States are rolling out red carpets for data centers. But some lawmakers are pushing back
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The explosive growth of the data centers needed to power America's fast-rising demand for artificial intelligence and cloud computing platforms has spurred states to dangle incentives in hopes of landing an economic bonanza, but it's also eliciting pushback from lawmakers and communities.
Activity in state legislatures — and competition for data centers — has been brisk in recent months, amid an intensifying buildout of the energy-hungry data centers and a search for new sites that was ignited by the late 2022 debut of OpenAI's ChatGPT.
Many states are offering financial incentives worth tens of millions of dollars. In some cases, those incentives are winning approval, but only after a fight or efforts to require data centers to pay for their own electricity or meet energy efficiency standards.
Some state lawmakers have contested the incentives in places where a heavy influx of massive data centers has caused friction with neighboring communities. In large part, the fights revolve around the things that tech companies and data center developers seem to most want: large tracts of land, tax breaks and huge volumes of electricity and water.
And their needs are exploding in size: from dozens of megawatts to hundreds of megawatts and from dozens of acres up to hundreds of acres for large-scale data centers sometimes called a hyperscaler.
While critics say data centers employ relatively few people and pack little long-term job-creation punch, their advocates say they require a huge number of construction jobs to build, spend enormous sums on goods and local vendors and generate strong tax revenues for local governments.
In Pennsylvania, lawmakers are writing legislation to fast-track permitting for data centers. The state is viewed as an up-and-coming data center destination, but there is also a sense that Pennsylvania is missing out on billions of dollars in investment that's landing in other states.
'Pennsylvania has companies that are interested, we have a labor force that is capable and we have a lot of water and natural gas,' said state Rep. Eric Nelson. "That's the winning combination. We just have a bureaucratic process that won't open its doors.'
Kansas approved a new sales tax exemption on goods to build and equip data centers, while Kentucky and Arkansas expanded pre-existing exemptions so that more projects will qualify.
Michigan approved one that carries some protections, including requirements to use municipal utility water and clean energy, meet energy-efficiency measures and ensure that it pays for its own electricity.
Such tax exemptions are now so widespread — about three dozen states have some version of it — that it is viewed as a must-have for a state to compete.
'It's often a nonstarter if you don't have them, for at least the hyperscalers,' said Andy Cvengros, who helps lead the data center practice at commercial real estate giant JLL. 'It's just such a massive impact on the overall spend of the data center.'
In West Virginia, lawmakers approved a bill to create 'microgrid' districts free from local zoning and electric rate regulations where data centers can procure power from standalone power plants.
Gov. Patrick Morrisey, a Republican, called the bill his 'landmark policy proposal' for 2025 to put West Virginia 'in a class of its own to attract new data centers and information technology companies.'
Utah and Oklahoma passed laws to make it easier for data center developers to procure their own power supply without going through the grid while Mississippi rolled out tens of millions of dollars in incentives last year to land a pair of Amazon data centers.
In South Carolina, Gov. Henry McMaster signed legislation earlier this month that eased regulations to speed up power plant construction to meet demand from data centers, including a massive Facebook facility.
The final bill was fought by some lawmakers who say they worried about data centers using disproportionate amounts of water, taking up large tracts of land and forcing regular ratepayers to finance the cost of new power plants.
'I do not like that we're making customers pay for two power plants when they only need one,' Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey told colleagues during floor debate.
Still, state Sen. Russell Ott suggested that data centers should be viewed like any other electricity customer because they reflect a society that is 'addicted' to electricity and are 'filling that need and that desire of what we all want. And we're all guilty of it. We're all responsible for it.'
In data center hotspots, some lawmakers are pushing back.
Lawmakers in Oregon are advancing legislation to order utility regulators to ensure data centers pay the cost of power plants and power lines necessary to serve them.
Georgia lawmakers are debating a similar bill.
In Virginia, the most heavily developed data center zone in the U.S., Gov. Glenn Youngkin vetoed a bill that would have forced more disclosures from data center developers about their site's noise pollution and water use.
In Texas, which endured a deadly winter blackout in 2021, lawmakers are wrestling with how to protect the state's electric grid from fast-growing data center demand.
Lawmakers still want to attract data centers, but a bill that would speed up direct hookups between data centers and power plants has provisions that are drawing protests from business groups.
Those provisions would give utility regulators new authority to approve those agreements and order big electric users such as data centers to switch to backup generators in a power emergency.
Walt Baum, the CEO of Powering Texans, which represents competitive power plant owners, warned lawmakers that those provisions might be making data center developers hesitant to do business in Texas.
