&w=3840&q=100)
Trump exits UN cultural body UNESCO again, calls it 'woke, divisive'
The withdrawal from the Paris-based agency, which was founded after World War Two to promote peace through international cooperation in education, science, and culture, will take effect at the end of next year.
The move is in line with the Trump administration's broader "America-first" foreign policy, which includes a deep skepticism of multilateral groups, including the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, and the Nato alliance.
White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said UNESCO "supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out-of-step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for."
The State Department accused UNESCO of supporting "a globalist, ideological agenda for international development at odds with our America First foreign policy".
It said its decision to admit the Palestinians as a member state was "highly problematic, contrary to US policy, and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric." UNESCO chief Audrey Azoulay said she deeply regretted Trump's decision, but it was "expected, and UNESCO has prepared for it."
Posting on X, French President Emmanuel Macron professed "unwavering support" for the "universal protector" of world heritage and said the US move would not weaken France's commitment to UNESCO.
China's foreign ministry said Washington's decision was "not the behaviour expected of a responsible major country", and expressed China's staunch support of UNESCO's work, its spokesperson told reporters during a press briefing on Wednesday.
UNESCO officials said the US withdrawal would have some limited impact on US-financed programmes.
Azoulay said UNESCO had diversified funding sources, receiving only about 8 per cent of its budget from Washington.
UNESCO was one of several international bodies Trump withdrew from during his first term, along with the World Health Organization, the Paris Agreement climate change accord, and the UN Human Rights Council. During his second term, he has largely reinstated those steps.
Trump's pick to be his UN envoy, Mike Waltz, said this month the United Nations needs reform while expressing confidence that "we can make the UN great again."
ISRAEL PRAISES US 'MORAL SUPPORT AND LEADERSHIP' Israel welcomed the US decision with its UN ambassador, Danny Danon, accusing UNESCO of "consistent misguided anti-Israel bias."
In a post on X, Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar, thanked Washington for its "moral support and leadership" and said that "Singling out Israel and politicization by member states must end, in this and all professional UN agencies." US SeNator Jeanne Shaheen, the senior Democrat on the Republican-controlled Senate Foreign Relations Committee, called Trump's decision "short-sighted and a win for China," which she said became the largest financial contributor to UNESCO after Trump last withdrew from the agency.
UNESCO officials said all relevant agency statements had been agreed with both Israel and the Palestinians over the past eight years.
Azoulay said the US had given the same reasons for its pullout as it had seven years ago "even though the situation has changed profoundly, political tensions have receded, and UNESCO today constitutes a rare forum for consensus on concrete and action-oriented multilateralism."
"These claims also contradict the reality of UNESCO's efforts, particularly in the field of Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism," she added.
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization is best known for designating World Heritage Sites, including the US Grand Canyon and Egypt's pyramids.
It lists 26 sites in the United States, including the Statue of Liberty, on its World Heritage List which highlights 1,248 global locations of "outstanding universal value." Washington has had a troubled relationship with UNESCO over the years.
It was a founding member in 1945 but first withdrew in 1984 to protest alleged financial mismanagement and perceived anti-US bias during the Cold War.
It returned in 2003 under President George W. Bush, who said UNESCO had undertaken needed reforms, but in 2011 the Obama administration announced it was stopping funding for the agency following its vote to grant the Palestinians full membership.
Trump's first administration announced in 2017 it was quitting after accusing UNESCO of anti-Israeli bias, with Washington owing $542 million in dues, before former President Biden reversed the decision in 2023. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
10 minutes ago
- First Post
IDF's localised ceasefire in Gaza show war's strategy has crumbled, says Israeli expert
Amid rising condemnation over the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, Israeli expert Yonah Jeremy Bob has said that the Israeli decision to come up with localised ceasefires to facilitate the flow of humanitarian supplies shows the strategy in the war so far has failed. read more In a rare rebuke, an Israeli analyst has said that Israel's localised ceasefires put in place over the weekend shows that the strategy so far in the war has failed. Israel on Sunday announced that it had implemented localised ceasefires for the flow of humanitarian supplies. These ceasefires have been implemented in the Al-Muwasi area in central-southern Gaza's coastal areas, Deir al-Balah in central Gaza, and Gaza City in northern Gaza, according to The Jerusalem Post. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even though these areas account for just 25 per cent of Gaza, nearly the entire population of the Palestinian enclave is living in this area as it has been displaced by the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas. The Israeli localised ceasefires have come as international condemnation of the Israeli policy of restricting the flow of food and other essentials to Gaza has risen by the day. Palestinians are facing acute hunger and the United Nations (UN) has said that the level is such that one in every five children is affected by malnutrition. The situation is such that even US President Donald Trump has broken ranks with Israel and flagged the hunger crisis affecting the children of Gaza. During March and May, Israel completely blocked the UN and other organisations from delivering aid to Gaza. Instead, the Netanyahu government joined hands with the United States to prop a private organisation, Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), to deliver aid. The GHF has not just failed in its mandate because of its inability to deliver food at scale, but its delivery sites had turned into killing fields as hundreds of Palestinians have been killed in gunfire while awaiting aid at distribution sites. Gazans have attributed such fire to Israeli forces. Amid such a situation, Israeli analyst Yonah Jeremy Bob has noted that even as Israel maintains there is no starvation, 'the brutal truth is that the IDF [Israel Defense Forces] admits there is a dangerous food situation in Gaza, even if short of the claimed mass starvation, and an awful public-relations situation there — all of this because of several Israeli policies that some in the defence establishment warned about but that were overruled by the political echelon'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Netanyahu ignored ex-Israeli military chief, defence minister & botched aid operation In an article in The Jerusalem Post, Bob said that policies implemented by Netanyahu by ignoring the advice of former IDF chief Herzi Halevi and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant have led to the present crisis. Bob said that Halevi and Gallant had suggested that the a GHF-like operation should have been implemented initially at a very small scale while the UN and other organisations were still active in Gaza. He said that such a mechanism would have allowed GHF's shortcomings in the delivery of food to be fulfilled by the UN and others and, at the same, allow the GHF to finetune its delivery system and get ready for a subsequent bigger role. Bob noted, 'Before taking larger responsibility for a larger number of Palestinians, a smaller-scale GHF-style experiment to test its potential would have been able to work through some of the issues in building a radical new and untested non-UN alternative to providing food aid. Also, this would have happened in a time period when the Palestinians had relatively more food saved in inventory storage areas, i.e., if there were hiccups with a few food deliveries, the Palestinian civilian population would not be in any immediate danger. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'In contrast, the current Israeli policy since March was to loudly and proudly block all new food aid until May to try to pressure Hamas, and then open GHF in a framework when Palestinian civilians were already at one of the worst food shortages of the war (even if not at a point of mass starvation).' With the current ceasefires, Bob noted that neither food crisis was being addressed nor the war on Hamas. 'Israel is also providing a 'localised' ceasefire and trying to present this as a non-ceasefire, which only covers 25 per cent of Gaza. But for the food to get to that 25 per cent, a much larger portion of Gaza will need to be under ceasefire status – maybe even the majority of Gaza. Moreover, all or nearly all of the Hamas terrorists are hiding in the 25 per cent of humanitarian areas where the 'localised' ceasefire is holding securely in place, and some of their smaller numbers in other places can now make their way to those areas to obtain immunity,' noted Bob. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD


Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Only Trump can end it': Egypt's al-Sisi's big appeal to US Prez to stop Gaza war & open aid routes
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi issued a direct appeal to US President Donald Trump, urging him to step in and help end the ongoing Gaza war. As Egypt, Qatar, and the United States continue their efforts to mediate a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas since the war erupted on October 7, 2023, al-Sisi called Trump the one 'capable of stopping the war' and pleaded for his influence to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza. Show more Show less


New Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Jaishankar denies Trump's involvement in India-Pak ceasefire, says no call or contact with Modi
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Monday sought to end speculation over any involvement of US President Donald Trump in brokering the ceasefire between India and Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. Addressing Parliament during the ongoing 16-hour debate on the Pahalgam attack and Op Sindoor, Jaishankar said, 'There was no call between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump between April 22 and June 17.' The Pahalgam terror attack occurred on April 22, and the ceasefire between India and Pakistan was announced on June 17 — nearly 100 hours after India launched precision strikes on terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, prompting Islamabad to retaliate with missile strikes targeting military and civilian centres. Jaishankar added that during heightened tensions between India and Pakistan in May, the U.S. had warned India of an imminent Pakistani strike. He said U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance called Prime Minister Narendra Modi on May 9, 2025, cautioning him about a 'massive Pakistani attack' expected within hours. 'PM Modi responded that if such an attack happened, it would be met with an appropriate response. Our Armed Forces foiled that attack,' Jaishankar said. The next day, on May 10, India received calls from various countries indicating that Pakistan was ready to cease hostilities. 'Our position was clear — if Pakistan was serious, the request had to come through the DGMO channel. That is exactly how it came,' he said. Jaishankar also clarified that there was 'no linkage with trade' in any conversations with the U.S. during this period. 'Secondly, there was no call between PM Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump from April 22, when he called to express sympathy after the Pahalgam attack, till June 17, when he again spoke to PM Modi in Canada.' At this point, Home Minister Amit Shah intervened, asking the Opposition why they placed more faith in a foreign leader's claims than in India's own External Affairs Minister.