Hubble spots a roaming black hole light-years from where it belongs
Using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and other observatories, astronomers found the cosmic object in an unexpected place. Rather than sitting dead center in its galaxy like most supermassive black holes, this one was thousands of light-years away from the core — 2,600, in fact.
What's more, there is another enormous black hole that is the actual nucleus. While the catawampus black hole has the mass of 1 million suns, the one that defines the galactic center is 100 million times the mass of the sun.
The burst of radiation detected, known as a tidal disruption event or TDE, began when a star wandered too close to the black hole. If not for that stellar snack, the black hole would have escaped astronomers' notice.
"It opens up the entire possibility of uncovering this elusive population of wandering black holes with future sky surveys," said study author Yuhan Yao of UC Berkeley in a statement. "I think this discovery will motivate scientists to look for more examples of this type of event."
SEE ALSO: Soviets were headed to Venus in 1972. The spacecraft is about to return.
The Hubble Space Telescope, a partnership of NASA and the European Space Agency, confirms the presence of a wandering supermassive black hole, 600 million light-years from Earth. Credit: NASA
Out of about 100 TDE events discovered through surveys so far, this one, dubbed AT2024tvd, is the first scientists have seen emerging from a supermassive black hole that is not a galactic nucleus. The research team's findings, announced by NASA, will be published in an upcoming issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Black holes are some of the most inscrutable phenomena in outer space. About 50 years ago, they were little more than a theory — a kooky mathematical answer to a physics problem. Even astronomers at the top of their field weren't entirely convinced they existed. Today, not only are black holes accepted science, they're getting their pictures taken by a collection of enormous, synced-up radio dishes on Earth.
Unlike a planet or star, black holes don't have surfaces. Instead, they have a boundary called an "event horizon," or a point of no return. If anything swoops too close, like the doomed aforementioned star, it will fall in, never to escape the hole's gravitational clutch.
The most common kind, called a stellar black hole, is thought to be the result of an enormous star dying in a supernova explosion. The star's material then collapses onto itself, condensing into a relatively tiny area.
How supermassive black holes form is even more elusive. Astrophysicists believe these invisible giants lurk in the heart of virtually all galaxies. Recent Hubble observations have bolstered the theory that they begin in the dusty cores of starburst galaxies, where new stars are rapidly assembled, but scientists are still teasing that out.
A supermassive black hole is off-center in a galaxy 600 million light-years from Earth. Credit: NASA / ESA / STScI / Ralf Crawford illustration
As the star was stretched and torn asunder in the TDE, some of its gas formed a glowing ring around the black hole. The resulting flare flashed brightly in ultraviolet and visible light.
Telescopes on the ground, such as the Zwicky Transient Facility in California, first detected it. But it was Hubble that confirmed the flare's off-center location. NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory in space and the Very Large Array in New Mexico provided supporting data.
The two supermassive black holes both reside in the same galaxy, yet they are not a binary pair, meaning they're not bound to each other through gravity. Scientists don't know how the wandering black hole got there.
A star's remnants form a disk around a hidden supermassive black hole. Credit: NASA / ESA / STScI / Ralf Crawford illustration
One possibility is that the smaller black hole came from a smaller galaxy that at some point merged with the larger one, bringing its central black hole along for the ride. Eventually, the smaller black hole may spiral into the larger one. For now, it's doing its own thing.
Another possibility is that it was ganged up on by a couple of bully black holes. In so-called three-body interactions, the lowest-mass object can be evicted from the center of a galaxy, with the two others remaining in the galaxy's core.
