BHA imposes deadlines for weighing room upgrades
Racecourses are also required to provide a dedicated warm-up area, including the necessary equipment, by no later than July 31 this year.
There are 14 racecourses who have completed their upgrades already, including at York where a female valet is based in the women's changing area, and 14 further tracks are expected to finish their redevelopments in 2025.
The remainder of British tracks have to observe the new deadlines, and dispensation will only be considered should issues arise that are beyond the venue's immediate control, such as delays due to heritage listings, planning restrictions or environmental damage from, for example, flooding or fire.
Brant Dunshea, the BHA's acting chief executive officer, said: 'Our jockeys are elite athletes and the facilities they use should reflect this. We understand the disappointment that the work has taken longer than expected, especially as where racecourses have completed their upgrades, the new layout works well and the feedback is very positive.
'The firm deadlines we are announcing today are hopefully a significant step forward. They are underpinned by clear regulatory action and linked directly to a racecourse's licence to hold fixtures.
'We hope that this action provides reassurance to jockeys, valets, officials and everyone else operating in a weighing room on a raceday about our commitment to delivering the necessary improvements – and doing so as quickly as possible.'
The Professional Jockeys Association has criticised the BHA's deadlines, saying members will have to use 'sub-standard and discriminatory facilities' for a further two years, with the riders' group considering the 'next steps' to be taken.
A statement read: 'On the surface, this announcement from the BHA is a positive step forward. However, on closer inspection this doesn't really change anything other than enforcing existing BHA General Instructions on warm-up areas/equipment and ensuring that all Jockey Club Racecourse venues complete by the end of 2027 rather than 2030, which we know from recent discussions with JCR that they were already planning.
'We are therefore extremely disappointed, particularly on behalf of our significant female membership, with the BHA board for its continued failure to grip this issue whilst dressingup their decision as progress.
'We are effectively in the position we were at the start of 2024 when the BHA board and Racecourse Association agreed to extend the completion deadline from October 2024 to December 2027, a decision we vehemently opposed.
'We would like to reiterate our sincere thanks to those racecourses who have already completed the upgrades or are very close to doing so. We also welcome the new-found focus and engagement from many racecourses on this project following recent media coverage of the inadequate and often discriminatory facilities our members have had to endure at many racecourses.
'Given the financial climate, we could have accepted some delay to the completion of the project if the works would be complete for a racecourse's first fixture of their new season in 2026. But we cannot accept that our members will have to endure sub-standard and discriminatory facilities at up to 12 racecourses well into 2027 and we will have to consider our next steps.'
The RCA feels the BHA announcement provides 'clarity' with those completing upgrades by the end of next year having a 'suitable time' to complete their projects, while the December 2027 deadline gives 'a clear backstop to agree a costed and feasible plan' for tracks continuing work beyond 2026.
It added: 'The RCA will continue to work closely with colleagues at the BHA and PJA via the project working group to support our members in meeting these timelines. We would echo the statement made by the BHA for any areas of concern held by participants with regards to weighing rooms to be reported as soon as possible, so that we may review and take action if needed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
a few seconds ago
- Scottish Sun
Lewis Hamilton hints he is taking a break with cryptic two-word tweet after Ferrari star's F1 struggles
The break follows his explosive comments regarding Ferrari's choice of driver taking a brake Lewis Hamilton hints he is taking a break with cryptic two-word tweet after Ferrari star's F1 struggles LEWIS HAMILTON has put fans on alert after making a curt and cryptic post to his social media accounts. The seven-time world champion hinted that he is taking a break from social media in a two-word post uploaded to his 8.6 million followers on X. 4 Lewis Hamilton has posted a series of cryptic messages on his social media accounts Credit: Getty 4 The racing legend posted images of himself and his dog Roscoe in a scenic natural environment Credit: Instagram / lewishamilton Advertisement 4 He captioned the posts around the theme of getting away from his phone, and by extension, social media Credit: Instagram / lewishamilton The F1 legend has had a tough run of things in recent weeks as he continues his struggle to find his feet with new team Ferrari this season. Hamilton's message to fans was simply "back soon," implying the British sporting icon is stepping away from social media for a spell. This ties in with his earlier posts from this afternoon, when he posted a scenic picture of him and his bulldog Roscoe with the caption "Outta office." Advertisement He posted similar sentiments to his Instagram account, captioning the same images "DND" - Do Not Disturb. READ MORE IN F1 LEW SHOULD GO Hamilton told to quit F1 and demand £180m before 'anything bad happens' When one fan replied with "touching grass, literally" - a reference to a phrase meaning to get out of your house or place of work and go outside, he replied in agreement. "Exactly," the 40-year-old said, suggesting he is taking the time away from social media to reconnect with other areas of his life. It is no surprise that the racing champion is keen to get away from it all, considering the brutal few weeks he has been through recently on the track. Advertisement Hamilton did not land with the splash he was hoping for since making the switch from Mercedes to Ferrari ahead of the 2025 season and has failed to make any real headway in the championship race. CASINO SPECIAL - BEST CASINO BONUSES FROM £10 DEPOSITS He is yet to register a podium finish this season, and sits 42 points behind teammate and five-time podium holder Charles Leclerc in the drivers' standings. But it was in the most recent races in Belgium and Hungary that things really escalated for the Stevenage native. 