Street names and recognizing public figures
'A rose by any other name would smell as sweet,' William Shakespeare famously wrote in his play, Romeo and Juliet.
The problem is, sometimes the bloom falls off the rose, and other times, the smell becomes something that isn't sweet at all.
A year ago, Bishop Grandin Boulevard was renamed Abinojii Mikanah, a name that translates to 'children's way' in Anishinaabemowin. Bishop Grandin Trail became Awasisak Meskanôw — 'the children's road' in Ininimowin, or Cree, and Grandin Street, which runs from Taché Avenue
to St. Joseph Street in St. Boniface became
Taapweewin, which means 'truth' in Michif.
Russell Wangersky / Free Press
A street sign for Wolseley Avenue
The name changes all came because of the recognition of the extent of Bishop Vital Grandin's troubling role in establishing residential schools.
With that change in mind, it may well be a reckoning is coming for Wolseley the school, Wolseley the avenue, and maybe even Wolseley the neighbourhood — to cite just one other troubling name from the past.
Wolseley School's parent council has looked at the possibility of changing the school's name, and the Winnipeg School Division has collected feedback on the idea, because the school is named after Col. Garnet Wolseley, who led a campaign of repression against Manitoba Métis. (Interestingly, the Manitoba Métis Federation has argued the name should stay, arguing that renaming landmarks and removing statues is a way of erasing a history of wrongdoing.)
But one thing has arisen out of the renaming process that should also be considered by the city going forward. The WSD set renaming criteria for the Wolseley school that said prospective names 'should represent the neighbourhood and community; should connect to learning for the students' and 'must avoid the names of people.'
The last one is an idea whose time may have come — avoiding the names of people.
Because, more than anything else, people are complicated.
Right now, the City of Winnipeg website devotes more than 300 words to explaining how it chooses to name a street after a person, saying that it wants 'to honour and commemorate noteworthy people associated with the city of Winnipeg.'
That includes 'a person who demonstrates excellence, courage or exceptional dedication to service in ways that bring special credit to the city of Winnipeg; a person who volunteers and gives extraordinary help or care to individuals, families or groups, or supports community services or humanitarian causes; a person who fosters equality and reduces discrimination' and even 'an early pioneer or group or settlers who have contributed to the development of the city.'
The city is so keen on naming streets after worthy Winnipeggers that the $200 fee for adding a name to the suggested street name reserve list is waived 'for applications recognizing individuals.'
But maybe streets shouldn't be named after people at all, because history is a long road, and our viewpoints — and our knowledge about the character and behaviour of people who may seem like great examples today — can change with the years and with new knowledge. We've certainly seen that here. It's been recognized in other places as well.
Wednesdays
Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture.
St. John's, the capital of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador, has taken the approach of changing its street naming policy this month to exclude naming streets after individuals. Simply put, it can be fraught with difficulties.
'Naming streets after people carries a number of risks,' St. John's Coun. Ron Ellsworth said during a June 17 council meeting, including ' problematic legacies, political polarization, disparity in representation and cultural marginalization.'
The council vote in St. John's was unanimous, following the advice of the city's legal staff and the advice of the city's senior management.
Maybe it's not an approach that will garner much support from Winnipeg's council.