"Theorists have predicted that a population of massive black holes located away from the centers of galaxies must exist," said Ryan Chornock, a member of the ZTF team, in a statement, "but now we can use TDEs to find them.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A braided stream, not a family tree: How new evidence upends our understanding of how humans evolved
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Our species is the last living member of the human family tree. But just 40,000 years ago, Neanderthals walked the Earth, and hundreds of thousands of years before then, our ancestors overlapped with many other hominins — two-legged primate species. This raises several questions: Which other populations and species did our ancestors mate with, and when? And how did this ancient mingling shape who we are today? "Everywhere we've got hominins in the same place, we should assume there's the potential that there's a genetic interaction," Adam Van Arsdale, a biological anthropologist at Wellesley College in Massachusetts, told Live Science. In other words, different hominin species were having sex — and babies — together. This means our evolutionary family tree is tangled, with still-unknown relatives possibly hiding in the branches. Emerging DNA evidence suggests this "genetic interaction" resulted in the diversity and new combinations of traits that helped ancient humans — including our ancestors — thrive in different environments around the globe. "It's all about variation," Rebecca Ackermann, a biological anthropologist at the University of Cape Town in South Africa, told Live Science. "More variation in humans allows us to be more flexible as a species and, as a result, be more successful as a species because of all the diversity." Cutting-edge techniques may illuminate the crucial periods deeper in our evolutionary past that led to Homo sapiens evolving in Africa, or even shed light on periods before the Homo genus existed. That knowledge, in turn, could improve our understanding of exactly what makes us human. Related: Lucy's last day: What the iconic fossil reveals about our ancient ancestor's last hours A braided stream In the early 20th century, scientists thought there was a clear evolutionary line between our ancestors and us, with one species sequentially evolving into another and no contribution from "outside" populations, like the branches on a tree. But 21st-century advances in ancient DNA analysis techniques have revealed that our origins are more like a braided stream — an idea borrowed from geology, where shallow channels branch off and rejoin a stream like a network. "It becomes very hard when you think about things in more of a braided stream model to divide [populations] into discrete groups," Ackermann said. "There are not, by definition, any discrete groups; they have contributed to each other's evolution." Ackermann studies variation and hybridization — the exchange of genes between different groups — across the evolutionary history of hominins, to better understand how genetic and cultural exchange made us human. And she thinks hybridization both within and outside Africa played a significant role in our origins. Evidence of such hybridization has come out in a steady stream since the first Neanderthal genome was sequenced in 2010. That research program, which earned geneticist Svante Pääbo a Nobel Prize in 2022, revealed that H. sapiens and Neanderthals regularly had sex. It also led to the discovery of the Denisovans, a previously unknown population that ranged across Asia from about 200,000 to 30,000 years ago and that also had offspring with both Neanderthals and H. sapiens. "You have so much complexity that it makes no sense to say there was only one origin of sapiens. There can't be one universal model that explains literally every human on Earth." Sheela Athreya, Texas A&M University When species share genes with one another through hybridization, the process is known as introgression, and when those shared genes are beneficial to a population, it's known as adaptive introgression. Emerging from two decades of gene studies of humans and our extinct relatives is the understanding that we may be who we are thanks to a proclivity to pair off with anyone — including other species. Connecting with other groups — socially and sexually — was an important part of human evolution. "For us to survive and become human probably really depended on that," Van Arsdale said. Benefits of hybridization Since the first Neanderthal genome was sequenced, researchers have attempted to identify when and how often our H. sapiens ancestors mated with other species and groups. They've also investigated how Neanderthal and Denisovan genes affect us today. Many of these studies rely on large datasets of genomes from humans living today and tie them back to ancient DNA extracted from the bones of extinct humans and their relatives who lived tens of thousands of years ago. These analyses show that many genes that originated in now-extinct groups may confer advantages to us today. For instance, modern Tibetans have a unique gene variant for high-altitude living that they likely inherited from the Denisovans, while different versions of Neanderthal skin pigment genes may have helped some populations adapt to less-sunny climates while protecting others from UV radiation. There is also evidence that Neanderthal genes helped early members of our species adapt quickly to life in Europe. Given their long history in Europe prior to