logo
Gaza aid point crush kills 20 people

Gaza aid point crush kills 20 people

News.com.au16-07-2025
A crush at an aid centre in southern Gaza killed at least 20 people on Wednesday, with the site's operator blaming "agitators" within the crowd and the Palestinian territory's civil defence agency attributing the panic to Israeli gunfire.
It was the first time that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), backed by the United States and Israel, acknowledged deaths at one of its distribution sites after weeks of chaotic scenes and near-daily reports of Palestinians being killed nearby while waiting to collect rations.
AFP footage showed lifeless bodies taken to a nearby hospital, in the city of Khan Yunis, with some placed on the floor and others on already-bloodied beds.
Abdullah Alian, a witness, said that mayhem unfolded as the crowd of aid-seekers was hit with stun grenades and pepper spray.
"When they saw people starting to die on the ground and people on top of each other suffocating, they opened the gate and people started climbing on top of each other."
It was not clear whether he was referring to US contractors securing GHF sites, Israeli forces or another party.
Paramedic Ziad Farhat said that after more than 21 months of devastating war, "there are not enough hospitals for the injured or the martyrs".
"Enough of the tragedies that we are living."
The latest deaths came as indirect negotiations between Israel and Palestinian group Hamas were ongoing, aiming to seal a deal for a 60-day ceasefire, the release of hostages held in Gaza and the unfettered flow of much-needed aid into the territory.
Hamas has accused Israel of wanting to retain long-term military control of Gaza -- a key sticking point in the talks, which are now in their second week in Qatar.
- 'Stampede' -
The GHF said it understood that 19 of those killed on Wednesday "were trampled and one was stabbed amid a chaotic and dangerous surge".
The organisation said the crush was "driven by agitators", adding: "We have credible reason to believe that elements within the crowd -- armed and affiliated with Hamas -- deliberately fomented the unrest".
Gaza's civil defence agency said at least 20 people were killed in the incident, blaming it on fire from Israeli troops.
Agency spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP that thousands had gathered at the site when "Israeli forces opened fire and used (tear) gas, causing panic and a stampede after aid centre guards closed the main gates in front of the hungry crowd".
The Israeli military did not respond to a request for comment.
The GHF, an officially private effort, began operations on May 26 as Israel eased a two-month aid blockade that had sparked warnings of famine.
On Tuesday, the UN said it had recorded 875 people killed in Gaza while trying to get food since late May, including 674 "in the vicinity of GHF sites".
Last week, UN rights office spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani told reporters that "most of the injuries are gunshot injuries".
The GHF -- accused by aid organisations of catering to Israeli military needs -- has denied that fatal shootings have occurred in the immediate vicinity of its aid points, and the Israeli army has accused Hamas of firing at civilians, though witnesses have blamed the military.
- 'No progress' -
In the truce negotiations, Hamas is seeking a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, and last week rejected an Israeli proposal that it said would have kept troops in more than 40 percent of the territory.
Israeli public broadcaster Kan reported on Wednesday that work was ongoing to revise Israeli pullback maps, citing an unnamed foreign official.
Bassem Naim, a member of Hamas's political leadership, told AFP that Israel "has not yet delivered any new or revised maps regarding military withdrawals".
"What is happening on the ground confirms (Israel's) intentions and plans to maintain and prolong military control within the Gaza Strip for the long term," he said.
Speaking in Gaza on Wednesday, Israel's army chief Eyal Zamir said that "in the coming days, we will know whether or not we have an agreement", according to a military statement.
A Palestinian source close to the negotiations earlier told AFP there had been "no progress so far".
If a deal is not reached, Israel will "intensify and expand combat operations as much as possible, beyond what we are currently doing", Zamir said.
The war was sparked by Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Israel's retaliatory campaign in Gaza has killed 58,573 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Peaceful approach ensured bridge march was a success
Peaceful approach ensured bridge march was a success

Sydney Morning Herald

time29 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Peaceful approach ensured bridge march was a success