But maybe it's an idea whose time has come.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Manitoba slides down mining sector investment attractiveness list: report
Manitoba's attractiveness to mining investors has dropped, a new report by a conservative think tank states. The keystone province made the Fraser Institute's top-10 list of most attractive jurisdictions for mineral endowment. However, the 2024 Annual Survey of Mining Companies — released earlier this week — places Manitoba 26th of 82 jurisdictions for investment attractiveness. A year prior, Manitoba ranked sixth of 86. The Tanco lithium mine near Lac du Bonnet. (Sinomine Resource Group / Free Press files) 'It's just a wake-up call that there are some outstanding issues that need to be addressed,' said John Morris, co-director of the Mining Association of Manitoba. Survey respondents cited increased concerns about Manitoba's community development conditions, political stability and uncertainty over what areas will be protected, the report reads. Morris said it aligns with what he's heard from junior firms that don't yet have operational mines. Hesitation stems, in part, from the New Democrats' 2023 promise to protect 30 per cent of Manitoba's lands and waters by 2030, Morris said. 'They do not know whether certain areas will become off limits for future mining projects,' he continued. 'If you're trying to plan a 30-year project … you will want to know in the early days whether where you're exploring is going to be put into a protected area or not.' Mine production often follows a decade of research and exploration, Morris noted. Policy interpretation of Manitoba's heritage resource permits and requirements is a long-standing issue, he added. Morris expressed confidence the industry's concerns will be addressed: 'Our association has a very good working relationship with the provincial government.' Politicians have touted Manitoba as the 'Costco of critical minerals,' referring to the variety of goods available at the big-box retailer. Manitoba has 30 of 34 minerals deemed critical. It has four active mines producing zinc, copper, gold, nickel, tantalum, cesium and lithium. Provincial mining minister Jamie Moses underscored the Fraser Institute report's timeline: the survey was conducted August-December 2024. Since the feedback window's tail end, the NDP has released a critical mineral strategy, opened a critical mineral office and a new gold mine, Moses said. (The Alamos Gold mine near Lynn Lake was being developed during the Progressive Conservatives' most recent reign.) 'Our government takes seriously the economic opportunity we have in our critical minerals sector,' Moses said. Environmental safety is also taken seriously, he said. He deferred to the province's environment minister when asked about a map or other means of transparency to show which areas will be conserved by 2030. There's been 'a lot of discussion' about the Seal River Watershed, Moses noted. Government and Indigenous leaders are pursuing a formal designation to turn the watershed, which is 50,000 square kilometres, into an protected area; it follows a year-long assessment. 'We know that we can do more than one thing at one time,' Moses said. 'That includes being able to advance mineral projects and also ensure that we have the right environmental sustainability approach.' Lauren Stone, PC finance critic, said the report shows the New Democrats have demonstrated they're 'anti-development and have created an anti-business rhetoric.' Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. 'Manitoba should be very concerned when we have almost equivalent the number of critical minerals here … to Saskatchewan.' Saskatchewan ranked seventh on the Fraser Institute's list for investor attractiveness. It touts 27 critical minerals within its borders. The 86-page report incorporates 350 responses from mining and exploration companies. Finland was crowned the top jurisdiction based on investment attractiveness. The Fraser Institute ranked every province and territory except for Prince Edward Island. Newfoundland and Labrador, British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Yukon also ranked ahead of Manitoba in investment attractiveness, the report says. Gabrielle PichéReporter Gabrielle Piché reports on business for the Free Press. She interned at the Free Press and worked for its sister outlet, Canstar Community News, before entering the business beat in 2021. Read more about Gabrielle. Every piece of reporting Gabrielle produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
A case must be made before refusing a permit
Opinion Will new problems sent our way from the United States never cease? Trumps and tariffs and annexation and borders and fentanyl and complaints about us being nasty for not buying American products or vacationing in the United States is all bad enough. Now, enter Sean Feucht. JOSE LUIS MAGANA / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES Christian musician Sean Feucht The Christian musician has ruffled feathers across the country because — to quote Feucht himself — 'God called us to come to Canada.' After he requested permission to hold free concerts in a number of public spaces, a series of municipalities have cancelled or refused to issue permits for his performances. Winnipeg has denied him a permit to perform: so has Abbottsford, Halifax, Charlottetown, Moncton, Gatineau, Quebec City and Vaughn. West Kelowna is considering its options, and Saskatoon has granted a permit, but has said it is also monitoring security concerns. There are plenty of personal reasons you may not want Feucht to perform in your province: you may find parts of his hardline Christian message to be exclusionary and effectively promote discrimination against members of our community. You may question the ethics of his ministry: after all, in June, six former senior members of his groups issued a report saying he should be removed from 'all positions of leadership and financial stewardship,' and said 'Having witnessed first-hand what we have witnessed about Sean we can no longer encourage any financial contributions to him and his endeavours; we can no longer encourage anyone to work for him, paid or unpaid; and we can no longer encourage anyone to partner with him in any ministry capacity.' But you can't simply go to a laundry list of the most common reasons to refuse to issue a permit for a performance, and select the one most likely to apply. In Winnipeg's case, the reason given was that the chosen public location, Central Park on Ellice Avenue, was too small, at just under two hectares, for the 2,000 people Feucht's organizers are expecting — especially because the concert is free, and total numbers of attendees were hard to predict. As well, there are concerns from the city's emergency services about how they would access the area, given the numbers of pedestrians, concert-goers, vehicle volumes and parking issues related to a concert of that size. That's certainly a more cogent set of reasons than other municipalities have given. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. But perhaps it would have been simpler to request that the organizers find a better site. Holding something like a national Liberal Party Convention would have security and safety concerns — but the City of Winnipeg would not turn that away. Heck, a True North Whiteout street party has security and operational concerns, yet the city and the Winnipeg Police Service manage to address those. A city can certainly refuse to issue a permit for a performance, but that refusal has to be clearly articulated, transparent, and the refusal has to be made for good reasons. (Just to be clear — being hounded by outspoken citizens who don't like a performer's public positions doesn't constitute a good reason.) If those reasons aren't clear and cogent, the risk is that they will be interpreted as a means to quell free speech or the ability of people to assemble. Which, unfortunately, is what's happening now. One thing is for sure: denying Feucht permission to perform pretty much across the country has most likely been a far greater money and attention generator for the performer than just ignoring him — or, at the minimum, suggesting a venue better suited to the size of his proposed event — would ever have been.
