Three takeaways from Worcestershire County Council elections
Reform's rout of the Tories
Almost every seat in the county was affected in some way by the swing towards Reform. Before this set of elections the relatively new party had never won a seat in the county; now it is the largest party with 27 councillors.Twenty-six of those gains – based off the 2021 results – were from the Conservatives. Before polling day, Reform candidates were optimistic but this result has far exceeded their expectations. Two seats short of an overall majority, they now face a decision - form a minority administration and try to go it alone or find a partner to run the county council with.
Dead Heat
The most dramatic moment of these elections came in the rural Littletons division, where the Green and Reform candidates had a dead heat - both on 889 votes.This meant a ballot was drawn with both their names being placed into a box and one drawn at random. Green candidate Hannah Robson's name came out, meaning she took seat from the Tories.She acknowledged it was not the ideal way to decide a vote but "that's what we have to work with".
Good day for the Greens
If these elections were evidence voters were disenchanted with the two main Westminster parties, Worcestershire's Greens were the other clear winners. The party now has eight seats on the county council, five more than in 2021. They managed to cement their strong position in Worcester itself, with music teacher and parliamentary candidate Tor Pingree defeating the Conservative council leader Simon Geraghty.
Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
24 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Missing out on £54m research fund ‘undermines' northern universities, say mayors
A total 12 institutions have access to the money to help attract 60 to 80 leading researchers into the UK. But the mayors, including Labour's Andy Burnham in Greater Manchester, Steve Rotheram in Liverpool and Tracy Brabin in West Yorkshire, have called on the Government to build a 'new funding model that truly reflects the strengths and aspirations of all of our regions'. They warned that investment was 'concentrated disproportionately in London and the South East'. According to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, the money is intended to bolster industrial strategy by helping universities to back research in sectors such as life sciences, defence and the creative industries. Beneficiaries include Oxford and Cambridge universities, the Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, which is also based in Cambridge, Imperial College London and the University of Birmingham. Queen's University Belfast in Northern Ireland, the University of Strathclyde in Scotland and Cardiff University in Wales are also listed as being in line for money from the fund. But northern universities' 'exclusion from the Global Talent Fund undermines their contribution to the UK's economic success, as well as the Government's stated commitment to rebalance our economy', the mayors wrote in a joint statement. They said: 'We are deeply disappointed that universities in the north of England, some of the best and brightest in the world, have once again been overlooked in the allocation of national innovation funding, despite their research credentials. 'The North is home to some of the UK's most innovative, high-performing universities. These institutions drive the development of life-changing technologies and work hand in hand with industry to create good jobs and grow the economy.' The cross-party group added: 'As mayors, we stand ready to support the Government in its mission to make the UK a global science superpower. 'But to truly deliver on that mission, investment in innovation must reflect the full breadth and depth of talent that exists across the country, not continue to be concentrated disproportionately in London and the South East. 'We are calling for urgent reform to ensure greater transparency and fairness in how public research and innovation funding is allocated. 'Strategic funds like this must support national growth, and that means recognising and investing in the full potential of the North of England and the 15 million people we collectively represent. 'We urge UK Research and Innovation to think again, review this disappointing decision and work together with us on creating a new funding model that truly reflects the strengths and aspirations of all of our regions, to build a brighter Britain that works for us all.' Reform UK mayor of Hull and East Yorkshire, Luke Campbell, and Conservative mayor of Tees Valley, Lord Houchen of High Leven, joined the Labour politicians – who also include the South Yorkshire, North East and York and North Yorkshire mayors Oliver Coppard, Kim McGuinness and David Skaith – in signing the statement. Backing the fund last month, science minister Lord Vallance said 'genius is not bound by geography'. He continued: 'But the UK is one of the few places blessed with the infrastructure, skills base, world-class institutions and international ties needed to incubate brilliant ideas, and turn them into new medicines that save lives, new products that make our lives easier, and even entirely new jobs and industries.'