I walked the bridge with about 90,000 fellow citizens on Sunday, and it was utterly inspiring (' 90,000 halt city with march across Harbour Bridge ', August 3). There was no disruption of any kind, despite police warnings of a 'perilous' situation. Far from it. There were all kinds of people – the disabled, older people with walkers or scooters, parents, children and babies, and I didn't hear an angry word exchanged. Mostly the chanting and the posters were various versions of 'free Palestine' and 'stop the war in Gaza'. There were anti-Israel messages, too, and some may have struck a discordant note, but no one spoke out against any other protester. It was truly a peace rally. As for the 'catastrophe' the police warned of, the only danger I could see was few piles of horse manure, courtesy of the police mounted unit. Carolyn Quadrio, Randwick NSW Police acting deputy commissioner Peter McKenna said Sunday's Harbour Bridge march came 'very close to a catastrophic situation'. Yes, it did, but the peaceful marchers saved the situation. Most crowd catastrophes involve pushing people into a confined space or a dead end. The march had both, but worse. Police made marchers turn around and walk back directly into the oncoming marchers. The police could not have set up a better plan for a catastrophe. I know they'll blame the organisers, but if the police and Premier Chris Minns had read the room, they would have understood the heat of public opinion about Gaza and know that thousands were going to march and planned accordingly. It could not have been planned and executed worse. John Clark, Terrey Hills So Peter McKenna claims police were 'forced' to turn people around on the Harbour Bridge. I disagree. The problems were caused by closing Bradfield Highway and leaving only the narrow Milsons Point exit open. This meant that people in wheelchairs, walking frames and parents with strollers had to navigate narrow flights of stairs. Sending random text messages and using loudhailers to tell a large crowd to turn back on itself is a recipe for disaster. Joanna Mendelssohn, Dulwich Hill As one of people on the Harbour Bridge on Sunday I would love to know what situation was so close to 'catastrophic' that the NSW Police decided to trap the crowds in the confined space of the bridge with no way back or forward. We were stopped dead, with thousands coming behind us. Elderly people and parents of young children were visibly distressed. Police texts said stop and await directions, but none were given. Security guards had no answers for people asking where we were supposed to go to avoid being crushed. What was so catastrophic on the other side that we couldn't walk over the bridge to disperse? Police took a very real risk with public safety. It was chaos. Luckily for police, the crowds were patient and took good care of each other, focused as they were on protesting without being sidetracked by police mismanagement or silly games. David Snell, Enmore I wish to thank those who crossed the Harbour Bridge with me. Their good-natured attitude prevented a disaster after the police decided to stop the progress at the north side of the bridge while the majority of the people were still crossing. The police panicked, the public did not. The police handling of the situation displayed poor planning, poor decision-making and poor communication. The announcements from Polair could not be deciphered. The SMS messages were ambiguous and unhelpful. The calm response of the marchers avoided a disaster. Siobhan Mullany, Pyrmont Alexandra Smith states that Sydney took a stand for humanity without turning its back on the Jewish community (' This was the day Sydney took a stand for humanity ', August 4). However, a real march for humanity would not have ignored the hostages still captive and starving in Gaza. It would have called for peace, rather than sanctions, intifada and 'death'. It would have called out Hamas for their acts of barbarity. It would not have platformed the Ayatollah, nor displayed swastikas and Hamas' inverted triangle of death. These acts and omissions meant this was less a march for humanity but more a march of hate. David Ziegler, Dover Heights The leadership of the Palestine Action Group has proved to be most impressive. Having the boldness to target the Harbour Bridge, galvanising interest groups and the media, defying the premier, convincing the Supreme Court not to interfere, forcing the police and transport authorities into a last-minute scramble and convincing nearly 100,000 to come out in the driving rain. And the prize? Pictures beamed across the world of tens of thousands marching across the bridge alongside the black, red, green and white of Palestine, effectively snubbing Israel and demonstrating to an international audience Australians' solidarity with the people of Gaza. You would have to say 'well played'. Doug