Russia Issues Nuclear Warning Directed at US and NATO
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Russia said Monday it will no longer honor a self‑imposed moratorium on deploying land‑based intermediate‑range nuclear missiles, blaming U.S. and NATO plans to station similar weapons in Europe and the Asia‑Pacific.
The Russia Foreign Ministry accused Washington of escalating tensions by testing, producing and moving systems once banned under the defunct Intermediate‑Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty.
Moscow said the deployments, including recent U.S. missile activity in Denmark, the Philippines and Australia, pose a "direct threat" to Russian security. The Kremlin warned it will take "military‑technical" steps in response to restore what it calls a strategic balance.
This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
20 minutes ago
Michigan manufacturer warns Trump tariffs threaten small business survival
The impact of President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariffs became reality for American businesses on Thursday, as dozens of countries faced levies ranging from 15% to 41% on goods entering the United States. For Carrin Harris, CEO of Michigan-based manufacturing company Blitz Proto, the tariffs have already created significant challenges. Her company, which makes prototypes for products including toys, medical devices and car parts, has been grappling with rising costs since January. "A lot of our quotes are no longer good because the cost of components continues to go up, and it's volatile, and we can't even anticipate it," Harris told ABC News on Thursday. The new tariffs affected more than 90 trading partners, with some nations facing particularly steep increases. Brazil, for instance, received a 50% tariff on its coffee exports to the U.S. The Yale Budget Lab estimated these new trade policies could cost the average American household an additional $2,400 annually. Harris explained that the uncertainty forced her company to dramatically shorten their quote expiration times. "We've changed our quote expiration from one month to one week," she said. "The customers have to get a new quote every week, depending on what it is they're looking for." The impact hasn't just affected pricing. "Sometimes the customers don't even want to work with us because the costs are so high," Harris told ABC News. "The timelines of the projects are also impacted, so that will also turn customers away because they have deadlines." While Trump argued these tariffs would bring manufacturing back to the U.S., Harris expressed skepticism about this claim. "I don't know that I believe that, because infrastructure doesn't happen overnight," she said. "I do see that some of the American suppliers are trying to be more competitive, but it's more expensive in the United States, we don't have the same resources." The situation has become so challenging that Harris warned about her company's future. "We struggle with taxes in general, and another tax is devastating to our company," she said. "We can't remain viable unless we have predictability for our customers." The tariffs have impacted businesses of all sizes differently. Harris said that larger companies seemed to be handling the changes better "because they have more capital to work with," while many of her smaller business partners were struggling. Major corporations have already announced price increases in response to the tariffs. Ford estimated the tariffs would cost them $2 billion this year, while Procter & Gamble planned to raise prices on 25% of their products. The only exceptions to the new trade policies were Canada and Mexico, which remain in negotiations for their own trade deals. Meanwhile, China faced 30% tariffs under a separate trade truce, and India's total tariff rate rose to 50% due to its purchase of Russian oil and energy.
Newsweek
20 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Democrats' Chances of Flipping Congress From Republican Control Next Year
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Democrats are building an early lead in congressional polling ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, but it's yet to be seen whether the party's momentum can be enough amid the threat of mid-decade redistricting. Viet Shelton, spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, told Newsweek that Democrats are confident they will "re-take the majority powered by an aggressive message focused on fighting for lowering prices and holding Republicans and Trump accountable for their record of broken promises." Newsweek also reached out to the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) for comment via email. Why It Matters The midterms are still more than a year away, so early polls are far from definitive. Still, they are an important gauge of voter sentiment about both Democrats and Republicans as candidates begin ramping up their campaigns. Historically, the party in the White House loses seats in the midterms, and recent polls show President Donald Trump's approval has fallen since the start of his administration, fueling Democratic optimism about a 2018-esque blue wave. But several GOP-led states may redraw their congressional boundaries to become more favorable to Republicans in an attempt to thwart Democratic gains. While blue states like California say they will redraw their own maps to retaliate, the full impact of these mid-decade redraws in states like Texas or Missouri could limit Democratic gains in November 2026. What To Know A flurry of recent polls have delivered good news for Democrats, showing them ahead of Republicans on the generic ballot, which asks voters which party they'll be supporting, rather than specific candidates. A CNBC poll released Thursday, for instance, showed Democrats with a 5-point lead on the generic ballot. Forty-nine percent of respondents said they would vote for Democratic candidates, while 44 percent said they'd back Republicans. That's up from a lead of 48 percent to 44 percent in April. The poll surveyed 1,000 adults nationwide from July 29 to August 3. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points. The latest poll from YouGov and The Economist showed Democrats up 6 percentage points—44 percent to 38 percent. It surveyed 1,528 registered voters from August 1 to August 4. An Emerson College poll showed Democrats with a more modest 2-point lead—44 percent to 42 percent. It surveyed 1,400 registered voters on July 21 and July 22, with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, speaks during a news conference on June 27, 2024, in Washington, D.C. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, speaks during a news conference on June 27, 2024, in Washington, context, in 2024, Republicans won the House popular vote by about 2.6 points and won a 220-215 majority. In 2022, Republicans won the popular vote by 2.7 points and secured a 222-213 majority. In 2020, Democrats won the popular vote by 3.1 points and also had a 222-213 majority. In 2018, the midterm of Trump's first term in office, Democrats won a 235-199 majority, picking up 41 seats. These polls show a lead for Democrats, but are not predictive of a blue wave like in 2018, Raymond La Raja, professor of political science and co-director of University of Massachusetts Amherst's polling program, told Newsweek. This is because Trump is more of a "quantified figure" to voters this time around, and Democrats are more demoralized after the 2024 losses, he said. "I think Democrats are very disappointed about the loss in 2024. They think the party made mistakes that demoralized them. The base doesn't think they're fighting hard enough against the Trump administration," La Raja said. "In many ways, there's not much they can do. They lack power in both chambers. They're frustrated about that." Democrats likely need polling giving them a 7- or 8-point lead over Republicans in generic ballot polling to indicate a blue wave, he said. The economy will be a key factor in the midterms. If it falters, Democrats are more likely to pick up more seats. But if it hold steady, gains may be more limited, La Raja added. Grant Davis Reeher, professor of political science at Syracuse University, told Newsweek that Trump being underwater on major policy issues like immigration and tariffs does not "bode well" for the GOP, but a "huge wave" may be less likely for Democrats. "I would expect Republicans to lose the House, and have thought so since election day. Only George W. Bush was able to increase his party's majority in the House, and that was not a typical mid-term, given 9-11," he said. "The Republican margin is razor-thin, so any kind of set-back would likely knock them out of the majority. But I wouldn't expect to see a huge wave, in part because we are even more polarized than before, and that tends to make movement from one party to the other more difficult." How Americans are experiencing the economy in the months leading up to the midterms will be decisive for Democrats' returns, he said. Midterms 2026: What Do Betting Odds Show? Betting odds also give Democrats an advantage in the midterms for the House of Representatives. Polymarket shows them with a 71 percent chance of flipping the chamber. However, Republicans are favored in the Senate, where Democrats face a challenging map to win back control from the GOP's 53-47 majority. GOP-held seats in Maine, won by former Vice President Kamala Harris, and North Carolina, which Trump carried by only 3 points in 2024, present their best opportunities to flip a seat next year. But no other swing states are up for grabs, meaning they'll need to flip seats Trump won by the lower double-digits, like Alaska, Iowa, Ohio or Texas, to win back control. Will Redistricting Threaten Democratic Majority in 2027? The impact of redistricting remains an open question. Texas, with Trump's support, kicked of the redistricting "arms race," with Republicans proposing a map that could give them up to five new seats. States like Missouri, Indiana and Florida could also give Republicans more seats if they redraw. On the other hand, Democratic states like California, Maryland and New York are eyeing their own redistricting in response to Texas. But Democrats in some of those states are likely to face legal challenges to redistrict due to independent commissions or other laws making it more difficult to undertake mid-decade redraws. If this is a low-pickup year for Democrats, it is "plausible" this redistricting could outright cost them a majority," according to La Raja. Reeher said it's hard to know how either party will win on this front ahead of the midterms. "There will be tons of lawsuits, and a lot of these redrawn districts will be in limbo, perhaps right up until the election," he said. "Hard to say who 'wins' on this, on a short-term basis. Long-term, we all lose if this becomes the new normal." What People Are Saying Reeher also told Newsweek: "As to why the party of the president typically loses seats in a mid-term, it's because we have a two-party system, and the out-party has two years to criticize what the in-party is doing, or trying to do, and the struggles of the president are front and center in the media for everyone to see. And people simply tire of each president, to some degree. There's a natural tendency toward buyer's remorse and a desire to check what is being done. Political human nature is at the root of it all. "Presidents also tend to ask their party's more marginal members to make some tough votes to get their agendas through in the first couple years, when their political capital is highest, and there's often a reaction against those votes by the voters in those marginal districts. That's what happened in the Tea Party's response to Obamacare, for example, and something similar may happen with the OBBB [One Big Beautiful Bill Act] in this election cycle. Some Republicans made some hard votes in favor on that bill." Shelton also told Newsweek: "The midterms are shaping up to be a referendum on who is going to lower costs and improve the lives of everyday Americans, not the wealthiest few. By all accounts, the Republican trifecta is failing miserably and we're seeing an escalating level of buyer's remorse amongst the public. People hate the Big, Ugly Law, oppose price-spiking tariffs, and are showing their displeasure at rallies and town halls across the country. House Democrats will re-take the majority powered by an aggressive message focused on fighting for lowering prices and holding Republicans and Trump accountable for their record of broken promises." CNN Harry Enten wrote in a July 25 X post: "Trump's drop w/ indies is his biggest danger sign. There seems to be no bottom. He owns the worst net approval w/ indies 6 months into a presidency (-29 pt), beating his own record. Wave adios to the GOP House majority if his net approval on inflation w/ indies (-45 pt!) holds." What Happens Next The midterms will be held November 3, 2026. New Jersey and Virginia elections held in three months will be earlier gauges of the Trump administration's popularity.