the arrival of H. sapiens, Neanderthals had built up a suite of genetic variations to deal with diseases unique to the area. H. sapiens encountered these novel diseases when they spread into areas where Neanderthals lived. But, by mating with Neanderthals, they also got genes that protected them from those viruses. Beyond specific traits that may confer advantages in humans today, these episodes of mating diversified the human gene pool, which may have helped our ancestors weather varied environments. The importance of modern genetic diversity can be illustrated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, which are critical to the human immune system's ability to recognize pathogens. Humans today have a dizzying array of these genes, especially in eastern Asia. This area of the world is a "hotspot" for emerging infectious diseases due to a combination of biological, ecological and social factors, so this diversity may provide advantages in an area where new diseases are frequently emerging. When genetic diversity is lost through population isolation and decline, groups may become particularly susceptible to new infections or unable to adapt to new ecological circumstances. For instance, one theory holds that Neanderthal populations declined and eventually went extinct around 40,000 years ago because they lacked genetic diversity due to inbreeding and isolation. Related: Did we kill the Neanderthals? New research may finally answer an age-old question. Discovery of "ghost populations" Some of the newest research goes deeper into evolutionary time, identifying "ghost populations" — human groups that went extinct after contributing genes to our species. Often, archaeologists have no skeletal remains from these populations, but their echoes linger in our genome, and their existence can be gleaned by modeling how genes change over time. For instance, a "mystery population" of up to 50,000 individuals that interbred with our ancestors 300,000 years ago passed along genes that created more connections between brain cells, which may have boosted our brain functioning. The population that hybridized with H. sapiens and helped boost our brains may have been a lineage of Homo erectus. This species was once thought to have disappeared after evolving into H. sapiens in Africa, but anthropologists now think H. erectus survived in parts of Asia until 115,000 years ago. In fact, our evolutionary history may include the mating of populations that had been separated for up to a million years, Van Arsdale said. These "superarchaic" populations are increasingly being discovered as we mine our own genomes and those of our close relatives, Neanderthals and Denisovans. For instance, a genetic study published in 2020 identified a superarchaic population that separated from other human ancestors about 2 million years ago but then interbred with the ancestors of Neanderthals and Denisovans around 700,000 years ago. Experts don't know exactly what genes this superarchaic ghost population shared with our ancestors or who it was, but it may have been a lineage of H. erectus. Evolutionary blank space But there's a large, unmapped region of human evolutionary history — and it's crucial for our identity as a species. The period when H. sapiens was first evolving in Africa, and the more distant period of human evolutionary history on the continent that predates the Homo genus, remains a huge knowledge gap. That's in part because DNA preserves well in caves and other stable environments in frigid areas of the world, like those found in areas of Europe and Asia, while Africa's warmer conditions usually degrade DNA. As a result, the most ancient complete human DNA sequence from Africa is just 18,000 years old. By contrast, a skeleton discovered in northern Spain produced a full mitochondrial genome from a human relative, H. heidelbergensis, who lived more than 300,000 years ago. "Maps of human ancient DNA are overwhelmingly Eurasian data," Van Arsdale said. "And the reality is that's a marginal place in our evolutionary past. So to understand what was happening in the core of Africa would be potentially transformative." This is where current DNA technology falls short. Small hominins that walked on two legs, called australopithecines, evolved around 4.4 million years ago in Africa. And between 3 million and 2 million years ago, our genus, Homo, likely evolved from them. H. sapiens evolved around 300,000 years ago in Africa and then traveled around the world. But given the scarcity of ancient DNA from Africa, it is difficult to figure out which groups were mating and hybridizing in that vast time span, or how the fossil skeletons of human relatives from the continent were related. Related: 'It makes no sense to say there was only one origin of Homo sapiens': How the evolutionary record of Asia is complicating what we know about our species A new technique called paleoproteomics could help shed light on our African origin as a species and even reveal clues about the genetic makeup of australopithecines and other related hominins. Because genes are the instructions that code for proteins, identifying ancient proteins trapped in tooth enamel and fossil skeletons can help scientists determine some of the genes that were present in populations that lived millions of years ago. Still, it's a very new technique. To date, paleoproteomic analysis has identified only a handful of incomplete protein sequences in ancient human relatives and has thus far been able to glean only a small