'You've seen a lot of new announcements in other states and over the last several months and not as much here in Texas," Baum told House members during a May 7 committee hearing. "I think everybody right now is in a waiting pattern and I worry that we could be losing to other states while that waiting pattern is happening.'
Follow Marc Levy on X at https://x.com/timelywriter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
42 minutes ago
- Mint
Boulder attack: Suspect Mohamed Soliman used makeshift flamethrower in Colorado, taken into custody
A man threw a 'fire bomb' at a crowd at an outdoor mall in Boulder, Colorado, injuring six people, on Sunday. The injured demonstrators were calling for the release of Israeli hostages in Gaza. Police say the suspect used a makeshift flamethrower and hurled an incendiary device into the crowd. The FBI immediately described the incident as a 'targeted terror attack", an AP report said. The suspect, identified by the FBI as 45-year-old Mohamed Sabry Soliman, yelled 'Free Palestine' and used a makeshift flamethrower during the attack on the group of demonstrators, said Mark Michalek, the special agent in charge of the FBI's Denver field office. Soliman attacked demonstrators who had gathered at the Pearl Street pedestrian mall, a four-block area in downtown Boulder popular with tourists and students, according to an AP report. Video from the scene showed a witness shouting, "He's right there. He's throwing Molotov cocktails," as a police officer with his gun drawn advanced on a bare-chested suspect with containers in each hand. Soliman was also injured and was taken to the hospital to be treated, but authorities didn't elaborate on the nature of his injuries, the report said. The attack occurred more than a week after the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington by a Chicago man who yelled, "I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza" as he was being led away by police. Police in Boulder evacuated multiple blocks of the pedestrian mall. The scene after the attack was tense, as law enforcement agents with a police dog walked through the streets looking for threats and instructed the public to stay clear. 'Our agents and local law enforcement are on the scene already, and we will share updates as more information becomes available,' FBI Director Kash Patel posted on social media. Several people were injured and hospitalised after the attack, officials said. Videos showed dense clouds of black smoke emerging from the scene with people lying on the ground, and being helped by others with water and towels. The injuries authorities found were consistent with reports of individuals being set on fire, Boulder Police Chief Steve Redfearn said, adding that injuries ranged from serious to minor, the AP report added. Redfearn told reporters Sunday evening that it was too early to discuss a motive but that witnesses were being interviewed. 'It would be irresponsible for me to speculate on motive this early on,' he said. FBI leaders in Washington said they were treating the Boulder attack as an act of terrorism, and the Justice Department — which leads investigations into acts of violence driven by religious, racial or ethnic motivations — decried the attack as a 'needless act of violence, which follows recent attacks against Jewish Americans.'
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Can foreign students still work in the US.? OPT programme faces scrutiny
If you're an international student—or planning to become one—understanding your financial and career risks in the U.S. right now is essential. Recent policy shifts are raising serious concerns for students on F-1 visas, especially those relying on Optional Practical Training (OPT) or aiming for long-term careers in the U.S. Here's a clear explainer of what's happening. As the U.S. tightens immigration policies under the Trump administration, thousands of international students—including recent graduates from top institutions like MIT and Harvard—are reconsidering their American dreams. The growing threat to the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, which allows foreign graduates to work in the U.S. after completing their studies, has sparked a wave of anxiety and career uncertainty. Bob Zeng, a 30-year-old Chinese student graduating from MIT with a master's degree in science and management, had long envisioned building a life in the U.S. But with the administration signaling the possible end of post-study work permits for foreign students, Zeng is now considering moving to Europe or returning to China. 'I'm worried about working here,' he told AP. 'You never know what's going to happen.' Zeng's concerns are not isolated. Nearly 240,000 international students in the U.S. rely on OPT—a one-year work authorization (extendable up to three years for STEM graduates)—as a critical bridge between education and employment. The program not only gives students experience in U.S. companies but often leads to H-1B visa sponsorship and, for some, permanent residency. What is OPT and Why it matters? Optional Practical Training (OPT) is a U.S. work program that allows international students on F-1 visas to work for 12 months after graduation (up to 36 months for STEM graduates). It's the bridge between university and a career—offering practical job experience and often serving as a stepping stone to an H-1B visa or permanent residency. Around 240,000 students are currently on OPT. What is changing and why you should care The U.S. government may end OPT. Trump-era immigration leaders, like USCIS nominee Joseph Edlow, are pushing to stop post-graduate work authorization for F-1 students. Visa revocations and surveillance: Students with minor police interactions or missing employment record updates have had their visas threatened or revoked. Chinese students are being singled