The Stache returns
Eight years ago, Randy Bryce challenged the Speaker of the House, raised more than almost any other candidate for Congress, and lost. The union ironworker, a longtime Democratic activist, gained national attention for an unscripted, uncautious campaign that endorsed Medicare for All and the abolition of ICE. He claimed a sort of victory when then-Speaker Paul Ryan announced his resignation. Once Republicans picked businessman Bryan Steil to replace Ryan, they successfully used Bryce's old arrests and new progressive views against him, holding the seat.
Southeastern Wisconsin's 1st congressional district is still competitive, though — Trump carried it by just 5 points — and Democrats have put it on their ambitious target list. There's a chance that the state will be forced, by a court order, to redraw maps, which Republicans see as a threat to Steil. But they're fairly dismissive about Bryce, who ran behind the ticket in 2018. He jumped on the phone to explain why he thinks a rematch, in this environment, would be winnable. This is an edited transcript of the conversation.
Dave Weigel: Why are you running again?
Randy Bryce: It's just gotten so bad. Somebody has to do something. We didn't win our race in 2018, but we made a huge splash, and people felt heard, and we encouraged other working class people to run for office. I've tried to help them, too, because we need more of us in elected office.
The Republicans have this big, beautiful bill that's cutting Social Security and Medicare from people, and not enough people are aware of it. I went to a Social Security office this morning. Last month we had an event there, for Social Security Works. I asked the state rep for their union, are any facilities in danger of closing in Racine County? She was like, no, there's two, and they're both solid, there's no plan to cut them. Well, today, I found out that they relocated the one that we were at and moved it several miles away, closer to the interstate. I can't imagine anybody who needs a walker going there in a snowstorm. And we get a little snow in Wisconsin, you know?
What's changed for this seat, or your strategy, since 2018?
The map's better this time. We have UW Whitewater in the district. There's a possibility of congressional maps being redrawn, thanks to the Supreme Court election, when Susan Crawford. And Bryan Steil is running from people, not having any town halls.
What's new? I don't think we should take money from billionaires. So once again, I'm not taking money from fossil fuel companies, Wall Street, corporate PACs, but I'm adding billionaires to it this time, too, because I don't think that there are, like, good and bad billionaires, I disagree with that.
What did you learn from your defeat last time?
I think we peaked very early in the last campaign, but I learned how to bring people together in that campaign. The last time I ran, I had a primary opponent, and it was sort of like Bernie versus Hillary at the beginning. But we ended up having Hillary and Bernie people working together in our campaign.
A lot of Republican attacks that year were very personal, about your arrest record and DUIs. Won't the same issue come up this time?
I mean, this is an issue that happened, like, 30 years ago. If you check my record now, that stuff is so old, it's fallen off. All I have now is, I rented a Dodge Challenger for work with a Hemi engine, I went a little fast, and I got a ticket. And I got one for protesting outside Paul Ryan's office. That's still on there.
Have you changed your platform at all from eight years ago? It was very progressive, in that race.
I'm not in favor of using labels. When you hear 'Medicare for all,' that paints this picture of what's called the far left. I don't picture myself as far left. I'm more of a populist. I want universal health care for everybody, and right now we're going the wrong direction. In a few months, if not weeks, I'm expecting shelves to be bare. Prices are already getting jacked up. We need to protect our social safety net for when people fall on hard times. We need that more than billionaires need tax cuts. So the issues have changed.
So would you still get to the House and co-sponsor the Medicare for All bill?
I think we do it a disservice now by calling it Medicare for all, because the coverage might not be through Medicare or Medicaid. One thing I've thought of was expanding the VA system, start coverage from when a child is born until they go to school. Start off there, keep expanding it, until we meet in the middle and everybody is covered. I don't expect that you get one bill signed and boom, everything is done.
In 2018, you wanted to abolish ICE. You the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that you feel 'vindicated' by how Trump's been using the agency. Do you still want to abolish it?
What I'm opposed to is any law enforcement agency feeling the need to cover their faces, cover up that they're law enforcement, and go after people like a union brother and a sheet metal worker from Virginia? That's law enforcement? With no due process. I'm opposed to not having due process. If ICE is going to stay around, they need to have proper training. They're arresting mayors and a judge in Milwaukee, who's a good judge. I don't want to see any instances of agents jumping people and arresting the people who film them doing it. My dad is a retired cop. I have nothing but appreciation for police and the job that they do. But we can't have people that are supposed to be law enforcement acting as thugs.
