Bill Clinton endorses former top aide Cuomo for NYC mayor
Ex-President Bill Clinton on Sunday endorsed his former Housing secretary Andrew Cuomo in the Big Apple's mayoral primary, describing the city as in 'crisis'' and his pal as a 'competent leader.'
In a robocall released by Cuomo's campaign, the Democratic former commander in chief urged New Yorkers to back the ex-governor in the Tuesday's Dem showdown.
3 Former President Bill Clinton formally endorsed his previous HUD secretary, Andrew Cuomo, for New York City mayor in a robocall to voters.
Paul Martinka
Advertisement
'The election will decide the next mayor of New York, and I urge you to vote for Andrew Cuomo,' Clinton said in the recorded message. 'As president, I chose Andrew to be my secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and he never let me down.'
Clinton, 78 — who lives in tony Chappaqua in Westchester County — noted that Cuomo worked in his presidential administration on such issues as affordable housing and helping to stave off hate, including 'discrimination, including against the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and antisemitism,' he said.
The ex-president said Cuomo can fix what he called a city in 'crisis.
Advertisement
'New York City is facing major challenges. There is a desperate need for affordable housing, homelessness is at a crisis level, and public safety must be restored,' Clinton said.
'It is imperative that New York chooses a mayor who has the ability, talent, and experience to do the job.
'He's a fighter who knows how to make government work, and at a time when our basic rights are under assault, I know he'll stand up and protect the people of this city,' he said of Cuomo, adding his Dem buddy has the ability to raise the 'progressive standard.'
3 Clinton expressed his confidence that Cuomo could lead a city in 'crisis.'
Matthew McDermott
Advertisement
Cuomo, 67, responded to the endorsement with gratitude.
'I am honored to have the support of President Bill Clinton — a personal mentor, friend, and hero. His administration was one of the most accomplished in modern political history,' Cuomo said in the message.
Cuomo, who resigned in disgrace as governor in 2021 amid a slew of sexual-harassment allegations, is aiming for a political resurrection in his mayoral comeback bid. Cuomo has vehemently any accusation of wrongdoing.
Clinton similarly had a presidency rocked by scandal.
Advertisement
His Oval Office affair with then-22-year-old intern Monica Lewinsky led him to be impeached by the House for perjury and obstruction of justice — though he was acquitted by the Senate and never resigned.
3 The two Democrats have had political careers rocked by scandal.
Richard Harbus
Clinton's endorsement of Cuomo comes just two days before the city's Tuesday primary.
Democratic kingmaker and 84-year-old South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn endorsed Cuomo on Friday — as surging socialist contender Zohran Mamdani's campaign garnered a mix of fresh condemnation and support.
In the city's ranked-choice voting contest, Cuomo currently prevails 55% to 45% against Mamdani in a potential seventh round, according to a recent Marist College Institute for Public Opinion survey.
The poll indicated a big drop from a Marist poll conducted in May, when Cuomo led Mamdani 60% to 40% after all the other candidates were eliminated and second preference votes transferred to the two finalists.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Senate parliamentarian rejects GOP's attempt to limit courts' contempt powers
The Senate parliamentarian has ruled against a controversial provision in the Senate Republicans' megabill that would have made it significantly more difficult for courts to enforce contempt findings against the Trump administration. The parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, ruled that limiting courts' ability to hold Trump officials in contempt violated the Senate's rules governing what can be passed with a simple-majority vote on the budget reconciliation fast track. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) hailed the parliamentarian's decision as a major victory. 'Senate Republicans tried to write Donald Trump's contempt for the courts into law — gutting judicial enforcement, defying the Constitution and bulldozing the very rule of law that forms our democracy,' Schumer said in a statement responding to the development. 'But Senate Democrats stopped them cold. We successfully fought for rule of law and struck out this reckless and downright un-American provision,' he said. The provision, tucked into the thousand-page bill House Republicans passed in May, would have required anyone suing the federal government to pay a bond before a court would be allowed to use its contempt power to enforce injunctions and other rulings. Courts have already ruled more than 190 times against the Trump administration since January. The controversial language received little notice when it came to the floor, and Rep. Mike Flood (R-Neb.) later caused an uproar at a town hall meeting when he admitted he didn't know the provision was in the legislation when he voted for it. 'If enacted, this would have been one of the most brazen power grabs we've seen in American history — an attempt to let a future President Trump ignore court orders with impunity, putting him above the law,' Schumer said Sunday afternoon. 'Donald Trump is not above the law. And thanks to Senate Democrats – including the tireless work of Senator Durbin and the Judiciary Democrats – the courts can still hold him and any president accountable,' Schumer said.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Republicans order key panel to score extension of Trump tax cuts as budget neutral
Senate Republicans have directed the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) to score the cost of extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts as a continuation of current policy that would not add significantly to federal deficits, which would allow them to make those tax rates permanent. The joint panel on taxation, which projects the deficit impact of all tax bills, scored the extension of 26 provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as a continuation of 'current policy' and therefore budget neutral, which dramatically lowers the project cost of President Trump's megabill. In a score released Saturday, the JCT projects tax-related provisions of the Republican bill as adding $441.5 billion to the deficit over the next decade, instead of the $4 trillion that Democrats say would be the projected cost of the tax provisions if they were scored on a 'current law' baseline. Much of the 2017 tax law, including the reduction in individual income tax rates, is due to expire at the end of 2025. 'Republicans finally showed their hand, and it's completely dishonest. 