amount of genetic information from those. But in a landmark study published this year, researchers used proteins in tooth enamel to figure out the biological sex of a 3.5 million-year-old Australopithecus africanus individual from South Africa. And in another study, also published this year, scientists used tooth enamel from a 2 million-year-old human relative, Paranthropus robustus, to identify genetic variability among four fossil skeletons — a finding that suggests they may have been from different groups, or even different species. Paleoproteomics is still pretty limited, though. In a recent study, scientists analyzed a dozen ancient proteins found in fossils of Neanderthals, Denisovans, H. sapiens and chimpanzees. They found that these proteins could help reconstruct a family tree down to the genus level, but were not useful at the species level. Still, the fact that protein data can be used to reconstruct part of the braided stream of early humans and to identify the chromosomal sex of human relatives is encouraging, and further research along these lines is needed, experts told Live Science. Some are confident new approaches could help us unpack these early interactions. "I think we're going to learn a lot more about Africa's ancient past in the next two decades than we have so far," Van Arsdale said. Ackermann is more cautious. To really understand when, where and with whom our human ancestors mated and how that made us who we are, "we need to have a whole genome" from these ancient human relatives, she said. "With proteins, you just don't get that." Sheela Athreya, a biological anthropologist at Texas A&M University, is optimistic that we can use these new techniques to tease apart our more distant evolutionary past — and that it will yield surprises. For instance, she thinks what we now call Denisovans may actually have been H. erectus. RELATED STORIES —DNA has an expiration date. But proteins are revealing secrets about our ancient ancestors we never thought possible. —28,000-year-old Neanderthal-and-human 'Lapedo child' lived tens of thousands of years after our closest relatives went extinct —Never-before-seen cousin of Lucy might have lived at the same site as the oldest known human species, new study suggests "Absolutely in my lifetime, someone will be able to get a Homo erectus genome," Athreya said, likely from colder areas of Asia. "I'm excited. I think it'll look Denisovan." Either way, it's clear that a whole lot of mixing made us human. The Homo lineage may have first evolved in Africa, Athreya said. "But once it left Africa, you have so much complexity that it makes no sense to say there was only one origin of sapiens. There can't be one universal model that explains literally every human on Earth."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hubble reveals new details about alien comet 3I/ATLAS
Hubble has captured the sharpest images to date of interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, revealing new details about this icy alien traveller. The discovery of the third interstellar object passing through our solar system has the astronomy community fairly excited. Given the limited amount of time we have to observe 3I/ATLAS before it leaves our solar system, never to be seen again, astronomers want to find out as much as they can about it, while they have a chance. To this end, increasingly more powerful telescopes are being turned towards 3I/ATLAS. Ground-based observatories have been delivering images, so far, giving researchers a chance to make educated guesses at the nature of the object and how big it is. On July 21, astronomers got their first look at 3I/ATLAS using the Hubble Space Telescope. Hubble's first image of Comet 3I/ATLAS. The streaks in the background are distant stars, drawn out into lines as the telescope tracked the moving object. According to NASA, a blue filter was used for these observations. (Image: NASA, ESA, David Jewitt (UCLA); Image Processing: Joseph DePasquale (STScI)) With 3I/ATLAS currently surrounded by a cloud of dust, ice, and gas (its 'coma'), the solid nucleus of the comet cannot be seen, even by Hubble. However, these observations give astronomers a better estimate of the size of this alien object, simply by comparing what they're seeing with the behaviour of 'home grown' comets. From ground observatories, based on its brightness, the original best estimate for the size of its nucleus was anywhere from 10-20 kilometres in diameter. New data from Hubble has significantly reduced that, putting an upper limit on the comet's size of 5.6 kilometres wide. That's still substantially larger than both 2I/Borisov and 1I/'Oumuamua, which were estimated at being roughly 500 metres wide and 100 metres wide, respectively. Still, the researchers who took the Hubble observations believe it's possible 3I/ATLAS's nucleus could be as small as just 320 metres across. Hubble's view of 3I/ATLAS. The comet is travelling from left to right in this field of view, with the Sun generally located off the right edge of the image. (Image: NASA, ESA, David Jewitt (UCLA); Image Processing: Joseph DePasquale (STScI)) The image captured by Hubble also reveals more detail, confirming 3I/ATLAS's cometary nature. As seen above, the solid nucleus is located within the bright region on the left side of the fuzzy 'teardrop'. The diffuse region on the right appears to be a plume of dust being ejected from it, as sunlight warms the nucleus' surface. Comets produce tails of dust and ionized gas, which