'I'm absolutely useless' - Lewis Hamilton says Ferrari 'need to change driver' after Hungarian GP qualifying nightmare Hamilton had a nightmare start to the Belgian Grand Prix weekend at Spa in late July, qualifying in 16th after a shocking knockout in Q1. Advertisement But things went from bad to worse as he was slapped with a 60-place grid penalty and forced to start from 18th after taking on a new power unit. He was keen to right his wrongs at the Hungarian GP the following week, but things were only going to get more dire. Hamilton only managed to make it to Q2 at the Hungaroring, prompting an outburst in a post-qualifying interview in which he labelled himself "absolutely useless." "It's me every time. I'm useless, absolutely useless," he said following his 12th place qualifying finish. 4 Hamilton appeared distraught as he talked media through his disappointing qualifying performance Credit: Getty Advertisement "The team have no problem. You've seen the car's on pole so we probably need to change driver." Former team boss Toto Wolff came out in defence of Hamilton following his comments, and suggested that he could still come back and challenge at the very top of the sport. F1 icon Bernie Ecclestone was perhaps the Brit's harshest critic, suggesting Hamilton should retire before his legacy suffers at the hands of his declining performances. Whether it be his conduct on or off the track, or the comments of those around him in F1, it is becoming increasingly clear that the pressure is mounting on the shoulders of one of the best to ever do it. His next chance to turn things around will be at the Dutch GP at Zandvoort in two weeks.
Reuters
a minute ago
- Reuters
Britain refuses to bail out bioethanol industry hit by Trump trade deal
LONDON, Aug 15 (Reuters) - Britain's bioethanol industry is facing imminent collapse after the government said it would not provide financial support to a sector hit by the UK's tariff deal with U.S. President Donald Trump. "We ... have taken the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces," a government spokesman said on Friday. Under May's trade deal, the UK's 19% tariffs on U.S. ethanol fell to zero, through a 1.4 billion-litre (370 million gallon) quota - a figure equating to the size of the UK's entire ethanol market. Britain has two major bioethanol plants in northern England - Associated British Foods' (ABF.L), opens new tab Vivergo plant and one operated by Ensus, owned by Germany's Sudzucker Group - which account for nearly all of the UK's production capacity. AB Foods said in June it would close the Vivergo plant by September unless the government stepped in with an aid package. Ensus has also said its plant faces closure. A spokesperson for AB Foods said it was "deeply regrettable that the government has chosen not to support a key national asset." Ensus did not respond immediately to a request for comment. Both companies have said that the trade deal, along with existing regulations that give U.S. producers an advantage in the British market, had made the environment impossible. The industry supports thousands of UK jobs. Bioethanol is produced from crops such as wheat and is used to make petrol greener and to make sustainable aviation fuel.
Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
‘Will buying a flat in London land me with a huge tax bill in America?'
Receive free, personalised tips on how to improve your financial situation, for free. Here's how to apply or fill in the form below. Despite being born in the UK, Elizabeth Hopkinson, 25, felt little connection with the country for most of her life. A dual citizen with a British father, she was raised in a town outside Boston, Massachusetts before coming to the UK in 2023 to study. She says: 'I always just thought it was a random fun fact that I happened to be born somewhere else. But I spent the summer after uni in London and just really loved the city.' She continues: 'Where I'm from is really sleepy. I love that part of the world, but it can be isolating. Life is really centred around cars, so sometimes you feel a bit alien if you try to walk from place to place. I love that in London you get the hustle and bustle but it's also not too hard to find pockets of quiet and peace. It's special to have both in a city.' Ms Hopkinson, who is fascinated by how people live in urban environments, now works as a city planner for a London council, earning £37,000 a year. At the moment she is happy renting but eventually wants a place of her own. She plans to invest £400 a month for about 10 years in the hope of saving enough for a house deposit either in the US or the UK. 'I'm in the extraordinarily lucky position of expecting some help from my parents when the time comes, but I'll also be contributing my own savings.' She already has £6,000 in emergency savings in a cash Isa and a $16,000 (£11,800) investment pot in the US, earmarked for a sabbatical in a few years. She knows she wants to invest according to her social values – for instance, avoiding fossil fuels – but otherwise she's unsure how to get started investing in the UK. 'I spent some time during uni trying to become more financially literate and learning about different options for saving and wealth building in the US. But things are a bit different in the UK – it feels like I'm starting from scratch.' On top of this, Ms Hopkinson wants some advice on how to invest tax-efficiently as a dual citizen. 