Walker, Baulkham Hills My wife and I joined the March for Gaza on the Harbour Bridge. We were very impressed with the atmosphere and empathy of the marchers. A statement from organiser Josh Lees that it was 'a beautiful, inspiring outpouring of humanity' really captured it. The police claim that it was close to catastrophe was just ridiculous, with the only problem arising when the police stopped the march and turned people around. Even this was resolved peacefully and calmly. I sincerely hope our political leaders were paying attention. Bill Munro, Point Frederick I took part in the march with my family and a friend aged 84 with a prosthetic leg. He did well on the long walk over the bridge. However, when we were suddenly ordered to turn around and walk back he was unable to do so, owing to extreme fatigue. The crowd were tremendously well-behaved and there was no sign at all of 'possible catastrophe'. A policeman I told about my friend's condition asked him very rudely why he had bothered to come at all. We then somehow ended up in the wrong queue for North Sydney station, so I asked a woman officer if my friend could enter near the top as he was exhausted. In a very officious manner, she told him to join the end of the queue again 200 metres away. Another old lady arrived and she was told the same thing. I found the police very rude and unkind to elderly people who needed help. Patricia McCudden, Oatley Despite the foul weather, nearly 100,000 protesters marched in support of the Palestinian cause, but police decided to block the exit on the north side and turn people around into the path of those approaching. They stood idly by as people were not clearly informed to what was happening. There were young children and people in wheelchairs on the march, yet there was no attempt from the police to mitigate the risk of a crush. I'm very disappointed with the NSW police force. Kenny Macintyre, North Ryde On behalf of the Islamic Friendship Association of Australia, thank you for Monday's front page. In a media climate of distortion and silence, the Herald showed a city united for humanity, with Australians of many hues and backgrounds grieving yet resolute. You gave moral clarity to a moment many would rather blur. As the humanitarian crisis in Gaza deepens, we urge you and your readers to support calls for an immediate, protected humanitarian corridor to deliver food, medicine and dignity to a besieged people. Thank you again to the editorial team, reporters, photographers and all who helped produce the front cover and the accompanying articles. Keysar Trad, Yagoona Coal mine proposal ignores reality I was gobsmacked to read in Monday's Herald a NSW government notice asking for a 'market interest test' on exploration proposals for a new coal mine about six kilometres north-west of Helensburgh, just outside Sydney. Quite apart from this proposal being under or close to Sydney's water catchment and dam, and much too close to Helensburgh and the M1 highway, it seems to be in the middle of valuable and reasonably undisturbed bushland. Probably not national park, but maybe it should be. Anyway, in the global warming disaster unfolding around us, it is utter madness for the Minns government to be assessing any proposal for a new coal mine. What planet is Chris Minns on? Not ours, it seems. Dave Pyett, Maroubra Once again, Chris Minns's lack of judgment casts shadows on his suitability to be premier, backflips on regulating the gambling industry, backflips on removing shark nets, watering down tenants' protections, and now an implacable opposition to the march on Sunday. Somebody in Labor should tap him on the shoulder and suggest it's time he 'spent more time with his family'. Nicholas Triggs, Katoomba Fish market access fail As a local, I'm delighted that a majority of leaseholders have signed for space in the new Sydney Fish Markets building (' Breakthrough in toxic dispute over Sydney Fish Market', August 4). However, I remain concerned about its accessibility for others. It will be several years before a ferry operates from the CBD, and while the light rail provides some public transport, there is at present no bus service to the site. Of even more concern is the proposal to close the Bank Street exit from the first Anzac Bridge off-ramp, which provides access to people driving from the western suburbs. In addition, private tour buses/taxis travelling from the east will be unable to turn into the pick-up/drop-off area on Bridge Road. Instead, they will have to make a long detour around the narrow streets of Glebe to approach the pick-up zone from the west. All efforts to meet with Transport for NSW to discuss these issues have failed. Elizabeth Elenius, Pyrmont Action Shore's maths lesson I am compelled to respond to the letter of Shore headmaster John Collier (Letters, August 4). Shore School is a registered