out, with new policies targeting those linked to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in 'critical' fields. How Trump has targeted foreign students in the US Threats to end OPT visa Trump's administration has openly considered ending the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, which allows international students to work in the U.S. after graduation. This has created major uncertainty for students hoping to gain career experience. Increased visa scrutiny: The administration added extra layers of vetting for F-1 student visas, making it harder for international students to get approved or stay in the country. Termination of legal status: In April, ICE began terminating the legal status of student visa holders who were found in police databases — even without charges or convictions. Many of these were OPT participants, forced to leave jobs or risk legal trouble. Threat letters to graduates: In May, many recent graduates received letters warning them that their visa status would be revoked unless they updated employment records. Even though corrections were allowed, the letters caused panic and stress among students. Targeting Chinese students: Recently, the administration announced plans to revoke visas for Chinese students connected to the Communist Party or those in 'sensitive' academic fields — a move that raised fears of racial profiling and academic discrimination. Mixed Signals: Trump once floated the idea of offering green cards to international graduates but his policies took a sharp turn toward restricting student opportunities Trump's nominee for director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Joseph Edlow, said during his confirmation hearing on May 21 that he would like to see an end to post-graduate work authorization for international students. "What I want to see would be essentially a regulatory and sub-regulatory program that would allow us to remove the ability for employment authorizations for F-1 students beyond the time that they are in school," said Edlow, referring to the F-1 visas on which most international students attend college in the US. The opportunity to gain career experience at US companies, especially in technology and other fields where American companies dominate, has long been a draw of studying in the US. Many enter the H-1B visa lottery, hoping to be selected for one of the employer-sponsored visas that offer a pathway to permanent residency in the United States. Threatening practical training opportunities would have long-term consequences for the US in attracting international students, Fanta Aw, CEO of NAFSA, which represents international educators, told the AP. Like many international students, Marko, 29, finds himself glued to the news with a growing sense of alarm. His Optional Practical Training expires in a month, and he has applied for an extension but hasn't heard back, leaving him in limbo. Lawyers for the tech company where he works in New York City advised him to carry proof of his legal status in his wallet, which he finds "dehumanising." "The message being sent now is that: You are not one of us, and we are going to get rid of you," said Marko, who asked that only his first name be used because he is worried about being targeted for removal from the country. He has lived in the US for a decade spanning college and graduate school, but his family and friends back home have encouraged him to leave. His hope is that he gets the OPT extension and can then apply for an H-1B visa and continue his life in the US, but he also worries about anti-immigrant sentiment and who will be targeted next. Recent crackdowns have only added to the chaos. In April, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) began terminating student visas for those flagged in police databases—even for minor or mistaken entries. Though many were reinstated after legal action, several students chose to leave preemptively. The administration has also moved to revoke visas of Chinese students studying in sensitive fields or allegedly connected to the Chinese Communist Party. These developments have pushed students like Yurong "Luanna" Jiang, a Chinese graduate of Harvard University, to reconsider their future in the U.S. 'Everything is up in the air,' she said, now open to working anywhere in the world. For students who once saw the U.S. as a land of opportunity, the message today is less welcoming. 'It feels like there's a war on immigrants,' said Guy, a UK citizen and HIV researcher at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, who would be forced to leave the country if OPT is eliminated. 'It's not a particularly attractive place to stay and do science right now.' What students can do right now? Keep your employment records up to date in SEVIS and on your university's system. Consult an immigration attorney if you're near the end of your OPT or applying for an H-1B. Have a backup plan: Look into career options in Canada, UK, EU, or back home where policies may be more stable.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
WWDC 2025 preview: iOS redesign to steal the spotlight, but keep ‘AI' expectations in check