Winnipeg Free Press
4 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
The politics and process of grade inflation
Opinion For 60 years as an educator in both schools and universities, I have listened to 'University … instructors are warning there's a high level of unpreparedness among first year students …' (Not making the grades, July 25, Free Press). In all of those years, the fault-finding and blame-laying have not changed. Now every time the accusations arise, I am reminded of a memorable cartoon from the Excellence in Education movement of the 1980s. It featured a student talking to another, 'Whenever we have excellence in education, I don't learn more, I just get lower marks.' It's a regular reminder that the recurring 'grade inflation' furore is more a political question than an educational one, as are most of the predictable responses. If we seriously believe what some university professors are implying — that their curricula are critical and indispensable, their teaching and assessment methodologies are above reproach and that today's students are deficient — we should be worried. Something would really be amiss if we were so sure they were right but, of course, the truth is very different. Past discussions suggest the ensuing script. University professors declare that high schools are not preparing student's adequately for the programs they choose, high school teachers say the same about the middle years, middle years about the early years and early years about the parents not readying children for the rigours of school life. Finally, everyone blames the government and the minister of education for lack of oversight, demanding that this emergency situation demands immediate attention. If I was a conspiracy theorist, I would suggest that the whole charade is just a deliberate diversion or distraction. But I am not. I believe that most everyone in the system, from parents to professors, is well meaning and committed to doing their best for young people. And because they care they can easily be drawn into public machinations like the grade inflation scam, and each will process it and respond in their own way — ranging from feeling guilty to being resentful, neither of which is very helpful, and both of which can do our young more harm than good. The political response and its implications are self defeating at all levels. The educational response is different and, I not so humbly suggest, should prevail. Parents get the children they get, not necessarily the ones they imagined, and good parents accept their children as sacred gifts, and do their best to help them become self-regulating, self-governing individuals. This usually includes sending them to the care of others — schools, teachers and other adults. Good teachers at all levels welcome the children and young people as they are, accepting the responsibility to advance their meaningful learning, and helping them accept their self-worth and imagine their positive possibilities. And they concern themselves more with this than with judgments about their presumed deficiencies and faults. Good professors do the same but, because they are the first to deal with these people as adults who have made conscious choices, they can rightfully have greater expectations about attitudes, behaviours, and efforts. That level of responsibility is a step beyond what is expected in schools where the programs are largely, choices aside, predetermined. If the educational imperative is accepted, then grade inflation is a non-issue. However, post-secondary institutions are also responsible for credentialization, and parents and teachers are aware that credentials rely largely on prior academic performance. The stakes can be high, which explains why we continue to return to the question of marks. Marks on tests, although one of the crudest ways to measure achievement and potential, are generally accepted by the system and the public. I think this is because they seem to provide certainty, enhance efficiency, and predict success, again more political than educational. The high stakes would explain why high school parents' appeal their adolescents' marks to the highest levels, insisting that they be raised — university entrance, scholarships and recognition are up for grabs — added to the desire to appear as good parents by their children and peers. And many teachers have learned that it's easier to give slightly higher marks than to have your evaluations be overturned by an administrator bowing to parental wishes. After all, what is the statistical difference between a 93 and a 96 arrived at through subjective tests administered to students at various stages of maturity and states of mental health? At the university and college level similar political decisions are made — why go through the challenges of multiple appeals at various levels to have someone change the grade you gave from or a B+ to an A? It's doubtfully worth the hassle, particularly when you're also aware of the tentativeness of your scholarly reputation, the imperfections and vagaries of your judgments, and sometimes, accompanying threats of retribution. In my view, everyone involved would benefit from not being drawn into the political 'grade inflation' diversion as a substitute for a real meaningful dialogue about why and how we need to educate our young in the first instance. John R. Wiens is dean emeritus at the faculty of education, University of Manitoba.