Newsweek
20 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How 'Trump Bridge' May Soon Reshape Warzone Bordering Russia, Iran, Turkey
Based on factual reporting, incorporates the expertise of the journalist and may offer interpretations and conclusions. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As he pushes forward to placate feuds simmering across several regions around the globe, President Donald Trump is set to soon oversee a new peace deal between two bitter rivals in the South Caucasus. While the details of the anticipated U.S.-backed agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan have yet to be released as the leaders of both nations meet their U.S. counterpart for a two-day summit starting Thursday, a key aspect of the deal is being referred to as "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity" (TRIPP), or simply, the "Trump Bridge." The prospective project would link Azerbaijan's mainland to its exclave province of Nakhchivan through Armenia via a hotly contested route known in Azerbaijan as the "Zangezur corridor" and in Armenia as "Syunik road." The deal also comes on the heels of rapid shifts in the South Caucasus, where in 2023 Azerbaijan launched a swift offensive to seize control of the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region, dismantling 30 years of Armenia-backed separatist rule. The defeat, which followed staggering losses from Armenia in an earlier war with Azerbaijan in 2020, has left Armenia reconsidering its regional position, including its alliance with Russia and deep-rooted rivalry with Turkey. For both Trump and the region, it's an opportunity. "Trump may be aiming to add this initiative to his Nobel Prize candidacy or simply to confirm his intention to establish peace in the world, but beyond personal motivations, for the region, this is really big and important," Olesya Vartanyan, an expert in conflicts and security in the South Caucasus, told Newsweek. "This step forward—even without a final signature on a peace agreement—should increase the chances for stability and no war in the region for a longer period," she added. Armenian and Azerbaijani flags can be seen standing just meters apart in the distance on the outskirts of Khnatsakh village in Armenia's Syunik province on May 16, 2025. Armenian and Azerbaijani flags can be seen standing just meters apart in the distance on the outskirts of Khnatsakh village in Armenia's Syunik province on May 16, 2025. ANTHONY PIZZOFERRATO/Middle East Images/AFP/Getty Images Peace as Victory Trump has made little secret of his quest for international recognition over his ongoing peacemaking initiatives. In this endeavor, he has counted tangible progress in securing agreements on conflicts between Serbia and Kosovo, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, Cambodia and Thailand and India and Pakistan, though the extent of the White House's role in the South Asian crisis that erupted in May remains disputed. On the two deadliest conflicts raging today, the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war, Trump has struggled to achieve breakthroughs. As such, Ali Mammodov, a researcher at George Mason University, pointed out the clear calculus of Trump's diplomatic intervention in the South Caucasus. "The idea of U.S. involvement in the 'Zangezur corridor,' fits within a broader trend of transactional, interest-based diplomacy that President Trump has favored in other regions," Mammadov told Newsweek. "For Trump," he added, "championing such a project would allow him to present a tangible, infrastructure-based peace dividend, potentially branding it as a personal diplomatic success similar to the Abraham Accords." Mammadov also pointed out "several benefits" that both Armenia and Azerbaijan could enjoy from such a deal. "First, it provides a counterbalance to Russian or Iranian-backed alternatives, allowing both countries to diversify their partnerships," Mammadov said. "Second, if framed correctly, such a corridor could be seen not just as a regional link, but part of a broader connectivity agenda—tying the South Caucasus into global trade routes via the Middle Corridor." "That narrative could help reduce mutual suspicion and make the project more politically palatable domestically," he added. A map shows the South Caucasus region, including Armenia and Azerbaijan. A map shows the South Caucasus region, including Armenia and Azerbaijan. PeterHermesFurian/Getty Devils in the Details Joshua Kucera, senior analyst at the International Crisis Group, also tied the president's efforts in the South Caucasus to his other diplomatic campaigns, arguing that "it's clear that the Trump administration is looking for an easy win in peacemaking after Ukraine and Gaza have gone more slowly than he hoped." But he noted that questions still linger over the execution of the Armenia-Azerbaijan agreement, including the implementation of a route that has been the center of controversy in the region. "The most potentially groundbreaking element is the transportation agreement, the TRIPP, and there are a lot of important details that we don't know yet," Kucera said. "In principle, Azerbaijan wants some kind of transportation route that Armenia can't interfere with between the Azerbaijani mainland and its exclave of Nakhchivan," he added, "and Armenia also has argued that it wants the same through Nakhchivan, which would be the fastest way to get between northern and southern Armenia." Tigran Grigoryan, director of the Regional Center for Democracy and Security in Armenia, echoed how Trump's success in bringing together Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Heydar Aliyev at the White House "is seen as a quick foreign policy win." And he, too, emphasized that the details of the U.S.