both generally point away from the Sun. However, this kind of dust plume being generated in the direction of the Sun is apparently common in comets when they are farther out in space and first begin to feel the Sun's heat. Additionally, according to NASA, the researchers report seeing the hints of a dust tail streaming away from the nucleus. We still have roughly a month before most telescopes will lose sight of comet 3I/ATLAS as it passes around the other side of the Sun. At that time, orbiters around Mars might get a better look. Then, starting in early December, astronomers will pick up observations of it again, and have at least until early 2026 before it gets too far away to see. "Observations from other NASA missions including the James Webb Space Telescope, TESS (Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite), and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, as well as NASA's partnership with the W.M. Keck Observatory, will help further refine our knowledge about the comet, including its chemical makeup," says NASA. Watch below: August Sky Guide — Watch for a six planet parade Click here to view the video Solve the daily Crossword
Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
Cancer vaccine shows promise in preventing recurrence of pancreatic, colorectal tumors
An experimental cancer vaccine has shown promise in keeping certain cancers from coming back. In a phase 1 clinical trial led in part by the UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, researchers tested the vaccine (ELI-002 2P) with 25 patients who had been treated for pancreatic and colorectal cancer. The patients had all undergone surgery to remove tumors and showed "signs of minimal residual disease" or traces of DNA, putting them at a high risk of recurrence, according to a UCLA press release. More than 80% of pancreatic cancer patients experience recurrence of the disease after surgery, research shows — and for 40% to 50%, this happens within the first year. For colorectal cancer, the recurrence rate is between 30% and 50% and is most likely to occur within the first two years after surgery. Mutations in the KRAS gene are responsible for half of colorectal cancers and more than 90% of pancreatic cancers. The vaccine, which targets those mutations, was given via a series of injections to activate an immune response in the lymph nodes. A majority (21 out of 25) of the patients generated "KRAS-specific T cells," which indicates a stronger immune response. The ones with higher T-cell responses showed a longer relapse-free survival compared to those with lower responses, the researchers found. For three colorectal cancer patients and three pancreatic cancer patients, the vaccine appeared to remove all disease biomarkers. Among the patients who showed the strongest immune response, a majority were still cancer-free nearly 20 months after receiving the vaccine. The findings were published in Nature Medicine. "This is an exciting advance for patients with KRAS-driven cancers, particularly pancreatic cancer, where recurrence after standard treatment is almost a given and effective therapies are limited," said first author of the study, Zev Wainberg, M.D., professor of medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and researcher in the UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, in the release. "We observed that patients who developed strong immune responses to the vaccine remained disease-free and survived for much longer than expected." "The new cancer vaccine from UCLA is very promising as a major tool against these cancers." In another finding, 67% of the patients in the trial showed immune responses to "additional tumor-associated mutations," indicating that the vaccine could be used to suppress "broader anti-tumor activity." One of the benefits of ELI-002 2P, according to the researchers, is that it's considered "off-the-shelf," which means it's a mass-produced, standardized vaccine that doesn't have to be personalized for each individual patient. "This study shows that the ELI-002 2P vaccine can safely and effectively train the immune system to recognize and fight cancer-driving mutations," Wainberg said. "It offers a promising approach to generating precise and durable immune responses without the complexity or cost of fully personalized vaccines." The team has already finished enrolling participants for a phase 2 study that will test ELI-002 7P, the next iteration of the vaccine that will target a "broader set" of KRAS mutations, the release stated. The study was sponsored and funded by Elicio Therapeutics, the Massachusetts company that developed the vaccine. It was conducted in conjunction with the MD Anderson Cancer Center and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Dr. Marc Siegel, Fox News senior medical analyst, was not involved in the study but commented that targeted therapies are becoming increasingly important tools in the fight against cancer. "Solid tumors, especially pancreatic, can be difficult to treat because they are not as mutagenic (capable of inducing or causing mutations) as hematological malignancies (blood cancers) or melanoma, for example, so they don't have as many ready targets for immunotherapy," he told Fox News Digital. For more Health articles, visit "The new cancer vaccine from UCLA is very promising as a major tool against these cancers, as it 'programs' the immune system to target these mutations and has been shown in the NATURE study to elicit a strong clinical response."