When Tim Cook opens the annual Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) early next week—perhaps the biggest Apple event after the iPhone's fall launch—look for subtle hints about Apple's future roadmap in artificial intelligence, even as this year's focus will be squarely on software overhauls. It may be a sign that Cupertino is falling behind in the AI race compared to peers like OpenAI and Google. And while Apple won't admit it, this year's developer conference is shaping up to be a more subdued affair than past WWDCs, partly due to Apple's unpreparedness in AI. At WWDC 2024, Apple unveiled Apple Intelligence—a suite of AI features—and announced a revamped Siri powered by ChatGPT. However, the rollout has been sluggish, the features are limited, and the promised Siri revamp has been delayed indefinitely. This has only widened the gap between Apple and its 'Magnificent Seven' peers, the world's top seven tech companies. Once the most valuable tech company in the world, Apple now sits in third place behind Microsoft and Nvidia. While competitors are developing and launching new AI features every month—and betting heavily on generative AI and AI agents—Apple has barely made a dent. Instead, it leaned on a partnership-driven strategy, which appears to have backfired, raising concerns on Wall Street and among investors about whether Apple can reclaim its former dominance. In recent years, Apple hasn't introduced any major breakthroughs, with the exception of the Vision Pro, a $3,500 mixed reality headset. But sales have been underwhelming, and developer interest has faded. Reports suggest the headset has sold fewer than 500,000 units, highlighting tepid consumer reception. Apple also faced a significant setback when it shut down its long-running autonomous car project. While the iPhone continues to generate billions and accounts for nearly half of Apple's annual revenue, the device is showing signs of innovation fatigue. Adding to the pressure, Apple's former design chief Jony Ive has joined OpenAI—one of the hottest AI companies in the world—and is working on a new type of AI hardware that could potentially challenge the iPhone's dominance. Investors are now questioning how long Apple can maintain consumer interest in the iPhone. While reaching new customers in developing markets like India and Indonesia may provide short-term gains, Apple's core platforms—the iPhone, Mac, and iPad—have matured. In recent years, Apple has successfully pivoted to services such as the App Store, Apple Music, and iCloud, but the performance of these services is still tightly linked to hardware sales. With little clarity on Apple's next big move, this year's developer conference is expected to focus primarily on the usual annual software updates, with the iPhone set to receive its biggest software redesign in years. Well, that now seems likely to be the case. Instead of iOS 19, the next version of the iPhone's operating system may be called iOS 26—and the same naming shift could apply to macOS 26 (the next Mac update will be a Lake Tahoe-themed), iPadOS 26, and watchOS 26. The rationale behind the name change isn't entirely clear, but it could be tied to the major software overhaul expected this year. WWDC is typically where Apple previews new software for its core platforms—the iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple Watch, HomePod, and more. But for years, Apple has mostly introduced new features while leaving the interface and overall user experience largely unchanged. However, the buzz this year is that Apple is planning to unify the look of its iPhone, Mac, and iPad operating systems. Reportedly, the new interface will have a 'glass' aesthetic—possibly inspired by the Vision Pro's UI, which features a transparent look and rounded menus. The last major iPhone interface redesign was over a decade ago with iOS 7, so this overhaul is long overdue. In terms of new features, expect functionalities like the heavily rumored desktop mode, which would allow users to connect an iPhone with a USB-C port to an external display. New battery-saving features are also anticipated, and there's hope that Apple will introduce deeper integration between iPadOS and macOS, allowing the two platforms to increasingly mirror each other. One of the platforms that missed out on Apple Intelligence support last year was the Apple Watch—but hopefully, that will change this year. The big question is how Apple plans to integrate AI into the Apple Watch's interface. Not every Apple Intelligence feature makes sense on a device with such a small screen, but reportedly, Cupertino is working on incorporating generative AI insights into Health app data. There are also reports that Apple could be developing AI-powered medical services, which might launch in 2026. For years, there have been constant requests for Apple to penetrate deeper into gaming—whether by launching a game console, a gaming-focused streaming device, or perhaps a gaming Mac. All of these remain rumours, but Apple did launch a subscription service called Apple Arcade. It's a fun service that works across all Apple devices, but the game selection is pretty limited. With the Switch 2 launching soon (and the hype is astronomically high), Apple may introduce a new app that acts as a hub for games and could fold Apple Arcade into it, replacing the Game Center. Details are scant at the moment, but the idea of a dedicated gaming app that brings together the best games from the App Store and Apple Arcade makes a lot of sense—especially at a time when Apple is being questioned for its monopoly and tight grip on the App Store. Anuj Bhatia is a personal technology writer at who has been covering smartphones, personal computers, gaming, apps, and lifestyle tech actively since 2011. He specialises in writing longer-form feature articles and explainers on trending tech topics. His unique interests encompass delving into vintage tech, retro gaming and composing in-depth narratives on the intersection of history, technology, and popular culture. He covers major international tech conferences and product launches from the world's biggest and most valuable tech brands including Apple, Google and others. At the same time, he also extensively covers indie, home-grown tech startups. Prior to joining The Indian Express in late 2016, he served as a senior tech writer at My Mobile magazine and previously held roles as a reviewer and tech writer at Gizbot. Anuj holds a postgraduate degree from Banaras Hindu University. You can find Anuj on Linkedin. Email: ... Read More
