RTHK

timea day ago

  • RTHK

US$92b Fukushima damages order overturned

US$92b Fukushima damages order overturned Plaintiffs in the Fukushima case carry a banner calling for 22 trillion in damages outside the Tokyo High Court. Photo: AFP The Tokyo High Court on Friday overturned a US$92 billion damages order against four ex-bosses of the operator of the devastated Fukushima nuclear plant, Japanese media reported. The former executives had in 2022 been ordered to pay the sum, or 13.3 trillion yen, in a suit brought by shareholders over the nuclear disaster triggered by a massive tsunami in 2011 following an earthquake. Shareholders had argued the catastrophe could have been prevented if Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) bosses had listened to research and implemented preventative measures like placing an emergency power source on higher ground. But the defendants countered that the risks were unpredictable, and the studies cited were not credible. The 13.3 trillion yen damages award was believed to be the largest amount ever ordered in a civil suit in Japan. It was meant to cover Tepco's costs for dismantling reactors, compensating affected residents and cleaning up contamination. In 2015, British oil giant BP was ordered to pay US$20.8 billion for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill in what was described at the time as the highest fine ever imposed on a company in US history. Jiji Press reported on Friday that the High Court had denied the tsunami was a predictable event. Footage broadcast on Japanese networks showed the plaintiffs holding a banner calling for an even higher damages order of 22 trillion yen. "Take responsibility for the Fukushima nuclear accident!" their banner said. Three of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant's six reactors were operating when a massive undersea quake triggered a massive tsunami on March 11, 2011. They went into meltdown after their cooling systems failed when waves flooded backup generators, leading to the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl. Overall the tsunami along Japan's northeast coast left around 18,500 people dead or missing. In March, Japan's top court said it had finalised the acquittal of two former Tepco executives charged with professional negligence over the Fukushima meltdown. The decision concluded the only criminal trial to arise from the plant's 2011 accident. (AFP)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store