-backed proposal are at the same time "crucial," given the demands of both sides. "Azerbaijan has been insisting on an unimpeded passage for its cargo and passengers to its exclave of Nakhichevan, effectively demanding no Armenian control over the route," Grigoryan told Newsweek. "Armenia, while open to the idea of reestablishing communications, insists that such a route must operate under its full territorial integrity, sovereignty, and jurisdiction, and follow the principle of reciprocity." "That is, if Azerbaijan is allowed to connect to Nakhichevan via Armenian territory under a simplified regime," he added, "the same rules must apply to Armenia using the Nakhichevan segment of the railway to access its northern regions." Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev (right) and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan pose for a photo prior to their talks in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, on July 10, 2025. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev (right) and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan pose for a photo prior to their talks in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, on July 10, 2025. Azerbaijani Presidential Press Office/AP Competing Interests The impact of the expected deal, in whatever form it ultimately manifests, is likely to extend beyond the two nations and have ramifications for three powers that border the South Caucasus—Russia, Iran and Turkey. "Each of these regional powers views the South Caucasus as part of its strategic perimeter, so any U.S. engagement—particularly under a high-profile Trump initiative—will be met with scrutiny," Mammadov said. Located on the strategic crossroads of Asia and Europe, Armenia and Azerbaijan have been under the control of the Persian, Ottoman and Russian Empires at various points through history. They gained their independence in 1991 from the Soviet Union, leading to the first major war over the Nagorno-Karabakh region during which Armenia established the unrecognized Artsakh Republic. Since that conflict, Armenia and Azerbaijan have both accused one another of ethnic cleansing, while Armenia continues to seek Turkish recognition of the systematic expulsion and killings of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire during World War I, a campaign most nations recognize as a genocide. Azerbaijan, for its part, has cultivated close relations with Turkey over the past three decades. Turkish drones played a key role in inflicting large-scale losses against Armenia during their 2020 war, subsequent clashes and Azerbaijan's 2023 offensive that led to the collapse of the Artsakh Republic, along with Armenia suspending its membership in Russia's Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). Meanwhile, Moscow and Tehran have another interest in the region, which involves the proposed International North-South Transport Corridor that would establish a sanctions-proof rail route extending from India to Russia. The so-called "Trump Bridge" has the potential to disrupt this plan as reports indicate it may be established close to Iran's border with Armenia. Now with the U.S. poised to play a greater role in the troubled region, Kucera noted that "Iran and Russia are of course both wary of any U.S. presence in the region, particularly on security issues, and in this case, the route that we are talking about passes directly along Iran's border, making any American presence there especially sensitive." On the hand, he said that "Turkey is eager to have better transportation connections eastward through Armenia and Azerbaijan." A view from Armenia's southern border reveals the Arax River, with Iran visible across the water on May 18, 2025. A view from Armenia's southern border reveals the Arax River, with Iran visible across the water on May 18, 2025. ANTHONY PIZZOFERRATO/Middle East Images/AFP/Getty Images Winners and Losers Grigoryan also argued that "Turkey is the only one of the three major regional actors likely to welcome the U.S. proposal," and in fact has already begun building infrastructure to link its eastern city of Kars to Azerbaijan's Nakhchivan province. On the other hand, he argued Iran would likely oppose any measure that threats to cut off this link. "Since the route lies along the Iran-Armenia border," Grigoryan said. "Tehran sees any weakening of Armenian sovereignty over it as a direct threat to both its northern border and to the North–South transport corridor, which connects Iran to Europe via Armenian territory." Also potentially worrying for Iran is the growing relationship between Azerbaijan and Israel, which has prompted Tehran to seek better ties with Baku. And "for Russia, the issue is even more sensitive," Grigoryan said, given its waning position in a region it once dominated. "Any success by the U.S. in taking over this initiative would represent a major blow to Russia's standing in the region." Vartanyan argued that "Russia is certainly the loser in this story" as "it had hoped the road would remain under its control." "The American move helps Armenia and Azerbaijan achieve more stability and peace—and it further solidifies Russia's loss of leverage in the South Caucasus, a process that began some time ago and was reinforced by the collapse of Nagorno-Karabakh amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine," she said. "Well," she added, "this is the price Russia has to pay."