'Current policy baseline' in a budget gimmick that is nothing more than smoke and mirrors instead of honest accounting. This bill will add trillions upon trillions of dollars to the national debt to fund tax breaks for billionaires — while Republicans want everyone to think it adds zero,' said Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the ranking member of the Budget Committee. 'Republicans who claim to care about fiscal responsibility should be outraged and doing everything they can to stop it. This is the Great Betrayal of working families where families lose, and billionaires win,' Merkley said. Senate Republicans have argued for months that Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has authority under the 1974 Budget and Impoundment Control Act to determine the baseline for scoring the budget reconciliation bill. Republicans argue that Congress has used an asymmetrical system for scoring spending bills and tax bills in recent decades, as extensions of spending reauthorizations are often scored as extensions of current policy and therefore as budget neutral while extensions of expiring tax law are scored as adding to the deficit. Democrats could challenge the Republicans' use of a 'current policy' baseline to score the extension of the expiring 2017 tax cuts as a violation of the Byrd Rule. The Byrd Rule states that changes in law that increase the deficit for fiscal years beyond the 10-year budget window are subject to a 60-vote point-of-order objection. If the parliamentarian rules that scoring the extension of the 2017 tax cuts as largely budget neutral in the years beyond 2034 as a violation of the Byrd Rule, Republicans may have to vote to override the parliamentarian or rewrite the bill.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump's Iran strike sends Democrats into tailspin over how to respond: ‘All over the map'
President Trump has caught Democrats off guard over how to respond to the decisive airstrikes he ordered against Iran's nuclear program — perhaps the most consequential move his his second administration. While some Democrats erupted in fury, including a few like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who demanded he be impeached, others are outright praising the attacks as overdue. Dem leadership, meanwhile, is seemingly moving the goalposts for how tough they expect Trump to be on Iran. 'It's all over the map,' Democratic strategist Brad Bannon, who hosts the progressive podcast 'Deadline DC,' admitted to The Post about the party's messaging on the strikes against Iran. Advertisement 'It's never good when messaging is all over the map,' he added. 'Democrats have to find a way to unite against Trump's provocations. The implications of this are mind-numbing.' Shortly after Trump announced his strikes on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities, a few Democrats began beating the drums for impeaching Trump (for a third time), accusing the president of exceeding his constitutional powers. 4 President Trump has warned Iran against retaliation. The White House Advertisement 'The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers,' AOC (D-NY) declared on X. 'It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment.' Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.), echoed that sentiment as well. But many in the party are wary that the impeachment would be futile or could even risk bolstering Trump politically, recounting how he survived two impeachment efforts in the past. 'I think impeachment is not a wide sentiment. That's fringes,' a top Democratic source told The Post, despite the clamoring among the left flank. Advertisement Then there was the staunchly pro-Israel cohort of Democrats, who quickly praised Trump's actions, with varying degrees of enthusiasm. 'As I've long maintained, this was the correct move,' Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) declared. 'Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities. I'm grateful for and salute the finest military in the world.' 4 Sen. John Fetterman called the strikes against Iran the 'correct move.' AP Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) hailed the move, concluding that 'The world is safer because of the actions of our brave service members.' Advertisement Reps. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) and Jared Moskowitz (D-NJ) similarly implied that the world is safer because of the Trump-directed strikes but caveated that Congress should approve offensive strikes. 'Presidents of both parties have unilaterally undertaken major military operations without Congressional authorization,' Torres noted. 'If there is a serious effort to reclaim those powers, I would vote for it.' 4 Democratic leadership condemned President Trump for not recieving congressional approval before ordering the strikes. Getty Images Democratic leadership, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), both faulted Trump for escalating the situation in the region. But, almost three weeks ago, Schumer, who voted against the Obama-era Iran nuclear deal, blasted Trump over reports that his negotiators were set to take a much softer line on Iran's uranium enrichment — something the president later denied. He referenced a derisive acronym in his statement — TACO, short for 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' 'If TACO Trump is already folding on Iran, the American people need to know about it,' Schumer declared at the time. 'No side deals.' Advertisement But Trump didn't chicken out. And now the Dems don't quite know what to do. 'I wish Trump had chickened out on this one,' Bannon quipped. 'Trump's actions put American troops in danger…and also, there's a threat to the American economy with rising gasoline prices,' he continued, referring to the risks of Iran targeting the Strait of Hormuz. Bannon argued that Democrats shouldn't dwell on Trump's strikes or focus on impeachment, but instead concentrate on the future. Advertisement He suggested the party should rally behind a bipartisan measure from Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) to limit the president's ability to take further military action against Iran without congressional authorization. 4 Officials are still assessing the damage done to Iran's nuclear capabilities in the wake of the Saturday strikes. Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies/AFP via Getty Images Several Republicans appear to be open to backing that measure or similar legislation. 'What is not fringe is the agreement that the War Powers Act is being violated. Congress consultation ignored,' the Democratic source added. Advertisement 'Many Dems would support strikes in theory, but can't blindly without more information. There needs to be communication of a plan, grounded by intel and shared with the Gang of Eight.' The Gang of Eight is comprised of the Republican and Democratic leaders and their top members on the intelligence committee in both chambers of Congress. Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee and Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, were not briefed ahead of time, but their GOP counterparts were, sources claim.
