Trump unveils website for $5 million US residency visa
President Donald Trump touted a new website for his planned $5 million US residency permit on Wednesday, saying the waiting list for the golden visa has opened on TrumpCard.gov.
"Thousands have been calling and asking how they can sign up to ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere in the World," Trump wrote in a social media post.
Trump unveiled the first such visa aboard Air Force One in April, holding a golden prototype that bore his face and promising the special permit would probably be available "in less than two weeks."
The visas are not available yet, but the website announced Wednesday allows interested parties to submit their name, desired visa and email address under a header that says "The Trump Card is Coming."
Trump previously said the new visa, a high-price version of the traditional green card, would bring in job creators and could be used to reduce the US national deficit.
The announcement comes as deportation raids are being ramped up across the country, prompting protests, and as Trump's administration faces ongoing lawsuits and accusations of rights violations over its anti-immigration blitz.
Trump has said the new card would be a route to highly prized US citizenship. He said in February that his administration hoped to sell "maybe a million" of the cards and did not rule out that Russian oligarchs may be eligible.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
36 minutes ago
- ABC News
Trump can keep National Guard deployed to LA for now, appeals court rules
A US appeals court has temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California after he deployed them there following protests in Los Angeles over immigration raids. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals said it would hold a hearing on the matter on June 17. The ruling came just hours after a federal judge's order was to take effect at noon on Friday, local time. Earlier on Thursday, US District Judge Charles Breyer ruled the Guard deployment was illegal, violating the Tenth Amendment and exceeding Trump's statutory authority. The order applied only to the National Guard troops and not Marines who were also deployed to the LA protests. The judge said he would not rule on the Marines because they were not out on the streets yet. California Governor Gavin Newsom, who had asked the judge for an emergency stop to troops helping carry out immigration raids, had praised the earlier ruling. "Today was really about a test of democracy, and today we passed the test," he said in a news conference before the appeals court decision. The White House had called Breyer's order "unprecedented" and said it "puts our brave federal officials in danger". "The district court has no authority to usurp the President's authority as Commander in Chief," White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement. "The President exercised his lawful authority to [mobilise] the National Guard to protect federal buildings and personnel in Gavin Newsom's lawless Los Angeles. "The Trump Administration will immediately appeal this abuse of power and looks forward to ultimate victory on the issue." Mr Newsom's case was solely focused on the National Guard, and the judge said when the state attorney asked about whether this could apply to the Marines that he would not rule on that because they were not on the streets yet. About 700 Marines have been undergoing civil disturbance training at Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach in Orange County, California. "I have been told by the office of the governor that within the next 24 hours, 140 Marines will replace and relieve National Guard members in Los Angeles," attorney for the state Nicholas Green told the court. Typically the authority to call up the National Guard lies with governors, but there are limited circumstances under which the president can deploy those troops. Mr Trump federalised members of the California National Guard under an authority known as Title 10. Title 10 allows the president to call the National Guard into federal service under certain limited circumstances, such as when the country "is invaded," when "there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government," or when the president is unable "to execute the laws of the United States". Judge Breyer said in his ruling that what is happening in Los Angeles does not meet the definition of a rebellion. "The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,'" he wrote. It was not immediately clear how that would change the situation on the ground. Mr Newsom sued to block the Guard's deployment against his wishes. California later filed an emergency motion asking the judge to block the Guard from assisting with immigration raids. The governor argued the troops were originally deployed to guard federal buildings and called for the court to block the troops from helping protect immigration agents during the raids, saying involving the Guard would only escalate tensions and promote civil unrest. Major General Scott Sherman, commander of Task Force 51 which is overseeing the Guard troops and Marines sent to Los Angeles, said as of Wednesday about 500 Guard troops had been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations. Photos of Guard soldiers providing security for the agents have already been circulated by immigration officials. None of the Marines have been trained to go on immigration raids, and it is not yet clear if they eventually will, Major General Sherman said. In his broad ruling, the judge determined Mr Trump had not properly called the Guard up in the first place. The lawsuit argued that Title 10 also requires the president to go through governors when issuing orders to the National Guard. Brett Shumate, a lawyer for the federal government, said Mr Trump complied with the statute by informing the general in charge of the troops of his decision and would have the authority to call in the Guard even if he had not. In a brief filed ahead of the Thursday hearing, the Department of Justice said Mr Trump's orders were not subject to judicial review. "Courts did not interfere when President Eisenhower deployed the military to protect school desegregation," the department said. "Courts did not interfere when President Nixon deployed the military to deliver the mail in the midst of a postal strike. "And courts should not interfere here either." Judge Breyer, who at one point waved a copy of the constitution, said he disagreed. "We're talking about the president exercising his authority, and the president is of course limited in that authority," he said. "That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George." AP
AU Financial Review
36 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Trump's ‘deal' with China is just a waypoint to the next fight
It might sound odd to say, given that Donald Trump at one stage hit Chinese imports with tariffs of 145 per cent, but the truth is that the US president has barely turned his attention to China policy. The negotiations, which concluded in London this week and involved three US cabinet secretaries and a politburo-led Chinese team, were an effort to untie the knot tangled by Trump's initial sky-high tariffs.
ABC News
37 minutes ago
- ABC News
Submerged
As the US launches a review into AUKUS, Four Corners examines the future of the $368 billion submarine deal. Reporter Mark Willacy and the Four Corners team travel to Washington, DC to speak with key players inside the Congress and the defence community. One former Trump Defense Secretary says the program is moving too slowly. Now, the Pentagon is reviewing the entire AUKUS deal with fears it might not align with the new administration's 'America First' policy. In London, senior UK figures also sound the alarm. They warn of cost blowouts and delays in building the new AUKUS-class nuclear submarine with Australia. Submerged asks the tough questions about what happens to Australia if Donald Trump decides the AUKUS deal doesn't serve America's interests – leaving Australia out of pocket and stranded. Submerged, reported by Mark Willacy and produced by Ninah Kopel, goes to air on Monday June 16 at 8.30pm on ABC TV and ABC iview.