ITV News
24 minutes ago
- ITV News
Homelessness minister urged to resign over rent hike 'hypocrisy'
Housing Politics rent The homelessness minister is facing calls to resign after reportedly hiking the rent on a property she owns in London by £700 a month, weeks after the previous tenants' contract ended. The i Paper claims that Rushanara Ali told her tenants that she would not be renewing their lease and gave them four months to leave the property she owned in east London. Ali's property was then allegedly re-listed just weeks later, with a £700 increase on the rent, a rise of more than 20%. Kevin Hollinrake, the Conservative Party chairman, accused the minister of exploiting tenants and called for her to step down. "I think it shows staggering hypocrisy. Rushanara Ali has been somebody who's obviously a Government minister in charge of homelessness. "She's spoken out about exploiting tenants, about providing more protections to tenants. "You can't say those things, then do the opposite in practice, as a landlord. She's got to resign." He said the conduct appeared to be "unethical, not illegal," but "we can't just say one thing and do another". A spokesperson for Ali said: "Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements." The house, rented on a fixed-term contract, was put up for sale while the tenants were living there, and it was only re-listed as a rental because it had not sold, according to the i Paper. The report comes as the Renters' Rights Bill is nearing its journey through parliament, which is hoping to clamp down on what the government sees as unfair rental practices. The bill includes measures to ban landlords who end a tenancy to sell a property from re-listing it for six months, abolish fixed-term tenancies and ensure landlords give four months' notice if they want to sell their property. Tom Darling, director at the Renters' Reform Coalition, said: "It's mind-boggling that we have a homelessness minister who has just evicted four people in order to rake in more rent - something that will soon be illegal under the Renters' Rights Bill her own department is bringing through Parliament. "The Government are currently considering an amendment to the legislation from the House of Lords which reduces the ban on re-letting after eviction from 12 months to six months. "The Government must remove this amendment, and at the very least, Minister Ali must recuse herself from any discussions on this within Government." Chancellor Rachel Reeves said she "didn't understand" why the Conservatives were calling for Ali to resign, saying: "I don't know the details, but Rushanara Ali seems to have done everything in accordance with the law."
South Wales Argus
44 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Wealth tax will not work, says Scottish Secretary
Ian Murray told an audience at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe that the policy would not work. Speaking to comedian Matt Forde, the Labour minister said he 'wished' it worked but suggested wealthy people would leave the country. Some within Labour, including former leader Lord Neil Kinnock, Welsh First Minister Baroness Eluned Morgan and former equality minister Anneliese Dodds, have backed the idea. It has also become popular among unions and other left-wing parties, including the Greens and Jeremy Corbyn's new, unnamed party. On Thursday, Mr Murray said there was 'no silver bullet' to the economic issues facing the country, saying 'if you pull one leaver you have to push another' in a reference to tax rises and public spending cuts. He said while some UK Government decisions have been 'unpalatable', 'things would have been even more unpalatable' if they did not make tough choices. Asked if a wealth tax could be a solution to the issue, the Scottish Secretary said: 'No, it doesn't work. The Laffer curve (a theory showing the relationship between taxation and a government's revenue) is there for everyone to see. 'So, yes, you can bring in a wealth tax, because it might make you feel principally better. 'You might bring in £200 million but the cost of doing that would be huge because there is just flight, whether we like that or not.' Mr Murray said the tax had failed in other countries which, he said, had since gone on to roll back their decisions. He said: 'Every single principal decision we have to make has got to be on the basis of does it raise more money? 'Is it fair? Is it equitable? And will it resolve the situation? 'If the answer to any of those questions is no, we should not do it. 'So the wealth tax, and honestly, the wealth tax has been spent about 500 times over already for every single issue – just doing well tax, it doesn't work. 'I wish it did, but it doesn't.' Mr Murray added that the 'only real palatable option' was to grow the economy.