Something that wasn't as a question in 2018: Does what Israel's doing in Gaza constitute a genocide?
As a veteran, I'm for peace. I'm opposed to all wars. I hate to see our tax dollars used for destruction. I'm in construction, not demolition. I don't want to see our money used to blow stuff up.
Does that mean no military funding for Israel or Ukraine?
I'm opposed to all wars. Donald Trump promised that the Ukraine war was going to be over with, before he even took office, and it's still going on.
Bernie Sanders has been urging working class candidates to run for office, and training them. Are you part of that? Do you have his support?
We've had a really good relationship throughout the years. I spoke when he was here in Wisconsin at the anti-oligarchy rally. He's always encouraged me to run. After the last time he reminded me about losing his first races, including his first race for Congress, when he lost by a couple thousand votes. He was like, don't give up. And Ro Khanna too. Ro was like, it took me three times to run to win. Don't give up.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
9 minutes ago
- Fox News
Family of Boulder firebombing suspect taken into federal custody, visas revoked: sources
The family of a Boulder, Colorado, firebombing suspect is in federal custody and their visas have been revoked, sources confirm to Fox News. According to senior sources within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the wife and five children of 45-year-old Mohamed Sabry Soliman were taken into custody. A senior State Department official confirmed to Fox News that all visas for the Soliman family have been revoked. In a statement provided by the senior official, the department emphasized its commitment to national security, saying, "The Secretary did exactly what he said he would — support the administration's objective of getting terrorists and their family members out of America." The family is being processed for expedited removal, sources said. In a statement on X Tuesday afternoon, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said her agency is investigating his family to identify "to what extent" they knew about the alleged attack. "Mohamed's despicable actions will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, but we're also investigating to what extent his family knew about this horrific attack," Noem said in the X post. "If they had any knowledge of it or if they provided any support to it." Soliman is an Egyptian national who overstayed his visa after entering the U.S. during the Biden administration, three DHS and ICE sources told Fox News. Soliman first arrived in the U.S. after landing at Los Angeles International Airport Aug. 27, 2022, with a non-immigrant visa. He was authorized to stay through Feb. 2, 2023, but never left. On Sept. 9, 2022, he filed a claim with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. On March 29, 2023, Soliman was granted work authorization, which was valid through March of this year. Victims and witnesses observed Soliman throw what appeared to be a glass bottle, which burst upon impact, creating large flames, toward a crowd of peaceful pro-Israel demonstrators in Boulder Sunday, authorities said. Twelve people were injured in the attack. None of the victims have died. Now facing a litany of charges, including multiple counts of attempted first-degree murder, first-degree assault and possession of incendiary devices, Soliman is being held on $10 million bond. Judicial District Attorney Michael Dougherty outlined the severe potential penalties Soliman faces if convicted on all charges related to the alleged June 1 attack. He faces 16 counts of attempted first-degree murder – eight for attempted murder with intent and deliberation and eight for attempted murder with extreme indifference. If he's convicted and sentences are ordered to run consecutively, he could face a maximum of 384 years in state prison for those charges alone. In addition, Soliman is charged with two counts of use of an incendiary device, which could add up to 48 years if served consecutively. He also faces 16 counts of attempted use of an incendiary device, carrying a potential additional 192 years. In total, the maximum possible sentence could reach 624 years if all convictions are handed down and run consecutively. Along with charges at the state level, he has also been federally charged with a hate crime involving actual or perceived race, religion or national origin. His next court appearance is scheduled for Thursday, June 5, at 3:30 p.m. MT.