'I don't pay taxes in the US because I don't earn enough, but as a US citizen who lives abroad, I still have to file taxes. I don't know if the same thing applies to returns on investment or how that works.' Annie Hughes, partner at Blick Rothenberg As a US citizen who has been living in the UK for some time, Ms Hopkinson is subject to tax on her worldwide income and gains in both jurisdictions. However, the US/UK Double Taxation Agreement works to assign the 'primary' right to taxation – and if implemented correctly with careful timing of tax payments, Ms Hopkinson shouldn't suffer double taxation. Being a dual US/UK taxpayer is complex and, when making investments, both the US and UK tax consequences need to be considered. We'll need to review each of Ms Hopkinson's income sources separately. Ms Hopkinson earns £37,000 annually and will pay UK income tax through Pay As You Earn (PAYE). While the income should be reported in the US, Ms Hopkinson will receive a credit for the UK taxes suffered. No additional US tax will be due. Alternatively, Ms Hopkinson may wish to use the foreign earned income exclusion on her US filings. This exempts the first $130,000 (£95,000) of employment income for those who are resident in a foreign country for the whole tax year. Given Ms Hopkinson's situation, this will likely be beneficial. Income and gains from her investments will be reportable in both jurisdictions. In the UK, the first £1,000 of interest income and £500 of dividend income outside of an Isa will be tax-free, as Ms Hopkinson is a basic rate taxpayer. Given the level of investment, it's likely no UK tax will be due. With no tax paid in the UK, US tax could bite. If the foreign earned income exclusion is used to exempt employment income, Ms Hopkinson will have her 'standard deduction' available – $15,000 for 2025. This deduction, available to all US taxpayers, reduces the amount of income subject to tax. As such, Ms Hopkinson may not have US or UK tax due on this investment income. As investment income grows, Ms Hopkinson should be aware that timely UK tax payments are essential to ensuring a credit in the US for UK taxes. As no withholding is applied to investment income, this means paying tax in advance to HMRC, aligning payments with the calendar year that income and gains arise. While Ms Hopkinson is a UK resident, HMRC would not give a credit for US taxes suffered, except some tax suffered on US dividends. Any investments held in the US should be reviewed to ensure they have 'reporting' status in the UK, otherwise income tax can be applied upon sale. Growth within an Isa is tax-free in the UK. However, they are not tax-free investments in the States. As UK tax rates are higher than the US, suppressing Ms Hopkinson's overall tax liability by using Isas is still sensible tax planning. Ms Hopkinson should be aware that US tax may be due on any income and gains, which will impact the return on investment. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has a whole raft of rules to dissuade US taxpayers from investing in non-US passive investments. Holding non-US passive investments can lead to penal tax rates and additional reporting requirements in the US; what the Isa holds should be carefully considered. A lifetime Isa would avoid these complications, as the funds sit in cash. However, the 'top up' payment will be taxable in the US. If Ms Hopkinson returns to the US, she can manage her days in the UK to become non-UK resident. Ms Hopkinson should consider her social security position, which will depend on the length of the move. Darius McDermott, managing director at Chelsea Financial Services Starting to invest in your 20s is one of the most powerful financial decisions you can make. Every year you delay means missing out on the compounding growth that turns steady monthly contributions into a much larger sum over time. By committing £400 a month for a decade, Ms Hopkinson is putting time firmly on her side. The eventual size of her pot will depend on market performance, but to illustrate the possibilities: investing £400 each month for 10 years could give her around £53,000 if she averaged a 2pc interest rate a year, roughly in line with a high street savings account. If returns averaged 5pc – close to long-term global equity averages after inflation – she might expect about £62,000. In a strong market, with 8pc average annual returns, achievable but with higher volatility, her pot could reach £73,000. These are estimates, but over a decade, a well-diversified, equity-focused portfolio has historically had a strong chance of positive returns. Using a stocks and shares Isa will also help Ms Hopkinson keep more of those gains free from tax. Diversifying her money across different regions, sectors and companies reduces the risk that a single poor performer drags down her portfolio. Given her timeframe and risk appetite, starting with a 100pc equity allocation is reasonable, but gradually shifting into lower-risk assets such as bonds or cash as she nears her goal will help protect her gains when she needs them most. Charges are also important. Passive trackers typically cost around 0.1pc a year, while active funds average 0.75pc. While trackers offer cost efficiency, an investor prioritising social value may prefer an active fund with more rigorous ESG (environmental, social and governance) screening and the ability to engage directly with companies to improve standards. Active strategies can also offer more targeted exposure to smaller companies or specialist sustainability themes. Given the complexity of US tax rules for UK-based investments, you should speak with a US-UK cross-border tax specialist before making any decisions. The right advice now can prevent costly mistakes later. With discipline and diversification, Ms Hopkinson's £400 monthly investment could grow into a meaningful deposit – and she'll have built it in a way that aligns with her principles. If she sticks to the plan, compounding will work in her favour.