charity. An extract from the financial returns lodged with the Charities Register (Annual Information Statement 2024) shows Shore has assets of $371,220,883. It had a gross income of $102,703,867. More than $6,000,000 of that revenue came from the government. The extract also shows total expenses of $98,054,561. From the maths that I learnt at public school, that equates to a profit after interest expenses of about $4,800,000 – hardly small. In the same period, the grants and donations made by Shore are recorded in its financial statements as $0. I think it could afford to pay rates and extend a little charity to those less fortunate. Rob Siebert, Skennars Head I live close to Shore School and drive past it most days. The school's lands are more than enough already. If John Collier and his school truly want to 'serve the community' meaningfully, what they should be doing is converting one or two of the many football grounds there to off-street parking, so that Alpha Road, on the school's western boundary, can be a clearway on weekends as it is during peak-hour traffic, instead of becoming the gridlock created solely by cars belonging to parents of pupils keen on delivering, then watching, then driving home their little darlings from their game of cricket or rugby or the like. Oh, but that would deny the school use of a portion of its rates-free land and it would actually put some of it to 'community service'. Can't have that. Denis Williams, Sydney Heritage? Here it is There is a site on the Georges River that should also have been heritage listed (' The green spaces redefining city's heritage', August 4). With its large areas of remnant native vegetation, it is a natural landscape. With its house built in 1910, an orchard, a garden, a vegetable garden and a series of cultural plantings still remaining, it is a cultural landscape. With five sites of First Nations' significance, it also has Aboriginal heritage. But efforts by the community to get Glenlee in Lugarno heritage-listed have fallen on deaf ears. So it is more than passing strange to read that the Heritage Penny Sharpe, says: 'We're always looking at expanding the [heritage] register.' Doesn't this waterfront site also deserve to be 'cared for forever'? Shouldn't these 'various elements that come together so we can tell the stories of our past as we head into the future' be preserved? Or does this prime waterfront site just deserve to be developed? Anne Wagstaff, Oatley The vital question Reading Kayla Olaya and Kate Aubusson's article (' The question medics must now ask could save a sick child's life ', August 4) took me back to my childhood, when my mother took my three-year-old sister to the GP every day for four days with tummy pains, only to be dismissed and sent home. The doctor told mum my sister was acting up and nothing was wrong. Luckily, a locum was on duty on day five and sent my sister to hospital, recognising how sick she was. Alas, it was too late and the dear child died of a burst appendix the next day. If the doctor had asked my mum 'are you worried it might be getting worse?' I can only dream of the different family life we may have had, without that dark pall of grief. Julie Garrard, Leichhardt Back to school, Barnaby Barnaby Joyce has latched onto recent unusual snowfalls in his electorate of New England to rubbish climate change. You know it makes sense. Sadly, he must have been otherwise engaged when his geography or science teachers at Riverview explained the difference between weather and climate. Phil Armour, Yass Serious joke The funniest joke I've heard all year is from White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt: 'Neither the president nor his family have ever engaged, or will ever engage, in conflicts of interest.' Hilarious. Alan Marel, North Curl Curl

Sydney Harbour Bridge protests were ‘concerning' for the community
Sydney Harbour Bridge protests were ‘concerning' for the community

Sky News AU

time29 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Sydney Harbour Bridge protests were ‘concerning' for the community

Executive Council of Australian Jewry Alex Ryvchin says the Sydney Harbour Bridge pro-Palestine protests were 'concerning' for the community. 'The whole process was concerning for the community, the minute the judge of the Supreme Court announced she was effectively overturning the decision made by the premier and by the police to not allow this to go ahead on the Harbour Bridge there was a great deal of despair and anxiety in the community,' Mr Ryvchin told Sky News host Chris Kenny. 'We have seen large-scale gatherings before turn violent, we've seen chants in support of terrorism, chants villainising the Jewish community, and this was badged on this was a march for humanity … this is not a group that is interested in humanity.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store