Fox News
9 minutes ago
- Fox News
Biden-appointed judge blocks deportation of Boulder attack suspect's family despite visa violations
In an emergency ruling, a Biden administration-appointed federal judge in Colorado halted the deportation of the wife and five children of Mohamed Soliman, the Egyptian national under federal investigation for the Boulder firebombing attack. The temporary restraining order (TRO), issued by U.S. District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher, prevents federal immigration authorities from removing Soliman's wife, Hayem El Gamal, and the couple's five children from the country—at least for now. "Defendants are temporarily restrained and enjoined from removing Hayem El Gamal and her five minor children from the State of Colorado or the United States," Gallagher wrote in the order. The ruling will remain in effect until a scheduled hearing on June 13. The order came after El Gamal's friend, Susanna Dvortsin, sought emergency legal protection for the family. She argued that the family faced imminent deportation by the Trump administration without the opportunity to present their case in court. Gallagher agreed, writing that the family's deportation would cause "irreparable harm." The judge ruled that Dvortsin must submit a supporting legal brief by June 6, with government attorneys required to file a response by June 11. A hearing is set for June 13 at the Byron G. Rogers Courthouse in Denver. According to Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin, citing sources, El Gamal and her five children have all overstayed their visas. However, an asylum application had already been submitted on their behalf by Soliman. The central question is whether deportation should move forward in spite of the family's pending asylum claim. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has publicly addressed the detention and potential deportation of El Gamal and her five children. In a social media video Tuesday, Secretary Noem confirmed that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had taken Soliman's family into custody. "Mohamed's despicable actions will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, but we're also investigating to what extent his family knew about this horrific attack," Noem said in the X post. "If they had any knowledge of it or if they provided any support to it." The Boulder attack triggered a political firestorm in Washington and Colorado, as Republican lawmakers have slammed it as a lack of immigration enforcement through sanctuary policies and poor management during the Biden administration. "This is a direct result of failed sanctuary states like Colorado and California," Rep. Gabe Evans, R-Colo., said in the aftermath of the attack. "For the sake of our state, Democrats MUST stop putting illegals ahead of Americans. There are lives on the line." Meanwhile, Gov. Jared Polis' office said they were never aware of any threat from the suspect." "The reality is that Colorado is not a sanctuary state and state, federal and local law enforcement work together closely to apprehend criminals, whether they are from this country or not," a spokesperson for Polis' office told Fox News Digital, adding that the governor "expects to see the suspect prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law." "There were no requests from federal law enforcement agencies regarding this individual, and if there had been then the state would have eagerly cooperated. Reports indicate that this person's legal presence ended in March, nearly three months ago, and we are not aware of any attempt by any federal agency to deport him," the spokesperson added. In addition, some Democrats in Colorado also faced scrutiny for attending a fundraiser with Rep. Ilhan Omar in nearby Denver roughly 30 minutes after the attack, as she's had a past history of anti-Semitic remarks and intense criticism of Israel.


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Environment and Public Works panel releases ‘big beautiful bill' text
The Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee released text for its portion of the Trump legislative agenda policy bill that Republicans are trying to get across the finish line, becoming the first Senate panel to do so. The EPW bill appears similar to provisions passed by the House. It's not one of the committees that deals with thorny issues like Medicaid or energy tax credits that is likely to undergo changes in the upper chamber. Like the House version of the bill, the text released by Senate Republicans on Wednesday repeals numerous green programs passed by the Democrats in 2022. This includes a $20 billion program that seeks to provide financing for climate-friendly projects and a $3 billion program that provides grants for underserved communities that want to fight air pollution and climate change. It also repeals other grant programs related to air pollution monitoring and reducing air pollution at schools – as well as a program that seeks to charge oil and gas companies for their excess methane emissions. Like the House version, the Senate bill also includes a provision criticized by Democrats as 'pay-for-play' that allows companies to pay for expedited reviews of energy or other infrastructure projects. And it seeks to repeal a Biden-era regulation that's expected to push the auto market toward selling more electric vehicles. The ultimate text could still change as the parliamentarian has to decide which programs can actually be passed through reconciliation – a process by which the Senate can pass legislation with a simple majority instead of the 60 votes it usually needs. However, since the green programs it seeks to repeal were passed in a similar manner in 2022, those are likely to make it into the final version. 'This legislative text puts in motion plans that Senate Republicans pledged to take, like stopping Democrats' natural gas tax and rescinding unobligated dollars from the so-called Inflation Reduction Act,' said EPW Chair Shelley Moore Capito ( in a written statement. 'I look forward to working with my colleagues to move our legislative package forward to enact President Trump's agenda, which the American people overwhelmingly support,' she added.